mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 00:34:20 +08:00
KVM: x86/xen: Validate port number in SCHEDOP_poll
We shouldn't allow guests to poll on arbitrary port numbers off the end
of the event channel table.
Fixes: 1a65105a5a
("KVM: x86/xen: handle PV spinlocks slowpath")
[dwmw2: my bug though; the original version did check the validity as a
side-effect of an idr_find() which I ripped out in refactoring.]
Reported-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d72cf8ffe4
commit
4ea9439fd5
@ -954,6 +954,14 @@ static int kvm_xen_hypercall_complete_userspace(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
return kvm_xen_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, run->xen.u.hcall.result);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int max_evtchn_port(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && kvm->arch.xen.long_mode)
|
||||
return EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return COMPAT_EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool wait_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int nr_ports,
|
||||
evtchn_port_t *ports)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -1042,6 +1050,10 @@ static bool kvm_xen_schedop_poll(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool longmode,
|
||||
*r = -EFAULT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ports[i] >= max_evtchn_port(vcpu->kvm)) {
|
||||
*r = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sched_poll.nr_ports == 1)
|
||||
@ -1297,14 +1309,6 @@ int kvm_xen_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int max_evtchn_port(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && kvm->arch.xen.long_mode)
|
||||
return EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return COMPAT_EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void kvm_xen_check_poller(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int poll_evtchn = vcpu->arch.xen.poll_evtchn;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user