mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 13:14:07 +08:00
KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the relevant pages when removing a memslot
Modify kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_pages_in_memslot(), a.k.a. the x86 MMU's handler for kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(), to zap only the pages/PTEs that actually belong to the memslot being removed. This improves performance, especially why the deleted memslot has only a few shadow entries, or even no entries. E.g. a microbenchmark to access regular memory while concurrently reading PCI ROM to trigger memslot deletion showed a 5% improvement in throughput. Cc: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a21136345c
commit
4e103134b8
@ -5622,7 +5622,38 @@ static void kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_pages_in_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
|
||||
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
|
||||
struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages(kvm);
|
||||
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
|
||||
LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
|
||||
unsigned long i;
|
||||
bool flush;
|
||||
gfn_t gfn;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (list_empty(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages))
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
flush = slot_handle_all_level(kvm, slot, kvm_zap_rmapp, false);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
|
||||
gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_valid_sp(kvm, sp, gfn) {
|
||||
if (sp->gfn != gfn)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock)) {
|
||||
kvm_mmu_remote_flush_or_zap(kvm, &invalid_list, flush);
|
||||
flush = false;
|
||||
cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
kvm_mmu_remote_flush_or_zap(kvm, &invalid_list, flush);
|
||||
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user