From 4d8f7418e8ba36036c8486d92d9591c368ab9b85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Hildenbrand Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:44:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mm/rmap: remove page_remove_rmap() All callers are gone, let's remove it and some leftover traces. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231220224504.646757-33-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Peter Xu Cc: Ryan Roberts Cc: Yin Fengwei Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/linux/rmap.h | 4 +--- mm/filemap.c | 10 +++++----- mm/internal.h | 2 +- mm/memory-failure.c | 4 ++-- mm/rmap.c | 23 ++--------------------- 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h index 57e045093f04..fef369e37039 100644 --- a/include/linux/rmap.h +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h @@ -241,8 +241,6 @@ void folio_add_file_rmap_ptes(struct folio *, struct page *, int nr_pages, folio_add_file_rmap_ptes(folio, page, 1, vma) void folio_add_file_rmap_pmd(struct folio *, struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *); -void page_remove_rmap(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *, - bool compound); void folio_remove_rmap_ptes(struct folio *, struct page *, int nr_pages, struct vm_area_struct *); #define folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma) \ @@ -389,7 +387,7 @@ dup: * * This is similar to page_try_dup_anon_rmap(), however, not used during fork() * to duplicate a mapping, but instead to prepare for KSM or temporarily - * unmapping a page (swap, migration) via page_remove_rmap(). + * unmapping a page (swap, migration) via folio_remove_rmap_*(). * * Marking the page shared can only fail if the page may be pinned; device * private pages cannot get pinned and consequently this function cannot fail. diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 67ba56ecdd32..c8dafe70d4cc 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -113,11 +113,11 @@ * ->i_pages lock (try_to_unmap_one) * ->lruvec->lru_lock (follow_page->mark_page_accessed) * ->lruvec->lru_lock (check_pte_range->isolate_lru_page) - * ->private_lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty) - * ->i_pages lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty) - * bdi.wb->list_lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty) - * ->inode->i_lock (page_remove_rmap->set_page_dirty) - * ->memcg->move_lock (page_remove_rmap->folio_memcg_lock) + * ->private_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty) + * ->i_pages lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty) + * bdi.wb->list_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty) + * ->inode->i_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->set_page_dirty) + * ->memcg->move_lock (folio_remove_rmap_pte->folio_memcg_lock) * bdi.wb->list_lock (zap_pte_range->set_page_dirty) * ->inode->i_lock (zap_pte_range->set_page_dirty) * ->private_lock (zap_pte_range->block_dirty_folio) diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 222e63b2dea4..a94355e70bd7 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ folio_within_vma(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma) * under page table lock for the pte/pmd being added or removed. * * mlock is usually called at the end of page_add_*_rmap(), munlock at - * the end of page_remove_rmap(); but new anon folios are managed by + * the end of folio_remove_rmap_*(); but new anon folios are managed by * folio_add_lru_vma() calling mlock_new_folio(). */ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio); diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 5a23da5eb8c1..a0d9b4ac7d54 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -2315,8 +2315,8 @@ try_again: * We use page flags to determine what action should be taken, but * the flags can be modified by the error containment action. One * example is an mlocked page, where PG_mlocked is cleared by - * page_remove_rmap() in try_to_unmap_one(). So to determine page status - * correctly, we save a copy of the page flags at this time. + * folio_remove_rmap_*() in try_to_unmap_one(). So to determine page + * status correctly, we save a copy of the page flags at this time. */ page_flags = p->flags; diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index a3ec2be484cf..3ee254a99622 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ void __init anon_vma_init(void) /* * Getting a lock on a stable anon_vma from a page off the LRU is tricky! * - * Since there is no serialization what so ever against page_remove_rmap() + * Since there is no serialization what so ever against folio_remove_rmap_*() * the best this function can do is return a refcount increased anon_vma * that might have been relevant to this page. * @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ void __init anon_vma_init(void) * [ something equivalent to page_mapped_in_vma() ]. * * Since anon_vma's slab is SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and we know from - * page_remove_rmap() that the anon_vma pointer from page->mapping is valid + * folio_remove_rmap_*() that the anon_vma pointer from page->mapping is valid * if there is a mapcount, we can dereference the anon_vma after observing * those. * @@ -1498,25 +1498,6 @@ void folio_add_file_rmap_pmd(struct folio *folio, struct page *page, #endif } -/** - * page_remove_rmap - take down pte mapping from a page - * @page: page to remove mapping from - * @vma: the vm area from which the mapping is removed - * @compound: uncharge the page as compound or small page - * - * The caller needs to hold the pte lock. - */ -void page_remove_rmap(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, - bool compound) -{ - struct folio *folio = page_folio(page); - - if (likely(!compound)) - folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma); - else - folio_remove_rmap_pmd(folio, page, vma); -} - static __always_inline void __folio_remove_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct page *page, int nr_pages, struct vm_area_struct *vma, enum rmap_level level)