From 4d2eeafecd6c83b4444db3dc0ada201c89b1aa44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amir Goldstein Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:17:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: more robust allocation failure handling in nfsd_file_cache_init The nfsd file cache table can be pretty large and its allocation may require as many as 80 contigious pages. Employ the same fix that was employed for similar issue that was reported for the reply cache hash table allocation several years ago by commit 8f97514b423a ("nfsd: more robust allocation failure handling in nfsd_reply_cache_init"). Fixes: 65294c1f2c5e ("nfsd: add a new struct file caching facility to nfsd") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/e3cdaeec85a6cfec980e87fc294327c0381c1778.camel@kernel.org/ Suggested-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Tested-by: Amir Goldstein --- fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c index 8bc807c5fea4..cc2831cec669 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ nfsd_file_cache_init(void) if (!nfsd_filecache_wq) goto out; - nfsd_file_hashtbl = kcalloc(NFSD_FILE_HASH_SIZE, + nfsd_file_hashtbl = kvcalloc(NFSD_FILE_HASH_SIZE, sizeof(*nfsd_file_hashtbl), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nfsd_file_hashtbl) { pr_err("nfsd: unable to allocate nfsd_file_hashtbl\n"); @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ out_err: nfsd_file_slab = NULL; kmem_cache_destroy(nfsd_file_mark_slab); nfsd_file_mark_slab = NULL; - kfree(nfsd_file_hashtbl); + kvfree(nfsd_file_hashtbl); nfsd_file_hashtbl = NULL; destroy_workqueue(nfsd_filecache_wq); nfsd_filecache_wq = NULL; @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ nfsd_file_cache_shutdown(void) fsnotify_wait_marks_destroyed(); kmem_cache_destroy(nfsd_file_mark_slab); nfsd_file_mark_slab = NULL; - kfree(nfsd_file_hashtbl); + kvfree(nfsd_file_hashtbl); nfsd_file_hashtbl = NULL; destroy_workqueue(nfsd_filecache_wq); nfsd_filecache_wq = NULL;