mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 04:34:08 +08:00
kernfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy hooks
It seems strange that kernfs should be an outlier with a set_policy and
get_policy in its kernfs_vm_ops. Ah, it dates back to v2.6.30's commit
095160aee9
("sysfs: fix some bin_vm_ops errors"), when I had crashed on
powerpc's pci_mmap_legacy_page_range() fallback to shmem_zero_setup().
Well, that was commendably thorough, to give sysfs-bin a set_policy and
get_policy, just to avoid the way it was coded resulting in EINVAL from
mmap when CONFIG_NUMA; but somehow feels a bit over-the-top to me now.
It's easier to say that nobody should expect to manage a shmem object's
shared NUMA mempolicy via some kernfs backdoor to that object: delete that
code (and there's no longer an EINVAL from mmap in the NUMA case).
This then leaves set_policy/get_policy as implemented only by shmem -
though importantly also by SysV SHM, which has to interface with shmem
which implements them, and with SHM_HUGETLB which does not.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/302164-a760-4a9e-879b-6870c9b4013@google.com
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
10969b5571
commit
4b981bc1aa
@ -429,60 +429,11 @@ static int kernfs_vma_access(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
|
||||
static int kernfs_vma_set_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
||||
struct mempolicy *new)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
|
||||
struct kernfs_open_file *of = kernfs_of(file);
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!of->vm_ops)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!kernfs_get_active(of->kn))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
if (of->vm_ops->set_policy)
|
||||
ret = of->vm_ops->set_policy(vma, new);
|
||||
|
||||
kernfs_put_active(of->kn);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct mempolicy *kernfs_vma_get_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
||||
unsigned long addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
|
||||
struct kernfs_open_file *of = kernfs_of(file);
|
||||
struct mempolicy *pol;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!of->vm_ops)
|
||||
return vma->vm_policy;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!kernfs_get_active(of->kn))
|
||||
return vma->vm_policy;
|
||||
|
||||
pol = vma->vm_policy;
|
||||
if (of->vm_ops->get_policy)
|
||||
pol = of->vm_ops->get_policy(vma, addr);
|
||||
|
||||
kernfs_put_active(of->kn);
|
||||
return pol;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct vm_operations_struct kernfs_vm_ops = {
|
||||
.open = kernfs_vma_open,
|
||||
.fault = kernfs_vma_fault,
|
||||
.page_mkwrite = kernfs_vma_page_mkwrite,
|
||||
.access = kernfs_vma_access,
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
|
||||
.set_policy = kernfs_vma_set_policy,
|
||||
.get_policy = kernfs_vma_get_policy,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int kernfs_fop_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user