mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 00:34:20 +08:00
Input: synaptics - fix 1->3 contact transition reporting
Investigating the following gesture highlighted two slight implementation errors with choosing which slots to report in which slot when multiple contacts are present: Action SGM AGM (MTB slot:Contact) 1. Touch contact 0 (0:0) 2. Touch contact 1 (0:0, 1:1) 3. Lift contact 0 (1:1) 4. Touch contacts 2,3 (0:2, 1:3) In step 4, slot 1 was not being cleared first, which means the same tracking ID was being used for reporting both the old contact 1 and the new contact 3. This could result in "drumroll", where the old contact 1 would appear to suddenly jump to new finger 3 position. Similarly, if contacts 2 & 3 are not detected at the same sample, step 4 is split into two: Action SGM AGM (MTB slot:contact) 1. Touch contact 0 (0:0) 2. Touch contact 1 (0:0, 1:1) 3. Lift contact 0 (1:1) 4. Touch contact 2 (0:2, 1:1) 5. Touch contact 3 (0:2, 1:3) In this case, there was also a bug. In step 4, when contact 1 moves from SGM to AGM and contact 2 is first reported in SGM, slot 0 was actually empty. So slot 0 can be used to report the new SGM (contact 0), immediately. Since it was empty, contact 2 in slot 0 will get a new tracking ID. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d722260d23
commit
48064bdcd6
@ -722,11 +722,13 @@ static void synaptics_report_mt_data(struct psmouse *psmouse,
|
||||
default:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the finger slot contained in SGM is valid, and either
|
||||
* hasn't changed, or is new, then report SGM in MTB slot 0.
|
||||
* hasn't changed, or is new, or the old SGM has now moved to
|
||||
* AGM, then report SGM in MTB slot 0.
|
||||
* Otherwise, empty MTB slot 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (mt_state->sgm != -1 &&
|
||||
(mt_state->sgm == old->sgm || old->sgm == -1))
|
||||
(mt_state->sgm == old->sgm ||
|
||||
old->sgm == -1 || mt_state->agm == old->sgm))
|
||||
synaptics_report_slot(dev, 0, sgm);
|
||||
else
|
||||
synaptics_report_slot(dev, 0, NULL);
|
||||
@ -735,9 +737,31 @@ static void synaptics_report_mt_data(struct psmouse *psmouse,
|
||||
* If the finger slot contained in AGM is valid, and either
|
||||
* hasn't changed, or is new, then report AGM in MTB slot 1.
|
||||
* Otherwise, empty MTB slot 1.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* However, in the case where the AGM is new, make sure that
|
||||
* that it is either the same as the old SGM, or there was no
|
||||
* SGM.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Otherwise, if the SGM was just 1, and the new AGM is 2, then
|
||||
* the new AGM will keep the old SGM's tracking ID, which can
|
||||
* cause apparent drumroll. This happens if in the following
|
||||
* valid finger sequence:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Action SGM AGM (MTB slot:Contact)
|
||||
* 1. Touch contact 0 (0:0)
|
||||
* 2. Touch contact 1 (0:0, 1:1)
|
||||
* 3. Lift contact 0 (1:1)
|
||||
* 4. Touch contacts 2,3 (0:2, 1:3)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In step 4, contact 3, in AGM must not be given the same
|
||||
* tracking ID as contact 1 had in step 3. To avoid this,
|
||||
* the first agm with contact 3 is dropped and slot 1 is
|
||||
* invalidated (tracking ID = -1).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (mt_state->agm != -1 &&
|
||||
(mt_state->agm == old->agm || old->agm == -1))
|
||||
(mt_state->agm == old->agm ||
|
||||
(old->agm == -1 &&
|
||||
(old->sgm == -1 || mt_state->agm == old->sgm))))
|
||||
synaptics_report_slot(dev, 1, agm);
|
||||
else
|
||||
synaptics_report_slot(dev, 1, NULL);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user