mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-05 10:04:12 +08:00
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code
There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only exception is client IMC uncore, which has been specially handled. For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter. The code quality issue will bring problem when a new counter index is introduced. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: acme@kernel.org Cc: eranian@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525371913-10597-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d71f11c076
commit
4749f81964
@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *e
|
||||
u64 prev_count, new_count, delta;
|
||||
int shift;
|
||||
|
||||
if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
|
||||
if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
|
||||
shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
|
||||
else
|
||||
shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user