mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-27 14:14:24 +08:00
net: Implmement RFC 6936 (zero RX csums for UDP/IPv6)
RFC 6936 relaxes the requirement of RFC 2460 that UDP/IPv6 packets which are received with a zero UDP checksum value must be dropped. RFC 6936 allows zero checksums to support tunnels over UDP. When sk_no_check is set we allow on a socket we allow a zero IPv6 UDP checksum. This is for both sending zero checksum and accepting a zero checksum on receive. Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4f45b7f40
commit
4068579e1e
@ -75,16 +75,12 @@ int udp6_csum_init(struct sk_buff *skb, struct udphdr *uh, int proto)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (uh->check == 0) {
|
||||
/* RFC 2460 section 8.1 says that we SHOULD log
|
||||
this error. Well, it is reasonable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
LIMIT_NETDEBUG(KERN_INFO "IPv6: udp checksum is 0 for [%pI6c]:%u->[%pI6c]:%u\n",
|
||||
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, ntohs(uh->source),
|
||||
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, ntohs(uh->dest));
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return skb_checksum_init(skb, IPPROTO_UDP, ip6_compute_pseudo);
|
||||
/* To support RFC 6936 (allow zero checksum in UDP/IPV6 for tunnels)
|
||||
* we accept a checksum of zero here. When we find the socket
|
||||
* for the UDP packet we'll check if that socket allows zero checksum
|
||||
* for IPv6 (set by socket option).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return skb_checksum_init_zero_check(skb, proto, uh->check,
|
||||
ip6_compute_pseudo);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp6_csum_init);
|
||||
|
@ -760,6 +760,17 @@ static void flush_stack(struct sock **stack, unsigned int count,
|
||||
if (unlikely(skb1))
|
||||
kfree_skb(skb1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void udp6_csum_zero_error(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* RFC 2460 section 8.1 says that we SHOULD log
|
||||
* this error. Well, it is reasonable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
LIMIT_NETDEBUG(KERN_INFO "IPv6: udp checksum is 0 for [%pI6c]:%u->[%pI6c]:%u\n",
|
||||
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, ntohs(udp_hdr(skb)->source),
|
||||
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, ntohs(udp_hdr(skb)->dest));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note: called only from the BH handler context,
|
||||
* so we don't need to lock the hashes.
|
||||
@ -779,7 +790,12 @@ static int __udp6_lib_mcast_deliver(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
dif = inet6_iif(skb);
|
||||
sk = udp_v6_mcast_next(net, sk, uh->dest, daddr, uh->source, saddr, dif);
|
||||
while (sk) {
|
||||
stack[count++] = sk;
|
||||
/* If zero checksum and sk_no_check is not on for
|
||||
* the socket then skip it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (uh->check || sk->sk_no_check)
|
||||
stack[count++] = sk;
|
||||
|
||||
sk = udp_v6_mcast_next(net, sk_nulls_next(sk), uh->dest, daddr,
|
||||
uh->source, saddr, dif);
|
||||
if (unlikely(count == ARRAY_SIZE(stack))) {
|
||||
@ -867,6 +883,11 @@ int __udp6_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct udp_table *udptable,
|
||||
if (sk != NULL) {
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!uh->check && !sk->sk_no_check) {
|
||||
udp6_csum_zero_error(skb);
|
||||
goto csum_error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = udpv6_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb);
|
||||
sock_put(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -879,6 +900,11 @@ int __udp6_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct udp_table *udptable,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!uh->check) {
|
||||
udp6_csum_zero_error(skb);
|
||||
goto csum_error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!xfrm6_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
|
||||
goto discard;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1006,7 +1032,10 @@ static int udp_v6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_udplite)
|
||||
csum = udplite_csum_outgoing(sk, skb);
|
||||
else if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) { /* UDP hardware csum */
|
||||
else if (sk->sk_no_check == UDP_CSUM_NOXMIT) { /* UDP csum disabled */
|
||||
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
|
||||
goto send;
|
||||
} else if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) { /* UDP hardware csum */
|
||||
udp6_hwcsum_outgoing(sk, skb, &fl6->saddr, &fl6->daddr,
|
||||
up->len);
|
||||
goto send;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user