media: ov2680: Fix ov2680_enum_frame_interval()

Fix and simplify ov2680_enum_frame_interval(), the index is not
an index into ov2680_mode_data[], so using OV2680_MODE_MAX is wrong.

Instead it is an index indexing the different framerates for
the resolution specified in fie->width, fie->height.

Note validating fie->which is not necessary this is already done
by the v4l2-core.

Acked-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Hans de Goede 2023-08-03 11:33:33 +02:00 committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab
parent df3ecab8d7
commit 4007015e60

View File

@ -527,21 +527,30 @@ static int ov2680_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
return 0;
}
static bool ov2680_valid_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval_enum *fie)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < OV2680_MODE_MAX; i++) {
if (fie->width == ov2680_mode_data[i].width &&
fie->height == ov2680_mode_data[i].height)
return true;
}
return false;
}
static int ov2680_enum_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
struct v4l2_subdev_state *sd_state,
struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval_enum *fie)
{
struct v4l2_fract tpf;
struct ov2680_dev *sensor = to_ov2680_dev(sd);
if (fie->index >= OV2680_MODE_MAX || fie->width > OV2680_WIDTH_MAX ||
fie->height > OV2680_HEIGHT_MAX ||
fie->which > V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE)
/* Only 1 framerate */
if (fie->index || !ov2680_valid_frame_size(fie))
return -EINVAL;
tpf.denominator = OV2680_FRAME_RATE;
tpf.numerator = 1;
fie->interval = tpf;
fie->interval = sensor->frame_interval;
return 0;
}