drm/i915: Fix refcount leak and possible NULL pointerdereference.

Since get_pid_task() grabs a reference on the task_struct, we have to drop the
refcount after reading that task's comm name. Use pid_task() with RCU instead.

Also, avoid directly reading like pid_task()->comm because
pid_task() will return NULL if the task have already exit()ed.

This patch fixes both problems.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Tetsuo Handa 2014-01-03 20:42:18 +09:00 committed by Daniel Vetter
parent d8ccba8663
commit 3ec2f427e6

View File

@ -404,16 +404,26 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void* data)
seq_putc(m, '\n');
list_for_each_entry_reverse(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
struct file_stats stats;
struct task_struct *task;
memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
idr_for_each(&file->object_idr, per_file_stats, &stats);
/*
* Although we have a valid reference on file->pid, that does
* not guarantee that the task_struct who called get_pid() is
* still alive (e.g. get_pid(current) => fork() => exit()).
* Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
seq_printf(m, "%s: %u objects, %zu bytes (%zu active, %zu inactive, %zu unbound)\n",
get_pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID)->comm,
task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
stats.count,
stats.total,
stats.active,
stats.inactive,
stats.unbound);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);