korg/linux
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git synced 2024-11-23 20:24:12 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'bpf-verifier-correct-tail_call_reachable-for-bpf-prog'

Browse Source 
Leon Hwang says:

====================
bpf, verifier: Correct tail_call_reachable for bpf prog

It's confusing to inspect 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' with drgn[0],
when bpf prog has tail call but 'tail_call_reachable' is false.

This patch corrects 'tail_call_reachable' when bpf prog has tail call.

Therefore, it's unnecessary to detect tail call in x86 jit. Let's remove
it.

Changes:
v1 -> v2:
* Address comment from Yonghong:
  * Remove unnecessary tail call detection in x86 jit.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---

Links:
[0] https://github.com/osandov/drgn
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alexei Starovoitov 2024-06-20 19:48:29 -07:00
commit 3b06304370
2 changed files with 5 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
View File

@ -1234,13 +1234,11 @@ bool ex_handler_bpf(const struct exception_table_entry *x, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
static void detect_reg_usage(struct bpf_insn *insn, int insn_cnt,
bool *regs_used, bool *tail_call_seen)
bool *regs_used)
{
int i;
for (i = 1; i <= insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL))
*tail_call_seen = true;
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_6 || insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_6)
regs_used[0] = true;
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_7 || insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_7)
@ -1324,7 +1322,6 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
struct bpf_insn *insn = bpf_prog->insnsi;
bool callee_regs_used[4] = {};
int insn_cnt = bpf_prog->len;
bool tail_call_seen = false;
bool seen_exit = false;
u8 temp[BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE + BPF_INSN_SAFETY];
u64 arena_vm_start, user_vm_start;
@ -1336,11 +1333,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(bpf_prog->aux->arena);
user_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_user_vm_start(bpf_prog->aux->arena);
detect_reg_usage(insn, insn_cnt, callee_regs_used,
&tail_call_seen);
/* tail call's presence in current prog implies it is reachable */
tail_call_reachable |= tail_call_seen;
detect_reg_usage(insn, insn_cnt, callee_regs_used);
emit_prologue(&prog, bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog), tail_call_reachable,

4
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View File

@ -2982,8 +2982,10 @@ static int check_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) &&
insn[i].src_reg == 0 &&
insn[i].imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call)
insn[i].imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
subprog[cur_subprog].has_tail_call = true;
subprog[cur_subprog].tail_call_reachable = true;
}
if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_LD &&
(BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_ABS || BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_IND))
subprog[cur_subprog].has_ld_abs = true;