From 39e913ee4c4e143434d251c2a2e4f340f0e4e7fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miaohe Lin Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:04:33 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm/memory.c: fix potential pte_unmap_unlock pte error [ Upstream commit 90a3e375d324b2255b83e3dd29e99e2b05d82aaf ] Since commit 42e4089c7890 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings"), when the first pfn modify is not allowed, we would break the loop with pte unchanged. Then the wrong pte - 1 would be passed to pte_unmap_unlock. Andi said: "While the fix is correct, I'm not sure if it actually is a real bug. Is there any architecture that would do something else than unlocking the underlying page? If it's just the underlying page then it should be always the same page, so no bug" Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210109080118.20885-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 42e4089c789 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings") Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- mm/memory.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index eeae63bd9502..4bd37296df89 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -1995,11 +1995,11 @@ static int remap_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { - pte_t *pte; + pte_t *pte, *mapped_pte; spinlock_t *ptl; int err = 0; - pte = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); + mapped_pte = pte = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); if (!pte) return -ENOMEM; arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(); @@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ static int remap_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pfn++; } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(); - pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl); + pte_unmap_unlock(mapped_pte, ptl); return err; }