mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 08:14:15 +08:00
net: sched: consistently use rcu_replace_pointer() in taprio_change()
[ Upstream commit d5c4546062
]
According to Vinicius (and carefully looking through the whole
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa
once again), txtime branch of 'taprio_change()' is not going to
race against 'advance_sched()'. But using 'rcu_replace_pointer()'
in the former may be a good idea as well.
Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f5625e9e9
commit
37a6fc0d8f
@ -1975,7 +1975,9 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
|
|||||||
goto unlock;
|
goto unlock;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
rcu_assign_pointer(q->admin_sched, new_admin);
|
/* Not going to race against advance_sched(), but still */
|
||||||
|
admin = rcu_replace_pointer(q->admin_sched, new_admin,
|
||||||
|
lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
|
||||||
if (admin)
|
if (admin)
|
||||||
call_rcu(&admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
|
call_rcu(&admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user