mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-29 23:24:11 +08:00
locking/rwsem: Optimize rwsem structure for uncontended lock acquisition
For an uncontended rwsem, count and owner are the only fields a task needs to touch when acquiring the rwsem. So they are put next to each other to increase the chance that they will share the same cacheline. On a ThunderX2 99xx (arm64) system with 32K L1 cache and 256K L2 cache, a rwsem locking microbenchmark with one locking thread was run to write-lock and write-unlock an array of rwsems separated 2 cachelines apart in a 1M byte memory block. The locking rates (kops/s) of the microbenchmark when the rwsems are at various "long" (8-byte) offsets from beginning of the cacheline before and after the patch were as follows: Cacheline Offset Pre-patch Post-patch ---------------- --------- ---------- 0 17,449 16,588 1 17,450 16,465 2 17,450 16,460 3 17,453 16,462 4 14,867 16,471 5 14,867 16,470 6 14,853 16,464 7 14,867 13,172 Before the patch, the count and owner are 4 "long"s apart. After the patch, they are only 1 "long" apart. The rwsem data have to be loaded from the L3 cache for each access. It can be seen that the locking rates are more consistent after the patch than before. Note that for this particular system, the performance drop happens whenever the count and owner are at an odd multiples of "long"s apart. No performance drop was observed when only a single rwsem was used (hot cache). So the drop is likely just an idiosyncrasy of the cache architecture of this chip than an inherent problem with the patch. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190404174320.22416-12-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8654596f0
commit
364f784f04
@ -20,21 +20,30 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/osq_lock.h>
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore;
|
||||
|
||||
/* All arch specific implementations share the same struct */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For an uncontended rwsem, count and owner are the only fields a task
|
||||
* needs to touch when acquiring the rwsem. So they are put next to each
|
||||
* other to increase the chance that they will share the same cacheline.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In a contended rwsem, the owner is likely the most frequently accessed
|
||||
* field in the structure as the optimistic waiter that holds the osq lock
|
||||
* will spin on owner. For an embedded rwsem, other hot fields in the
|
||||
* containing structure should be moved further away from the rwsem to
|
||||
* reduce the chance that they will share the same cacheline causing
|
||||
* cacheline bouncing problem.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore {
|
||||
atomic_long_t count;
|
||||
struct list_head wait_list;
|
||||
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
|
||||
struct optimistic_spin_queue osq; /* spinner MCS lock */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Write owner. Used as a speculative check to see
|
||||
* if the owner is running on the cpu.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct task_struct *owner;
|
||||
struct optimistic_spin_queue osq; /* spinner MCS lock */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
|
||||
struct list_head wait_list;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
||||
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user