mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
btrfs: split assert into two different asserts when removing block group
When starting a transaction to remove a block group we have one ASSERT that checks we found an extent map and that the extent map's start offset matches the desired chunk offset. In case one of the conditions fails, we get a stack trace that point to the respective line of code, however we can't tell which condition failed: either there's no extent map or we got one with an unexpected start offset. To make such an issue easier to debug and analyse, split the assertion into two, one for each condition. This was actually triggered during development of another upcoming change. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5031660a1b
commit
3128b548c7
@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_trans_remove_block_group(
|
||||
read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
|
||||
em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_offset, 1);
|
||||
read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
|
||||
ASSERT(em && em->start == chunk_offset);
|
||||
ASSERT(em != NULL);
|
||||
ASSERT(em->start == chunk_offset);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need to reserve 3 + N units from the metadata space info in order
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user