mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 21:38:32 +08:00
lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations
In order to test various backward-edge control flow integrity methods, add a test that manipulates the return address on the stack. Currently only arm64 Pointer Authentication and Shadow Call Stack is supported. $ echo CFI_BACKWARD | cat >/sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT Under SCS, successful test of the mitigation is reported as: lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ... lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address. lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ... lkdtm: ok: control flow unchanged. Under PAC, successful test of the mitigation is reported by the PAC exception handler: lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ... lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address. lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ... Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bfffffc0088d0514 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x86000004 EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [bfffffc0088d0514] address between user and kernel address ranges ... If the CONFIGs are missing (or the mitigation isn't working), failure is reported as: lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ... lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address. lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ... lkdtm: FAIL: stack return address was redirected! lkdtm: This is probably expected, since this kernel was built *without* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL=y nor CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK=y Co-developed-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220416001103.1524653-1-keescook@chromium.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
73f62e60d8
commit
2e53b877dc
@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
||||
* This is for all the tests relating directly to Control Flow Integrity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#include "lkdtm.h"
|
||||
#include <asm/page.h>
|
||||
|
||||
static int called_count;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -42,8 +43,141 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void)
|
||||
pr_expected_config(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This can stay local to LKDTM, as there should not be a production reason
|
||||
* to disable PAC && SCS.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL
|
||||
# ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL
|
||||
# define __no_pac "branch-protection=bti"
|
||||
# else
|
||||
# define __no_pac "branch-protection=none"
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
# define __no_ret_protection __noscs __attribute__((__target__(__no_pac)))
|
||||
#else
|
||||
# define __no_ret_protection __noscs
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#define no_pac_addr(addr) \
|
||||
((__force __typeof__(addr))((__force u64)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET))
|
||||
|
||||
/* The ultimate ROP gadget. */
|
||||
static noinline __no_ret_protection
|
||||
void set_return_addr_unchecked(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Use of volatile is to make sure final write isn't seen as a dead store. */
|
||||
unsigned long * volatile *ret_addr = (unsigned long **)__builtin_frame_address(0) + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure we've found the right place on the stack before writing it. */
|
||||
if (no_pac_addr(*ret_addr) == expected)
|
||||
*ret_addr = (addr);
|
||||
else
|
||||
/* Check architecture, stack layout, or compiler behavior... */
|
||||
pr_warn("Eek: return address mismatch! %px != %px\n",
|
||||
*ret_addr, addr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static noinline
|
||||
void set_return_addr(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Use of volatile is to make sure final write isn't seen as a dead store. */
|
||||
unsigned long * volatile *ret_addr = (unsigned long **)__builtin_frame_address(0) + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure we've found the right place on the stack before writing it. */
|
||||
if (no_pac_addr(*ret_addr) == expected)
|
||||
*ret_addr = (addr);
|
||||
else
|
||||
/* Check architecture, stack layout, or compiler behavior... */
|
||||
pr_warn("Eek: return address mismatch! %px != %px\n",
|
||||
*ret_addr, addr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static volatile int force_check;
|
||||
|
||||
static void lkdtm_CFI_BACKWARD(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Use calculated gotos to keep labels addressable. */
|
||||
void *labels[] = {0, &&normal, &&redirected, &&check_normal, &&check_redirected};
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Always false */
|
||||
if (force_check) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prepare to call with NULLs to avoid parameters being treated as
|
||||
* constants in -02.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
set_return_addr_unchecked(NULL, NULL);
|
||||
set_return_addr(NULL, NULL);
|
||||
if (force_check)
|
||||
goto *labels[1];
|
||||
if (force_check)
|
||||
goto *labels[2];
|
||||
if (force_check)
|
||||
goto *labels[3];
|
||||
if (force_check)
|
||||
goto *labels[4];
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Use fallthrough switch case to keep basic block ordering between
|
||||
* set_return_addr*() and the label after it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
switch (force_check) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
set_return_addr_unchecked(&&normal, &&redirected);
|
||||
fallthrough;
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
normal:
|
||||
/* Always true */
|
||||
if (!force_check) {
|
||||
pr_err("FAIL: stack return address manipulation failed!\n");
|
||||
/* If we can't redirect "normally", we can't test mitigations. */
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
redirected:
|
||||
pr_info("ok: redirected stack return address.\n");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...\n");
|
||||
|
||||
switch (force_check) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
set_return_addr(&&check_normal, &&check_redirected);
|
||||
fallthrough;
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
check_normal:
|
||||
/* Always true */
|
||||
if (!force_check) {
|
||||
pr_info("ok: control flow unchanged.\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
check_redirected:
|
||||
pr_err("FAIL: stack return address was redirected!\n");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL)) {
|
||||
pr_expected_config(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK)) {
|
||||
pr_expected_config(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
pr_warn("This is probably expected, since this %s was built *without* %s=y nor %s=y\n",
|
||||
lkdtm_kernel_info,
|
||||
"CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL", "CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
|
||||
CRASHTYPE(CFI_FORWARD_PROTO),
|
||||
CRASHTYPE(CFI_BACKWARD),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct crashtype_category cfi_crashtypes = {
|
||||
|
@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND
|
||||
USERCOPY_KERNEL
|
||||
STACKLEAK_ERASING OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased
|
||||
CFI_FORWARD_PROTO
|
||||
CFI_BACKWARD call trace:|ok: control flow unchanged
|
||||
FORTIFIED_STRSCPY
|
||||
FORTIFIED_OBJECT
|
||||
FORTIFIED_SUBOBJECT
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user