mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-10 12:34:07 +08:00
net: Fix more NAPI interface netdev argument drop fallout.
I hit similar build failure due to the change in the netif_rx_reschedule() drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function 'ehea_poll': drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:844: warning: passing argument 1 of 'netif_rx_reschedule' from incompatible pointer type drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:844: error: too many arguments to function 'netif_rx_reschedule' make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o] Error 1 greping through the sources for the changes missed out, we have ./drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c:507: netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) { ./drivers/net/arm/ep93xx_eth.c:310: if (more && netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) ./drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c:657: netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) { Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
59c5ea6ebd
commit
2d0658d4ef
@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ poll_some_more:
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&ep->rx_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (more && netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi))
|
||||
if (more && netif_rx_reschedule(napi))
|
||||
goto poll_some_more;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int eth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
netif_rx_complete(napi);
|
||||
qmgr_enable_irq(rxq);
|
||||
if (!qmgr_stat_empty(rxq) &&
|
||||
netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) {
|
||||
netif_rx_reschedule(napi)) {
|
||||
#if DEBUG_RX
|
||||
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: eth_poll"
|
||||
" netif_rx_reschedule successed\n",
|
||||
|
@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static int hss_hdlc_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
netif_rx_complete(dev, napi);
|
||||
qmgr_enable_irq(rxq);
|
||||
if (!qmgr_stat_empty(rxq) &&
|
||||
netif_rx_reschedule(dev, napi)) {
|
||||
netif_rx_reschedule(napi)) {
|
||||
#if DEBUG_RX
|
||||
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: hss_hdlc_poll"
|
||||
" netif_rx_reschedule succeeded\n",
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user