mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
memcg: protect prev_priority
Currently, mem_cgroup doesn't have own lock and almost its member doesn't need. (e.g. mem_cgroup->info is protected by zone lock, mem_cgroup->stat is per cpu variable) However, there is one explict exception. mem_cgroup->prev_priorit need lock, but doesn't protect. Luckly, this is NOT bug because prev_priority isn't used for current reclaim code. However, we plan to use prev_priority future again. Therefore, fixing is better. In addition, we plan to reuse this lock for another member. Then "reclaim_param_lock" name is better than "prev_priority_lock". Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e72e2bd674
commit
2733c06ac8
@ -144,6 +144,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct mem_cgroup_lru_info info;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
protect against reclaim related member.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spinlock_t reclaim_param_lock;
|
||||
|
||||
int prev_priority; /* for recording reclaim priority */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -400,18 +405,28 @@ int mem_cgroup_calc_mapped_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return mem->prev_priority;
|
||||
int prev_priority;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
prev_priority = mem->prev_priority;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return prev_priority;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mem_cgroup_note_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
if (priority < mem->prev_priority)
|
||||
mem->prev_priority = priority;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
mem->prev_priority = priority;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
|
||||
@ -2076,6 +2091,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
|
||||
}
|
||||
mem_cgroup_set_inactive_ratio(mem);
|
||||
mem->last_scanned_child = NULL;
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return &mem->css;
|
||||
free_out:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user