From ad1f5e826d91d6c27ecd36a607ad7c7f4d0b0733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:17:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] can: m_can: tcan4x5x_can_probe(): fix error path: remove erroneous clk_disable_unprepare() The clocks mcan_class->cclk and mcan_class->hclk are not prepared by any call during tcan4x5x_can_probe(), so remove erroneous clk_disable_unprepare() on them. Fixes: 5443c226ba91 ("can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel") Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130114252.215334-1-mkl@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c index e5d7d85e0b6d..7347ab39c5b6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c @@ -489,18 +489,18 @@ static int tcan4x5x_can_probe(struct spi_device *spi) spi->bits_per_word = 32; ret = spi_setup(spi); if (ret) - goto out_clk; + goto out_m_can_class_free_dev; priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init(&spi->dev, &tcan4x5x_bus, &spi->dev, &tcan4x5x_regmap); if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap)) { ret = PTR_ERR(priv->regmap); - goto out_clk; + goto out_m_can_class_free_dev; } ret = tcan4x5x_power_enable(priv->power, 1); if (ret) - goto out_clk; + goto out_m_can_class_free_dev; ret = tcan4x5x_parse_config(mcan_class); if (ret) @@ -519,11 +519,6 @@ static int tcan4x5x_can_probe(struct spi_device *spi) out_power: tcan4x5x_power_enable(priv->power, 0); -out_clk: - if (!IS_ERR(mcan_class->cclk)) { - clk_disable_unprepare(mcan_class->cclk); - clk_disable_unprepare(mcan_class->hclk); - } out_m_can_class_free_dev: m_can_class_free_dev(mcan_class->net); dev_err(&spi->dev, "Probe failed, err=%d\n", ret); From bd0ccb92efb09c7da5b55162b283b42a93539ed7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeroen Hofstee Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:59:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] can: sja1000: sja1000_err(): don't count arbitration lose as an error Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but the sja1000 driver also incremeants tx_error, causing errors to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them as errors. Fixes: 8935f57e68c4 ("can: sja1000: fix network statistics update") Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201127095941.21609-1-jhofstee@victronenergy.com [mkl: split into two seperate patches] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c index 9f107798f904..25a4d7d0b349 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c @@ -474,7 +474,6 @@ static int sja1000_err(struct net_device *dev, uint8_t isrc, uint8_t status) netdev_dbg(dev, "arbitration lost interrupt\n"); alc = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_ALC); priv->can.can_stats.arbitration_lost++; - stats->tx_errors++; cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_LOSTARB; cf->data[0] = alc & 0x1f; } From c2d095eff797813461a426b97242e3ffc50e4134 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeroen Hofstee Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:59:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] can: sun4i_can: sun4i_can_err(): don't count arbitration lose as an error Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but the sun4i driver also incremeants tx_error, causing errors to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them as errors. Fixes: 0738eff14d81 ("can: Allwinner A10/A20 CAN Controller support - Kernel module") Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201127095941.21609-1-jhofstee@victronenergy.com [mkl: split into two seperate patches] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c b/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c index e2c6cf4b2228..b3f2f4fe5ee0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/sun4i_can.c @@ -604,7 +604,6 @@ static int sun4i_can_err(struct net_device *dev, u8 isrc, u8 status) netdev_dbg(dev, "arbitration lost interrupt\n"); alc = readl(priv->base + SUN4I_REG_STA_ADDR); priv->can.can_stats.arbitration_lost++; - stats->tx_errors++; if (likely(skb)) { cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_LOSTARB; cf->data[0] = (alc >> 8) & 0x1f; From 44cef0c0ffbd8d61143712ce874be68a273b7884 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhang Qilong Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 21:39:21 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] can: c_can: c_can_power_up(): fix error handling In the error handling in c_can_power_up(), there are two bugs: 1) c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync() will increase usage counter if device is not empty. Forgetting to call c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync() will result in a reference leak here. 2) c_can_reset_ram() operation will set start bit when enable is true. We should clear it in the error handling. We fix it by adding c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync() for 1), and c_can_reset_ram(enable is false) for 2) in the error handling. Fixes: 8212003260c60 ("can: c_can: Add d_can suspend resume support") Fixes: 52cde85acc23f ("can: c_can: Add d_can raminit support") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201128133922.3276973-2-zhangqilong3@huawei.com [mkl: return "0" instead of "ret"] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c index 1ccdbe89585b..1a9e9b9a4bf6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c @@ -1295,12 +1295,22 @@ int c_can_power_up(struct net_device *dev) time_after(time_out, jiffies)) cpu_relax(); - if (time_after(jiffies, time_out)) - return -ETIMEDOUT; + if (time_after(jiffies, time_out)) { + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + goto err_out; + } ret = c_can_start(dev); - if (!ret) - c_can_irq_control(priv, true); + if (ret) + goto err_out; + + c_can_irq_control(priv, true); + + return 0; + +err_out: + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); + c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); return ret; } From 13a84cf37a4cf1155a41684236c2314eb40cd65c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhang Qilong Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 21:39:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] can: kvaser_pciefd: kvaser_pciefd_open(): fix error handling If kvaser_pciefd_bus_on() failed, we should call close_candev() to avoid reference leak. Fixes: 26ad340e582d3 ("can: kvaser_pciefd: Add driver for Kvaser PCIEcan devices") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201128133922.3276973-3-zhangqilong3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c index 72acd1ba162d..43151dd6cb1c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c @@ -692,8 +692,10 @@ static int kvaser_pciefd_open(struct net_device *netdev) return err; err = kvaser_pciefd_bus_on(can); - if (err) + if (err) { + close_candev(netdev); return err; + } return 0; }