mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 16:44:10 +08:00
powerpc/cell/OProfile: Fix on-stack array size in activate spu profiling function
The size of the pm_signal_local array should be equal to the number of SPUs being configured in the array. Currently, the array is of size 4 (NR_PHYS_CTRS) but being indexed by a for loop from 0 to 7 (NUM_SPUS_PER_NODE). This could potentially cause an oops or random memory corruption since the pm_signal_local array is on the stack. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: Carl Love <carll@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3c10c9c45e
commit
210434d763
@ -582,6 +582,13 @@ static int cell_reg_setup(struct op_counter_config *ctr,
|
||||
|
||||
num_counters = num_ctrs;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(num_ctrs > NR_PHYS_CTRS)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR
|
||||
"%s: Oprofile, number of specified events " \
|
||||
"exceeds number of physical counters\n",
|
||||
__func__);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
pm_regs.group_control = 0;
|
||||
pm_regs.debug_bus_control = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -830,13 +837,13 @@ static int calculate_lfsr(int n)
|
||||
static int pm_rtas_activate_spu_profiling(u32 node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret, i;
|
||||
struct pm_signal pm_signal_local[NR_PHYS_CTRS];
|
||||
struct pm_signal pm_signal_local[NUM_SPUS_PER_NODE];
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set up the rtas call to configure the debug bus to
|
||||
* route the SPU PCs. Setup the pm_signal for each SPU
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NUM_SPUS_PER_NODE; i++) {
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pm_signal_local); i++) {
|
||||
pm_signal_local[i].cpu = node;
|
||||
pm_signal_local[i].signal_group = 41;
|
||||
/* spu i on word (i/2) */
|
||||
@ -848,7 +855,7 @@ static int pm_rtas_activate_spu_profiling(u32 node)
|
||||
|
||||
ret = rtas_ibm_cbe_perftools(SUBFUNC_ACTIVATE,
|
||||
PASSTHRU_ENABLE, pm_signal_local,
|
||||
(NUM_SPUS_PER_NODE
|
||||
(ARRAY_SIZE(pm_signal_local)
|
||||
* sizeof(struct pm_signal)));
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user