mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 12:28:41 +08:00
signal: Don't disable preemption in ptrace_stop() on PREEMPT_RT
On PREEMPT_RT keeping preemption disabled during the invocation of cgroup_enter_frozen() is a problem because the function acquires css_set_lock which is a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT and must not be acquired with disabled preemption. The preempt-disabled section is only for performance optimisation reasons and can be avoided. Extend the comment and don't disable preemption before scheduling on PREEMPT_RT. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803100932.325870-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
a20d6f63db
commit
1aabbc5324
@ -2345,11 +2345,22 @@ static int ptrace_stop(int exit_code, int why, unsigned long message,
|
||||
* will be no preemption between unlock and schedule() and so
|
||||
* improving the performance since the ptracer will observe that
|
||||
* the tracee is scheduled out once it gets on the CPU.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* On PREEMPT_RT locking tasklist_lock does not disable preemption.
|
||||
* Therefore the task can be preempted after do_notify_parent_cldstop()
|
||||
* before unlocking tasklist_lock so there is no benefit in doing this.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In fact disabling preemption is harmful on PREEMPT_RT because
|
||||
* the spinlock_t in cgroup_enter_frozen() must not be acquired
|
||||
* with preemption disabled due to the 'sleeping' spinlock
|
||||
* substitution of RT.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
|
||||
cgroup_enter_frozen();
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
cgroup_leave_frozen(true);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user