From 18ffbc47d45a1489b664dd68fb3a7610a6e1dea3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Machek Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:12:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] intel_th: Consistency and off-by-one fix Consistently use "< ... +1" in for loops. Fix of-by-one in for_each_set_bit(). Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190724095841.GA6952@amd/ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414171251.14672-6-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/gth.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/gth.c b/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/gth.c index f72803a02391..28509b02a0b5 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/gth.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/intel_th/gth.c @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void intel_th_gth_disable(struct intel_th_device *thdev, output->active = false; for_each_set_bit(master, gth->output[output->port].master, - TH_CONFIGURABLE_MASTERS) { + TH_CONFIGURABLE_MASTERS + 1) { gth_master_set(gth, master, -1); } spin_unlock(>h->gth_lock); @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static void intel_th_gth_unassign(struct intel_th_device *thdev, othdev->output.port = -1; othdev->output.active = false; gth->output[port].output = NULL; - for (master = 0; master <= TH_CONFIGURABLE_MASTERS; master++) + for (master = 0; master < TH_CONFIGURABLE_MASTERS + 1; master++) if (gth->master[master] == port) gth->master[master] = -1; spin_unlock(>h->gth_lock);