mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
dm zoned: Fix zone reclaim trigger
Only triggering reclaim based on the percentage of unmapped cache zones can fail to detect cases where reclaim is needed, e.g. if the target has only 2 or 3 cache zones and only one unmapped cache zone, the percentage of free cache zones is higher than DMZ_RECLAIM_LOW_UNMAP_ZONES (30%) and reclaim does not trigger. This problem, combined with the fact that dmz_schedule_reclaim() is called from dmz_handle_bio() without the map lock held, leads to a race between zone allocation and dmz_should_reclaim() result. Depending on the workload applied, this race can lead to the write path waiting forever for a free zone without reclaim being triggered. Fix this by moving dmz_schedule_reclaim() inside dmz_alloc_zone() under the map lock. This results in checking the need for zone reclaim whenever a new data or buffer zone needs to be allocated. Also fix dmz_reclaim_percentage() to always return 0 if the number of unmapped cache (or random) zones is less than or equal to 1. Suggested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ce34c9b461
commit
174364f6a8
@ -2217,8 +2217,15 @@ struct dm_zone *dmz_alloc_zone(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, unsigned int dev_idx,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *list;
|
||||
struct dm_zone *zone;
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Schedule reclaim to ensure free zones are available */
|
||||
if (!(flags & DMZ_ALLOC_RECLAIM)) {
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < zmd->nr_devs; i++)
|
||||
dmz_schedule_reclaim(zmd->dev[i].reclaim);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
again:
|
||||
if (flags & DMZ_ALLOC_CACHE)
|
||||
list = &zmd->unmap_cache_list;
|
||||
|
@ -456,6 +456,8 @@ static unsigned int dmz_reclaim_percentage(struct dmz_reclaim *zrc)
|
||||
nr_zones = dmz_nr_rnd_zones(zmd, zrc->dev_idx);
|
||||
nr_unmap = dmz_nr_unmap_rnd_zones(zmd, zrc->dev_idx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (nr_unmap <= 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return nr_unmap * 100 / nr_zones;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -400,15 +400,7 @@ static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
|
||||
dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
|
||||
struct dmz_metadata *zmd = dmz->metadata;
|
||||
struct dm_zone *zone;
|
||||
int i, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Write may trigger a zone allocation. So make sure the
|
||||
* allocation can succeed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE)
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < dmz->nr_ddevs; i++)
|
||||
dmz_schedule_reclaim(dmz->dev[i].reclaim);
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
dmz_lock_metadata(zmd);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user