mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
atm: solos-pci: Fix potential deadlock on &tx_queue_lock
As &card->tx_queue_lock is acquired under softirq context along the
following call chain from solos_bh(), other acquisition of the same
lock inside process context should disable at least bh to avoid double
lock.
<deadlock #2>
pclose()
--> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock)
<interrupt>
--> solos_bh()
--> fpga_tx()
--> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock)
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock.
To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_bh()
on &card->tx_queue_lock under process context code consistently to
prevent the possible deadlock scenario.
Fixes: 213e85d389
("solos-pci: clean up pclose() function")
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d5dba32b8f
commit
15319a4e8e
@ -956,14 +956,14 @@ static void pclose(struct atm_vcc *vcc)
|
||||
struct pkt_hdr *header;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Remove any yet-to-be-transmitted packets from the pending queue */
|
||||
spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&card->tx_queue_lock);
|
||||
skb_queue_walk_safe(&card->tx_queue[port], skb, tmpskb) {
|
||||
if (SKB_CB(skb)->vcc == vcc) {
|
||||
skb_unlink(skb, &card->tx_queue[port]);
|
||||
solos_pop(vcc, skb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&card->tx_queue_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&card->tx_queue_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
skb = alloc_skb(sizeof(*header), GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!skb) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user