mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 05:04:09 +08:00
btrfs: use mutex in btrfs_resume_balance_async
While the spinlock does not cause problems, using the mutex is more correct and consistent with others. The global status of balance is eg. checked from btrfs_pause_balance or btrfs_cancel_balance with mutex. Resuming balance happens during mount or ro->rw remount. In the former case, no other user of the balance_ctl exists, in the latter, balance cannot run until the ro/rw transition is finished. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
008ef0969d
commit
1354e1a13e
@ -3959,12 +3959,12 @@ int btrfs_resume_balance_async(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *tsk;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
|
||||
if (!fs_info->balance_ctl) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SKIP_BALANCE)) {
|
||||
btrfs_info(fs_info, "force skipping balance");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user