mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-29 23:24:11 +08:00
futex: Ensure the correct return value from futex_lock_pi()
In case that futex_lock_pi() was aborted by a signal or a timeout and the
task returned without acquiring the rtmutex, but is the designated owner of
the futex due to a concurrent futex_unlock_pi() fixup_owner() is invoked to
establish consistent state. In that case it invokes fixup_pi_state_owner()
which in turn tries to acquire the rtmutex again. If that succeeds then it
does not propagate this success to fixup_owner() and futex_lock_pi()
returns -EINTR or -ETIMEOUT despite having the futex locked.
Return success from fixup_pi_state_owner() in all cases where the current
task owns the rtmutex and therefore the futex and propagate it correctly
through fixup_owner(). Fixup the other callsite which does not expect a
positive return value.
Fixes: c1e2f0eaf0
("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
13391c60da
commit
12bb3f7f1b
@ -2373,8 +2373,8 @@ retry:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (__rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&pi_state->pi_mutex)) {
|
||||
/* We got the lock after all, nothing to fix. */
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
/* We got the lock. pi_state is correct. Tell caller. */
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2402,7 +2402,7 @@ retry:
|
||||
* We raced against a concurrent self; things are
|
||||
* already fixed up. Nothing to do.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
newowner = argowner;
|
||||
@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ retry:
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&newowner->pi_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return argowner == current;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In order to reschedule or handle a page fault, we need to drop the
|
||||
@ -2490,7 +2490,7 @@ handle_err:
|
||||
* Check if someone else fixed it for us:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pi_state->owner != oldowner) {
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
ret = argowner == current;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2523,8 +2523,6 @@ static long futex_wait_restart(struct restart_block *restart);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (locked) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Got the lock. We might not be the anticipated owner if we
|
||||
@ -2535,8 +2533,8 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
||||
* stable state, anything else needs more attention.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (q->pi_state->owner != current)
|
||||
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current);
|
||||
return ret ? ret : locked;
|
||||
return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, current);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2547,10 +2545,8 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
||||
* Another speculative read; pi_state->owner == current is unstable
|
||||
* but needs our attention.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (q->pi_state->owner == current) {
|
||||
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, NULL);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (q->pi_state->owner == current)
|
||||
return fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Paranoia check. If we did not take the lock, then we should not be
|
||||
@ -2563,7 +2559,7 @@ static int fixup_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
||||
q->pi_state->owner);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -3261,7 +3257,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
|
||||
if (q.pi_state && (q.pi_state->owner != current)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
|
||||
ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr2, &q, current);
|
||||
if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current) {
|
||||
if (ret < 0 && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current) {
|
||||
pi_state = q.pi_state;
|
||||
get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -3271,6 +3267,11 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
put_pi_state(q.pi_state);
|
||||
spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Adjust the return value. It's either -EFAULT or
|
||||
* success (1) but the caller expects 0 for success.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user