mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 16:24:13 +08:00
x86: signal: check sas_ss_size instead of sas_ss_flags()
Impact: fix redundant and incorrect check
Oleg Nesterov noticed wrt commit:
14fc9fb
: x86: signal: check signal stack overflow properly
>> No need to check SA_ONSTACK if we're already using alternate signal stack.
>
> Yes, but this also mean that we don't need sas_ss_flags() under
> "if (!onsigstack)",
Checking on_sig_stack() in sas_ss_flags() at get_sigframe() is redundant
and not correct on 64 bit. To check sas_ss_size is enough.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: roland@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <49CBB54C.5080201@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
93394a761d
commit
0f8f308925
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs *regs, size_t frame_size,
|
||||
if (!onsigstack) {
|
||||
/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching. */
|
||||
if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
|
||||
if (sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0)
|
||||
if (current->sas_ss_size)
|
||||
sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user