mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 04:18:39 +08:00
erofs: mark experimental fscache backend deprecated
Although fscache is still described as "General Filesystem Caching" for network filesystems and other things such as ISO9660 filesystems, it has actually become a part of netfslib recently, which was unexpected at the time when "EROFS over fscache" proposed (2021) since EROFS is entirely a disk filesystem and the dependency is redundant. Mark it deprecated and it will be removed after "fanotify pre-content hooks" lands, which will provide the same functionality for EROFS. Reviewed-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830032840.3783206-4-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
283213718f
commit
0d442ce0b3
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ config EROFS_FS_ZIP_ZSTD
|
||||
If unsure, say N.
|
||||
|
||||
config EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND
|
||||
bool "EROFS fscache-based on-demand read support"
|
||||
bool "EROFS fscache-based on-demand read support (deprecated)"
|
||||
depends on EROFS_FS
|
||||
select NETFS_SUPPORT
|
||||
select FSCACHE
|
||||
@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ config EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND
|
||||
This permits EROFS to use fscache-backed data blobs with on-demand
|
||||
read support.
|
||||
|
||||
It is now deprecated and scheduled to be removed from the kernel
|
||||
after fanotify pre-content hooks are landed.
|
||||
|
||||
If unsure, say N.
|
||||
|
||||
config EROFS_FS_PCPU_KTHREAD
|
||||
|
@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
ret = erofs_scan_devices(sb, dsb);
|
||||
|
||||
if (erofs_is_fscache_mode(sb))
|
||||
erofs_info(sb, "EXPERIMENTAL fscache-based on-demand read feature in use. Use at your own risk!");
|
||||
erofs_info(sb, "[deprecated] fscache-based on-demand read feature in use. Use at your own risk!");
|
||||
out:
|
||||
erofs_put_metabuf(&buf);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user