mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 00:04:15 +08:00
cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask
->related_cpus is empty at this point of time and copying ->cpus to it or orring ->related_cpus with ->cpus would result in the same value. But cpumask_copy makes it rather clear. Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
083701b13c
commit
0998a03a3a
@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_policy) {
|
||||
/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
|
||||
cpumask_or(policy->related_cpus, policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
|
||||
cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
|
||||
/* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
|
||||
cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user