mirror of
https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git
synced 2024-12-27 13:05:03 +08:00
68 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
68 lines
3.3 KiB
Plaintext
|
TODO LIST
|
||
|
|
---------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
POW{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, Fn, <Fm,#value> - power
|
||
|
|
RPW{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, Fn, <Fm,#value> - reverse power
|
||
|
|
POL{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, Fn, <Fm,#value> - polar angle (arctan2)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
LOG{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - logarithm to base 10
|
||
|
|
LGN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - logarithm to base e
|
||
|
|
EXP{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - exponent
|
||
|
|
SIN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - sine
|
||
|
|
COS{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - cosine
|
||
|
|
TAN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - tangent
|
||
|
|
ASN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - arcsine
|
||
|
|
ACS{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - arccosine
|
||
|
|
ATN{cond}<S|D|E>{P,M,Z} Fd, <Fm,#value> - arctangent
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These are not implemented. They are not currently issued by the compiler,
|
||
|
|
and are handled by routines in libc. These are not implemented by the FPA11
|
||
|
|
hardware, but are handled by the floating point support code. They should
|
||
|
|
be implemented in future versions.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There are a couple of ways to approach the implementation of these. One
|
||
|
|
method would be to use accurate table methods for these routines. I have
|
||
|
|
a couple of papers by S. Gal from IBM's research labs in Haifa, Israel that
|
||
|
|
seem to promise extreme accuracy (in the order of 99.8%) and reasonable speed.
|
||
|
|
These methods are used in GLIBC for some of the transcendental functions.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Another approach, which I know little about is CORDIC. This stands for
|
||
|
|
Coordinate Rotation Digital Computer, and is a method of computing
|
||
|
|
transcendental functions using mostly shifts and adds and a few
|
||
|
|
multiplications and divisions. The ARM excels at shifts and adds,
|
||
|
|
so such a method could be promising, but requires more research to
|
||
|
|
determine if it is feasible.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Rounding Methods
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The IEEE standard defines 4 rounding modes. Round to nearest is the
|
||
|
|
default, but rounding to + or - infinity or round to zero are also allowed.
|
||
|
|
Many architectures allow the rounding mode to be specified by modifying bits
|
||
|
|
in a control register. Not so with the ARM FPA11 architecture. To change
|
||
|
|
the rounding mode one must specify it with each instruction.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This has made porting some benchmarks difficult. It is possible to
|
||
|
|
introduce such a capability into the emulator. The FPCR contains
|
||
|
|
bits describing the rounding mode. The emulator could be altered to
|
||
|
|
examine a flag, which if set forced it to ignore the rounding mode in
|
||
|
|
the instruction, and use the mode specified in the bits in the FPCR.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This would require a method of getting/setting the flag, and the bits
|
||
|
|
in the FPCR. This requires a kernel call in ArmLinux, as WFC/RFC are
|
||
|
|
supervisor only instructions. If anyone has any ideas or comments I
|
||
|
|
would like to hear them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
[NOTE: pulled out from some docs on ARM floating point, specifically
|
||
|
|
for the Acorn FPE, but not limited to it:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The floating point control register (FPCR) may only be present in some
|
||
|
|
implementations: it is there to control the hardware in an implementation-
|
||
|
|
specific manner, for example to disable the floating point system. The user
|
||
|
|
mode of the ARM is not permitted to use this register (since the right is
|
||
|
|
reserved to alter it between implementations) and the WFC and RFC
|
||
|
|
instructions will trap if tried in user mode.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Hence, the answer is yes, you could do this, but then you will run a high
|
||
|
|
risk of becoming isolated if and when hardware FP emulation comes out
|
||
|
|
-- Russell].
|