linux/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

744 lines
18 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* BPF JIT compiler for ARM64
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "bpf_jit: " fmt
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
#include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
#include "bpf_jit.h"
int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly;
#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_REG + 0)
#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_REG + 1)
/* Map BPF registers to A64 registers */
static const int bpf2a64[] = {
/* return value from in-kernel function, and exit value from eBPF */
[BPF_REG_0] = A64_R(7),
/* arguments from eBPF program to in-kernel function */
[BPF_REG_1] = A64_R(0),
[BPF_REG_2] = A64_R(1),
[BPF_REG_3] = A64_R(2),
[BPF_REG_4] = A64_R(3),
[BPF_REG_5] = A64_R(4),
/* callee saved registers that in-kernel function will preserve */
[BPF_REG_6] = A64_R(19),
[BPF_REG_7] = A64_R(20),
[BPF_REG_8] = A64_R(21),
[BPF_REG_9] = A64_R(22),
/* read-only frame pointer to access stack */
[BPF_REG_FP] = A64_FP,
/* temporary register for internal BPF JIT */
[TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(23),
[TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(24),
};
struct jit_ctx {
const struct bpf_prog *prog;
int idx;
int tmp_used;
int body_offset;
int *offset;
u32 *image;
};
static inline void emit(const u32 insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
if (ctx->image != NULL)
ctx->image[ctx->idx] = cpu_to_le32(insn);
ctx->idx++;
}
static inline void emit_a64_mov_i64(const int reg, const u64 val,
struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
u64 tmp = val;
int shift = 0;
emit(A64_MOVZ(1, reg, tmp & 0xffff, shift), ctx);
tmp >>= 16;
shift += 16;
while (tmp) {
if (tmp & 0xffff)
emit(A64_MOVK(1, reg, tmp & 0xffff, shift), ctx);
tmp >>= 16;
shift += 16;
}
}
static inline void emit_a64_mov_i(const int is64, const int reg,
const s32 val, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
u16 hi = val >> 16;
u16 lo = val & 0xffff;
if (hi & 0x8000) {
if (hi == 0xffff) {
emit(A64_MOVN(is64, reg, (u16)~lo, 0), ctx);
} else {
emit(A64_MOVN(is64, reg, (u16)~hi, 16), ctx);
emit(A64_MOVK(is64, reg, lo, 0), ctx);
}
} else {
emit(A64_MOVZ(is64, reg, lo, 0), ctx);
if (hi)
emit(A64_MOVK(is64, reg, hi, 16), ctx);
}
}
static inline int bpf2a64_offset(int bpf_to, int bpf_from,
const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
int to = ctx->offset[bpf_to + 1];
/* -1 to account for the Branch instruction */
int from = ctx->offset[bpf_from + 1] - 1;
return to - from;
}
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
static void jit_fill_hole(void *area, unsigned int size)
{
u32 *ptr;
/* We are guaranteed to have aligned memory. */
for (ptr = area; size >= sizeof(u32); size -= sizeof(u32))
*ptr++ = cpu_to_le32(AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT);
}
static inline int epilogue_offset(const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
int to = ctx->offset[ctx->prog->len - 1];
int from = ctx->idx - ctx->body_offset;
return to - from;
}
/* Stack must be multiples of 16B */
#define STACK_ALIGN(sz) (((sz) + 15) & ~15)
static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
const u8 r6 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_6];
const u8 r7 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_7];
const u8 r8 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_8];
const u8 r9 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_9];
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
const u8 ra = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_A];
const u8 rx = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_X];
const u8 tmp1 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
int stack_size = MAX_BPF_STACK;
stack_size += 4; /* extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */
stack_size = STACK_ALIGN(stack_size);
/* Save callee-saved register */
emit(A64_PUSH(r6, r7, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_PUSH(r8, r9, A64_SP), ctx);
if (ctx->tmp_used)
emit(A64_PUSH(tmp1, tmp2, A64_SP), ctx);
/* Set up BPF stack */
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
/* Set up frame pointer */
emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);
/* Clear registers A and X */
emit_a64_mov_i64(ra, 0, ctx);
emit_a64_mov_i64(rx, 0, ctx);
}
static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
const u8 r6 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_6];
const u8 r7 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_7];
const u8 r8 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_8];
const u8 r9 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_9];
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
const u8 tmp1 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
int stack_size = MAX_BPF_STACK;
stack_size += 4; /* extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */
stack_size = STACK_ALIGN(stack_size);
/* We're done with BPF stack */
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
/* Restore callee-saved register */
if (ctx->tmp_used)
emit(A64_POP(tmp1, tmp2, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_POP(r8, r9, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_POP(r6, r7, A64_SP), ctx);
/* Restore frame pointer */
emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);
/* Set return value */
emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(0), r0), ctx);
emit(A64_RET(A64_LR), ctx);
}
/* JITs an eBPF instruction.
* Returns:
* 0 - successfully JITed an 8-byte eBPF instruction.
* >0 - successfully JITed a 16-byte eBPF instruction.
* <0 - failed to JIT.
*/
static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
const u8 code = insn->code;
const u8 dst = bpf2a64[insn->dst_reg];
const u8 src = bpf2a64[insn->src_reg];
const u8 tmp = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
const s16 off = insn->off;
const s32 imm = insn->imm;
const int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
const bool is64 = BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU64;
u8 jmp_cond;
s32 jmp_offset;
switch (code) {
/* dst = src */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
emit(A64_MOV(is64, dst, src), ctx);
break;
/* dst = dst OP src */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
emit(A64_ADD(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
emit(A64_AND(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
emit(A64_ORR(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
emit(A64_EOR(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
emit(A64_MUL(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, src), ctx);
emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, src), ctx);
emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
emit(A64_LSLV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
emit(A64_LSRV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
emit(A64_ASRV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
break;
/* dst = -dst */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_NEG:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG:
emit(A64_NEG(is64, dst, dst), ctx);
break;
/* dst = BSWAP##imm(dst) */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_BE:
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
if (BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_BE)
break;
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN */
if (BPF_SRC(code) == BPF_FROM_LE)
break;
#endif
switch (imm) {
case 16:
emit(A64_REV16(is64, dst, dst), ctx);
break;
case 32:
emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx);
break;
case 64:
emit(A64_REV64(dst, dst), ctx);
break;
}
break;
/* dst = imm */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, dst, imm, ctx);
break;
/* dst = dst OP imm */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_ADD(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_AND(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_ORR(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_EOR(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_MUL(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(is64, tmp2, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, tmp2), ctx);
emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, tmp2), ctx);
emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
emit(A64_LSL(is64, dst, dst, imm), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
emit(A64_LSR(is64, dst, dst, imm), ctx);
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
emit(A64_ASR(is64, dst, dst, imm), ctx);
break;
#define check_imm(bits, imm) do { \
if ((((imm) > 0) && ((imm) >> (bits))) || \
(((imm) < 0) && (~(imm) >> (bits)))) { \
pr_info("[%2d] imm=%d(0x%x) out of range\n", \
i, imm, imm); \
return -EINVAL; \
} \
} while (0)
#define check_imm19(imm) check_imm(19, imm)
#define check_imm26(imm) check_imm(26, imm)
/* JUMP off */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JA:
jmp_offset = bpf2a64_offset(i + off, i, ctx);
check_imm26(jmp_offset);
emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
break;
/* IF (dst COND src) JUMP off */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
emit(A64_CMP(1, dst, src), ctx);
emit_cond_jmp:
jmp_offset = bpf2a64_offset(i + off, i, ctx);
check_imm19(jmp_offset);
switch (BPF_OP(code)) {
case BPF_JEQ:
jmp_cond = A64_COND_EQ;
break;
case BPF_JGT:
jmp_cond = A64_COND_HI;
break;
case BPF_JGE:
jmp_cond = A64_COND_CS;
break;
case BPF_JNE:
jmp_cond = A64_COND_NE;
break;
case BPF_JSGT:
jmp_cond = A64_COND_GT;
break;
case BPF_JSGE:
jmp_cond = A64_COND_GE;
break;
default:
return -EFAULT;
}
emit(A64_B_(jmp_cond, jmp_offset), ctx);
break;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X:
emit(A64_TST(1, dst, src), ctx);
goto emit_cond_jmp;
/* IF (dst COND imm) JUMP off */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_CMP(1, dst, tmp), ctx);
goto emit_cond_jmp;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, imm, ctx);
emit(A64_TST(1, dst, tmp), ctx);
goto emit_cond_jmp;
/* function call */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
{
const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
const u64 func = (u64)__bpf_call_base + imm;
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, func, ctx);
emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_BLR(tmp), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, r0, A64_R(0)), ctx);
emit(A64_POP(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
break;
}
/* function return */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT:
if (i == ctx->prog->len - 1)
break;
jmp_offset = epilogue_offset(ctx);
check_imm26(jmp_offset);
emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
break;
/* dst = imm64 */
case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW:
{
const struct bpf_insn insn1 = insn[1];
u64 imm64;
if (insn1.code != 0 || insn1.src_reg != 0 ||
insn1.dst_reg != 0 || insn1.off != 0) {
/* Note: verifier in BPF core must catch invalid
* instructions.
*/
pr_err_once("Invalid BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
imm64 = (u64)insn1.imm << 32 | imm;
emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx);
return 1;
}
/* LDX: dst = *(size *)(src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, off, ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
emit(A64_LDR32(dst, src, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_H:
emit(A64_LDRH(dst, src, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_B:
emit(A64_LDRB(dst, src, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_DW:
emit(A64_LDR64(dst, src, tmp), ctx);
break;
}
break;
/* ST: *(size *)(dst + off) = imm */
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
goto notyet;
/* STX: *(size *)(dst + off) = src */
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
ctx->tmp_used = 1;
emit_a64_mov_i(1, tmp, off, ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
emit(A64_STR32(src, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_H:
emit(A64_STRH(src, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_B:
emit(A64_STRB(src, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
case BPF_DW:
emit(A64_STR64(src, dst, tmp), ctx);
break;
}
break;
/* STX XADD: lock *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W:
/* STX XADD: lock *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW:
goto notyet;
/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + imm)) */
case BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_W:
case BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_H:
case BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_B:
/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + src + imm)) */
case BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_W:
case BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_H:
case BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_B:
{
const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0]; /* r0 = return value */
const u8 r6 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_6]; /* r6 = pointer to sk_buff */
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
const u8 r1 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_1]; /* r1: struct sk_buff *skb */
const u8 r2 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_2]; /* r2: int k */
const u8 r3 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_3]; /* r3: unsigned int size */
const u8 r4 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_4]; /* r4: void *buffer */
const u8 r5 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_5]; /* r5: void *(*func)(...) */
int size;
emit(A64_MOV(1, r1, r6), ctx);
emit_a64_mov_i(0, r2, imm, ctx);
if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_IND)
emit(A64_ADD(0, r2, r2, src), ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
size = 4;
break;
case BPF_H:
size = 2;
break;
case BPF_B:
size = 1;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
emit_a64_mov_i64(r3, size, ctx);
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, r4, fp, MAX_BPF_STACK), ctx);
emit_a64_mov_i64(r5, (unsigned long)bpf_load_pointer, ctx);
emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
emit(A64_BLR(r5), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, r0, A64_R(0)), ctx);
emit(A64_POP(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
jmp_offset = epilogue_offset(ctx);
check_imm19(jmp_offset);
emit(A64_CBZ(1, r0, jmp_offset), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, r5, r0), ctx);
switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
case BPF_W:
emit(A64_LDR32(r0, r5, A64_ZR), ctx);
#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
emit(A64_REV32(0, r0, r0), ctx);
#endif
break;
case BPF_H:
emit(A64_LDRH(r0, r5, A64_ZR), ctx);
#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
emit(A64_REV16(0, r0, r0), ctx);
#endif
break;
case BPF_B:
emit(A64_LDRB(r0, r5, A64_ZR), ctx);
break;
}
break;
}
notyet:
pr_info_once("*** NOT YET: opcode %02x ***\n", code);
return -EFAULT;
default:
pr_err_once("unknown opcode %02x\n", code);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
const struct bpf_prog *prog = ctx->prog;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
int ret;
if (ctx->image == NULL)
ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx;
ret = build_insn(insn, ctx);
if (ret > 0) {
i++;
continue;
}
if (ret)
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
{
flush_icache_range((unsigned long)start, (unsigned long)end);
}
void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
/* Nothing to do here. We support Internal BPF. */
}
void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
struct bpf_binary_header *header;
struct jit_ctx ctx;
int image_size;
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
u8 *image_ptr;
if (!bpf_jit_enable)
return;
if (!prog || !prog->len)
return;
memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
ctx.prog = prog;
ctx.offset = kcalloc(prog->len, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
if (ctx.offset == NULL)
return;
/* 1. Initial fake pass to compute ctx->idx. */
/* Fake pass to fill in ctx->offset. */
if (build_body(&ctx))
goto out;
build_prologue(&ctx);
build_epilogue(&ctx);
/* Now we know the actual image size. */
image_size = sizeof(u32) * ctx.idx;
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
header = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(image_size, &image_ptr,
sizeof(u32), jit_fill_hole);
if (header == NULL)
goto out;
/* 2. Now, the actual pass. */
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
ctx.image = (u32 *)image_ptr;
ctx.idx = 0;
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
build_prologue(&ctx);
ctx.body_offset = ctx.idx;
if (build_body(&ctx)) {
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
goto out;
}
build_epilogue(&ctx);
/* And we're done. */
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
bpf_jit_dump(prog->len, image_size, 2, ctx.image);
bpf_flush_icache(ctx.image, ctx.image + ctx.idx);
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages);
prog->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.image;
prog->jited = true;
out:
kfree(ctx.offset);
}
void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)prog->bpf_func & PAGE_MASK;
struct bpf_binary_header *header = (void *)addr;
if (!prog->jited)
goto free_filter;
set_memory_rw(addr, header->pages);
bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
net: bpf: arm64: address randomize and write protect JIT code This is the ARM64 variant for 314beb9bcab ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). Thanks to commit 11d91a770f1f ("arm64: Add CONFIG_DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX support") which added necessary infrastructure, we can now implement RO marking of eBPF generated JIT image pages and randomize start offset for the JIT code, so that it does not reside directly on a page boundary anymore. Likewise, the holes are filled with illegal instructions: here we use BRK #0x100 (opcode 0xd4202000) to trigger a fault in the kernel (unallocated BRKs would trigger a fault through do_debug_exception). This seems more reliable as we don't have a guaranteed undefined instruction space on ARM64. This is basically the ARM64 variant of what we already have in ARM via commit 55309dd3d4cd ("net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code"). Moreover, this commit also presents a merge resolution due to conflicts with commit 60a3b2253c41 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only") as we don't use kfree() in bpf_jit_free() anymore to release the locked bpf_prog structure, but instead bpf_prog_unlock_free() through a different allocator. JIT tested on aarch64 with BPF test suite. Reference: http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2014-09-16 15:48:50 +08:00
free_filter:
bpf_prog_unlock_free(prog);
}