linux/drivers/spi/spi-dw.h

308 lines
8.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#ifndef __SPI_DW_H__
#define __SPI_DW_H__
#include <linux/bits.h>
spi: dw: Locally wait for the DMA transfers completion In general each DMA-based SPI transfer can be split up into two stages: DMA data transmission/reception and SPI-bus transmission/reception. DMA asynchronous transactions completion can be tracked by means of the DMA async Tx-descriptor completion callback. But that callback being called indicates that the DMA transfer has been finished, it doesn't mean that SPI data transmission is also done. Moreover in fact it isn't for at least Tx-only SPI transfers. Upon DMA transfer completion some data is left in the Tx FIFO and being pushed out by the SPI controller. So in order to make sure that an SPI transfer is completely pushed to the SPI-bus, the driver has to wait for both DMA transaction and the SPI-bus transmission/reception are finished. Note if there is a way to asynchronously track the former event by means of the DMA async Tx callback, there isn't easy one for the later (IRQ-based solution won't work since SPI controller doesn't notify about Rx FIFO being empty). The DMA transfer completion callback isn't suitable to wait for the SPI controller activity finish either. The callback might (in case of DW DMAC it will) be called in the tasklet context. Waiting for the SPI controller to complete the transfer might take a considerable amount of time since SPI-bus might be pretty slow. In this case delaying the execution in the tasklet atomic context might cause significant system performance drop. So to speak the best option we've got to solve the problem is to consequently wait for both stages being finished in the locally implemented SPI transfer execution procedure even if it costs us of the local wait-function re-implementation. In this case we don't need to use the SPI-core transfer-wait functionality, but we'll make sure that all DMA and SPI-bus transactions are completely finished before the SPI-core transfer_one callback returns. In this commit we provide an implementation of the DMA-transfers completion wait functionality. The DW APB SSI DMA-specific SPI transfer_one function waits for both Tx and Rx DMA transfers being finished, and only then exits with zero returned signalling to the SPI core that the SPI transfer is finished. This implementation is fully equivalent to the currently used DMA-execution-SPI-core-wait algorithm. The SPI-bus transmission/reception wait methods will be added in the follow-up commits. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529131205.31838-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29 21:11:52 +08:00
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/irqreturn.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
spi: dw: Add memory operations support Aside from the synchronous Tx-Rx mode, which has been utilized to create the normal SPI transfers in the framework of the DW SSI driver, DW SPI controller supports Tx-only and EEPROM-read modes. The former one just enables the controller to transmit all the data from the Tx FIFO ignoring anything retrieved from the MISO lane. The later mode is so called write-then-read operation: DW SPI controller first pushes out all the data from the Tx FIFO, after that it'll automatically receive as much data as has been specified by means of the CTRLR1 register. Both of those modes can be used to implement the memory operations supported by the SPI-memory subsystem. The memory operation implementation is pretty much straightforward, except a few peculiarities we have had to take into account to make things working. Since DW SPI controller doesn't provide a way to directly set and clear the native CS lane level, but instead automatically de-asserts it when a transfer going on, we have to make sure the Tx FIFO isn't empty during entire Tx procedure. In addition we also need to read data from the Rx FIFO as fast as possible to prevent it' overflow with automatically fetched incoming traffic. The denoted peculiarities get to cause even more problems if DW SSI controller is equipped with relatively small FIFO and is connected to a relatively slow system bus (APB) (with respect to the SPI bus speed). In order to workaround the problems for as much as it's possible, the memory operation execution procedure collects all the Tx data into a single buffer and disables the local IRQs to speed the write-then-optionally-read method up. Note the provided memory operations are utilized by default only if a glue driver hasn't provided a custom version of ones and this is not a DW APB SSI controller with fixed automatic CS toggle functionality. Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007235511.4935-18-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-08 07:55:06 +08:00
#include <linux/spi/spi-mem.h>
spi: dw: Add support for 32-bits max xfer size The Synopsis DesignWare DW_apb_ssi specifications version 3.23 onward define a 32-bits maximum transfer size synthesis parameter (SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=32) in addition to the legacy 16-bits configuration (SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=16) for SPI controllers. When SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=32, the layout of the ctrlr0 register changes, moving the data frame format field from bits [3..0] to bits [16..20], and the RX/TX FIFO word size can be up to 32-bits. To support this new format, introduce the DW SPI capability flag DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 to indicate that a controller is configured with SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=32. Since SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE is a controller synthesis parameter not accessible through a register, the detection of this parameter value is done in spi_hw_init() by writing and reading the ctrlr0 register and testing the value of bits [3..0]. These bits are ignored (unchanged) for SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=16, allowing the detection. If a DFS32 capable SPI controller is detected, the new field dfs_offset in struct dw_spi is set to SPI_DFS32_OFFSET (16). dw_spi_update_config() is modified to set the data frame size field at the correct position is the CTRLR0 register, as indicated by the dfs_offset field of the dw_spi structure. The DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 flag is also unconditionally set for SPI slave controllers, e.g. controllers that have the DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_SSI capability flag set. However, for these ssi controllers, the dfs_offset field is set to 0 as before (as per specifications). Finally, for any controller with the DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 capability flag set, dw_spi_add_host() extends the value of bits_per_word_mask from 16-bits to 32-bits. dw_reader() and dw_writer() are also modified to handle 32-bits iTX/RX FIFO words. Suggested-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206011817.11700-3-damien.lemoal@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-12-06 09:18:16 +08:00
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
spi: dw: Introduce Synopsys IP-core versions interface The driver currently supports two IP-core versions. It's DW APB SSI which is older version of the controller with APB system bus interface, and DW SSI controller with AHB bus interface. The later one is supposed to be a new generation high-speed SSI. Even though both of these IP-cores have got an almost identical registers space there are some differences. The driver differentiates these distinctions by the DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI capability flag. In addition to that each DW SSI IP-core is equipped with a Synopsys Component version register, which encodes the IP-core release ID the has been synthesized from. Seeing we are going to need the later one to differentiate some controller peculiarities it would be better to have a unified interface for both IP-core line and release versions instead of using each of them separately. Introduced here IP-core versioning interface consists of two parts: 1) IDs of the IP-core (virtual) and component versions. 2) a set of macro helpers to identify current IP-core and component versions. So the platform code is supposed to assign a proper IP-core version based on it's platform -knowledge. The main driver initialization method reads the IP-core release ID from the SSI component version register. That data is used by the helpers to distinguish one IP-core release from another. Thus the rest of the driver can use these macros to implement the conditional code execution based on the specified IP-core and version IDs. Collect the IP-core versions interface and the defined capabilities at the top of the header file since they represent a common device description data and so to immediately available for the driver hackers. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-6-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:15 +08:00
/* Synopsys DW SSI IP-core virtual IDs */
#define DW_PSSI_ID 0
#define DW_HSSI_ID 1
/* Synopsys DW SSI component versions (FourCC sequence) */
#define DW_HSSI_102A 0x3130322a
/* DW SSI IP-core ID and version check helpers */
#define dw_spi_ip_is(_dws, _ip) \
((_dws)->ip == DW_ ## _ip ## _ID)
#define __dw_spi_ver_cmp(_dws, _ip, _ver, _op) \
(dw_spi_ip_is(_dws, _ip) && (_dws)->ver _op DW_ ## _ip ## _ ## _ver)
spi: dw: Introduce Synopsys IP-core versions interface The driver currently supports two IP-core versions. It's DW APB SSI which is older version of the controller with APB system bus interface, and DW SSI controller with AHB bus interface. The later one is supposed to be a new generation high-speed SSI. Even though both of these IP-cores have got an almost identical registers space there are some differences. The driver differentiates these distinctions by the DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI capability flag. In addition to that each DW SSI IP-core is equipped with a Synopsys Component version register, which encodes the IP-core release ID the has been synthesized from. Seeing we are going to need the later one to differentiate some controller peculiarities it would be better to have a unified interface for both IP-core line and release versions instead of using each of them separately. Introduced here IP-core versioning interface consists of two parts: 1) IDs of the IP-core (virtual) and component versions. 2) a set of macro helpers to identify current IP-core and component versions. So the platform code is supposed to assign a proper IP-core version based on it's platform -knowledge. The main driver initialization method reads the IP-core release ID from the SSI component version register. That data is used by the helpers to distinguish one IP-core release from another. Thus the rest of the driver can use these macros to implement the conditional code execution based on the specified IP-core and version IDs. Collect the IP-core versions interface and the defined capabilities at the top of the header file since they represent a common device description data and so to immediately available for the driver hackers. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-6-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:15 +08:00
#define dw_spi_ver_is(_dws, _ip, _ver) __dw_spi_ver_cmp(_dws, _ip, _ver, ==)
#define dw_spi_ver_is_ge(_dws, _ip, _ver) __dw_spi_ver_cmp(_dws, _ip, _ver, >=)
/* DW SPI controller capabilities */
#define DW_SPI_CAP_CS_OVERRIDE BIT(0)
#define DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 BIT(1)
spi: dw: Introduce Synopsys IP-core versions interface The driver currently supports two IP-core versions. It's DW APB SSI which is older version of the controller with APB system bus interface, and DW SSI controller with AHB bus interface. The later one is supposed to be a new generation high-speed SSI. Even though both of these IP-cores have got an almost identical registers space there are some differences. The driver differentiates these distinctions by the DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI capability flag. In addition to that each DW SSI IP-core is equipped with a Synopsys Component version register, which encodes the IP-core release ID the has been synthesized from. Seeing we are going to need the later one to differentiate some controller peculiarities it would be better to have a unified interface for both IP-core line and release versions instead of using each of them separately. Introduced here IP-core versioning interface consists of two parts: 1) IDs of the IP-core (virtual) and component versions. 2) a set of macro helpers to identify current IP-core and component versions. So the platform code is supposed to assign a proper IP-core version based on it's platform -knowledge. The main driver initialization method reads the IP-core release ID from the SSI component version register. That data is used by the helpers to distinguish one IP-core release from another. Thus the rest of the driver can use these macros to implement the conditional code execution based on the specified IP-core and version IDs. Collect the IP-core versions interface and the defined capabilities at the top of the header file since they represent a common device description data and so to immediately available for the driver hackers. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-6-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:15 +08:00
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
/* Register offsets (Generic for both DWC APB SSI and DWC SSI IP-cores) */
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0 0x00
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR1 0x04
#define DW_SPI_SSIENR 0x08
#define DW_SPI_MWCR 0x0c
#define DW_SPI_SER 0x10
#define DW_SPI_BAUDR 0x14
#define DW_SPI_TXFTLR 0x18
#define DW_SPI_RXFTLR 0x1c
#define DW_SPI_TXFLR 0x20
#define DW_SPI_RXFLR 0x24
#define DW_SPI_SR 0x28
#define DW_SPI_IMR 0x2c
#define DW_SPI_ISR 0x30
#define DW_SPI_RISR 0x34
#define DW_SPI_TXOICR 0x38
#define DW_SPI_RXOICR 0x3c
#define DW_SPI_RXUICR 0x40
#define DW_SPI_MSTICR 0x44
#define DW_SPI_ICR 0x48
#define DW_SPI_DMACR 0x4c
#define DW_SPI_DMATDLR 0x50
#define DW_SPI_DMARDLR 0x54
#define DW_SPI_IDR 0x58
#define DW_SPI_VERSION 0x5c
#define DW_SPI_DR 0x60
#define DW_SPI_RX_SAMPLE_DLY 0xf0
#define DW_SPI_CS_OVERRIDE 0xf4
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
/* Bit fields in CTRLR0 (DWC APB SSI) */
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_DFS_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_DFS32_MASK GENMASK(20, 16)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_FRF_MASK GENMASK(5, 4)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_MOTO_SPI 0x0
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_TI_SSP 0x1
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_NS_MICROWIRE 0x2
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_FRF_RESV 0x3
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_MODE_MASK GENMASK(7, 6)
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_SCPHA BIT(6)
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_SCPOL BIT(7)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_TMOD_MASK GENMASK(9, 8)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_TR 0x0 /* xmit & recv */
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_TO 0x1 /* xmit only */
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_RO 0x2 /* recv only */
#define DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_EPROMREAD 0x3 /* eeprom read mode */
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_SLV_OE BIT(10)
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_SRL BIT(11)
#define DW_PSSI_CTRLR0_CFS BIT(12)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
/* Bit fields in CTRLR0 (DWC SSI with AHB interface) */
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_DFS_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_FRF_MASK GENMASK(7, 6)
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_SCPHA BIT(8)
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_SCPOL BIT(9)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_TMOD_MASK GENMASK(11, 10)
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_SRL BIT(13)
#define DW_HSSI_CTRLR0_MST BIT(31)
spi: dw: Add memory operations support Aside from the synchronous Tx-Rx mode, which has been utilized to create the normal SPI transfers in the framework of the DW SSI driver, DW SPI controller supports Tx-only and EEPROM-read modes. The former one just enables the controller to transmit all the data from the Tx FIFO ignoring anything retrieved from the MISO lane. The later mode is so called write-then-read operation: DW SPI controller first pushes out all the data from the Tx FIFO, after that it'll automatically receive as much data as has been specified by means of the CTRLR1 register. Both of those modes can be used to implement the memory operations supported by the SPI-memory subsystem. The memory operation implementation is pretty much straightforward, except a few peculiarities we have had to take into account to make things working. Since DW SPI controller doesn't provide a way to directly set and clear the native CS lane level, but instead automatically de-asserts it when a transfer going on, we have to make sure the Tx FIFO isn't empty during entire Tx procedure. In addition we also need to read data from the Rx FIFO as fast as possible to prevent it' overflow with automatically fetched incoming traffic. The denoted peculiarities get to cause even more problems if DW SSI controller is equipped with relatively small FIFO and is connected to a relatively slow system bus (APB) (with respect to the SPI bus speed). In order to workaround the problems for as much as it's possible, the memory operation execution procedure collects all the Tx data into a single buffer and disables the local IRQs to speed the write-then-optionally-read method up. Note the provided memory operations are utilized by default only if a glue driver hasn't provided a custom version of ones and this is not a DW APB SSI controller with fixed automatic CS toggle functionality. Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007235511.4935-18-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-08 07:55:06 +08:00
/* Bit fields in CTRLR1 */
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_SPI_NDF_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
spi: dw: Add memory operations support Aside from the synchronous Tx-Rx mode, which has been utilized to create the normal SPI transfers in the framework of the DW SSI driver, DW SPI controller supports Tx-only and EEPROM-read modes. The former one just enables the controller to transmit all the data from the Tx FIFO ignoring anything retrieved from the MISO lane. The later mode is so called write-then-read operation: DW SPI controller first pushes out all the data from the Tx FIFO, after that it'll automatically receive as much data as has been specified by means of the CTRLR1 register. Both of those modes can be used to implement the memory operations supported by the SPI-memory subsystem. The memory operation implementation is pretty much straightforward, except a few peculiarities we have had to take into account to make things working. Since DW SPI controller doesn't provide a way to directly set and clear the native CS lane level, but instead automatically de-asserts it when a transfer going on, we have to make sure the Tx FIFO isn't empty during entire Tx procedure. In addition we also need to read data from the Rx FIFO as fast as possible to prevent it' overflow with automatically fetched incoming traffic. The denoted peculiarities get to cause even more problems if DW SSI controller is equipped with relatively small FIFO and is connected to a relatively slow system bus (APB) (with respect to the SPI bus speed). In order to workaround the problems for as much as it's possible, the memory operation execution procedure collects all the Tx data into a single buffer and disables the local IRQs to speed the write-then-optionally-read method up. Note the provided memory operations are utilized by default only if a glue driver hasn't provided a custom version of ones and this is not a DW APB SSI controller with fixed automatic CS toggle functionality. Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007235511.4935-18-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-08 07:55:06 +08:00
/* Bit fields in SR, 7 bits */
#define DW_SPI_SR_MASK GENMASK(6, 0)
#define DW_SPI_SR_BUSY BIT(0)
#define DW_SPI_SR_TF_NOT_FULL BIT(1)
#define DW_SPI_SR_TF_EMPT BIT(2)
#define DW_SPI_SR_RF_NOT_EMPT BIT(3)
#define DW_SPI_SR_RF_FULL BIT(4)
#define DW_SPI_SR_TX_ERR BIT(5)
#define DW_SPI_SR_DCOL BIT(6)
/* Bit fields in ISR, IMR, RISR, 7 bits */
#define DW_SPI_INT_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
#define DW_SPI_INT_TXEI BIT(0)
#define DW_SPI_INT_TXOI BIT(1)
#define DW_SPI_INT_RXUI BIT(2)
#define DW_SPI_INT_RXOI BIT(3)
#define DW_SPI_INT_RXFI BIT(4)
#define DW_SPI_INT_MSTI BIT(5)
/* Bit fields in DMACR */
#define DW_SPI_DMACR_RDMAE BIT(0)
#define DW_SPI_DMACR_TDMAE BIT(1)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
/* Mem/DMA operations helpers */
#define DW_SPI_WAIT_RETRIES 5
#define DW_SPI_BUF_SIZE \
spi: dw: Add memory operations support Aside from the synchronous Tx-Rx mode, which has been utilized to create the normal SPI transfers in the framework of the DW SSI driver, DW SPI controller supports Tx-only and EEPROM-read modes. The former one just enables the controller to transmit all the data from the Tx FIFO ignoring anything retrieved from the MISO lane. The later mode is so called write-then-read operation: DW SPI controller first pushes out all the data from the Tx FIFO, after that it'll automatically receive as much data as has been specified by means of the CTRLR1 register. Both of those modes can be used to implement the memory operations supported by the SPI-memory subsystem. The memory operation implementation is pretty much straightforward, except a few peculiarities we have had to take into account to make things working. Since DW SPI controller doesn't provide a way to directly set and clear the native CS lane level, but instead automatically de-asserts it when a transfer going on, we have to make sure the Tx FIFO isn't empty during entire Tx procedure. In addition we also need to read data from the Rx FIFO as fast as possible to prevent it' overflow with automatically fetched incoming traffic. The denoted peculiarities get to cause even more problems if DW SSI controller is equipped with relatively small FIFO and is connected to a relatively slow system bus (APB) (with respect to the SPI bus speed). In order to workaround the problems for as much as it's possible, the memory operation execution procedure collects all the Tx data into a single buffer and disables the local IRQs to speed the write-then-optionally-read method up. Note the provided memory operations are utilized by default only if a glue driver hasn't provided a custom version of ones and this is not a DW APB SSI controller with fixed automatic CS toggle functionality. Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007235511.4935-18-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-08 07:55:06 +08:00
(sizeof_field(struct spi_mem_op, cmd.opcode) + \
sizeof_field(struct spi_mem_op, addr.val) + 256)
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#define DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(_val, _idx) \
spi: dw: Add memory operations support Aside from the synchronous Tx-Rx mode, which has been utilized to create the normal SPI transfers in the framework of the DW SSI driver, DW SPI controller supports Tx-only and EEPROM-read modes. The former one just enables the controller to transmit all the data from the Tx FIFO ignoring anything retrieved from the MISO lane. The later mode is so called write-then-read operation: DW SPI controller first pushes out all the data from the Tx FIFO, after that it'll automatically receive as much data as has been specified by means of the CTRLR1 register. Both of those modes can be used to implement the memory operations supported by the SPI-memory subsystem. The memory operation implementation is pretty much straightforward, except a few peculiarities we have had to take into account to make things working. Since DW SPI controller doesn't provide a way to directly set and clear the native CS lane level, but instead automatically de-asserts it when a transfer going on, we have to make sure the Tx FIFO isn't empty during entire Tx procedure. In addition we also need to read data from the Rx FIFO as fast as possible to prevent it' overflow with automatically fetched incoming traffic. The denoted peculiarities get to cause even more problems if DW SSI controller is equipped with relatively small FIFO and is connected to a relatively slow system bus (APB) (with respect to the SPI bus speed). In order to workaround the problems for as much as it's possible, the memory operation execution procedure collects all the Tx data into a single buffer and disables the local IRQs to speed the write-then-optionally-read method up. Note the provided memory operations are utilized by default only if a glue driver hasn't provided a custom version of ones and this is not a DW APB SSI controller with fixed automatic CS toggle functionality. Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007235511.4935-18-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-08 07:55:06 +08:00
((_val) >> (BITS_PER_BYTE * (_idx)) & 0xff)
/* Slave spi_transfer/spi_mem_op related */
struct dw_spi_cfg {
u8 tmode;
u8 dfs;
u32 ndf;
u32 freq;
};
struct dw_spi;
struct dw_spi_dma_ops {
int (*dma_init)(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws);
void (*dma_exit)(struct dw_spi *dws);
int (*dma_setup)(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_transfer *xfer);
bool (*can_dma)(struct spi_controller *master, struct spi_device *spi,
struct spi_transfer *xfer);
int (*dma_transfer)(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_transfer *xfer);
void (*dma_stop)(struct dw_spi *dws);
};
struct dw_spi {
struct spi_controller *master;
spi: dw: Introduce Synopsys IP-core versions interface The driver currently supports two IP-core versions. It's DW APB SSI which is older version of the controller with APB system bus interface, and DW SSI controller with AHB bus interface. The later one is supposed to be a new generation high-speed SSI. Even though both of these IP-cores have got an almost identical registers space there are some differences. The driver differentiates these distinctions by the DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_HSSI capability flag. In addition to that each DW SSI IP-core is equipped with a Synopsys Component version register, which encodes the IP-core release ID the has been synthesized from. Seeing we are going to need the later one to differentiate some controller peculiarities it would be better to have a unified interface for both IP-core line and release versions instead of using each of them separately. Introduced here IP-core versioning interface consists of two parts: 1) IDs of the IP-core (virtual) and component versions. 2) a set of macro helpers to identify current IP-core and component versions. So the platform code is supposed to assign a proper IP-core version based on it's platform -knowledge. The main driver initialization method reads the IP-core release ID from the SSI component version register. That data is used by the helpers to distinguish one IP-core release from another. Thus the rest of the driver can use these macros to implement the conditional code execution based on the specified IP-core and version IDs. Collect the IP-core versions interface and the defined capabilities at the top of the header file since they represent a common device description data and so to immediately available for the driver hackers. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-6-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:15 +08:00
u32 ip; /* Synopsys DW SSI IP-core ID */
u32 ver; /* Synopsys component version */
u32 caps; /* DW SPI capabilities */
void __iomem *regs;
unsigned long paddr;
int irq;
u32 fifo_len; /* depth of the FIFO buffer */
spi: dw: Add support for 32-bits max xfer size The Synopsis DesignWare DW_apb_ssi specifications version 3.23 onward define a 32-bits maximum transfer size synthesis parameter (SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=32) in addition to the legacy 16-bits configuration (SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=16) for SPI controllers. When SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=32, the layout of the ctrlr0 register changes, moving the data frame format field from bits [3..0] to bits [16..20], and the RX/TX FIFO word size can be up to 32-bits. To support this new format, introduce the DW SPI capability flag DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 to indicate that a controller is configured with SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=32. Since SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE is a controller synthesis parameter not accessible through a register, the detection of this parameter value is done in spi_hw_init() by writing and reading the ctrlr0 register and testing the value of bits [3..0]. These bits are ignored (unchanged) for SSI_MAX_XFER_SIZE=16, allowing the detection. If a DFS32 capable SPI controller is detected, the new field dfs_offset in struct dw_spi is set to SPI_DFS32_OFFSET (16). dw_spi_update_config() is modified to set the data frame size field at the correct position is the CTRLR0 register, as indicated by the dfs_offset field of the dw_spi structure. The DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 flag is also unconditionally set for SPI slave controllers, e.g. controllers that have the DW_SPI_CAP_DWC_SSI capability flag set. However, for these ssi controllers, the dfs_offset field is set to 0 as before (as per specifications). Finally, for any controller with the DW_SPI_CAP_DFS32 capability flag set, dw_spi_add_host() extends the value of bits_per_word_mask from 16-bits to 32-bits. dw_reader() and dw_writer() are also modified to handle 32-bits iTX/RX FIFO words. Suggested-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201206011817.11700-3-damien.lemoal@wdc.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-12-06 09:18:16 +08:00
unsigned int dfs_offset; /* CTRLR0 DFS field offset */
u32 max_mem_freq; /* max mem-ops bus freq */
u32 max_freq; /* max bus freq supported */
u32 reg_io_width; /* DR I/O width in bytes */
u16 bus_num;
u16 num_cs; /* supported slave numbers */
void (*set_cs)(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable);
/* Current message transfer state info */
void *tx;
unsigned int tx_len;
void *rx;
unsigned int rx_len;
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
u8 buf[DW_SPI_BUF_SIZE];
int dma_mapped;
u8 n_bytes; /* current is a 1/2 bytes op */
irqreturn_t (*transfer_handler)(struct dw_spi *dws);
u32 current_freq; /* frequency in hz */
u32 cur_rx_sample_dly;
u32 def_rx_sample_dly_ns;
spi: dw: Add memory operations support Aside from the synchronous Tx-Rx mode, which has been utilized to create the normal SPI transfers in the framework of the DW SSI driver, DW SPI controller supports Tx-only and EEPROM-read modes. The former one just enables the controller to transmit all the data from the Tx FIFO ignoring anything retrieved from the MISO lane. The later mode is so called write-then-read operation: DW SPI controller first pushes out all the data from the Tx FIFO, after that it'll automatically receive as much data as has been specified by means of the CTRLR1 register. Both of those modes can be used to implement the memory operations supported by the SPI-memory subsystem. The memory operation implementation is pretty much straightforward, except a few peculiarities we have had to take into account to make things working. Since DW SPI controller doesn't provide a way to directly set and clear the native CS lane level, but instead automatically de-asserts it when a transfer going on, we have to make sure the Tx FIFO isn't empty during entire Tx procedure. In addition we also need to read data from the Rx FIFO as fast as possible to prevent it' overflow with automatically fetched incoming traffic. The denoted peculiarities get to cause even more problems if DW SSI controller is equipped with relatively small FIFO and is connected to a relatively slow system bus (APB) (with respect to the SPI bus speed). In order to workaround the problems for as much as it's possible, the memory operation execution procedure collects all the Tx data into a single buffer and disables the local IRQs to speed the write-then-optionally-read method up. Note the provided memory operations are utilized by default only if a glue driver hasn't provided a custom version of ones and this is not a DW APB SSI controller with fixed automatic CS toggle functionality. Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007235511.4935-18-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-10-08 07:55:06 +08:00
/* Custom memory operations */
struct spi_controller_mem_ops mem_ops;
/* DMA info */
struct dma_chan *txchan;
u32 txburst;
struct dma_chan *rxchan;
u32 rxburst;
spi: dw-dma: Add one-by-one SG list entries transfer In case if at least one of the requested DMA engine channels doesn't support the hardware accelerated SG list entries traverse, the DMA driver will most likely work that around by performing the IRQ-based SG list entries resubmission. That might and will cause a problem if the DMA Tx channel is recharged and re-executed before the Rx DMA channel. Due to non-deterministic IRQ-handler execution latency the DMA Tx channel will start pushing data to the SPI bus before the Rx DMA channel is even reinitialized with the next inbound SG list entry. By doing so the DMA Tx channel will implicitly start filling the DW APB SSI Rx FIFO up, which while the DMA Rx channel being recharged and re-executed will eventually be overflown. In order to solve the problem we have to feed the DMA engine with SG list entries one-by-one. It shall keep the DW APB SSI Tx and Rx FIFOs synchronized and prevent the Rx FIFO overflow. Since in general the SPI tx_sg and rx_sg lists may have different number of entries of different lengths (though total length should match) we virtually split the SG-lists to the set of DMA transfers, which length is a minimum of the ordered SG-entries lengths. The solution described above is only executed if a full-duplex SPI transfer is requested and the DMA engine hasn't provided channels with hardware accelerated SG list traverse capability to handle both SG lists at once. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200920112322.24585-12-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-09-20 19:23:22 +08:00
u32 dma_sg_burst;
unsigned long dma_chan_busy;
dma_addr_t dma_addr; /* phy address of the Data register */
const struct dw_spi_dma_ops *dma_ops;
spi: dw: Locally wait for the DMA transfers completion In general each DMA-based SPI transfer can be split up into two stages: DMA data transmission/reception and SPI-bus transmission/reception. DMA asynchronous transactions completion can be tracked by means of the DMA async Tx-descriptor completion callback. But that callback being called indicates that the DMA transfer has been finished, it doesn't mean that SPI data transmission is also done. Moreover in fact it isn't for at least Tx-only SPI transfers. Upon DMA transfer completion some data is left in the Tx FIFO and being pushed out by the SPI controller. So in order to make sure that an SPI transfer is completely pushed to the SPI-bus, the driver has to wait for both DMA transaction and the SPI-bus transmission/reception are finished. Note if there is a way to asynchronously track the former event by means of the DMA async Tx callback, there isn't easy one for the later (IRQ-based solution won't work since SPI controller doesn't notify about Rx FIFO being empty). The DMA transfer completion callback isn't suitable to wait for the SPI controller activity finish either. The callback might (in case of DW DMAC it will) be called in the tasklet context. Waiting for the SPI controller to complete the transfer might take a considerable amount of time since SPI-bus might be pretty slow. In this case delaying the execution in the tasklet atomic context might cause significant system performance drop. So to speak the best option we've got to solve the problem is to consequently wait for both stages being finished in the locally implemented SPI transfer execution procedure even if it costs us of the local wait-function re-implementation. In this case we don't need to use the SPI-core transfer-wait functionality, but we'll make sure that all DMA and SPI-bus transactions are completely finished before the SPI-core transfer_one callback returns. In this commit we provide an implementation of the DMA-transfers completion wait functionality. The DW APB SSI DMA-specific SPI transfer_one function waits for both Tx and Rx DMA transfers being finished, and only then exits with zero returned signalling to the SPI core that the SPI transfer is finished. This implementation is fully equivalent to the currently used DMA-execution-SPI-core-wait algorithm. The SPI-bus transmission/reception wait methods will be added in the follow-up commits. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529131205.31838-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29 21:11:52 +08:00
struct completion dma_completion;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
struct dentry *debugfs;
struct debugfs_regset32 regset;
#endif
};
static inline u32 dw_readl(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset)
{
return __raw_readl(dws->regs + offset);
}
static inline void dw_writel(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset, u32 val)
{
__raw_writel(val, dws->regs + offset);
}
static inline u32 dw_read_io_reg(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset)
{
switch (dws->reg_io_width) {
case 2:
return readw_relaxed(dws->regs + offset);
case 4:
default:
return readl_relaxed(dws->regs + offset);
}
}
static inline void dw_write_io_reg(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 offset, u32 val)
{
switch (dws->reg_io_width) {
case 2:
writew_relaxed(val, dws->regs + offset);
break;
case 4:
default:
writel_relaxed(val, dws->regs + offset);
break;
}
}
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
static inline void dw_spi_enable_chip(struct dw_spi *dws, int enable)
{
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_SSIENR, (enable ? 1 : 0));
}
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
static inline void dw_spi_set_clk(struct dw_spi *dws, u16 div)
{
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_BAUDR, div);
}
/* Disable IRQ bits */
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
static inline void dw_spi_mask_intr(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 mask)
{
u32 new_mask;
new_mask = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_IMR) & ~mask;
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_IMR, new_mask);
}
/* Enable IRQ bits */
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
static inline void dw_spi_umask_intr(struct dw_spi *dws, u32 mask)
{
u32 new_mask;
new_mask = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_IMR) | mask;
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_IMR, new_mask);
}
/*
* This disables the SPI controller, interrupts, clears the interrupts status
* and CS, then re-enables the controller back. Transmit and receive FIFO
* buffers are cleared when the device is disabled.
*/
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
static inline void dw_spi_reset_chip(struct dw_spi *dws)
{
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0);
dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, 0xff);
dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_ICR);
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_SER, 0);
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 1);
}
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
static inline void dw_spi_shutdown_chip(struct dw_spi *dws)
{
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0);
dw_spi_set_clk(dws, 0);
}
extern void dw_spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable);
extern void dw_spi_update_config(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi,
struct dw_spi_cfg *cfg);
extern int dw_spi_check_status(struct dw_spi *dws, bool raw);
extern int dw_spi_add_host(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws);
extern void dw_spi_remove_host(struct dw_spi *dws);
extern int dw_spi_suspend_host(struct dw_spi *dws);
extern int dw_spi_resume_host(struct dw_spi *dws);
spi: dw: Move Non-DMA code to the DW PCIe-SPI driver This is a preparation patch before adding the DW DMA support into the DW SPI MMIO driver. We need to unpin the Non-DMA-specific code from the intended to be generic DW APB SSI DMA code. This isn't that hard, since the most part of the spi-dw-mid.c driver in fact implements a generic DMA interface for the DW SPI controller driver. The only Intel MID specifics concern getting the max frequency from the MRST Clock Control Unit and fetching the DMA controller channels from corresponding PCIe DMA controller. Since first one is related with the SPI interface configuration we moved it' implementation into the DW PCIe-SPI driver module. After that former spi-dw-mid.c file can be just renamed to be the DW SPI DMA module optionally compiled in to the DW APB SSI core driver. Co-developed-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529131205.31838-11-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29 21:11:59 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_DW_DMA
extern void dw_spi_dma_setup_mfld(struct dw_spi *dws);
extern void dw_spi_dma_setup_generic(struct dw_spi *dws);
spi: dw: Move Non-DMA code to the DW PCIe-SPI driver This is a preparation patch before adding the DW DMA support into the DW SPI MMIO driver. We need to unpin the Non-DMA-specific code from the intended to be generic DW APB SSI DMA code. This isn't that hard, since the most part of the spi-dw-mid.c driver in fact implements a generic DMA interface for the DW SPI controller driver. The only Intel MID specifics concern getting the max frequency from the MRST Clock Control Unit and fetching the DMA controller channels from corresponding PCIe DMA controller. Since first one is related with the SPI interface configuration we moved it' implementation into the DW PCIe-SPI driver module. After that former spi-dw-mid.c file can be just renamed to be the DW SPI DMA module optionally compiled in to the DW APB SSI core driver. Co-developed-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529131205.31838-11-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29 21:11:59 +08:00
#else
static inline void dw_spi_dma_setup_mfld(struct dw_spi *dws) {}
static inline void dw_spi_dma_setup_generic(struct dw_spi *dws) {}
spi: dw: Move Non-DMA code to the DW PCIe-SPI driver This is a preparation patch before adding the DW DMA support into the DW SPI MMIO driver. We need to unpin the Non-DMA-specific code from the intended to be generic DW APB SSI DMA code. This isn't that hard, since the most part of the spi-dw-mid.c driver in fact implements a generic DMA interface for the DW SPI controller driver. The only Intel MID specifics concern getting the max frequency from the MRST Clock Control Unit and fetching the DMA controller channels from corresponding PCIe DMA controller. Since first one is related with the SPI interface configuration we moved it' implementation into the DW PCIe-SPI driver module. After that former spi-dw-mid.c file can be just renamed to be the DW SPI DMA module optionally compiled in to the DW APB SSI core driver. Co-developed-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Co-developed-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@baikalelectronics.ru> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529131205.31838-11-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2020-05-29 21:11:59 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_SPI_DW_DMA */
spi: dw: Put the driver entities naming in order Mostly due to a long driver history it's methods and macro names look a bit messy. In particularly that concerns the code their prefixes. A biggest part of the driver functions and macros have got the dw_spi/DW_SPI prefixes. But there are some entities which have been just "spi_/SPI_"-prefixed. Especially that concerns the CSR and their fields macro definitions. It makes the code harder to comprehend since such methods and macros can be easily confused with the global SPI-subsystem exports. In this case the only possible way to more or less quickly distinguish one naming space from another is either by context or by the argument type, which most of the times isn't that easy anyway. In addition to that a new DW SSI IP-core support has been added in the framework of commit e539f435cb9c ("spi: dw: Add support for DesignWare DWC_ssi"), which introduced a new set or macro-prefixes to describe CTRLR0-specific fields and worsen the situation. Finally there are methods with no DW SPI driver-reference prefix at all, that make the code reading even harder. So in order to ease the driver hacking let's bring the code naming to a common base: 1) Each method is supposed to have "dw_spi_" prefix so to be easily distinguished from the kernel API, e.g. SPI-subsystem methods and macros. (Exception is the local implementation of the readl/writel methods since being just the regspace accessors.) 2) Each generically used macro should have DW_SPI_-prefix thus being easily comprehended as the local driver definition. 3) DW APB SSI and DW SSI specific macros should have prefixes as DW_PSSI_ and DW_HSSI_ respectively so referring to the system buses they support (APB and AHB similarly to the DT clocks naming like pclk, hclk). Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115181917.7521-4-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2021-11-16 02:19:13 +08:00
#endif /* __SPI_DW_H__ */