0
0
mirror of https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git synced 2024-12-27 04:54:41 +08:00
linux/fs/fhandle.c

384 lines
10 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/exportfs.h>
#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include "internal.h"
#include "mount.h"
static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
struct file_handle __user *ufh,
int __user *mnt_id, int fh_flags)
{
long retval;
struct file_handle f_handle;
int handle_dwords, handle_bytes;
struct file_handle *handle = NULL;
/*
* We need to make sure whether the file system support decoding of
* the file handle if decodeable file handle was requested.
*/
if (!exportfs_can_encode_fh(path->dentry->d_sb->s_export_op, fh_flags))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (copy_from_user(&f_handle, ufh, sizeof(struct file_handle)))
return -EFAULT;
if (f_handle.handle_bytes > MAX_HANDLE_SZ)
return -EINVAL;
handle = kzalloc(struct_size(handle, f_handle, f_handle.handle_bytes),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!handle)
return -ENOMEM;
/* convert handle size to multiple of sizeof(u32) */
handle_dwords = f_handle.handle_bytes >> 2;
/* we ask for a non connectable maybe decodeable file handle */
retval = exportfs_encode_fh(path->dentry,
(struct fid *)handle->f_handle,
&handle_dwords, fh_flags);
handle->handle_type = retval;
/* convert handle size to bytes */
handle_bytes = handle_dwords * sizeof(u32);
handle->handle_bytes = handle_bytes;
if ((handle->handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) ||
(retval == FILEID_INVALID) || (retval < 0)) {
/* As per old exportfs_encode_fh documentation
* we could return ENOSPC to indicate overflow
* But file system returned 255 always. So handle
* both the values
*/
if (retval == FILEID_INVALID || retval == -ENOSPC)
retval = -EOVERFLOW;
/*
* set the handle size to zero so we copy only
* non variable part of the file_handle
*/
handle_bytes = 0;
} else
retval = 0;
/* copy the mount id */
if (put_user(real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id, mnt_id) ||
copy_to_user(ufh, handle,
struct_size(handle, f_handle, handle_bytes)))
retval = -EFAULT;
kfree(handle);
return retval;
}
/**
* sys_name_to_handle_at: convert name to handle
* @dfd: directory relative to which name is interpreted if not absolute
* @name: name that should be converted to handle.
* @handle: resulting file handle
* @mnt_id: mount id of the file system containing the file
* @flag: flag value to indicate whether to follow symlink or not
* and whether a decodable file handle is required.
*
* @handle->handle_size indicate the space available to store the
* variable part of the file handle in bytes. If there is not
* enough space, the field is updated to return the minimum
* value required.
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE5(name_to_handle_at, int, dfd, const char __user *, name,
struct file_handle __user *, handle, int __user *, mnt_id,
int, flag)
{
struct path path;
int lookup_flags;
int fh_flags;
int err;
if (flag & ~(AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_HANDLE_FID))
return -EINVAL;
lookup_flags = (flag & AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW) ? LOOKUP_FOLLOW : 0;
fh_flags = (flag & AT_HANDLE_FID) ? EXPORT_FH_FID : 0;
if (flag & AT_EMPTY_PATH)
lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_EMPTY;
err = user_path_at(dfd, name, lookup_flags, &path);
if (!err) {
err = do_sys_name_to_handle(&path, handle, mnt_id, fh_flags);
path_put(&path);
}
return err;
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
static int get_path_from_fd(int fd, struct path *root)
{
if (fd == AT_FDCWD) {
struct fs_struct *fs = current->fs;
spin_lock(&fs->lock);
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
*root = fs->pwd;
path_get(root);
spin_unlock(&fs->lock);
} else {
struct fd f = fdget(fd);
if (!f.file)
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
return -EBADF;
*root = f.file->f_path;
path_get(root);
fdput(f);
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
return 0;
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
enum handle_to_path_flags {
HANDLE_CHECK_PERMS = (1 << 0),
HANDLE_CHECK_SUBTREE = (1 << 1),
};
struct handle_to_path_ctx {
struct path root;
enum handle_to_path_flags flags;
unsigned int fh_flags;
};
static int vfs_dentry_acceptable(void *context, struct dentry *dentry)
{
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
struct handle_to_path_ctx *ctx = context;
struct user_namespace *user_ns = current_user_ns();
struct dentry *d, *root = ctx->root.dentry;
struct mnt_idmap *idmap = mnt_idmap(ctx->root.mnt);
int retval = 0;
if (!root)
return 1;
/* Old permission model with global CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH. */
if (!ctx->flags)
return 1;
/*
* It's racy as we're not taking rename_lock but we're able to ignore
* permissions and we just need an approximation whether we were able
* to follow a path to the file.
*
* It's also potentially expensive on some filesystems especially if
* there is a deep path.
*/
d = dget(dentry);
while (d != root && !IS_ROOT(d)) {
struct dentry *parent = dget_parent(d);
/*
* We know that we have the ability to override DAC permissions
* as we've verified this earlier via CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH. But
* we also need to make sure that there aren't any unmapped
* inodes in the path that would prevent us from reaching the
* file.
*/
if (!privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(user_ns, idmap,
d_inode(parent))) {
dput(d);
dput(parent);
return retval;
}
dput(d);
d = parent;
}
if (!(ctx->flags & HANDLE_CHECK_SUBTREE) || d == root)
retval = 1;
WARN_ON_ONCE(d != root && d != root->d_sb->s_root);
dput(d);
return retval;
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
static int do_handle_to_path(struct file_handle *handle, struct path *path,
struct handle_to_path_ctx *ctx)
{
int handle_dwords;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
struct vfsmount *mnt = ctx->root.mnt;
/* change the handle size to multiple of sizeof(u32) */
handle_dwords = handle->handle_bytes >> 2;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
path->dentry = exportfs_decode_fh_raw(mnt,
(struct fid *)handle->f_handle,
handle_dwords, handle->handle_type,
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
ctx->fh_flags,
vfs_dentry_acceptable, ctx);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(path->dentry)) {
if (path->dentry == ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM))
return -ENOMEM;
return -ESTALE;
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
path->mnt = mntget(mnt);
return 0;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
}
/*
* Allow relaxed permissions of file handles if the caller has the
* ability to mount the filesystem or create a bind-mount of the
* provided @mountdirfd.
*
* In both cases the caller may be able to get an unobstructed way to
* the encoded file handle. If the caller is only able to create a
* bind-mount we need to verify that there are no locked mounts on top
* of it that could prevent us from getting to the encoded file.
*
* In principle, locked mounts can prevent the caller from mounting the
* filesystem but that only applies to procfs and sysfs neither of which
* support decoding file handles.
*/
static inline bool may_decode_fh(struct handle_to_path_ctx *ctx,
unsigned int o_flags)
{
struct path *root = &ctx->root;
/*
* Restrict to O_DIRECTORY to provide a deterministic API that avoids a
* confusing api in the face of disconnected non-dir dentries.
*
* There's only one dentry for each directory inode (VFS rule)...
*/
if (!(o_flags & O_DIRECTORY))
return false;
if (ns_capable(root->mnt->mnt_sb->s_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
ctx->flags = HANDLE_CHECK_PERMS;
else if (is_mounted(root->mnt) &&
ns_capable(real_mount(root->mnt)->mnt_ns->user_ns,
CAP_SYS_ADMIN) &&
!has_locked_children(real_mount(root->mnt), root->dentry))
ctx->flags = HANDLE_CHECK_PERMS | HANDLE_CHECK_SUBTREE;
else
return false;
/* Are we able to override DAC permissions? */
if (!ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH))
return false;
ctx->fh_flags = EXPORT_FH_DIR_ONLY;
return true;
}
static int handle_to_path(int mountdirfd, struct file_handle __user *ufh,
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
struct path *path, unsigned int o_flags)
{
int retval = 0;
struct file_handle f_handle;
struct file_handle *handle = NULL;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
struct handle_to_path_ctx ctx = {};
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
retval = get_path_from_fd(mountdirfd, &ctx.root);
if (retval)
goto out_err;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
if (!capable(CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH) && !may_decode_fh(&ctx, o_flags)) {
retval = -EPERM;
goto out_path;
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
if (copy_from_user(&f_handle, ufh, sizeof(struct file_handle))) {
retval = -EFAULT;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
goto out_path;
}
if ((f_handle.handle_bytes > MAX_HANDLE_SZ) ||
(f_handle.handle_bytes == 0)) {
retval = -EINVAL;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
goto out_path;
}
handle = kmalloc(struct_size(handle, f_handle, f_handle.handle_bytes),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!handle) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
goto out_path;
}
/* copy the full handle */
*handle = f_handle;
if (copy_from_user(&handle->f_handle,
&ufh->f_handle,
f_handle.handle_bytes)) {
retval = -EFAULT;
goto out_handle;
}
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
retval = do_handle_to_path(handle, path, &ctx);
out_handle:
kfree(handle);
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
out_path:
path_put(&ctx.root);
out_err:
return retval;
}
static long do_handle_open(int mountdirfd, struct file_handle __user *ufh,
int open_flag)
{
long retval = 0;
struct path path;
struct file *file;
int fd;
fhandle: relax open_by_handle_at() permission checks A current limitation of open_by_handle_at() is that it's currently not possible to use it from within containers at all because we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH in the initial namespace. That's unfortunate because there are scenarios where using open_by_handle_at() from within containers. Two examples: (1) cgroupfs allows to encode cgroups to file handles and reopen them with open_by_handle_at(). (2) Fanotify allows placing filesystem watches they currently aren't usable in containers because the returned file handles cannot be used. Here's a proposal for relaxing the permission check for open_by_handle_at(). (1) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over the filesystem (1.1) The caller has an unobstructed view of the filesystem. (1.2) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. This doesn't address the problem of opening a file handle when only a portion of a filesystem is exposed as is common in containers by e.g., bind-mounting a subtree. The proposal to solve this use-case is: (2) Opening file handles when the caller has privileges over a subtree (2.1) The caller is able to reach the file from the provided mount fd. (2.2) The caller has permissions to construct an unobstructed path to the file handle. (2.3) The caller has permissions to follow a path to the file handle. The relaxed permission checks are currently restricted to directory file handles which are what both cgroupfs and fanotify need. Handling disconnected non-directory file handles would lead to a potentially non-deterministic api. If a disconnected non-directory file handle is provided we may fail to decode a valid path that we could use for permission checking. That in itself isn't a problem as we would just return EACCES in that case. However, confusion may arise if a non-disconnected dentry ends up in the cache later and those opening the file handle would suddenly succeed. * It's potentially possible to use timing information (side-channel) to infer whether a given inode exists. I don't think that's particularly problematic. Thanks to Jann for bringing this to my attention. * An unrelated note (IOW, these are thoughts that apply to open_by_handle_at() generically and are unrelated to the changes here): Jann pointed out that we should verify whether deleted files could potentially be reopened through open_by_handle_at(). I don't think that's possible though. Another potential thing to check is whether open_by_handle_at() could be abused to open internal stuff like memfds or gpu stuff. I don't think so but I haven't had the time to completely verify this. This dates back to discussions Amir and I had quite some time ago and thanks to him for providing a lot of details around the export code and related patches! Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524-vfs-open_by_handle_at-v1-1-3d4b7d22736b@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-05-24 18:19:39 +08:00
retval = handle_to_path(mountdirfd, ufh, &path, open_flag);
if (retval)
return retval;
fd = get_unused_fd_flags(open_flag);
if (fd < 0) {
path_put(&path);
return fd;
}
file = file_open_root(&path, "", open_flag, 0);
if (IS_ERR(file)) {
put_unused_fd(fd);
retval = PTR_ERR(file);
} else {
retval = fd;
fd_install(fd, file);
}
path_put(&path);
return retval;
}
/**
* sys_open_by_handle_at: Open the file handle
* @mountdirfd: directory file descriptor
* @handle: file handle to be opened
* @flags: open flags.
*
* @mountdirfd indicate the directory file descriptor
* of the mount point. file handle is decoded relative
* to the vfsmount pointed by the @mountdirfd. @flags
* value is same as the open(2) flags.
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(open_by_handle_at, int, mountdirfd,
struct file_handle __user *, handle,
int, flags)
{
long ret;
if (force_o_largefile())
flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
ret = do_handle_open(mountdirfd, handle, flags);
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
/*
* Exactly like fs/open.c:sys_open_by_handle_at(), except that it
* doesn't set the O_LARGEFILE flag.
*/
COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(open_by_handle_at, int, mountdirfd,
struct file_handle __user *, handle, int, flags)
{
return do_handle_open(mountdirfd, handle, flags);
}
#endif