linux/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c

326 lines
7.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* pnpacpi -- PnP ACPI driver
*
* Copyright (c) 2004 Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
* Copyright (c) 2004 Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/pnp.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 16:04:11 +08:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include "../base.h"
#include "pnpacpi.h"
static int num;
/*
* Compatible Device IDs
*/
#define TEST_HEX(c) \
if (!(('0' <= (c) && (c) <= '9') || ('A' <= (c) && (c) <= 'F'))) \
return 0
#define TEST_ALPHA(c) \
if (!('A' <= (c) && (c) <= 'Z')) \
return 0
static int __init ispnpidacpi(const char *id)
{
TEST_ALPHA(id[0]);
TEST_ALPHA(id[1]);
TEST_ALPHA(id[2]);
TEST_HEX(id[3]);
TEST_HEX(id[4]);
TEST_HEX(id[5]);
TEST_HEX(id[6]);
if (id[7] != '\0')
return 0;
return 1;
}
static int pnpacpi_get_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, "get resources\n");
return pnpacpi_parse_allocated_resource(dev);
}
static int pnpacpi_set_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
acpi_handle handle;
int ret = 0;
pnp_dbg(&dev->dev, "set resources\n");
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
if (!acpi_dev) {
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "ACPI device not found in %s!\n", __func__);
return -ENODEV;
}
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(acpi_dev != dev->data))
dev->data = acpi_dev;
handle = acpi_dev->handle;
if (acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__SRS)) {
struct acpi_buffer buffer;
ret = pnpacpi_build_resource_template(dev, &buffer);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = pnpacpi_encode_resources(dev, &buffer);
if (!ret) {
acpi_status status;
status = acpi_set_current_resources(handle, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
ret = -EIO;
}
kfree(buffer.pointer);
}
if (!ret && acpi_device_power_manageable(acpi_dev))
ret = acpi_device_set_power(acpi_dev, ACPI_STATE_D0);
return ret;
}
static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
acpi_status status;
Enable PNPACPI _PSx Support, v3 (This is an update to the patch presented earlier in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/8/284, with new error handling.) This patch sets the power of PnP ACPI devices to D0 when they are activated and to D3 when they are disabled. The latter is in correspondence with the ACPI 3.0 specification, whereas the former is added in order to be able to power up a device after it has been previously disabled (or when booting up a system). (As a consequence, the patch makes the PnP ACPI code more ACPI compliant.) Section 6.2.2 of the ACPI Specification (at least versions 1.0b and 3.0a) states: "Prior to running this control method [_DIS], the OS[PM] will have already put the device in the D3 state." Unfortunately, there is no clear statement as to when to put a device in the D0 state. :-( Therefore, the patch executes the method calls as _PS3/_DIS and _SRS/_PS0. What is clear: "If the device is disabled, _SRS enables the device at the specified resources." (From the ACPI 3.0a Specification.) The patch fixes a problem with some IBM ThinkPads (at least the 600E and the 600X) where the serial ports have a dedicated power source that needs to be brought up before the serial port can be used. Without this patch, the serial port is enabled but has no power. (In the past, the tpctl utility had to be utilized to turn on the power, but support for this feature stopped with version 5.9 as it did not support the more recent kernel versions.) The error handlers that handle any errors that can occur during the power up/power down phases return the error codes to the caller directly. Comments welcome! :-) No regressions were observed on hardware that does not require this patch. The patch is applied against 2.6.27.x. Signed-off-by: Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@gmx.net> Acked-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-03-31 01:31:06 +08:00
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "disable resources\n");
acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
if (!acpi_dev) {
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "ACPI device not found in %s!\n", __func__);
return 0;
}
/* acpi_unregister_gsi(pnp_irq(dev, 0)); */
if (acpi_device_power_manageable(acpi_dev))
acpi_device_set_power(acpi_dev, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
/* continue even if acpi_device_set_power() fails */
status = acpi_evaluate_object(acpi_dev->handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
return -ENODEV;
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
static bool pnpacpi_can_wakeup(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
if (!acpi_dev) {
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "ACPI device not found in %s!\n", __func__);
return false;
}
return acpi_bus_can_wakeup(acpi_dev->handle);
}
static int pnpacpi_suspend(struct pnp_dev *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
int error = 0;
if (!acpi_dev) {
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "ACPI device not found in %s!\n", __func__);
return 0;
}
if (device_can_wakeup(&dev->dev)) {
error = acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup(&dev->dev,
device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev));
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
if (error)
return error;
}
if (acpi_device_power_manageable(acpi_dev)) {
int power_state = acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&dev->dev, NULL,
ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
if (power_state < 0)
power_state = (state.event == PM_EVENT_ON) ?
ACPI_STATE_D0 : ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
/*
* acpi_device_set_power() can fail (keyboard port can't be
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
* powered-down?), and in any case, our return value is ignored
* by pnp_bus_suspend(). Hence we don't revert the wakeup
* setting if the set_power fails.
*/
error = acpi_device_set_power(acpi_dev, power_state);
}
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
return error;
}
static int pnpacpi_resume(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev);
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
int error = 0;
if (!acpi_dev) {
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "ACPI device not found in %s!\n", __func__);
return -ENODEV;
}
if (device_may_wakeup(&dev->dev))
acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup(&dev->dev, false);
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
if (acpi_device_power_manageable(acpi_dev))
error = acpi_device_set_power(acpi_dev, ACPI_STATE_D0);
PNP / ACPI: Use DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() for device ACPI handle access The PNP ACPI driver squirrels the ACPI handles of PNP devices' ACPI companions, but this isn't correct, because those handles should be accessed using the DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() macro operating on struct device objects. Using DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() in the PNP ACPI driver instead of the driver's own copies of the ACPI handles allows us to avoid a problem with docking stations where a machine docked before suspend to RAM and undocked while suspended crashes during the subsequent resume (in that case the ACPI companion of the PNP device in question doesn't exist any more while the device is being resumed). It also allows us to avoid the problem where suspend to RAM fails when the machine was undocked while suspended before (again, the ACPI companion of the PNP device is not present any more while it is being suspended). This change doesn't fix all of the the PNP ACPI driver's problems with PNP devices in docking stations (generally speaking, the driver has no idea that devices can come and go and doesn't even attempt to handle such events), but at least it makes suspend work for the users of docking stations who don't use the PNP devices located in there. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100 Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-11 04:23:16 +08:00
return error;
}
#endif
struct pnp_protocol pnpacpi_protocol = {
.name = "Plug and Play ACPI",
.get = pnpacpi_get_resources,
.set = pnpacpi_set_resources,
.disable = pnpacpi_disable_resources,
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
.can_wakeup = pnpacpi_can_wakeup,
.suspend = pnpacpi_suspend,
.resume = pnpacpi_resume,
#endif
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pnpacpi_protocol);
static const char *__init pnpacpi_get_id(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_hardware_id *id;
list_for_each_entry(id, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
if (ispnpidacpi(id->id))
return id->id;
}
return NULL;
}
static int __init pnpacpi_add_device(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct pnp_dev *dev;
const char *pnpid;
struct acpi_hardware_id *id;
int error;
/* Skip devices that are already bound */
if (device->physical_node_count)
return 0;
/*
* If a PnPacpi device is not present , the device
* driver should not be loaded.
*/
if (!acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_CRS"))
return 0;
pnpid = pnpacpi_get_id(device);
if (!pnpid)
return 0;
ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not handle this in the right way currently. Namely, if an ACPI device object 1. Has a _CRS method, 2. Has an identification of "three capital characters followed by four hex digits", 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list, it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will be create for it). This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI. However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be created for them). As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP device objects for matching devices. That list has been continuously growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to grow even more in the future. To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices as platform devices by default. To this end, change the way of enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI device objects whose device IDs are present in that list. The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers, so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the PNP drivers. Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any technical reasons into platform drivers. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> [rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30 10:23:01 +08:00
if (!device->status.present)
return 0;
dev = pnp_alloc_dev(&pnpacpi_protocol, num, pnpid);
if (!dev)
return -ENOMEM;
ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&dev->dev, device);
dev->data = device;
/* .enabled means the device can decode the resources */
dev->active = device->status.enabled;
if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_SRS"))
dev->capabilities |= PNP_CONFIGURABLE;
dev->capabilities |= PNP_READ;
if (device->flags.dynamic_status && (dev->capabilities & PNP_CONFIGURABLE))
dev->capabilities |= PNP_WRITE;
if (device->flags.removable)
dev->capabilities |= PNP_REMOVABLE;
if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_DIS"))
dev->capabilities |= PNP_DISABLE;
if (strlen(acpi_device_name(device)))
strncpy(dev->name, acpi_device_name(device), sizeof(dev->name));
else
strncpy(dev->name, acpi_device_bid(device), sizeof(dev->name));
if (dev->active)
pnpacpi_parse_allocated_resource(dev);
if (dev->capabilities & PNP_CONFIGURABLE)
pnpacpi_parse_resource_option_data(dev);
list_for_each_entry(id, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
if (!strcmp(id->id, pnpid))
continue;
if (!ispnpidacpi(id->id))
continue;
pnp_add_id(dev, id->id);
}
/* clear out the damaged flags */
if (!dev->active)
pnp_init_resources(dev);
error = pnp_add_device(dev);
if (error) {
put_device(&dev->dev);
return error;
}
num++;
return 0;
}
static acpi_status __init pnpacpi_add_device_handler(acpi_handle handle,
u32 lvl, void *context,
void **rv)
{
struct acpi_device *device = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle);
if (!device)
return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not handle this in the right way currently. Namely, if an ACPI device object 1. Has a _CRS method, 2. Has an identification of "three capital characters followed by four hex digits", 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list, it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will be create for it). This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI. However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be created for them). As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP device objects for matching devices. That list has been continuously growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to grow even more in the future. To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices as platform devices by default. To this end, change the way of enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI device objects whose device IDs are present in that list. The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers, so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the PNP drivers. Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any technical reasons into platform drivers. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> [rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2014-05-30 10:23:01 +08:00
if (acpi_is_pnp_device(device))
pnpacpi_add_device(device);
return AE_OK;
}
int pnpacpi_disabled __initdata;
[PATCH] drivers/pnp/: cleanups This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global code static - #if 0 the following unused global function: - core.c: pnp_remove_device - #if 0 the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - card.c: pnp_add_card - card.c: pnp_remove_card - card.c: pnp_add_card_device - card.c: pnp_remove_card_device - card.c: pnp_add_card_id - core.c: pnp_register_protocol - core.c: pnp_unregister_protocol - core.c: pnp_add_device - core.c: pnp_remove_device - pnpacpi/core.c: pnpacpi_protocol - driver.c: pnp_add_id - isapnp/core.c: isapnp_read_byte - manager.c: pnp_auto_config_dev - resource.c: pnp_register_dependent_option - resource.c: pnp_register_independent_option - resource.c: pnp_register_irq_resource - resource.c: pnp_register_dma_resource - resource.c: pnp_register_port_resource - resource.c: pnp_register_mem_resource Note that this patch #if 0's exactly one functions and removes no functions. Most it does is the #if 0 of EXPORT_SYMBOL's, so if any modular code will use any of them, re-adding will be trivial. Modular ISAPnP might be interesting in some cases, but this is more legacy code. If someone would work on it to sort all the issues out (starting with the point that most users of __ISAPNP__ will have to be fixed) re-enabling the required EXPORT_SYMBOL's won't be hard for him. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-11-07 17:01:48 +08:00
static int __init pnpacpi_init(void)
{
if (acpi_disabled || pnpacpi_disabled) {
printk(KERN_INFO "pnp: PnP ACPI: disabled\n");
return 0;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "pnp: PnP ACPI init\n");
pnp_register_protocol(&pnpacpi_protocol);
acpi_get_devices(NULL, pnpacpi_add_device_handler, NULL, NULL);
printk(KERN_INFO "pnp: PnP ACPI: found %d devices\n", num);
PNP: notice whether we have PNP devices (PNPBIOS or PNPACPI) This series converts i386 and x86_64 legacy serial ports to be platform devices and prevents probing for them if we have PNP. This prevents double discovery, where a device was found both by the legacy probe and by 8250_pnp. This also prevents the serial driver from claiming IRDA devices (unless they have a UART PNP ID). The serial legacy probe sometimes assumed the wrong IRQ, so the user had to use "setserial" to fix it. Removing the need for setserial to make IRDA devices work seems good, but it does break some things. In particular, you may need to keep setserial from poking legacy UART stuff back in by doing something like "dpkg-reconfigure setserial" with the "kernel" option. Otherwise, the setserial-discovered "UART" will claim resources and prevent the IRDA driver from loading. This patch: If we can discover devices using PNP, we can skip some legacy probes. This flag ("pnp_platform_devices") indicates that PNPBIOS or PNPACPI is enabled and should tell us about builtin devices. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com> Cc: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr> Cc: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Ville Syrjala <syrjala@sci.fi> Cc: Russell King <rmk+serial@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-08 15:35:54 +08:00
pnp_platform_devices = 1;
return 0;
}
fs_initcall(pnpacpi_init);
static int __init pnpacpi_setup(char *str)
{
if (str == NULL)
return 1;
if (!strncmp(str, "off", 3))
pnpacpi_disabled = 1;
return 1;
}
__setup("pnpacpi=", pnpacpi_setup);