korg/linux
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn/git/linux.git synced 2025-01-25 15:24:17 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
9ac26e9973
linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c

31 lines
516 B
C
Raw Normal View History

selftests: bpf: add selftest for __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Simple test that sets cb to {1,2,3,4,5} and priority to 6, runs bpf program that fails if cb is not what we expect and increments cb[i] and priority. When the test finishes, we check that cb is now {2,3,4,5,6} and priority is 7. We also test the sanity checks: * ctx_in is provided, but ctx_size_in is zero (same for ctx_out/ctx_size_out) * unexpected non-zero fields in __sk_buff return EINVAL Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:11 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/bpf.h>
selftests: Use consistent include paths for libbpf Fix all selftests to include libbpf header files with the bpf/ prefix, to be consistent with external users of the library. Also ensure that all includes of exported libbpf header files (those that are exported on 'make install' of the library) use bracketed includes instead of quoted. To not break the build, keep the old include path until everything has been changed to the new one; a subsequent patch will remove that. Fixes: 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are taken from selftests dir") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560568.1683545.9649335788846513446.stgit@toke.dk
2020-01-20 21:06:45 +08:00
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
selftests: bpf: add selftest for __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Simple test that sets cb to {1,2,3,4,5} and priority to 6, runs bpf program that fails if cb is not what we expect and increments cb[i] and priority. When the test finishes, we check that cb is now {2,3,4,5,6} and priority is 7. We also test the sanity checks: * ctx_in is provided, but ctx_size_in is zero (same for ctx_out/ctx_size_out) * unexpected non-zero fields in __sk_buff return EINVAL Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:11 +08:00
int _version SEC("version") = 1;
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
SEC("skb_ctx")
int process(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
#pragma clang loop unroll(full)
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
if (skb->cb[i] != i + 1)
return 1;
skb->cb[i]++;
}
skb->priority++;
selftests: bpf: Add selftest for __sk_buff tstamp Make sure BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN accepts tstamp and exports any modifications that BPF program does. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191015183125.124413-2-sdf@google.com
2019-10-16 02:31:25 +08:00
skb->tstamp++;
bpf: Allow to change skb mark in test_run allow to pass skb's mark field into bpf_prog_test_run ctx for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS prog type. that would allow to test bpf programs which are doing decision based on this field Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@tehnerd.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-12-19 04:57:47 +08:00
skb->mark++;
selftests: bpf: add selftest for __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Simple test that sets cb to {1,2,3,4,5} and priority to 6, runs bpf program that fails if cb is not what we expect and increments cb[i] and priority. When the test finishes, we check that cb is now {2,3,4,5,6} and priority is 7. We also test the sanity checks: * ctx_in is provided, but ctx_size_in is zero (same for ctx_out/ctx_size_out) * unexpected non-zero fields in __sk_buff return EINVAL Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:11 +08:00
selftests/bpf: Test wire_len/gso_segs in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Make sure we can pass arbitrary data in wire_len/gso_segs. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191213223028.161282-2-sdf@google.com
2019-12-14 06:30:28 +08:00
if (skb->wire_len != 100)
return 1;
if (skb->gso_segs != 8)
return 1;
selftests/bpf: Test new __sk_buff field gso_size Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59 ("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field"). Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200303200503.226217-4-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
2020-03-04 04:05:03 +08:00
if (skb->gso_size != 10)
return 1;
selftests/bpf: Test wire_len/gso_segs in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Make sure we can pass arbitrary data in wire_len/gso_segs. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191213223028.161282-2-sdf@google.com
2019-12-14 06:30:28 +08:00
selftests: bpf: add selftest for __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN Simple test that sets cb to {1,2,3,4,5} and priority to 6, runs bpf program that fails if cb is not what we expect and increments cb[i] and priority. When the test finishes, we check that cb is now {2,3,4,5,6} and priority is 7. We also test the sanity checks: * ctx_in is provided, but ctx_size_in is zero (same for ctx_out/ctx_size_out) * unexpected non-zero fields in __sk_buff return EINVAL Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-10 02:49:11 +08:00
return 0;
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink