2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
==================================================
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Runtime Power Management Framework for I/O Devices
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
==================================================
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
PM: Make system-wide PM and runtime PM treat subsystems consistently
The code handling system-wide power transitions (eg. suspend-to-RAM)
can in theory execute callbacks provided by the device's bus type,
device type and class in each phase of the power transition. In
turn, the runtime PM core code only calls one of those callbacks at
a time, preferring bus type callbacks to device type or class
callbacks and device type callbacks to class callbacks.
It seems reasonable to make them both behave in the same way in that
respect. Moreover, even though a device may belong to two subsystems
(eg. bus type and device class) simultaneously, in practice power
management callbacks for system-wide power transitions are always
provided by only one of them (ie. if the bus type callbacks are
defined, the device class ones are not and vice versa). Thus it is
possible to modify the code handling system-wide power transitions
so that it follows the core runtime PM code (ie. treats the
subsystem callbacks as mutually exclusive).
On the other hand, the core runtime PM code will choose to execute,
for example, a runtime suspend callback provided by the device type
even if the bus type's struct dev_pm_ops object exists, but the
runtime_suspend pointer in it happens to be NULL. This is confusing,
because it may lead to the execution of callbacks from different
subsystems during different operations (eg. the bus type suspend
callback may be executed during runtime suspend of the device, while
the device type callback will be executed during system suspend).
Make all of the power management code treat subsystem callbacks in
a consistent way, such that:
(1) If the device's type is defined (eg. dev->type is not NULL)
and its pm pointer is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->type->pm
will be used.
(2) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL, but the device's
class is defined (eg. dev->class is not NULL) and its pm pointer
is not NULL, the callbacks from dev->class->pm will be used.
(3) If dev->type is NULL or dev->type->pm is NULL and dev->class is
NULL or dev->class->pm is NULL, the callbacks from dev->bus->pm
will be used provided that both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are
not NULL.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Reasoning-sounds-sane-to: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-02-19 06:20:21 +08:00
|
|
|
(C) 2009-2011 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, Novell Inc.
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
(C) 2010 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-16 08:47:37 +08:00
|
|
|
(C) 2014 Intel Corp., Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
===============
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Support for runtime power management (runtime PM) of I/O devices is provided
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
at the power management core (PM core) level by means of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The power management workqueue pm_wq in which bus types and device drivers can
|
|
|
|
put their PM-related work items. It is strongly recommended that pm_wq be
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
used for queuing all work items related to runtime PM, because this allows
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
them to be synchronized with system-wide power transitions (suspend to RAM,
|
|
|
|
hibernation and resume from system sleep states). pm_wq is declared in
|
|
|
|
include/linux/pm_runtime.h and defined in kernel/power/main.c.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* A number of runtime PM fields in the 'power' member of 'struct device' (which
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
is of the type 'struct dev_pm_info', defined in include/linux/pm.h) that can
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
be used for synchronizing runtime PM operations with one another.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* Three device runtime PM callbacks in 'struct dev_pm_ops' (defined in
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
include/linux/pm.h).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* A set of helper functions defined in drivers/base/power/runtime.c that can be
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
used for carrying out runtime PM operations in such a way that the
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
synchronization between them is taken care of by the PM core. Bus types and
|
|
|
|
device drivers are encouraged to use these functions.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
The runtime PM callbacks present in 'struct dev_pm_ops', the device runtime PM
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
fields of 'struct dev_pm_info' and the core helper functions provided for
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
runtime PM are described below.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
2. Device Runtime PM Callbacks
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
==============================
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
There are three device runtime PM callbacks defined in 'struct dev_pm_ops'::
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct dev_pm_ops {
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
int (*runtime_suspend)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*runtime_resume)(struct device *dev);
|
2009-12-04 04:04:08 +08:00
|
|
|
int (*runtime_idle)(struct device *dev);
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
...
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-10-09 11:40:25 +08:00
|
|
|
The ->runtime_suspend(), ->runtime_resume() and ->runtime_idle() callbacks
|
2011-11-24 04:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
are executed by the PM core for the device's subsystem that may be either of
|
|
|
|
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. PM domain of the device, if the device's PM domain object, dev->pm_domain,
|
|
|
|
is present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Device type of the device, if both dev->type and dev->type->pm are present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Device class of the device, if both dev->class and dev->class->pm are
|
|
|
|
present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Bus type of the device, if both dev->bus and dev->bus->pm are present.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
If the subsystem chosen by applying the above rules doesn't provide the relevant
|
|
|
|
callback, the PM core will invoke the corresponding driver callback stored in
|
|
|
|
dev->driver->pm directly (if present).
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-24 04:18:39 +08:00
|
|
|
The PM core always checks which callback to use in the order given above, so the
|
|
|
|
priority order of callbacks from high to low is: PM domain, device type, class
|
|
|
|
and bus type. Moreover, the high-priority one will always take precedence over
|
|
|
|
a low-priority one. The PM domain, bus type, device type and class callbacks
|
|
|
|
are referred to as subsystem-level callbacks in what follows.
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
By default, the callbacks are always invoked in process context with interrupts
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
enabled. However, the pm_runtime_irq_safe() helper function can be used to tell
|
|
|
|
the PM core that it is safe to run the ->runtime_suspend(), ->runtime_resume()
|
|
|
|
and ->runtime_idle() callbacks for the given device in atomic context with
|
|
|
|
interrupts disabled. This implies that the callback routines in question must
|
|
|
|
not block or sleep, but it also means that the synchronous helper functions
|
|
|
|
listed at the end of Section 4 may be used for that device within an interrupt
|
|
|
|
handler or generally in an atomic context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The subsystem-level suspend callback, if present, is _entirely_ _responsible_
|
|
|
|
for handling the suspend of the device as appropriate, which may, but need not
|
|
|
|
include executing the device driver's own ->runtime_suspend() callback (from the
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
PM core's point of view it is not necessary to implement a ->runtime_suspend()
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
callback in a device driver as long as the subsystem-level suspend callback
|
|
|
|
knows what to do to handle the device).
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* Once the subsystem-level suspend callback (or the driver suspend callback,
|
|
|
|
if invoked directly) has completed successfully for the given device, the PM
|
|
|
|
core regards the device as suspended, which need not mean that it has been
|
|
|
|
put into a low power state. It is supposed to mean, however, that the
|
|
|
|
device will not process data and will not communicate with the CPU(s) and
|
|
|
|
RAM until the appropriate resume callback is executed for it. The runtime
|
|
|
|
PM status of a device after successful execution of the suspend callback is
|
|
|
|
'suspended'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If the suspend callback returns -EBUSY or -EAGAIN, the device's runtime PM
|
|
|
|
status remains 'active', which means that the device _must_ be fully
|
|
|
|
operational afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If the suspend callback returns an error code different from -EBUSY and
|
|
|
|
-EAGAIN, the PM core regards this as a fatal error and will refuse to run
|
|
|
|
the helper functions described in Section 4 for the device until its status
|
2017-02-22 04:41:53 +08:00
|
|
|
is directly set to either 'active', or 'suspended' (the PM core provides
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
special helper functions for this purpose).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In particular, if the driver requires remote wakeup capability (i.e. hardware
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
mechanism allowing the device to request a change of its power state, such as
|
2017-06-24 07:58:53 +08:00
|
|
|
PCI PME) for proper functioning and device_can_wakeup() returns 'false' for the
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
device, then ->runtime_suspend() should return -EBUSY. On the other hand, if
|
2017-06-24 07:58:53 +08:00
|
|
|
device_can_wakeup() returns 'true' for the device and the device is put into a
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
low-power state during the execution of the suspend callback, it is expected
|
|
|
|
that remote wakeup will be enabled for the device. Generally, remote wakeup
|
|
|
|
should be enabled for all input devices put into low-power states at run time.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
The subsystem-level resume callback, if present, is **entirely responsible** for
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
handling the resume of the device as appropriate, which may, but need not
|
|
|
|
include executing the device driver's own ->runtime_resume() callback (from the
|
|
|
|
PM core's point of view it is not necessary to implement a ->runtime_resume()
|
|
|
|
callback in a device driver as long as the subsystem-level resume callback knows
|
|
|
|
what to do to handle the device).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Once the subsystem-level resume callback (or the driver resume callback, if
|
|
|
|
invoked directly) has completed successfully, the PM core regards the device
|
|
|
|
as fully operational, which means that the device _must_ be able to complete
|
|
|
|
I/O operations as needed. The runtime PM status of the device is then
|
|
|
|
'active'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If the resume callback returns an error code, the PM core regards this as a
|
|
|
|
fatal error and will refuse to run the helper functions described in Section
|
|
|
|
4 for the device, until its status is directly set to either 'active', or
|
|
|
|
'suspended' (by means of special helper functions provided by the PM core
|
|
|
|
for this purpose).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idle callback (a subsystem-level one, if present, or the driver one) is
|
|
|
|
executed by the PM core whenever the device appears to be idle, which is
|
|
|
|
indicated to the PM core by two counters, the device's usage counter and the
|
|
|
|
counter of 'active' children of the device.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If any of these counters is decreased using a helper function provided by
|
|
|
|
the PM core and it turns out to be equal to zero, the other counter is
|
|
|
|
checked. If that counter also is equal to zero, the PM core executes the
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
idle callback with the device as its argument.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
The action performed by the idle callback is totally dependent on the subsystem
|
|
|
|
(or driver) in question, but the expected and recommended action is to check
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if the device can be suspended (i.e. if all of the conditions necessary for
|
|
|
|
suspending the device are satisfied) and to queue up a suspend request for the
|
2013-06-04 03:49:59 +08:00
|
|
|
device in that case. If there is no idle callback, or if the callback returns
|
2013-10-16 04:25:08 +08:00
|
|
|
0, then the PM core will attempt to carry out a runtime suspend of the device,
|
|
|
|
also respecting devices configured for autosuspend. In essence this means a
|
2024-01-30 19:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
call to __pm_runtime_autosuspend() (do note that drivers needs to update the
|
2013-10-16 04:25:08 +08:00
|
|
|
device last busy mark, pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(), to control the delay under
|
|
|
|
this circumstance). To prevent this (for example, if the callback routine has
|
|
|
|
started a delayed suspend), the routine must return a non-zero value. Negative
|
|
|
|
error return codes are ignored by the PM core.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The helper functions provided by the PM core, described in Section 4, guarantee
|
2011-12-18 07:34:13 +08:00
|
|
|
that the following constraints are met with respect to runtime PM callbacks for
|
|
|
|
one device:
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The callbacks are mutually exclusive (e.g. it is forbidden to execute
|
|
|
|
->runtime_suspend() in parallel with ->runtime_resume() or with another
|
|
|
|
instance of ->runtime_suspend() for the same device) with the exception that
|
|
|
|
->runtime_suspend() or ->runtime_resume() can be executed in parallel with
|
|
|
|
->runtime_idle() (although ->runtime_idle() will not be started while any
|
|
|
|
of the other callbacks is being executed for the same device).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) ->runtime_idle() and ->runtime_suspend() can only be executed for 'active'
|
|
|
|
devices (i.e. the PM core will only execute ->runtime_idle() or
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
->runtime_suspend() for the devices the runtime PM status of which is
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
'active').
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) ->runtime_idle() and ->runtime_suspend() can only be executed for a device
|
|
|
|
the usage counter of which is equal to zero _and_ either the counter of
|
|
|
|
'active' children of which is equal to zero, or the 'power.ignore_children'
|
|
|
|
flag of which is set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) ->runtime_resume() can only be executed for 'suspended' devices (i.e. the
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
PM core will only execute ->runtime_resume() for the devices the runtime
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
PM status of which is 'suspended').
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, the helper functions provided by the PM core obey the following
|
|
|
|
rules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If ->runtime_suspend() is about to be executed or there's a pending request
|
|
|
|
to execute it, ->runtime_idle() will not be executed for the same device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* A request to execute or to schedule the execution of ->runtime_suspend()
|
|
|
|
will cancel any pending requests to execute ->runtime_idle() for the same
|
|
|
|
device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If ->runtime_resume() is about to be executed or there's a pending request
|
|
|
|
to execute it, the other callbacks will not be executed for the same device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* A request to execute ->runtime_resume() will cancel any pending or
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
scheduled requests to execute the other callbacks for the same device,
|
|
|
|
except for scheduled autosuspends.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
3. Runtime PM Device Fields
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
===========================
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
The following device runtime PM fields are present in 'struct dev_pm_info', as
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
defined in include/linux/pm.h:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`struct timer_list suspend_timer;`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- timer used for scheduling (delayed) suspend and autosuspend requests
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned long timer_expires;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- timer expiration time, in jiffies (if this is different from zero, the
|
|
|
|
timer is running and will expire at that time, otherwise the timer is not
|
|
|
|
running)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`struct work_struct work;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- work structure used for queuing up requests (i.e. work items in pm_wq)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`wait_queue_head_t wait_queue;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- wait queue used if any of the helper functions needs to wait for another
|
|
|
|
one to complete
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`spinlock_t lock;`
|
2017-02-22 04:41:53 +08:00
|
|
|
- lock used for synchronization
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`atomic_t usage_count;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- the usage counter of the device
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`atomic_t child_count;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- the count of 'active' children of the device
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int ignore_children;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- if set, the value of child_count is ignored (but still updated)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int disable_depth;`
|
2014-11-08 16:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
- used for disabling the helper functions (they work normally if this is
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
equal to zero); the initial value of it is 1 (i.e. runtime PM is
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
initially disabled for all devices)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int runtime_error;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- if set, there was a fatal error (one of the callbacks returned error code
|
2014-11-08 16:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
as described in Section 2), so the helper functions will not work until
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
this flag is cleared; this is the error code returned by the failing
|
|
|
|
callback
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int idle_notification;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- if set, ->runtime_idle() is being executed
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int request_pending;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- if set, there's a pending request (i.e. a work item queued up into pm_wq)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`enum rpm_request request;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- type of request that's pending (valid if request_pending is set)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int deferred_resume;`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- set if ->runtime_resume() is about to be run while ->runtime_suspend() is
|
|
|
|
being executed for that device and it is not practical to wait for the
|
|
|
|
suspend to complete; means "start a resume as soon as you've suspended"
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`enum rpm_status runtime_status;`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- the runtime PM status of the device; this field's initial value is
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
RPM_SUSPENDED, which means that each device is initially regarded by the
|
|
|
|
PM core as 'suspended', regardless of its real hardware status
|
|
|
|
|
PM: runtime: Capture device status before disabling runtime PM
In some cases (for example, during system-wide suspend and resume of
devices) it is useful to know whether or not runtime PM has ever been
enabled for a given device and, if so, what the runtime PM status of
it had been right before runtime PM was disabled for it last time.
For this reason, introduce a new struct dev_pm_info field called
last_status that will be used for capturing the runtime PM status of
the device when its power.disable_depth counter changes from 0 to 1.
The new field will be set to RPM_INVALID to start with and whenever
power.disable_depth changes from 1 to 0, so it will be valid only
when runtime PM of the device is currently disabled, but it has been
enabled at least once.
Immediately use power.last_status in rpm_resume() to make it handle
the case when PM runtime is disabled for the device, but its runtime
PM status is RPM_ACTIVE more consistently. Namely, make it return 1
if power.last_status is also equal to RPM_ACTIVE in that case (the
idea being that if the status was RPM_ACTIVE last time when
power.disable_depth was changing from 0 to 1 and it is still
RPM_ACTIVE, it can be assumed to reflect what happened to the device
last time when it was using runtime PM) and -EACCES otherwise.
Update the documentation to provide a description of last_status and
change the description of pm_runtime_resume() in it to reflect the
new behavior of rpm_active().
While at it, rearrange the code in pm_runtime_enable() to be more
straightforward and replace the WARN() macro in it with a pr_warn()
invocation which is less disruptive.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20211026222626.39222-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org/t/#u
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-12-08 02:54:32 +08:00
|
|
|
`enum rpm_status last_status;`
|
|
|
|
- the last runtime PM status of the device captured before disabling runtime
|
|
|
|
PM for it (invalid initially and when disable_depth is 0)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int runtime_auto;`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- if set, indicates that the user space has allowed the device driver to
|
|
|
|
power manage the device at run time via the /sys/devices/.../power/control
|
2019-11-19 22:09:23 +08:00
|
|
|
`interface;` it may only be modified with the help of the
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_allow() and pm_runtime_forbid() helper functions
|
2010-03-07 04:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int no_callbacks;`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- indicates that the device does not use the runtime PM callbacks (see
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
Section 8); it may be modified only by the pm_runtime_no_callbacks()
|
|
|
|
helper function
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int irq_safe;`
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
- indicates that the ->runtime_suspend() and ->runtime_resume() callbacks
|
|
|
|
will be invoked with the spinlock held and interrupts disabled
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int use_autosuspend;`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- indicates that the device's driver supports delayed autosuspend (see
|
|
|
|
Section 9); it may be modified only by the
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime{_dont}_use_autosuspend() helper functions
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned int timer_autosuspends;`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- indicates that the PM core should attempt to carry out an autosuspend
|
|
|
|
when the timer expires rather than a normal suspend
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int autosuspend_delay;`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- the delay time (in milliseconds) to be used for autosuspend
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned long last_busy;`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- the time (in jiffies) when the pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() helper
|
|
|
|
function was last called for this device; used in calculating inactivity
|
|
|
|
periods for autosuspend
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
All of the above fields are members of the 'power' member of 'struct device'.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
4. Runtime PM Device Helper Functions
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
=====================================
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
The following runtime PM helper functions are defined in
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
drivers/base/power/runtime.c and include/linux/pm_runtime.h:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_init(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- initialize the device runtime PM fields in 'struct dev_pm_info'
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_remove(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- make sure that the runtime PM of the device will be disabled after
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
removing the device from device hierarchy
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev);`
|
2013-06-04 03:49:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- execute the subsystem-level idle callback for the device; returns an
|
|
|
|
error code on failure, where -EINPROGRESS means that ->runtime_idle() is
|
|
|
|
already being executed; if there is no callback or the callback returns 0
|
2013-10-16 04:25:08 +08:00
|
|
|
then run pm_runtime_autosuspend(dev) and return its result
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- execute the subsystem-level suspend callback for the device; returns 0 on
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
success, 1 if the device's runtime PM status was already 'suspended', or
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
error code on failure, where -EAGAIN or -EBUSY means it is safe to attempt
|
2011-07-02 04:29:15 +08:00
|
|
|
to suspend the device again in future and -EACCES means that
|
|
|
|
'power.disable_depth' is different from 0
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- same as pm_runtime_suspend() except that the autosuspend delay is taken
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`into account;` if pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration() says the delay has
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
not yet expired then an autosuspend is scheduled for the appropriate time
|
|
|
|
and 0 is returned
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-01-18 05:22:28 +08:00
|
|
|
- execute the subsystem-level resume callback for the device; returns 0 on
|
PM: runtime: Capture device status before disabling runtime PM
In some cases (for example, during system-wide suspend and resume of
devices) it is useful to know whether or not runtime PM has ever been
enabled for a given device and, if so, what the runtime PM status of
it had been right before runtime PM was disabled for it last time.
For this reason, introduce a new struct dev_pm_info field called
last_status that will be used for capturing the runtime PM status of
the device when its power.disable_depth counter changes from 0 to 1.
The new field will be set to RPM_INVALID to start with and whenever
power.disable_depth changes from 1 to 0, so it will be valid only
when runtime PM of the device is currently disabled, but it has been
enabled at least once.
Immediately use power.last_status in rpm_resume() to make it handle
the case when PM runtime is disabled for the device, but its runtime
PM status is RPM_ACTIVE more consistently. Namely, make it return 1
if power.last_status is also equal to RPM_ACTIVE in that case (the
idea being that if the status was RPM_ACTIVE last time when
power.disable_depth was changing from 0 to 1 and it is still
RPM_ACTIVE, it can be assumed to reflect what happened to the device
last time when it was using runtime PM) and -EACCES otherwise.
Update the documentation to provide a description of last_status and
change the description of pm_runtime_resume() in it to reflect the
new behavior of rpm_active().
While at it, rearrange the code in pm_runtime_enable() to be more
straightforward and replace the WARN() macro in it with a pr_warn()
invocation which is less disruptive.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20211026222626.39222-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org/t/#u
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-12-08 02:54:32 +08:00
|
|
|
success, 1 if the device's runtime PM status is already 'active' (also if
|
|
|
|
'power.disable_depth' is nonzero, but the status was 'active' when it was
|
|
|
|
changing from 0 to 1) or error code on failure, where -EAGAIN means it may
|
|
|
|
be safe to attempt to resume the device again in future, but
|
|
|
|
'power.runtime_error' should be checked additionally, and -EACCES means
|
|
|
|
that the callback could not be run, because 'power.disable_depth' was
|
2011-07-02 04:29:15 +08:00
|
|
|
different from 0
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 23:22:09 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_resume_and_get(struct device *dev);`
|
|
|
|
- run pm_runtime_resume(dev) and if successful, increment the device's
|
|
|
|
usage counter; return the result of pm_runtime_resume
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_request_idle(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- submit a request to execute the subsystem-level idle callback for the
|
|
|
|
device (the request is represented by a work item in pm_wq); returns 0 on
|
|
|
|
success or error code if the request has not been queued up
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_request_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- schedule the execution of the subsystem-level suspend callback for the
|
|
|
|
device when the autosuspend delay has expired; if the delay has already
|
|
|
|
expired then the work item is queued up immediately
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_schedule_suspend(struct device *dev, unsigned int delay);`
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- schedule the execution of the subsystem-level suspend callback for the
|
|
|
|
device in future, where 'delay' is the time to wait before queuing up a
|
|
|
|
suspend work item in pm_wq, in milliseconds (if 'delay' is zero, the work
|
|
|
|
item is queued up immediately); returns 0 on success, 1 if the device's PM
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
runtime status was already 'suspended', or error code if the request
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
hasn't been scheduled (or queued up if 'delay' is 0); if the execution of
|
|
|
|
->runtime_suspend() is already scheduled and not yet expired, the new
|
|
|
|
value of 'delay' will be used as the time to wait
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_request_resume(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-12-23 03:43:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- submit a request to execute the subsystem-level resume callback for the
|
|
|
|
device (the request is represented by a work item in pm_wq); returns 0 on
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
success, 1 if the device's runtime PM status was already 'active', or
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
error code if the request hasn't been queued up
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- increment the device's usage counter
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_get(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- increment the device's usage counter, run pm_request_resume(dev) and
|
|
|
|
return its result
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_get_sync(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- increment the device's usage counter, run pm_runtime_resume(dev) and
|
2021-05-27 00:22:51 +08:00
|
|
|
return its result;
|
|
|
|
note that it does not drop the device's usage counter on errors, so
|
|
|
|
consider using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of it, especially
|
|
|
|
if its return value is checked by the caller, as this is likely to
|
|
|
|
result in cleaner code.
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct device *dev);`
|
2015-12-17 09:54:26 +08:00
|
|
|
- return -EINVAL if 'power.disable_depth' is nonzero; otherwise, if the
|
|
|
|
runtime PM status is RPM_ACTIVE and the runtime PM usage counter is
|
|
|
|
nonzero, increment the counter and return 1; otherwise return 0 without
|
|
|
|
changing the counter
|
|
|
|
|
2024-01-30 19:28:05 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_get_if_active(struct device *dev);`
|
2020-02-25 17:31:02 +08:00
|
|
|
- return -EINVAL if 'power.disable_depth' is nonzero; otherwise, if the
|
2024-01-30 19:28:05 +08:00
|
|
|
runtime PM status is RPM_ACTIVE, increment the counter and
|
2020-02-25 17:31:02 +08:00
|
|
|
return 1; otherwise return 0 without changing the counter
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_put_noidle(struct device *dev);`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's usage counter
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_put(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's usage counter; if the result is 0 then run
|
|
|
|
pm_request_idle(dev) and return its result
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2024-01-30 19:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- does the same as __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() for now, but in the
|
|
|
|
future, will also call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() as well, DO NOT USE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`int __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's usage counter; if the result is 0 then run
|
|
|
|
pm_request_autosuspend(dev) and return its result
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_put_sync(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's usage counter; if the result is 0 then run
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_idle(dev) and return its result
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's usage counter; if the result is 0 then run
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_suspend(dev) and return its result
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's usage counter; if the result is 0 then run
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_autosuspend(dev) and return its result
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_enable(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:06 +08:00
|
|
|
- decrement the device's 'power.disable_depth' field; if that field is equal
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
to zero, the runtime PM helper functions can execute subsystem-level
|
2011-07-06 16:52:06 +08:00
|
|
|
callbacks described in Section 2 for the device
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:06 +08:00
|
|
|
- increment the device's 'power.disable_depth' field (if the value of that
|
|
|
|
field was previously zero, this prevents subsystem-level runtime PM
|
2014-03-25 04:31:28 +08:00
|
|
|
callbacks from being run for the device), make sure that all of the
|
|
|
|
pending runtime PM operations on the device are either completed or
|
|
|
|
canceled; returns 1 if there was a resume request pending and it was
|
|
|
|
necessary to execute the subsystem-level resume callback for the device
|
|
|
|
to satisfy that request, otherwise 0 is returned
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_barrier(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:06 +08:00
|
|
|
- check if there's a resume request pending for the device and resume it
|
|
|
|
(synchronously) in that case, cancel any other pending runtime PM requests
|
|
|
|
regarding it and wait for all runtime PM operations on it in progress to
|
|
|
|
complete; returns 1 if there was a resume request pending and it was
|
|
|
|
necessary to execute the subsystem-level resume callback for the device to
|
|
|
|
satisfy that request, otherwise 0 is returned
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_suspend_ignore_children(struct device *dev, bool enable);`
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- set/unset the power.ignore_children flag of the device
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_runtime_set_active(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- clear the device's 'power.runtime_error' flag, set the device's runtime
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
PM status to 'active' and update its parent's counter of 'active'
|
|
|
|
children as appropriate (it is only valid to use this function if
|
|
|
|
'power.runtime_error' is set or 'power.disable_depth' is greater than
|
|
|
|
zero); it will fail and return error code if the device has a parent
|
|
|
|
which is not active and the 'power.ignore_children' flag of which is unset
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_set_suspended(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- clear the device's 'power.runtime_error' flag, set the device's runtime
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
PM status to 'suspended' and update its parent's counter of 'active'
|
|
|
|
children as appropriate (it is only valid to use this function if
|
|
|
|
'power.runtime_error' is set or 'power.disable_depth' is greater than
|
2017-11-17 05:51:22 +08:00
|
|
|
zero)
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`bool pm_runtime_active(struct device *dev);`
|
2013-01-24 04:49:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- return true if the device's runtime PM status is 'active' or its
|
|
|
|
'power.disable_depth' field is not equal to zero, or false otherwise
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`bool pm_runtime_suspended(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-12-17 00:11:58 +08:00
|
|
|
- return true if the device's runtime PM status is 'suspended' and its
|
|
|
|
'power.disable_depth' field is equal to zero, or false otherwise
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`bool pm_runtime_status_suspended(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-12 17:17:09 +08:00
|
|
|
- return true if the device's runtime PM status is 'suspended'
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_allow(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- set the power.runtime_auto flag for the device and decrease its usage
|
|
|
|
counter (used by the /sys/devices/.../power/control interface to
|
|
|
|
effectively allow the device to be power managed at run time)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_forbid(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
- unset the power.runtime_auto flag for the device and increase its usage
|
|
|
|
counter (used by the /sys/devices/.../power/control interface to
|
|
|
|
effectively prevent the device from being power managed at run time)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_no_callbacks(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
- set the power.no_callbacks flag for the device and remove the runtime
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
PM attributes from /sys/devices/.../power (or prevent them from being
|
|
|
|
added when the device is registered)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_irq_safe(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
- set the power.irq_safe flag for the device, causing the runtime-PM
|
2011-08-25 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
callbacks to be invoked with interrupts off
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`bool pm_runtime_is_irq_safe(struct device *dev);`
|
2014-11-14 16:47:25 +08:00
|
|
|
- return true if power.irq_safe flag was set for the device, causing
|
|
|
|
the runtime-PM callbacks to be invoked with interrupts off
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- set the power.last_busy field to the current time
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2017-04-10 19:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
- set the power.use_autosuspend flag, enabling autosuspend delays; call
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_get_sync if the flag was previously cleared and
|
|
|
|
power.autosuspend_delay is negative
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2017-04-10 19:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
- clear the power.use_autosuspend flag, disabling autosuspend delays;
|
|
|
|
decrement the device's usage counter if the flag was previously set and
|
|
|
|
power.autosuspend_delay is negative; call pm_runtime_idle
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`void pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(struct device *dev, int delay);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- set the power.autosuspend_delay value to 'delay' (expressed in
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
milliseconds); if 'delay' is negative then runtime suspends are
|
2017-04-10 19:38:25 +08:00
|
|
|
prevented; if power.use_autosuspend is set, pm_runtime_get_sync may be
|
|
|
|
called or the device's usage counter may be decremented and
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_idle called depending on if power.autosuspend_delay is
|
|
|
|
changed to or from a negative value; if power.use_autosuspend is clear,
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_idle is called
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`unsigned long pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
- calculate the time when the current autosuspend delay period will expire,
|
|
|
|
based on power.last_busy and power.autosuspend_delay; if the delay time
|
|
|
|
is 1000 ms or larger then the expiration time is rounded up to the
|
|
|
|
nearest second; returns 0 if the delay period has already expired or
|
|
|
|
power.use_autosuspend isn't set, otherwise returns the expiration time
|
|
|
|
in jiffies
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
It is safe to execute the following helper functions from interrupt context:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
- pm_request_idle()
|
|
|
|
- pm_request_autosuspend()
|
|
|
|
- pm_schedule_suspend()
|
|
|
|
- pm_request_resume()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_get_noresume()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_get()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_put_noidle()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_put()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
|
2024-01-30 19:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
- __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_enable()
|
|
|
|
- pm_suspend_ignore_children()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_set_active()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_set_suspended()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_suspended()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration()
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
If pm_runtime_irq_safe() has been called for a device then the following helper
|
|
|
|
functions may also be used in interrupt context:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_idle()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_suspend()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_autosuspend()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_resume()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_get_sync()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_put_sync()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend()
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend()
|
2010-12-01 07:14:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
5. Runtime PM Initialization, Device Probing and Removal
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
========================================================
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Initially, the runtime PM is disabled for all devices, which means that the
|
2014-11-08 16:54:51 +08:00
|
|
|
majority of the runtime PM helper functions described in Section 4 will return
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
-EAGAIN until pm_runtime_enable() is called for the device.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
In addition to that, the initial runtime PM status of all devices is
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
'suspended', but it need not reflect the actual physical state of the device.
|
|
|
|
Thus, if the device is initially active (i.e. it is able to process I/O), its
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
runtime PM status must be changed to 'active', with the help of
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
pm_runtime_set_active(), before pm_runtime_enable() is called for the device.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
However, if the device has a parent and the parent's runtime PM is enabled,
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
calling pm_runtime_set_active() for the device will affect the parent, unless
|
|
|
|
the parent's 'power.ignore_children' flag is set. Namely, in that case the
|
|
|
|
parent won't be able to suspend at run time, using the PM core's helper
|
|
|
|
functions, as long as the child's status is 'active', even if the child's
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
runtime PM is still disabled (i.e. pm_runtime_enable() hasn't been called for
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
the child yet or pm_runtime_disable() has been called for it). For this reason,
|
|
|
|
once pm_runtime_set_active() has been called for the device, pm_runtime_enable()
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
should be called for it too as soon as reasonably possible or its runtime PM
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
status should be changed back to 'suspended' with the help of
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_set_suspended().
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
If the default initial runtime PM status of the device (i.e. 'suspended')
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
reflects the actual state of the device, its bus type's or its driver's
|
|
|
|
->probe() callback will likely need to wake it up using one of the PM core's
|
|
|
|
helper functions described in Section 4. In that case, pm_runtime_resume()
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
should be used. Of course, for this purpose the device's runtime PM has to be
|
2009-08-19 05:38:32 +08:00
|
|
|
enabled earlier by calling pm_runtime_enable().
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-17 08:14:15 +08:00
|
|
|
Note, if the device may execute pm_runtime calls during the probe (such as
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
if it is registered with a subsystem that may call back in) then the
|
2015-04-17 08:14:15 +08:00
|
|
|
pm_runtime_get_sync() call paired with a pm_runtime_put() call will be
|
|
|
|
appropriate to ensure that the device is not put back to sleep during the
|
|
|
|
probe. This can happen with systems such as the network device layer.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-08 13:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
It may be desirable to suspend the device once ->probe() has finished.
|
2017-02-22 04:41:53 +08:00
|
|
|
Therefore the driver core uses the asynchronous pm_request_idle() to submit a
|
2013-11-08 13:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
request to execute the subsystem-level idle callback for the device at that
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
time. A driver that makes use of the runtime autosuspend feature may want to
|
2013-11-08 13:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
update the last busy mark before returning from ->probe().
|
2011-07-02 20:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, the driver core prevents runtime PM callbacks from racing with the bus
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
notifier callback in __device_release_driver(), which is necessary because the
|
2011-07-02 20:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
notifier is used by some subsystems to carry out operations affecting the
|
|
|
|
runtime PM functionality. It does so by calling pm_runtime_get_sync() before
|
|
|
|
driver_sysfs_remove() and the BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER notifications. This
|
|
|
|
resumes the device if it's in the suspended state and prevents it from
|
|
|
|
being suspended again while those routines are being executed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To allow bus types and drivers to put devices into the suspended state by
|
|
|
|
calling pm_runtime_suspend() from their ->remove() routines, the driver core
|
|
|
|
executes pm_runtime_put_sync() after running the BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER
|
|
|
|
notifications in __device_release_driver(). This requires bus types and
|
|
|
|
drivers to make their ->remove() callbacks avoid races with runtime PM directly,
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
but it also allows more flexibility in the handling of devices during the
|
2011-07-02 20:27:11 +08:00
|
|
|
removal of their drivers.
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-03 11:23:07 +08:00
|
|
|
Drivers in ->remove() callback should undo the runtime PM changes done
|
|
|
|
in ->probe(). Usually this means calling pm_runtime_disable(),
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() etc.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 04:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
The user space can effectively disallow the driver of the device to power manage
|
|
|
|
it at run time by changing the value of its /sys/devices/.../power/control
|
|
|
|
attribute to "on", which causes pm_runtime_forbid() to be called. In principle,
|
|
|
|
this mechanism may also be used by the driver to effectively turn off the
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
runtime power management of the device until the user space turns it on.
|
|
|
|
Namely, during the initialization the driver can make sure that the runtime PM
|
2010-03-07 04:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
status of the device is 'active' and call pm_runtime_forbid(). It should be
|
|
|
|
noted, however, that if the user space has already intentionally changed the
|
|
|
|
value of /sys/devices/.../power/control to "auto" to allow the driver to power
|
|
|
|
manage the device at run time, the driver may confuse it by using
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_forbid() this way.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
6. Runtime PM and System Sleep
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
==============================
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Runtime PM and system sleep (i.e., system suspend and hibernation, also known
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
as suspend-to-RAM and suspend-to-disk) interact with each other in a couple of
|
|
|
|
ways. If a device is active when a system sleep starts, everything is
|
|
|
|
straightforward. But what should happen if the device is already suspended?
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
The device may have different wake-up settings for runtime PM and system sleep.
|
|
|
|
For example, remote wake-up may be enabled for runtime suspend but disallowed
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
for system sleep (device_may_wakeup(dev) returns 'false'). When this happens,
|
|
|
|
the subsystem-level system suspend callback is responsible for changing the
|
|
|
|
device's wake-up setting (it may leave that to the device driver's system
|
|
|
|
suspend routine). It may be necessary to resume the device and suspend it again
|
|
|
|
in order to do so. The same is true if the driver uses different power levels
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
or other settings for runtime suspend and system sleep.
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-02 04:29:05 +08:00
|
|
|
During system resume, the simplest approach is to bring all devices back to full
|
|
|
|
power, even if they had been suspended before the system suspend began. There
|
|
|
|
are several reasons for this, including:
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The device might need to switch power levels, wake-up settings, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Remote wake-up events might have been lost by the firmware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The device's children may need the device to be at full power in order
|
|
|
|
to resume themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The driver's idea of the device state may not agree with the device's
|
|
|
|
physical state. This can happen during resume from hibernation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The device might need to be reset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Even though the device was suspended, if its usage counter was > 0 then most
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
likely it would need a runtime resume in the near future anyway.
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-02 04:29:05 +08:00
|
|
|
If the device had been suspended before the system suspend began and it's
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
brought back to full power during resume, then its runtime PM status will have
|
2011-07-02 04:29:05 +08:00
|
|
|
to be updated to reflect the actual post-system sleep status. The way to do
|
|
|
|
this is:
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_disable(dev);
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
|
|
|
|
- pm_runtime_enable(dev);
|
2009-12-23 03:43:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
The PM core always increments the runtime usage counter before calling the
|
PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
One of the roles of the PM core is to prevent different PM callbacks
executed for the same device object from racing with each other.
Unfortunately, after commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
(PM: Allow pm_runtime_suspend() to succeed during system suspend)
runtime PM callbacks may be executed concurrently with system
suspend/resume callbacks for the same device.
The main reason for commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
was that some subsystems and device drivers wanted to use runtime PM
helpers, pm_runtime_suspend() and pm_runtime_put_sync() in
particular, for carrying out the suspend of devices in their
.suspend() callbacks. However, as it's been determined recently,
there are multiple reasons not to do so, inlcuding:
* The caller really doesn't control the runtime PM usage counters,
because user space can access them through sysfs and effectively
block runtime PM. That means using pm_runtime_suspend() or
pm_runtime_get_sync() to suspend devices during system suspend
may or may not work.
* If a driver calls pm_runtime_suspend() from its .suspend()
callback, it causes the subsystem's .runtime_suspend() callback to
be executed, which leads to the call sequence:
subsys->suspend(dev)
driver->suspend(dev)
pm_runtime_suspend(dev)
subsys->runtime_suspend(dev)
recursive from the subsystem's point of view. For some subsystems
that may actually work (e.g. the platform bus type), but for some
it will fail in a rather spectacular fashion (e.g. PCI). In each
case it means a layering violation.
* Both the subsystem and the driver can provide .suspend_noirq()
callbacks for system suspend that can do whatever the
.runtime_suspend() callbacks do just fine, so it really isn't
necessary to call pm_runtime_suspend() during system suspend.
* The runtime PM's handling of wakeup devices is usually different
from the system suspend's one, so .runtime_suspend() may simply be
inappropriate for system suspend.
* System suspend is supposed to work even if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is
unset.
* The runtime PM workqueue is frozen before system suspend, so if
whatever the driver is going to do during system suspend depends
on it, that simply won't work.
Still, there is a good reason to allow pm_runtime_resume() to
succeed during system suspend and resume (for instance, some
subsystems and device drivers may legitimately use it to ensure that
their devices are in full-power states before suspending them).
Moreover, there is no reason to prevent runtime PM callbacks from
being executed in parallel with the system suspend/resume .prepare()
and .complete() callbacks and the code removed by commit
e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26 went too far in this
respect. On the other hand, runtime PM callbacks, including
.runtime_resume(), must not be executed during system suspend's
"late" stage of suspending devices and during system resume's "early"
device resume stage.
Taking all of the above into consideration, make the PM core
acquire a runtime PM reference to every device and resume it if
there's a runtime PM resume request pending right before executing
the subsystem-level .suspend() callback for it. Make the PM core
drop references to all devices right after executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them. Additionally,
make the PM core disable the runtime PM framework for all devices
during system suspend, after executing the subsystem-level .suspend()
callbacks for them, and enable the runtime PM framework for all
devices during system resume, right before executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-06 16:51:58 +08:00
|
|
|
->suspend() callback and decrements it after calling the ->resume() callback.
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Hence disabling runtime PM temporarily like this will not cause any runtime
|
PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
One of the roles of the PM core is to prevent different PM callbacks
executed for the same device object from racing with each other.
Unfortunately, after commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
(PM: Allow pm_runtime_suspend() to succeed during system suspend)
runtime PM callbacks may be executed concurrently with system
suspend/resume callbacks for the same device.
The main reason for commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
was that some subsystems and device drivers wanted to use runtime PM
helpers, pm_runtime_suspend() and pm_runtime_put_sync() in
particular, for carrying out the suspend of devices in their
.suspend() callbacks. However, as it's been determined recently,
there are multiple reasons not to do so, inlcuding:
* The caller really doesn't control the runtime PM usage counters,
because user space can access them through sysfs and effectively
block runtime PM. That means using pm_runtime_suspend() or
pm_runtime_get_sync() to suspend devices during system suspend
may or may not work.
* If a driver calls pm_runtime_suspend() from its .suspend()
callback, it causes the subsystem's .runtime_suspend() callback to
be executed, which leads to the call sequence:
subsys->suspend(dev)
driver->suspend(dev)
pm_runtime_suspend(dev)
subsys->runtime_suspend(dev)
recursive from the subsystem's point of view. For some subsystems
that may actually work (e.g. the platform bus type), but for some
it will fail in a rather spectacular fashion (e.g. PCI). In each
case it means a layering violation.
* Both the subsystem and the driver can provide .suspend_noirq()
callbacks for system suspend that can do whatever the
.runtime_suspend() callbacks do just fine, so it really isn't
necessary to call pm_runtime_suspend() during system suspend.
* The runtime PM's handling of wakeup devices is usually different
from the system suspend's one, so .runtime_suspend() may simply be
inappropriate for system suspend.
* System suspend is supposed to work even if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is
unset.
* The runtime PM workqueue is frozen before system suspend, so if
whatever the driver is going to do during system suspend depends
on it, that simply won't work.
Still, there is a good reason to allow pm_runtime_resume() to
succeed during system suspend and resume (for instance, some
subsystems and device drivers may legitimately use it to ensure that
their devices are in full-power states before suspending them).
Moreover, there is no reason to prevent runtime PM callbacks from
being executed in parallel with the system suspend/resume .prepare()
and .complete() callbacks and the code removed by commit
e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26 went too far in this
respect. On the other hand, runtime PM callbacks, including
.runtime_resume(), must not be executed during system suspend's
"late" stage of suspending devices and during system resume's "early"
device resume stage.
Taking all of the above into consideration, make the PM core
acquire a runtime PM reference to every device and resume it if
there's a runtime PM resume request pending right before executing
the subsystem-level .suspend() callback for it. Make the PM core
drop references to all devices right after executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them. Additionally,
make the PM core disable the runtime PM framework for all devices
during system suspend, after executing the subsystem-level .suspend()
callbacks for them, and enable the runtime PM framework for all
devices during system resume, right before executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-06 16:51:58 +08:00
|
|
|
suspend attempts to be permanently lost. If the usage count goes to zero
|
|
|
|
following the return of the ->resume() callback, the ->runtime_idle() callback
|
|
|
|
will be invoked as usual.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-02 04:29:05 +08:00
|
|
|
On some systems, however, system sleep is not entered through a global firmware
|
|
|
|
or hardware operation. Instead, all hardware components are put into low-power
|
|
|
|
states directly by the kernel in a coordinated way. Then, the system sleep
|
|
|
|
state effectively follows from the states the hardware components end up in
|
|
|
|
and the system is woken up from that state by a hardware interrupt or a similar
|
|
|
|
mechanism entirely under the kernel's control. As a result, the kernel never
|
|
|
|
gives control away and the states of all devices during resume are precisely
|
|
|
|
known to it. If that is the case and none of the situations listed above takes
|
|
|
|
place (in particular, if the system is not waking up from hibernation), it may
|
|
|
|
be more efficient to leave the devices that had been suspended before the system
|
|
|
|
suspend began in the suspended state.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-16 08:47:37 +08:00
|
|
|
To this end, the PM core provides a mechanism allowing some coordination between
|
|
|
|
different levels of device hierarchy. Namely, if a system suspend .prepare()
|
|
|
|
callback returns a positive number for a device, that indicates to the PM core
|
|
|
|
that the device appears to be runtime-suspended and its state is fine, so it
|
|
|
|
may be left in runtime suspend provided that all of its descendants are also
|
|
|
|
left in runtime suspend. If that happens, the PM core will not execute any
|
|
|
|
system suspend and resume callbacks for all of those devices, except for the
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
.complete() callback, which is then entirely responsible for handling the device
|
2014-05-16 08:47:37 +08:00
|
|
|
as appropriate. This only applies to system suspend transitions that are not
|
2017-10-11 01:36:09 +08:00
|
|
|
related to hibernation (see Documentation/driver-api/pm/devices.rst for more
|
2014-05-16 08:47:37 +08:00
|
|
|
information).
|
|
|
|
|
PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
One of the roles of the PM core is to prevent different PM callbacks
executed for the same device object from racing with each other.
Unfortunately, after commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
(PM: Allow pm_runtime_suspend() to succeed during system suspend)
runtime PM callbacks may be executed concurrently with system
suspend/resume callbacks for the same device.
The main reason for commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
was that some subsystems and device drivers wanted to use runtime PM
helpers, pm_runtime_suspend() and pm_runtime_put_sync() in
particular, for carrying out the suspend of devices in their
.suspend() callbacks. However, as it's been determined recently,
there are multiple reasons not to do so, inlcuding:
* The caller really doesn't control the runtime PM usage counters,
because user space can access them through sysfs and effectively
block runtime PM. That means using pm_runtime_suspend() or
pm_runtime_get_sync() to suspend devices during system suspend
may or may not work.
* If a driver calls pm_runtime_suspend() from its .suspend()
callback, it causes the subsystem's .runtime_suspend() callback to
be executed, which leads to the call sequence:
subsys->suspend(dev)
driver->suspend(dev)
pm_runtime_suspend(dev)
subsys->runtime_suspend(dev)
recursive from the subsystem's point of view. For some subsystems
that may actually work (e.g. the platform bus type), but for some
it will fail in a rather spectacular fashion (e.g. PCI). In each
case it means a layering violation.
* Both the subsystem and the driver can provide .suspend_noirq()
callbacks for system suspend that can do whatever the
.runtime_suspend() callbacks do just fine, so it really isn't
necessary to call pm_runtime_suspend() during system suspend.
* The runtime PM's handling of wakeup devices is usually different
from the system suspend's one, so .runtime_suspend() may simply be
inappropriate for system suspend.
* System suspend is supposed to work even if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is
unset.
* The runtime PM workqueue is frozen before system suspend, so if
whatever the driver is going to do during system suspend depends
on it, that simply won't work.
Still, there is a good reason to allow pm_runtime_resume() to
succeed during system suspend and resume (for instance, some
subsystems and device drivers may legitimately use it to ensure that
their devices are in full-power states before suspending them).
Moreover, there is no reason to prevent runtime PM callbacks from
being executed in parallel with the system suspend/resume .prepare()
and .complete() callbacks and the code removed by commit
e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26 went too far in this
respect. On the other hand, runtime PM callbacks, including
.runtime_resume(), must not be executed during system suspend's
"late" stage of suspending devices and during system resume's "early"
device resume stage.
Taking all of the above into consideration, make the PM core
acquire a runtime PM reference to every device and resume it if
there's a runtime PM resume request pending right before executing
the subsystem-level .suspend() callback for it. Make the PM core
drop references to all devices right after executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them. Additionally,
make the PM core disable the runtime PM framework for all devices
during system suspend, after executing the subsystem-level .suspend()
callbacks for them, and enable the runtime PM framework for all
devices during system resume, right before executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-06 16:51:58 +08:00
|
|
|
The PM core does its best to reduce the probability of race conditions between
|
|
|
|
the runtime PM and system suspend/resume (and hibernation) callbacks by carrying
|
|
|
|
out the following operations:
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-16 19:05:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* During system suspend pm_runtime_get_noresume() is called for every device
|
|
|
|
right before executing the subsystem-level .prepare() callback for it and
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_barrier() is called for every device right before executing the
|
|
|
|
subsystem-level .suspend() callback for it. In addition to that the PM core
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
calls __pm_runtime_disable() with 'false' as the second argument for every
|
2014-05-16 19:05:59 +08:00
|
|
|
device right before executing the subsystem-level .suspend_late() callback
|
|
|
|
for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* During system resume pm_runtime_enable() and pm_runtime_put() are called for
|
|
|
|
every device right after executing the subsystem-level .resume_early()
|
|
|
|
callback and right after executing the subsystem-level .complete() callback
|
2012-12-23 06:59:01 +08:00
|
|
|
for it, respectively.
|
PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
One of the roles of the PM core is to prevent different PM callbacks
executed for the same device object from racing with each other.
Unfortunately, after commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
(PM: Allow pm_runtime_suspend() to succeed during system suspend)
runtime PM callbacks may be executed concurrently with system
suspend/resume callbacks for the same device.
The main reason for commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
was that some subsystems and device drivers wanted to use runtime PM
helpers, pm_runtime_suspend() and pm_runtime_put_sync() in
particular, for carrying out the suspend of devices in their
.suspend() callbacks. However, as it's been determined recently,
there are multiple reasons not to do so, inlcuding:
* The caller really doesn't control the runtime PM usage counters,
because user space can access them through sysfs and effectively
block runtime PM. That means using pm_runtime_suspend() or
pm_runtime_get_sync() to suspend devices during system suspend
may or may not work.
* If a driver calls pm_runtime_suspend() from its .suspend()
callback, it causes the subsystem's .runtime_suspend() callback to
be executed, which leads to the call sequence:
subsys->suspend(dev)
driver->suspend(dev)
pm_runtime_suspend(dev)
subsys->runtime_suspend(dev)
recursive from the subsystem's point of view. For some subsystems
that may actually work (e.g. the platform bus type), but for some
it will fail in a rather spectacular fashion (e.g. PCI). In each
case it means a layering violation.
* Both the subsystem and the driver can provide .suspend_noirq()
callbacks for system suspend that can do whatever the
.runtime_suspend() callbacks do just fine, so it really isn't
necessary to call pm_runtime_suspend() during system suspend.
* The runtime PM's handling of wakeup devices is usually different
from the system suspend's one, so .runtime_suspend() may simply be
inappropriate for system suspend.
* System suspend is supposed to work even if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is
unset.
* The runtime PM workqueue is frozen before system suspend, so if
whatever the driver is going to do during system suspend depends
on it, that simply won't work.
Still, there is a good reason to allow pm_runtime_resume() to
succeed during system suspend and resume (for instance, some
subsystems and device drivers may legitimately use it to ensure that
their devices are in full-power states before suspending them).
Moreover, there is no reason to prevent runtime PM callbacks from
being executed in parallel with the system suspend/resume .prepare()
and .complete() callbacks and the code removed by commit
e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26 went too far in this
respect. On the other hand, runtime PM callbacks, including
.runtime_resume(), must not be executed during system suspend's
"late" stage of suspending devices and during system resume's "early"
device resume stage.
Taking all of the above into consideration, make the PM core
acquire a runtime PM reference to every device and resume it if
there's a runtime PM resume request pending right before executing
the subsystem-level .suspend() callback for it. Make the PM core
drop references to all devices right after executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them. Additionally,
make the PM core disable the runtime PM framework for all devices
during system suspend, after executing the subsystem-level .suspend()
callbacks for them, and enable the runtime PM framework for all
devices during system resume, right before executing the
subsystem-level .resume() callbacks for them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
2011-07-06 16:51:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
7. Generic subsystem callbacks
|
2024-02-25 21:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
==============================
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsystems may wish to conserve code space by using the set of generic power
|
|
|
|
management callbacks provided by the PM core, defined in
|
|
|
|
driver/base/power/generic_ops.c:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- invoke the ->runtime_suspend() callback provided by the driver of this
|
2014-03-25 04:31:29 +08:00
|
|
|
device and return its result, or return 0 if not defined
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_runtime_resume(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- invoke the ->runtime_resume() callback provided by the driver of this
|
2014-03-25 04:31:29 +08:00
|
|
|
device and return its result, or return 0 if not defined
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_suspend(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- if the device has not been suspended at run time, invoke the ->suspend()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by its driver and return its result, or return 0 if not
|
|
|
|
defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- if pm_runtime_suspended(dev) returns "false", invoke the ->suspend_noirq()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by the device's driver and return its result, or return
|
|
|
|
0 if not defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_resume(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- invoke the ->resume() callback provided by the driver of this device and,
|
|
|
|
if successful, change the device's runtime PM status to 'active'
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_resume_noirq(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- invoke the ->resume_noirq() callback provided by the driver of this device
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_freeze(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- if the device has not been suspended at run time, invoke the ->freeze()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by its driver and return its result, or return 0 if not
|
|
|
|
defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_freeze_noirq(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- if pm_runtime_suspended(dev) returns "false", invoke the ->freeze_noirq()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by the device's driver and return its result, or return
|
|
|
|
0 if not defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_thaw(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- if the device has not been suspended at run time, invoke the ->thaw()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by its driver and return its result, or return 0 if not
|
|
|
|
defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- if pm_runtime_suspended(dev) returns "false", invoke the ->thaw_noirq()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by the device's driver and return its result, or return
|
|
|
|
0 if not defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_poweroff(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- if the device has not been suspended at run time, invoke the ->poweroff()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by its driver and return its result, or return 0 if not
|
|
|
|
defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- if pm_runtime_suspended(dev) returns "false", run the ->poweroff_noirq()
|
|
|
|
callback provided by the device's driver and return its result, or return
|
|
|
|
0 if not defined
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_restore(struct device *dev);`
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
- invoke the ->restore() callback provided by the driver of this device and,
|
|
|
|
if successful, change the device's runtime PM status to 'active'
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
`int pm_generic_restore_noirq(struct device *dev);`
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
- invoke the ->restore_noirq() callback provided by the device's driver
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-27 05:26:55 +08:00
|
|
|
These functions are the defaults used by the PM core if a subsystem doesn't
|
2014-03-25 04:31:30 +08:00
|
|
|
provide its own callbacks for ->runtime_idle(), ->runtime_suspend(),
|
2011-07-02 04:12:59 +08:00
|
|
|
->runtime_resume(), ->suspend(), ->suspend_noirq(), ->resume(),
|
|
|
|
->resume_noirq(), ->freeze(), ->freeze_noirq(), ->thaw(), ->thaw_noirq(),
|
2014-03-25 04:31:30 +08:00
|
|
|
->poweroff(), ->poweroff_noirq(), ->restore(), ->restore_noirq() in the
|
|
|
|
subsystem-level dev_pm_ops structure.
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Device drivers that wish to use the same function as a system suspend, freeze,
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
poweroff and runtime suspend callback, and similarly for system resume, thaw,
|
|
|
|
restore, and runtime resume, can achieve this with the help of the
|
2010-03-07 04:28:37 +08:00
|
|
|
UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS macro defined in include/linux/pm.h (possibly setting its
|
|
|
|
last argument to NULL).
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. "No-Callback" Devices
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
========================
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some "devices" are only logical sub-devices of their parent and cannot be
|
|
|
|
power-managed on their own. (The prototype example is a USB interface. Entire
|
|
|
|
USB devices can go into low-power mode or send wake-up requests, but neither is
|
|
|
|
possible for individual interfaces.) The drivers for these devices have no
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
need of runtime PM callbacks; if the callbacks did exist, ->runtime_suspend()
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
and ->runtime_resume() would always return 0 without doing anything else and
|
|
|
|
->runtime_idle() would always call pm_runtime_suspend().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsystems can tell the PM core about these devices by calling
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_no_callbacks(). This should be done after the device structure is
|
|
|
|
initialized and before it is registered (although after device registration is
|
|
|
|
also okay). The routine will set the device's power.no_callbacks flag and
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
prevent the non-debugging runtime PM sysfs attributes from being created.
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When power.no_callbacks is set, the PM core will not invoke the
|
|
|
|
->runtime_idle(), ->runtime_suspend(), or ->runtime_resume() callbacks.
|
|
|
|
Instead it will assume that suspends and resumes always succeed and that idle
|
|
|
|
devices should be suspended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a consequence, the PM core will never directly inform the device's subsystem
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
or driver about runtime power changes. Instead, the driver for the device's
|
2010-09-26 05:35:15 +08:00
|
|
|
parent must take responsibility for telling the device's driver when the
|
|
|
|
parent's power state changes.
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-06-09 18:06:10 +08:00
|
|
|
Note that, in some cases it may not be desirable for subsystems/drivers to call
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_no_callbacks() for their devices. This could be because a subset of
|
|
|
|
the runtime PM callbacks needs to be implemented, a platform dependent PM
|
|
|
|
domain could get attached to the device or that the device is power managed
|
|
|
|
through a supplier device link. For these reasons and to avoid boilerplate code
|
|
|
|
in subsystems/drivers, the PM core allows runtime PM callbacks to be
|
|
|
|
unassigned. More precisely, if a callback pointer is NULL, the PM core will act
|
|
|
|
as though there was a callback and it returned 0.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
9. Autosuspend, or automatically-delayed suspends
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
=================================================
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changing a device's power state isn't free; it requires both time and energy.
|
|
|
|
A device should be put in a low-power state only when there's some reason to
|
|
|
|
think it will remain in that state for a substantial time. A common heuristic
|
|
|
|
says that a device which hasn't been used for a while is liable to remain
|
|
|
|
unused; following this advice, drivers should not allow devices to be suspended
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
at runtime until they have been inactive for some minimum period. Even when
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
the heuristic ends up being non-optimal, it will still prevent devices from
|
|
|
|
"bouncing" too rapidly between low-power and full-power states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The term "autosuspend" is an historical remnant. It doesn't mean that the
|
|
|
|
device is automatically suspended (the subsystem or driver still has to call
|
2011-07-06 16:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
the appropriate PM routines); rather it means that runtime suspends will
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
automatically be delayed until the desired period of inactivity has elapsed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inactivity is determined based on the power.last_busy field. Drivers should
|
|
|
|
call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() to update this field after carrying out I/O,
|
2024-01-30 19:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
typically just before calling __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). The desired
|
|
|
|
length of the inactivity period is a matter of policy. Subsystems can set this
|
|
|
|
length initially by calling pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(), but after device
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
registration the length should be controlled by user space, using the
|
|
|
|
/sys/devices/.../power/autosuspend_delay_ms attribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to use autosuspend, subsystems or drivers must call
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_use_autosuspend() (preferably before registering the device), and
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
thereafter they should use the various `*_autosuspend()` helper functions
|
|
|
|
instead of the non-autosuspend counterparts::
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of: pm_runtime_suspend use: pm_runtime_autosuspend;
|
|
|
|
Instead of: pm_schedule_suspend use: pm_request_autosuspend;
|
2024-01-30 19:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
Instead of: pm_runtime_put use: __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend;
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
Instead of: pm_runtime_put_sync use: pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drivers may also continue to use the non-autosuspend helper functions; they
|
2017-04-10 19:38:24 +08:00
|
|
|
will behave normally, which means sometimes taking the autosuspend delay into
|
|
|
|
account (see pm_runtime_idle).
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-11-04 06:39:18 +08:00
|
|
|
Under some circumstances a driver or subsystem may want to prevent a device
|
|
|
|
from autosuspending immediately, even though the usage counter is zero and the
|
|
|
|
autosuspend delay time has expired. If the ->runtime_suspend() callback
|
|
|
|
returns -EAGAIN or -EBUSY, and if the next autosuspend delay expiration time is
|
|
|
|
in the future (as it normally would be if the callback invoked
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()), the PM core will automatically reschedule the
|
|
|
|
autosuspend. The ->runtime_suspend() callback can't do this rescheduling
|
|
|
|
itself because no suspend requests of any kind are accepted while the device is
|
|
|
|
suspending (i.e., while the callback is running).
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
The implementation is well suited for asynchronous use in interrupt contexts.
|
|
|
|
However such use inevitably involves races, because the PM core can't
|
|
|
|
synchronize ->runtime_suspend() callbacks with the arrival of I/O requests.
|
|
|
|
This synchronization must be handled by the driver, using its private lock.
|
2019-06-13 18:10:36 +08:00
|
|
|
Here is a schematic pseudo-code example::
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foo_read_or_write(struct foo_priv *foo, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
lock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
add_request_to_io_queue(foo, data);
|
|
|
|
if (foo->num_pending_requests++ == 0)
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_get(&foo->dev);
|
|
|
|
if (!foo->is_suspended)
|
|
|
|
foo_process_next_request(foo);
|
|
|
|
unlock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foo_io_completion(struct foo_priv *foo, void *req)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
lock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
if (--foo->num_pending_requests == 0) {
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&foo->dev);
|
2024-01-30 19:28:32 +08:00
|
|
|
__pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&foo->dev);
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
foo_process_next_request(foo);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unlock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
/* Send req result back to the user ... */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int foo_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct foo_priv foo = container_of(dev, ...);
|
|
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
if (foo->num_pending_requests > 0) {
|
|
|
|
ret = -EBUSY;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* ... suspend the device ... */
|
|
|
|
foo->is_suspended = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unlock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int foo_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct foo_priv foo = container_of(dev, ...);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
/* ... resume the device ... */
|
|
|
|
foo->is_suspended = 0;
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&foo->dev);
|
|
|
|
if (foo->num_pending_requests > 0)
|
2014-03-25 04:31:31 +08:00
|
|
|
foo_process_next_request(foo);
|
2010-09-26 05:35:21 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock(&foo->private_lock);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The important point is that after foo_io_completion() asks for an autosuspend,
|
|
|
|
the foo_runtime_suspend() callback may race with foo_read_or_write().
|
|
|
|
Therefore foo_runtime_suspend() has to check whether there are any pending I/O
|
|
|
|
requests (while holding the private lock) before allowing the suspend to
|
|
|
|
proceed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the power.autosuspend_delay field can be changed by user space at
|
|
|
|
any time. If a driver cares about this, it can call
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_autosuspend_expiration() from within the ->runtime_suspend()
|
|
|
|
callback while holding its private lock. If the function returns a nonzero
|
|
|
|
value then the delay has not yet expired and the callback should return
|
|
|
|
-EAGAIN.
|