2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* zsmalloc memory allocator
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2011 Nitin Gupta
|
2014-01-31 07:45:55 +08:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2012, 2013 Minchan Kim
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This code is released using a dual license strategy: BSD/GPL
|
|
|
|
* You can choose the license that better fits your requirements.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Released under the terms of 3-clause BSD License
|
|
|
|
* Released under the terms of GNU General Public License Version 2.0
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2012-06-10 08:41:14 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Following is how we use various fields and flags of underlying
|
|
|
|
* struct page(s) to form a zspage.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Usage of struct page fields:
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* page->private: points to zspage
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
* page->index: links together all component pages of a zspage
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
* For the huge page, this is always 0, so we use this field
|
|
|
|
* to store handle.
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
* page->page_type: first object offset in a subpage of zspage
|
2012-06-10 08:41:14 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Usage of struct page flags:
|
|
|
|
* PG_private: identifies the first component page
|
2017-02-23 07:45:01 +08:00
|
|
|
* PG_owner_priv_1: identifies the huge component page
|
2012-06-10 08:41:14 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* lock ordering:
|
|
|
|
* page_lock
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* pool->lock
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* zspage->lock
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/bitops.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/highmem.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/string.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
2020-06-09 12:32:38 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/pgtable.h>
|
2020-06-09 12:32:42 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpu.h>
|
2012-02-13 22:47:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
|
2015-11-07 08:29:29 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/preempt.h>
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
2018-02-01 08:18:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/shrinker.h>
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/types.h>
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
|
2014-01-31 07:45:50 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/zsmalloc.h>
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/zpool.h>
|
2016-07-27 06:26:50 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/migrate.h>
|
2019-08-25 08:55:06 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/wait.h>
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
|
2018-01-05 08:18:02 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/fs.h>
|
2022-01-22 14:14:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/local_lock.h>
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define ZSPAGE_MAGIC 0x58
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2021-05-07 09:05:51 +08:00
|
|
|
* This must be power of 2 and greater than or equal to sizeof(link_free).
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
* These two conditions ensure that any 'struct link_free' itself doesn't
|
|
|
|
* span more than 1 page which avoids complex case of mapping 2 pages simply
|
|
|
|
* to restore link_free pointer values.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define ZS_ALIGN 8
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
#define ZS_HANDLE_SIZE (sizeof(unsigned long))
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Object location (<PFN>, <obj_idx>) is encoded as
|
2020-08-12 09:33:31 +08:00
|
|
|
* a single (unsigned long) handle value.
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
* Note that object index <obj_idx> starts from 0.
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is made more complicated by various memory models and PAE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 19:16:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS
|
|
|
|
#ifdef MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
|
|
|
|
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If this definition of MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is used, OBJ_INDEX_BITS will just
|
|
|
|
* be PAGE_SHIFT
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-02-14 19:16:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS BITS_PER_LONG
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2018-02-14 19:16:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define _PFN_BITS (MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Head in allocated object should have OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG
|
|
|
|
* to identify the object was allocated or not.
|
|
|
|
* It's okay to add the status bit in the least bit because
|
|
|
|
* header keeps handle which is 4byte-aligned address so we
|
|
|
|
* have room for two bit at least.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG 1
|
2023-01-11 07:17:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define OBJ_TAG_BITS 1
|
|
|
|
#define OBJ_TAG_MASK OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-28 10:38:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#define OBJ_INDEX_BITS (BITS_PER_LONG - _PFN_BITS)
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#define OBJ_INDEX_MASK ((_AC(1, UL) << OBJ_INDEX_BITS) - 1)
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#define HUGE_BITS 1
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
#define FULLNESS_BITS 4
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
#define CLASS_BITS 8
|
|
|
|
#define MAGIC_VAL_BITS 8
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
#define MAX(a, b) ((a) >= (b) ? (a) : (b))
|
2023-01-18 08:52:09 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE (_AC(CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_CHAIN_SIZE, UL))
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
/* ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE must be multiple of ZS_ALIGN */
|
|
|
|
#define ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE \
|
|
|
|
MAX(32, (ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE << PAGE_SHIFT >> OBJ_INDEX_BITS))
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
/* each chunk includes extra space to keep handle */
|
2015-04-16 07:15:39 +08:00
|
|
|
#define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-06-05 07:11:08 +08:00
|
|
|
* On systems with 4K page size, this gives 255 size classes! There is a
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
* trader-off here:
|
|
|
|
* - Large number of size classes is potentially wasteful as free page are
|
|
|
|
* spread across these classes
|
|
|
|
* - Small number of size classes causes large internal fragmentation
|
|
|
|
* - Probably its better to use specific size classes (empirically
|
|
|
|
* determined). NOTE: all those class sizes must be set as multiple of
|
|
|
|
* ZS_ALIGN to make sure link_free itself never has to span 2 pages.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE and ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA must be multiple of ZS_ALIGN
|
|
|
|
* (reason above)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
#define ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA (PAGE_SIZE >> CLASS_BITS)
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
#define ZS_SIZE_CLASSES (DIV_ROUND_UP(ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE - ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE, \
|
|
|
|
ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA) + 1)
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Pages are distinguished by the ratio of used memory (that is the ratio
|
|
|
|
* of ->inuse objects to all objects that page can store). For example,
|
|
|
|
* INUSE_RATIO_10 means that the ratio of used objects is > 0% and <= 10%.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The number of fullness groups is not random. It allows us to keep
|
|
|
|
* difference between the least busy page in the group (minimum permitted
|
|
|
|
* number of ->inuse objects) and the most busy page (maximum permitted
|
|
|
|
* number of ->inuse objects) at a reasonable value.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
enum fullness_group {
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0,
|
|
|
|
ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10,
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
/* NOTE: 8 more fullness groups here */
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
ZS_INUSE_RATIO_99 = 10,
|
|
|
|
ZS_INUSE_RATIO_100,
|
|
|
|
NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS,
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:54 +08:00
|
|
|
enum class_stat_type {
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
/* NOTE: stats for 12 fullness groups here: from inuse 0 to 100 */
|
|
|
|
ZS_OBJS_ALLOCATED = NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS,
|
|
|
|
ZS_OBJS_INUSE,
|
|
|
|
NR_CLASS_STAT_TYPES,
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct zs_size_stat {
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long objs[NR_CLASS_STAT_TYPES];
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT
|
|
|
|
static struct dentry *zs_stat_root;
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: introduce zs_huge_class_size()
Patch series "zsmalloc/zram: drop zram's max_zpage_size", v3.
ZRAM's max_zpage_size is a bad thing. It forces zsmalloc to store
normal objects as huge ones, which results in bigger zsmalloc memory
usage. Drop it and use actual zsmalloc huge-class value when decide if
the object is huge or not.
This patch (of 2):
Not every object can be share its zspage with other objects, e.g. when
the object is as big as zspage or nearly as big a zspage. For such
objects zsmalloc has a so called huge class - every object which belongs
to huge class consumes the entire zspage (which consists of a physical
page). On x86_64, PAGE_SHIFT 12 box, the first non-huge class size is
3264, so starting down from size 3264, objects can share page(-s) and
thus minimize memory wastage.
ZRAM, however, has its own statically defined watermark for huge
objects, namely "3 * PAGE_SIZE / 4 = 3072", and forcibly stores every
object larger than this watermark (3072) as a PAGE_SIZE object, in other
words, to a huge class, while zsmalloc can keep some of those objects in
non-huge classes. This results in increased memory consumption.
zsmalloc knows better if the object is huge or not. Introduce
zs_huge_class_size() function which tells if the given object can be
stored in one of non-huge classes or not. This will let us to drop
ZRAM's huge object watermark and fully rely on zsmalloc when we decide
if the object is huge.
[sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com: add pool param to zs_huge_class_size()]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314081833.1096-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180306070639.7389-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-06 07:24:43 +08:00
|
|
|
static size_t huge_class_size;
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct size_class {
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
struct list_head fullness_list[NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS];
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Size of objects stored in this class. Must be multiple
|
|
|
|
* of ZS_ALIGN.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int size;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:11 +08:00
|
|
|
int objs_per_zspage;
|
2016-01-15 07:22:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Number of PAGE_SIZE sized pages to combine to form a 'zspage' */
|
|
|
|
int pages_per_zspage;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned int index;
|
|
|
|
struct zs_size_stat stats;
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Placed within free objects to form a singly linked list.
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* For every zspage, zspage->freeobj gives head of this list.
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This must be power of 2 and less than or equal to ZS_ALIGN
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct link_free {
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
union {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
* Free object index;
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* It's valid for non-allocated object
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long next;
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Handle of allocated object.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
unsigned long handle;
|
|
|
|
};
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct zs_pool {
|
2015-11-07 08:29:21 +08:00
|
|
|
const char *name;
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *size_class[ZS_SIZE_CLASSES];
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct kmem_cache *handle_cachep;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct kmem_cache *zspage_cachep;
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: move pages_allocated to zs_pool
Currently, zram has no feature to limit memory so theoretically zram can
deplete system memory. Users have asked for a limit several times as even
without exhaustion zram makes it hard to control memory usage of the
platform. This patchset adds the feature.
Patch 1 makes zs_get_total_size_bytes faster because it would be used
frequently in later patches for the new feature.
Patch 2 changes zs_get_total_size_bytes's return unit from bytes to page
so that zsmalloc doesn't need unnecessary operation(ie, << PAGE_SHIFT).
Patch 3 adds new feature. I added the feature into zram layer, not
zsmalloc because limiation is zram's requirement, not zsmalloc so any
other user using zsmalloc(ie, zpool) shouldn't affected by unnecessary
branch of zsmalloc. In future, if every users of zsmalloc want the
feature, then, we could move the feature from client side to zsmalloc
easily but vice versa would be painful.
Patch 4 adds news facility to report maximum memory usage of zram so that
this avoids user polling frequently via /sys/block/zram0/ mem_used_total
and ensures transient max are not missed.
This patch (of 4):
pages_allocated has counted in size_class structure and when user of
zsmalloc want to see total_size_bytes, it should gather all of count from
each size_class to report the sum.
It's not bad if user don't see the value often but if user start to see
the value frequently, it would be not a good deal for performance pov.
This patch moves the count from size_class to zs_pool so it could reduce
memory footprint (from [255 * 8byte] to [sizeof(atomic_long_t)]).
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Reviewed-by: David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-10-10 06:29:48 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_t pages_allocated;
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:35 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zs_pool_stats stats;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Compact classes */
|
2023-09-11 17:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct shrinker *shrinker;
|
2018-02-01 08:18:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT
|
|
|
|
struct dentry *stat_dentry;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
|
|
|
|
struct work_struct free_work;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spinlock_t lock;
|
2023-04-18 15:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_t compaction_in_progress;
|
2012-08-08 14:12:17 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage {
|
|
|
|
struct {
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int huge:HUGE_BITS;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int fullness:FULLNESS_BITS;
|
2017-04-14 05:56:40 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int class:CLASS_BITS + 1;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int magic:MAGIC_VAL_BITS;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
unsigned int inuse;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int freeobj;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *first_page;
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list; /* fullness list */
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
rwlock_t lock;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
struct mapping_area {
|
2022-01-22 14:14:17 +08:00
|
|
|
local_lock_t lock;
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
char *vm_buf; /* copy buffer for objects that span pages */
|
|
|
|
char *vm_addr; /* address of kmap_atomic()'ed pages */
|
|
|
|
enum zs_mapmode vm_mm; /* mapping mode */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
/* huge object: pages_per_zspage == 1 && maxobj_per_zspage == 1 */
|
|
|
|
static void SetZsHugePage(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
zspage->huge = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool ZsHugePage(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return zspage->huge;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void migrate_lock_init(struct zspage *zspage);
|
|
|
|
static void migrate_read_lock(struct zspage *zspage);
|
|
|
|
static void migrate_read_unlock(struct zspage *zspage);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
static void migrate_write_lock(struct zspage *zspage);
|
|
|
|
static void migrate_write_unlock(struct zspage *zspage);
|
2024-02-19 21:33:51 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void kick_deferred_free(struct zs_pool *pool);
|
|
|
|
static void init_deferred_free(struct zs_pool *pool);
|
|
|
|
static void SetZsPageMovable(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *zspage);
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
static void kick_deferred_free(struct zs_pool *pool) {}
|
|
|
|
static void init_deferred_free(struct zs_pool *pool) {}
|
|
|
|
static void SetZsPageMovable(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *zspage) {}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static int create_cache(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
pool->handle_cachep = kmem_cache_create("zs_handle", ZS_HANDLE_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
0, 0, NULL);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!pool->handle_cachep)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pool->zspage_cachep = kmem_cache_create("zspage", sizeof(struct zspage),
|
|
|
|
0, 0, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (!pool->zspage_cachep) {
|
|
|
|
kmem_cache_destroy(pool->handle_cachep);
|
|
|
|
pool->handle_cachep = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static void destroy_cache(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-09-09 06:04:55 +08:00
|
|
|
kmem_cache_destroy(pool->handle_cachep);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
kmem_cache_destroy(pool->zspage_cachep);
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long cache_alloc_handle(struct zs_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return (unsigned long)kmem_cache_alloc(pool->handle_cachep,
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
gfp & ~(__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_MOVABLE));
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static void cache_free_handle(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kmem_cache_free(pool->handle_cachep, (void *)handle);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct zspage *cache_alloc_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, gfp_t flags)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-02-26 09:18:27 +08:00
|
|
|
return kmem_cache_zalloc(pool->zspage_cachep,
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
flags & ~(__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_MOVABLE));
|
2017-02-23 07:45:01 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void cache_free_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
kmem_cache_free(pool->zspage_cachep, zspage);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/* pool->lock(which owns the handle) synchronizes races */
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static void record_obj(unsigned long handle, unsigned long obj)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
*(unsigned long *)handle = obj;
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
/* zpool driver */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ZPOOL
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 17:38:13 +08:00
|
|
|
static void *zs_zpool_create(const char *name, gfp_t gfp)
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-05-21 07:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Ignore global gfp flags: zs_malloc() may be invoked from
|
|
|
|
* different contexts and its caller must provide a valid
|
|
|
|
* gfp mask.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
return zs_create_pool(name);
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zs_zpool_destroy(void *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
zs_destroy_pool(pool);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int zs_zpool_malloc(void *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long *handle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-05-21 07:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
*handle = zs_malloc(pool, size, gfp);
|
2022-07-14 16:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-04 10:38:18 +08:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(*handle))
|
2022-07-14 16:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR((void *)*handle);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void zs_zpool_free(void *pool, unsigned long handle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
zs_free(pool, handle);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void *zs_zpool_map(void *pool, unsigned long handle,
|
|
|
|
enum zpool_mapmode mm)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
enum zs_mapmode zs_mm;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (mm) {
|
|
|
|
case ZPOOL_MM_RO:
|
|
|
|
zs_mm = ZS_MM_RO;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case ZPOOL_MM_WO:
|
|
|
|
zs_mm = ZS_MM_WO;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2020-04-07 11:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
case ZPOOL_MM_RW:
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
zs_mm = ZS_MM_RW;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return zs_map_object(pool, handle, zs_mm);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void zs_zpool_unmap(void *pool, unsigned long handle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
zs_unmap_object(pool, handle);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static u64 zs_zpool_total_size(void *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2014-10-10 06:29:50 +08:00
|
|
|
return zs_get_total_pages(pool) << PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct zpool_driver zs_zpool_driver = {
|
2019-09-24 06:39:37 +08:00
|
|
|
.type = "zsmalloc",
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
|
|
|
.create = zs_zpool_create,
|
|
|
|
.destroy = zs_zpool_destroy,
|
|
|
|
.malloc_support_movable = true,
|
|
|
|
.malloc = zs_zpool_malloc,
|
|
|
|
.free = zs_zpool_free,
|
|
|
|
.map = zs_zpool_map,
|
|
|
|
.unmap = zs_zpool_unmap,
|
|
|
|
.total_size = zs_zpool_total_size,
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-30 06:18:40 +08:00
|
|
|
MODULE_ALIAS("zpool-zsmalloc");
|
2014-08-07 07:08:38 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* CONFIG_ZPOOL */
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* per-cpu VM mapping areas for zspage accesses that cross page boundaries */
|
2022-01-22 14:14:17 +08:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mapping_area, zs_map_area) = {
|
|
|
|
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
|
|
|
|
};
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:47:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static __maybe_unused int is_first_page(struct page *page)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2012-04-25 14:23:09 +08:00
|
|
|
return PagePrivate(page);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Protected by pool->lock */
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline int get_zspage_inuse(struct zspage *zspage)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage->inuse;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void mod_zspage_inuse(struct zspage *zspage, int val)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->inuse += val;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline struct page *get_first_page(struct zspage *zspage)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *first_page = zspage->first_page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_page(first_page), first_page);
|
|
|
|
return first_page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-09 16:37:22 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned int get_first_obj_offset(struct page *page)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
return page->page_type;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-09-09 16:37:22 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void set_first_obj_offset(struct page *page, unsigned int offset)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
page->page_type = offset;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned int get_freeobj(struct zspage *zspage)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage->freeobj;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void set_freeobj(struct zspage *zspage, unsigned int obj)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->freeobj = obj;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:17 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct size_class *zspage_class(struct zs_pool *pool,
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage)
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return pool->size_class[zspage->class];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* zsmalloc divides the pool into various size classes where each
|
|
|
|
* class maintains a list of zspages where each zspage is divided
|
|
|
|
* into equal sized chunks. Each allocation falls into one of these
|
|
|
|
* classes depending on its size. This function returns index of the
|
2021-05-07 09:05:51 +08:00
|
|
|
* size class which has chunk size big enough to hold the given size.
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static int get_size_class_index(int size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (likely(size > ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE))
|
|
|
|
idx = DIV_ROUND_UP(size - ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
return min_t(int, ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1, idx);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:54 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void class_stat_inc(struct size_class *class,
|
2017-09-09 07:13:02 +08:00
|
|
|
int type, unsigned long cnt)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
class->stats.objs[type] += cnt;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:54 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void class_stat_dec(struct size_class *class,
|
2017-09-09 07:13:02 +08:00
|
|
|
int type, unsigned long cnt)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
class->stats.objs[type] -= cnt;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned long zs_stat_get(struct size_class *class, int type)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return class->stats.objs[type];
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init zs_stat_init(void)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!debugfs_initialized()) {
|
|
|
|
pr_warn("debugfs not available, stat dir not created\n");
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zs_stat_root = debugfs_create_dir("zsmalloc", NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __exit zs_stat_exit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
debugfs_remove_recursive(zs_stat_root);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-18 05:20:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long zs_can_compact(struct size_class *class);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static int zs_stats_size_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
int i, fg;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool = s->private;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
int objs_per_zspage;
|
2016-03-18 05:20:42 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long obj_allocated, obj_used, pages_used, freeable;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long total_objs = 0, total_used_objs = 0, total_pages = 0;
|
2016-03-18 05:20:42 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long total_freeable = 0;
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long inuse_totals[NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS] = {0, };
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, " %5s %5s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %9s %13s %10s %10s %16s %8s\n",
|
|
|
|
"class", "size", "10%", "20%", "30%", "40%",
|
|
|
|
"50%", "60%", "70%", "80%", "90%", "99%", "100%",
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
"obj_allocated", "obj_used", "pages_used",
|
2016-03-18 05:20:42 +08:00
|
|
|
"pages_per_zspage", "freeable");
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ZS_SIZE_CLASSES; i++) {
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (class->index != i)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, " %5u %5u ", i, class->size);
|
|
|
|
for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10; fg < NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS; fg++) {
|
|
|
|
inuse_totals[fg] += zs_stat_get(class, fg);
|
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, "%9lu ", zs_stat_get(class, fg));
|
|
|
|
}
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
obj_allocated = zs_stat_get(class, ZS_OBJS_ALLOCATED);
|
|
|
|
obj_used = zs_stat_get(class, ZS_OBJS_INUSE);
|
2016-03-18 05:20:42 +08:00
|
|
|
freeable = zs_can_compact(class);
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-29 06:47:49 +08:00
|
|
|
objs_per_zspage = class->objs_per_zspage;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
pages_used = obj_allocated / objs_per_zspage *
|
|
|
|
class->pages_per_zspage;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, "%13lu %10lu %10lu %16d %8lu\n",
|
|
|
|
obj_allocated, obj_used, pages_used,
|
|
|
|
class->pages_per_zspage, freeable);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
total_objs += obj_allocated;
|
|
|
|
total_used_objs += obj_used;
|
|
|
|
total_pages += pages_used;
|
2016-03-18 05:20:42 +08:00
|
|
|
total_freeable += freeable;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seq_puts(s, "\n");
|
2023-03-04 11:48:35 +08:00
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, " %5s %5s ", "Total", "");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10; fg < NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS; fg++)
|
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, "%9lu ", inuse_totals[fg]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seq_printf(s, "%13lu %10lu %10lu %16s %8lu\n",
|
|
|
|
total_objs, total_used_objs, total_pages, "",
|
|
|
|
total_freeable);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-04-06 07:23:16 +08:00
|
|
|
DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(zs_stats_size);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-21 07:59:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static void zs_pool_stat_create(struct zs_pool *pool, const char *name)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!zs_stat_root) {
|
|
|
|
pr_warn("no root stat dir, not creating <%s> stat dir\n", name);
|
2016-05-21 07:59:56 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-22 23:21:09 +08:00
|
|
|
pool->stat_dentry = debugfs_create_dir(name, zs_stat_root);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debugfs_create_file("classes", S_IFREG | 0444, pool->stat_dentry, pool,
|
|
|
|
&zs_stats_size_fops);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zs_pool_stat_destroy(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
debugfs_remove_recursive(pool->stat_dentry);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#else /* CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT */
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __init zs_stat_init(void)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __exit zs_stat_exit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-21 07:59:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void zs_pool_stat_create(struct zs_pool *pool, const char *name)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:42 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void zs_pool_stat_destroy(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* For each size class, zspages are divided into different groups
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* depending on their usage ratio. This function returns fullness
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
* status of the given page.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static int get_fullness_group(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int inuse, objs_per_zspage, ratio;
|
2016-05-21 07:59:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
inuse = get_zspage_inuse(zspage);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:11 +08:00
|
|
|
objs_per_zspage = class->objs_per_zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (inuse == 0)
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0;
|
|
|
|
if (inuse == objs_per_zspage)
|
|
|
|
return ZS_INUSE_RATIO_100;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
ratio = 100 * inuse / objs_per_zspage;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Take integer division into consideration: a page with one inuse
|
|
|
|
* object out of 127 possible, will end up having 0 usage ratio,
|
|
|
|
* which is wrong as it belongs in ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10 fullness group.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return ratio / 10 + 1;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Each size class maintains various freelists and zspages are assigned
|
|
|
|
* to one of these freelists based on the number of live objects they
|
|
|
|
* have. This functions inserts the given zspage into the freelist
|
|
|
|
* identified by <class, fullness_group>.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-05-21 07:59:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static void insert_zspage(struct size_class *class,
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage,
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int fullness)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-01-22 14:13:54 +08:00
|
|
|
class_stat_inc(class, fullness, 1);
|
2023-03-04 11:48:32 +08:00
|
|
|
list_add(&zspage->list, &class->fullness_list[fullness]);
|
2024-02-20 14:53:00 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->fullness = fullness;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This function removes the given zspage from the freelist identified
|
|
|
|
* by <class, fullness_group>.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2024-02-20 14:53:01 +08:00
|
|
|
static void remove_zspage(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-20 14:53:01 +08:00
|
|
|
int fullness = zspage->fullness;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&class->fullness_list[fullness]));
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
list_del_init(&zspage->list);
|
2022-01-22 14:13:54 +08:00
|
|
|
class_stat_dec(class, fullness, 1);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Each size class maintains zspages in different fullness groups depending
|
|
|
|
* on the number of live objects they contain. When allocating or freeing
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* objects, the fullness status of the page can change, for instance, from
|
|
|
|
* INUSE_RATIO_80 to INUSE_RATIO_70 when freeing an object. This function
|
|
|
|
* checks if such a status change has occurred for the given page and
|
|
|
|
* accordingly moves the page from the list of the old fullness group to that
|
|
|
|
* of the new fullness group.
|
2013-12-11 10:04:37 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fix_fullness_group(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-20 14:53:02 +08:00
|
|
|
int newfg;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
newfg = get_fullness_group(class, zspage);
|
2024-02-20 14:53:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (newfg == zspage->fullness)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-20 14:53:01 +08:00
|
|
|
remove_zspage(class, zspage);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:07 +08:00
|
|
|
insert_zspage(class, zspage, newfg);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
return newfg;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct zspage *get_zspage(struct page *page)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-02-26 09:18:34 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage = (struct zspage *)page_private(page);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(zspage->magic != ZSPAGE_MAGIC);
|
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct page *get_next_page(struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage = get_zspage(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(ZsHugePage(zspage)))
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
return (struct page *)page->index;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* obj_to_location - get (<page>, <obj_idx>) from encoded object value
|
2018-04-06 07:24:57 +08:00
|
|
|
* @obj: the encoded object value
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
* @page: page object resides in zspage
|
|
|
|
* @obj_idx: object index
|
2013-11-23 01:30:41 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
static void obj_to_location(unsigned long obj, struct page **page,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int *obj_idx)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
*page = pfn_to_page(obj >> OBJ_INDEX_BITS);
|
|
|
|
*obj_idx = (obj & OBJ_INDEX_MASK);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
static void obj_to_page(unsigned long obj, struct page **page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
*page = pfn_to_page(obj >> OBJ_INDEX_BITS);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* location_to_obj - get obj value encoded from (<page>, <obj_idx>)
|
|
|
|
* @page: page object resides in zspage
|
|
|
|
* @obj_idx: object index
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static unsigned long location_to_obj(struct page *page, unsigned int obj_idx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long obj;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = page_to_pfn(page) << OBJ_INDEX_BITS;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
obj |= obj_idx & OBJ_INDEX_MASK;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
return obj;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long handle_to_obj(unsigned long handle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return *(unsigned long *)handle;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-09 10:56:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline bool obj_allocated(struct page *page, void *obj,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long *phandle)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long handle;
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage = get_zspage(page);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(ZsHugePage(zspage))) {
|
2016-05-21 07:59:39 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_page(page), page);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
handle = page->index;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:39 +08:00
|
|
|
} else
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
handle = *(unsigned long *)obj;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-09 10:56:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!(handle & OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG))
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-11 07:17:01 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Clear all tags before returning the handle */
|
|
|
|
*phandle = handle & ~OBJ_TAG_MASK;
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-02 22:13:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static void reset_page(struct page *page)
|
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
__ClearPageMovable(page);
|
2016-07-29 06:48:00 +08:00
|
|
|
ClearPagePrivate(page);
|
2012-04-02 22:13:56 +08:00
|
|
|
set_page_private(page, 0);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
page_mapcount_reset(page);
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
page->index = 0;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static int trylock_zspage(struct zspage *zspage)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page *cursor, *fail;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (cursor = get_first_page(zspage); cursor != NULL; cursor =
|
|
|
|
get_next_page(cursor)) {
|
|
|
|
if (!trylock_page(cursor)) {
|
|
|
|
fail = cursor;
|
|
|
|
goto unlock;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
unlock:
|
|
|
|
for (cursor = get_first_page(zspage); cursor != fail; cursor =
|
|
|
|
get_next_page(cursor))
|
|
|
|
unlock_page(cursor);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2012-04-02 22:13:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __free_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class,
|
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page, *next;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
assert_spin_locked(&pool->lock);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(get_zspage_inuse(zspage));
|
2024-02-20 14:53:02 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(zspage->fullness != ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
next = page = get_first_page(zspage);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
do {
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
|
|
|
|
next = get_next_page(page);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
reset_page(page);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
2016-07-27 06:24:45 +08:00
|
|
|
dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZSPAGES);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
|
|
|
page = next;
|
|
|
|
} while (page != NULL);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
cache_free_zspage(pool, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
class_stat_dec(class, ZS_OBJS_ALLOCATED, class->objs_per_zspage);
|
|
|
|
atomic_long_sub(class->pages_per_zspage, &pool->pages_allocated);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void free_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class,
|
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(get_zspage_inuse(zspage));
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&zspage->list));
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Since zs_free couldn't be sleepable, this function cannot call
|
|
|
|
* lock_page. The page locks trylock_zspage got will be released
|
|
|
|
* by __free_zspage.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!trylock_zspage(zspage)) {
|
|
|
|
kick_deferred_free(pool);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-20 14:53:01 +08:00
|
|
|
remove_zspage(class, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
__free_zspage(pool, class, zspage);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize a newly allocated zspage */
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static void init_zspage(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int freeobj = 1;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long off = 0;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page = get_first_page(zspage);
|
2016-05-21 07:59:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
while (page) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *next_page;
|
|
|
|
struct link_free *link;
|
2014-12-13 08:56:58 +08:00
|
|
|
void *vaddr;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
set_first_obj_offset(page, off);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-13 08:56:58 +08:00
|
|
|
vaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
|
|
|
|
link = (struct link_free *)vaddr + off / sizeof(*link);
|
2014-10-10 06:30:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ((off += class->size) < PAGE_SIZE) {
|
2016-07-27 06:23:37 +08:00
|
|
|
link->next = freeobj++ << OBJ_TAG_BITS;
|
2014-10-10 06:30:01 +08:00
|
|
|
link += class->size / sizeof(*link);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We now come to the last (full or partial) object on this
|
|
|
|
* page, which must point to the first object on the next
|
|
|
|
* page (if present)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
next_page = get_next_page(page);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (next_page) {
|
2016-07-27 06:23:37 +08:00
|
|
|
link->next = freeobj++ << OBJ_TAG_BITS;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2016-07-27 06:23:37 +08:00
|
|
|
* Reset OBJ_TAG_BITS bit to last link to tell
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
* whether it's allocated object or not.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-02-01 08:20:15 +08:00
|
|
|
link->next = -1UL << OBJ_TAG_BITS;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-12-13 08:56:58 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
page = next_page;
|
2014-10-10 06:30:01 +08:00
|
|
|
off %= PAGE_SIZE;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
set_freeobj(zspage, 0);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void create_page_chain(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[])
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
|
|
|
struct page *prev_page = NULL;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
int nr_pages = class->pages_per_zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Allocate individual pages and link them together as:
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
* 1. all pages are linked together using page->index
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* 2. each sub-page point to zspage using page->private
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* we set PG_private to identify the first page (i.e. no other sub-page
|
2017-02-25 06:59:42 +08:00
|
|
|
* has this flag set).
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
|
|
|
|
page = pages[i];
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)zspage);
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
page->index = 0;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
if (i == 0) {
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->first_page = page;
|
2012-04-25 14:23:09 +08:00
|
|
|
SetPagePrivate(page);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(class->objs_per_zspage == 1 &&
|
|
|
|
class->pages_per_zspage == 1))
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
SetZsHugePage(zspage);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2021-10-04 21:46:47 +08:00
|
|
|
prev_page->index = (unsigned long)page;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
prev_page = page;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Allocate a zspage for the given size class
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct zspage *alloc_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool,
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class,
|
|
|
|
gfp_t gfp)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE];
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage = cache_alloc_zspage(pool, gfp);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!zspage)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->magic = ZSPAGE_MAGIC;
|
|
|
|
migrate_lock_init(zspage);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < class->pages_per_zspage; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
page = alloc_page(gfp);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!page) {
|
2016-07-27 06:24:45 +08:00
|
|
|
while (--i >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
dec_zone_page_state(pages[i], NR_ZSPAGES);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
__free_page(pages[i]);
|
2016-07-27 06:24:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
cache_free_zspage(pool, zspage);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:24:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZSPAGES);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
pages[i] = page;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
create_page_chain(class, zspage, pages);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
init_zspage(class, zspage);
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->pool = pool;
|
2024-02-20 14:53:00 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage->class = class->index;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct zspage *find_get_zspage(struct size_class *class)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_99; i >= ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0; i--) {
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage = list_first_entry_or_null(&class->fullness_list[i],
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage, list);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (zspage)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline int __zs_cpu_up(struct mapping_area *area)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Make sure we don't leak memory if a cpu UP notification
|
|
|
|
* and zs_init() race and both call zs_cpu_up() on the same cpu
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (area->vm_buf)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2014-12-13 08:57:01 +08:00
|
|
|
area->vm_buf = kmalloc(ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!area->vm_buf)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void __zs_cpu_down(struct mapping_area *area)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2014-12-13 08:57:01 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(area->vm_buf);
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
area->vm_buf = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void *__zs_map_object(struct mapping_area *area,
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[2], int off, int size)
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int sizes[2];
|
|
|
|
void *addr;
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
char *buf = area->vm_buf;
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* disable page faults to match kmap_atomic() return conditions */
|
|
|
|
pagefault_disable();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* no read fastpath */
|
|
|
|
if (area->vm_mm == ZS_MM_WO)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sizes[0] = PAGE_SIZE - off;
|
|
|
|
sizes[1] = size - sizes[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* copy object to per-cpu buffer */
|
|
|
|
addr = kmap_atomic(pages[0]);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(buf, addr + off, sizes[0]);
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(addr);
|
|
|
|
addr = kmap_atomic(pages[1]);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(buf + sizes[0], addr, sizes[1]);
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(addr);
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
return area->vm_buf;
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __zs_unmap_object(struct mapping_area *area,
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[2], int off, int size)
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int sizes[2];
|
|
|
|
void *addr;
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
char *buf;
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* no write fastpath */
|
|
|
|
if (area->vm_mm == ZS_MM_RO)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:39 +08:00
|
|
|
buf = area->vm_buf;
|
2016-03-18 05:20:39 +08:00
|
|
|
buf = buf + ZS_HANDLE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
size -= ZS_HANDLE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
off += ZS_HANDLE_SIZE;
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
sizes[0] = PAGE_SIZE - off;
|
|
|
|
sizes[1] = size - sizes[0];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* copy per-cpu buffer to object */
|
|
|
|
addr = kmap_atomic(pages[0]);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(addr + off, buf, sizes[0]);
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(addr);
|
|
|
|
addr = kmap_atomic(pages[1]);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(addr, buf + sizes[0], sizes[1]);
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(addr);
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
/* enable page faults to match kunmap_atomic() return conditions */
|
|
|
|
pagefault_enable();
|
2012-07-03 05:15:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
static int zs_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct mapping_area *area;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
area = &per_cpu(zs_map_area, cpu);
|
|
|
|
return __zs_cpu_up(area);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
static int zs_cpu_dead(unsigned int cpu)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
struct mapping_area *area;
|
2014-12-13 08:57:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
area = &per_cpu(zs_map_area, cpu);
|
|
|
|
__zs_cpu_down(area);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2014-12-13 08:56:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool can_merge(struct size_class *prev, int pages_per_zspage,
|
|
|
|
int objs_per_zspage)
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if (prev->pages_per_zspage == pages_per_zspage &&
|
|
|
|
prev->objs_per_zspage == objs_per_zspage)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool zspage_full(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return get_zspage_inuse(zspage) == class->objs_per_zspage;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-11-09 19:50:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-24 13:12:14 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool zspage_empty(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return get_zspage_inuse(zspage) == 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-09 19:50:42 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* zs_lookup_class_index() - Returns index of the zsmalloc &size_class
|
|
|
|
* that hold objects of the provided size.
|
|
|
|
* @pool: zsmalloc pool to use
|
|
|
|
* @size: object size
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Context: Any context.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Return: the index of the zsmalloc &size_class that hold objects of the
|
|
|
|
* provided size.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
unsigned int zs_lookup_class_index(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned int size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return class->index;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_lookup_class_index);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long zs_get_total_pages(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return atomic_long_read(&pool->pages_allocated);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_get_total_pages);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-05 04:14:00 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* zs_map_object - get address of allocated object from handle.
|
|
|
|
* @pool: pool from which the object was allocated
|
|
|
|
* @handle: handle returned from zs_malloc
|
2021-05-07 09:06:47 +08:00
|
|
|
* @mm: mapping mode to use
|
2013-01-05 04:14:00 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* Before using an object allocated from zs_malloc, it must be mapped using
|
|
|
|
* this function. When done with the object, it must be unmapped using
|
|
|
|
* zs_unmap_object.
|
2013-01-05 04:14:00 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* Only one object can be mapped per cpu at a time. There is no protection
|
|
|
|
* against nested mappings.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function returns with preemption and page faults disabled.
|
2013-01-05 04:14:00 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
void *zs_map_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle,
|
|
|
|
enum zs_mapmode mm)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long obj, off;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int obj_idx;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
struct mapping_area *area;
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[2];
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
void *ret;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* Because we use per-cpu mapping areas shared among the
|
|
|
|
* pools/users, we can't allow mapping in interrupt context
|
|
|
|
* because it can corrupt another users mappings.
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-11-16 09:34:03 +08:00
|
|
|
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/* It guarantees it can get zspage from handle safely */
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
|
|
|
|
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage = get_zspage(page);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* migration cannot move any zpages in this zspage. Here, pool->lock
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* is too heavy since callers would take some time until they calls
|
|
|
|
* zs_unmap_object API so delegate the locking from class to zspage
|
|
|
|
* which is smaller granularity.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
migrate_read_lock(zspage);
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
|
2023-05-16 17:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
off = offset_in_page(class->size * obj_idx);
|
2014-12-13 08:57:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:17 +08:00
|
|
|
local_lock(&zs_map_area.lock);
|
|
|
|
area = this_cpu_ptr(&zs_map_area);
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
area->vm_mm = mm;
|
|
|
|
if (off + class->size <= PAGE_SIZE) {
|
|
|
|
/* this object is contained entirely within a page */
|
|
|
|
area->vm_addr = kmap_atomic(page);
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = area->vm_addr + off;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* this object spans two pages */
|
|
|
|
pages[0] = page;
|
|
|
|
pages[1] = get_next_page(page);
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!pages[1]);
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = __zs_map_object(area, pages, off, class->size);
|
|
|
|
out:
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (likely(!ZsHugePage(zspage)))
|
2015-04-16 07:15:39 +08:00
|
|
|
ret += ZS_HANDLE_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_map_object);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
void zs_unmap_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long obj, off;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int obj_idx;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
struct mapping_area *area;
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
|
|
|
|
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage = get_zspage(page);
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
|
2023-05-16 17:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
off = offset_in_page(class->size * obj_idx);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
area = this_cpu_ptr(&zs_map_area);
|
|
|
|
if (off + class->size <= PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(area->vm_addr);
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[2];
|
2014-12-13 08:57:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
pages[0] = page;
|
|
|
|
pages[1] = get_next_page(page);
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!pages[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__zs_unmap_object(area, pages, off, class->size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-22 14:14:17 +08:00
|
|
|
local_unlock(&zs_map_area.lock);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
migrate_read_unlock(zspage);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_unmap_object);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: introduce zs_huge_class_size()
Patch series "zsmalloc/zram: drop zram's max_zpage_size", v3.
ZRAM's max_zpage_size is a bad thing. It forces zsmalloc to store
normal objects as huge ones, which results in bigger zsmalloc memory
usage. Drop it and use actual zsmalloc huge-class value when decide if
the object is huge or not.
This patch (of 2):
Not every object can be share its zspage with other objects, e.g. when
the object is as big as zspage or nearly as big a zspage. For such
objects zsmalloc has a so called huge class - every object which belongs
to huge class consumes the entire zspage (which consists of a physical
page). On x86_64, PAGE_SHIFT 12 box, the first non-huge class size is
3264, so starting down from size 3264, objects can share page(-s) and
thus minimize memory wastage.
ZRAM, however, has its own statically defined watermark for huge
objects, namely "3 * PAGE_SIZE / 4 = 3072", and forcibly stores every
object larger than this watermark (3072) as a PAGE_SIZE object, in other
words, to a huge class, while zsmalloc can keep some of those objects in
non-huge classes. This results in increased memory consumption.
zsmalloc knows better if the object is huge or not. Introduce
zs_huge_class_size() function which tells if the given object can be
stored in one of non-huge classes or not. This will let us to drop
ZRAM's huge object watermark and fully rely on zsmalloc when we decide
if the object is huge.
[sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com: add pool param to zs_huge_class_size()]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314081833.1096-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180306070639.7389-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-06 07:24:43 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* zs_huge_class_size() - Returns the size (in bytes) of the first huge
|
|
|
|
* zsmalloc &size_class.
|
|
|
|
* @pool: zsmalloc pool to use
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The function returns the size of the first huge class - any object of equal
|
|
|
|
* or bigger size will be stored in zspage consisting of a single physical
|
|
|
|
* page.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Context: Any context.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Return: the size (in bytes) of the first huge zsmalloc &size_class.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
size_t zs_huge_class_size(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return huge_class_size;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_huge_class_size);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:57 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long obj_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool,
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage, unsigned long handle)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
int i, nr_page, offset;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long obj;
|
|
|
|
struct link_free *link;
|
2022-01-22 14:13:57 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct page *m_page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long m_offset;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
void *vaddr;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:13:57 +08:00
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[zspage->class];
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
handle |= OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = get_freeobj(zspage);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
offset = obj * class->size;
|
|
|
|
nr_page = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
2023-05-16 17:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
m_offset = offset_in_page(offset);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
m_page = get_first_page(zspage);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nr_page; i++)
|
|
|
|
m_page = get_next_page(m_page);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vaddr = kmap_atomic(m_page);
|
|
|
|
link = (struct link_free *)vaddr + m_offset / sizeof(*link);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:37 +08:00
|
|
|
set_freeobj(zspage, link->next >> OBJ_TAG_BITS);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (likely(!ZsHugePage(zspage)))
|
2015-04-16 07:15:39 +08:00
|
|
|
/* record handle in the header of allocated chunk */
|
|
|
|
link->handle = handle;
|
|
|
|
else
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
/* record handle to page->index */
|
|
|
|
zspage->first_page->index = handle;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
mod_zspage_inuse(zspage, 1);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = location_to_obj(m_page, obj);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return obj;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* zs_malloc - Allocate block of given size from pool.
|
|
|
|
* @pool: pool to allocate from
|
|
|
|
* @size: size of block to allocate
|
2016-07-29 06:47:54 +08:00
|
|
|
* @gfp: gfp flags when allocating object
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2012-05-03 14:40:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* On success, handle to the allocated object is returned,
|
2022-07-14 16:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
* otherwise an ERR_PTR().
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
* Allocation requests with size > ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE will fail.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-05-21 07:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long zs_malloc(struct zs_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long handle, obj;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int newfg;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-28 14:18:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(!size))
|
2022-07-14 16:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
return (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-28 14:18:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(size > ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE))
|
|
|
|
return (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
handle = cache_alloc_handle(pool, gfp);
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!handle)
|
2022-07-14 16:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
return (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
/* extra space in chunk to keep the handle */
|
|
|
|
size += ZS_HANDLE_SIZE;
|
zsmalloc: merge size_class to reduce fragmentation
zsmalloc has many size_classes to reduce fragmentation and they are in 16
bytes unit, for example, 16, 32, 48, etc., if PAGE_SIZE is 4096. And,
zsmalloc has constraint that each zspage has 4 pages at maximum.
In this situation, we can see interesting aspect. Let's think about
size_class for 1488, 1472, ..., 1376. To prevent external fragmentation,
they uses 4 pages per zspage and so all they can contain 11 objects at
maximum.
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1488 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1472 * 11 + remains
16384 (4096 * 4) = ...
16384 (4096 * 4) = 1376 * 11 + remains
It means that they have same characteristics and classification between
them isn't needed. If we use one size_class for them, we can reduce
fragementation and save some memory since both the 1488 and 1472 sized
classes can only fit 11 objects into 4 pages, and an object that's 1472
bytes can fit into an object that's 1488 bytes, merging these classes to
always use objects that are 1488 bytes will reduce the total number of
size classes. And reducing the total number of size classes reduces
overall fragmentation, because a wider range of compressed pages can fit
into a single size class, leaving less unused objects in each size class.
For this purpose, this patch implement size_class merging. If there is
size_class that have same pages_per_zspage and same number of objects per
zspage with previous size_class, we don't create new size_class. Instead,
we use previous, same characteristic size_class. With this way, above
example sizes (1488, 1472, ..., 1376) use just one size_class so we can
get much more memory utilization.
Below is result of my simple test.
TEST ENV: EXT4 on zram, mount with discard option WORKLOAD: untar kernel
source code, remove directory in descending order in size. (drivers arch
fs sound include net Documentation firmware kernel tools)
Each line represents orig_data_size, compr_data_size, mem_used_total,
fragmentation overhead (mem_used - compr_data_size) and overhead ratio
(overhead to compr_data_size), respectively, after untar and remove
operation is executed.
* untar-nomerge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
525.88MB 199.16MB 210.23MB 11.08MB 5.56%
288.32MB 97.43MB 105.63MB 8.20MB 8.41%
177.32MB 61.12MB 69.40MB 8.28MB 13.55%
146.47MB 47.32MB 56.10MB 8.78MB 18.55%
124.16MB 38.85MB 48.41MB 9.55MB 24.58%
103.93MB 31.68MB 40.93MB 9.25MB 29.21%
84.34MB 22.86MB 32.72MB 9.86MB 43.13%
66.87MB 14.83MB 23.83MB 9.00MB 60.70%
60.67MB 11.11MB 18.60MB 7.49MB 67.48%
55.86MB 8.83MB 16.61MB 7.77MB 88.03%
53.32MB 8.01MB 15.32MB 7.31MB 91.24%
* untar-merge.out
orig_size compr_size used_size overhead overhead_ratio
526.23MB 199.18MB 209.81MB 10.64MB 5.34%
288.68MB 97.45MB 104.08MB 6.63MB 6.80%
177.68MB 61.14MB 66.93MB 5.79MB 9.47%
146.83MB 47.34MB 52.79MB 5.45MB 11.51%
124.52MB 38.87MB 44.30MB 5.43MB 13.96%
104.29MB 31.70MB 36.83MB 5.13MB 16.19%
84.70MB 22.88MB 27.92MB 5.04MB 22.04%
67.11MB 14.83MB 19.26MB 4.43MB 29.86%
60.82MB 11.10MB 14.90MB 3.79MB 34.17%
55.90MB 8.82MB 12.61MB 3.79MB 42.97%
53.32MB 8.01MB 11.73MB 3.73MB 46.53%
As you can see above result, merged one has better utilization (overhead
ratio, 5th column) and uses less memory (mem_used_total, 3rd column).
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: "seungho1.park" <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-13 08:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[get_size_class_index(size)];
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/* pool->lock effectively protects the zpage migration */
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage = find_get_zspage(class);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (likely(zspage)) {
|
2022-01-22 14:13:57 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = obj_malloc(pool, zspage, handle);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Now move the zspage to another fullness group, if required */
|
|
|
|
fix_fullness_group(class, zspage);
|
|
|
|
record_obj(handle, obj);
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
class_stat_inc(class, ZS_OBJS_INUSE, 1);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: move LRU update from zs_map_object() to zs_malloc()
Under memory pressure, we sometimes observe the following crash:
[ 5694.832838] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5694.842093] list_del corruption, ffff888014b6a448->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
[ 5694.858677] WARNING: CPU: 33 PID: 418824 at lib/list_debug.c:47 __list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80
[ 5694.961820] CPU: 33 PID: 418824 Comm: fuse_counters.s Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 5.19.0-0_fbk3_rc3_hoangnhatpzsdynshrv41_10870_g85a9558a25de #1
[ 5694.990194] Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM16 05/24/2021
[ 5695.007072] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80
[ 5695.017351] Code: 08 48 83 c2 22 48 39 d0 74 24 48 8b 10 48 39 f2 75 2c 48 8b 51 08 b0 01 48 39 f2 75 34 c3 48 c7 c7 55 d7 78 82 e8 4e 45 3b 00 <0f> 0b eb 31 48 c7 c7 27 a8 70 82 e8 3e 45 3b 00 0f 0b eb 21 48 c7
[ 5695.054919] RSP: 0018:ffffc90027aef4f0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 5695.065366] RAX: 41fe484987275300 RBX: ffff888008988180 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 5695.079636] RDX: ffff88886006c280 RSI: ffff888860060480 RDI: ffff888860060480
[ 5695.093904] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc90027aef370
[ 5695.108175] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff82fdf1c0 R12: 0000000010000002
[ 5695.122447] R13: ffff888014b6a448 R14: ffff888014b6a420 R15: 00000000138dc240
[ 5695.136717] FS: 00007f23a7d3f740(0000) GS:ffff888860040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 5695.152899] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 5695.164388] CR2: 0000560ceaab6ac0 CR3: 000000001c06c001 CR4: 00000000007706e0
[ 5695.178659] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 5695.192927] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 5695.207197] PKRU: 55555554
[ 5695.212602] Call Trace:
[ 5695.217486] <TASK>
[ 5695.221674] zs_map_object+0x91/0x270
[ 5695.229000] zswap_frontswap_store+0x33d/0x870
[ 5695.237885] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x5d/0xa0
[ 5695.245899] __frontswap_store+0x51/0xb0
[ 5695.253742] swap_writepage+0x3c/0x60
[ 5695.261063] shrink_page_list+0x738/0x1230
[ 5695.269255] shrink_lruvec+0x5ec/0xcd0
[ 5695.276749] ? shrink_slab+0x187/0x5f0
[ 5695.284240] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x6e/0x120
[ 5695.292255] shrink_node+0x293/0x7b0
[ 5695.299402] do_try_to_free_pages+0xea/0x550
[ 5695.307940] try_to_free_pages+0x19a/0x490
[ 5695.316126] __folio_alloc+0x19ff/0x3e40
[ 5695.323971] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0
[ 5695.332681] ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50
[ 5695.340697] ? generic_permission+0xda/0x2a0
[ 5695.349231] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0
[ 5695.357940] ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50
[ 5695.365955] vma_alloc_folio+0x10e/0x570
[ 5695.373796] ? walk_component+0x52/0xb50
[ 5695.381634] wp_page_copy+0x38c/0xc10
[ 5695.388953] ? filename_lookup+0x378/0xbc0
[ 5695.397140] handle_mm_fault+0x87f/0x1800
[ 5695.405157] do_user_addr_fault+0x1bd/0x570
[ 5695.413520] exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110
[ 5695.421017] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
After some investigation, I have found the following issue: unlike other
zswap backends, zsmalloc performs the LRU list update at the object
mapping time, rather than when the slot for the object is allocated.
This deviation was discussed and agreed upon during the review process
of the zsmalloc writeback patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3flcAXNxxrvy3ZH@cmpxchg.org/
Unfortunately, this introduces a subtle bug that occurs when there is a
concurrent store and reclaim, which interleave as follows:
zswap_frontswap_store() shrink_worker()
zs_malloc() zs_zpool_shrink()
spin_lock(&pool->lock) zs_reclaim_page()
zspage = find_get_zspage()
spin_unlock(&pool->lock)
spin_lock(&pool->lock)
zspage = list_first_entry(&pool->lru)
list_del(&zspage->lru)
zspage->lru.next = LIST_POISON1
zspage->lru.prev = LIST_POISON2
spin_unlock(&pool->lock)
zs_map_object()
spin_lock(&pool->lock)
if (!list_empty(&zspage->lru))
list_del(&zspage->lru)
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1) /* BOOM */
With the current upstream code, this issue rarely happens. zswap only
triggers writeback when the pool is already full, at which point all
further store attempts are short-circuited. This creates an implicit
pseudo-serialization between reclaim and store. I am working on a new
zswap shrinking mechanism, which makes interleaving reclaim and store
more likely, exposing this bug.
zbud and z3fold do not have this problem, because they perform the LRU
list update in the alloc function, while still holding the pool's lock.
This patch fixes the aforementioned bug by moving the LRU update back to
zs_malloc(), analogous to zbud and z3fold.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230505185054.2417128-1-nphamcs@gmail.com
Fixes: 64f768c6b32e ("zsmalloc: add a LRU to zs_pool to keep track of zspages in LRU order")
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-05-06 02:50:54 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zspage = alloc_zspage(pool, class, gfp);
|
|
|
|
if (!zspage) {
|
|
|
|
cache_free_handle(pool, handle);
|
2022-07-14 16:07:57 +08:00
|
|
|
return (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
2022-01-22 14:13:57 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = obj_malloc(pool, zspage, handle);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
newfg = get_fullness_group(class, zspage);
|
|
|
|
insert_zspage(class, zspage, newfg);
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
record_obj(handle, obj);
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_add(class->pages_per_zspage, &pool->pages_allocated);
|
|
|
|
class_stat_inc(class, ZS_OBJS_ALLOCATED, class->objs_per_zspage);
|
|
|
|
class_stat_inc(class, ZS_OBJS_INUSE, 1);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We completely set up zspage so mark them as movable */
|
|
|
|
SetZsPageMovable(pool, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: move LRU update from zs_map_object() to zs_malloc()
Under memory pressure, we sometimes observe the following crash:
[ 5694.832838] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5694.842093] list_del corruption, ffff888014b6a448->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
[ 5694.858677] WARNING: CPU: 33 PID: 418824 at lib/list_debug.c:47 __list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80
[ 5694.961820] CPU: 33 PID: 418824 Comm: fuse_counters.s Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S 5.19.0-0_fbk3_rc3_hoangnhatpzsdynshrv41_10870_g85a9558a25de #1
[ 5694.990194] Hardware name: Wiwynn Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS YMM16 05/24/2021
[ 5695.007072] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x42/0x80
[ 5695.017351] Code: 08 48 83 c2 22 48 39 d0 74 24 48 8b 10 48 39 f2 75 2c 48 8b 51 08 b0 01 48 39 f2 75 34 c3 48 c7 c7 55 d7 78 82 e8 4e 45 3b 00 <0f> 0b eb 31 48 c7 c7 27 a8 70 82 e8 3e 45 3b 00 0f 0b eb 21 48 c7
[ 5695.054919] RSP: 0018:ffffc90027aef4f0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 5695.065366] RAX: 41fe484987275300 RBX: ffff888008988180 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 5695.079636] RDX: ffff88886006c280 RSI: ffff888860060480 RDI: ffff888860060480
[ 5695.093904] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc90027aef370
[ 5695.108175] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff82fdf1c0 R12: 0000000010000002
[ 5695.122447] R13: ffff888014b6a448 R14: ffff888014b6a420 R15: 00000000138dc240
[ 5695.136717] FS: 00007f23a7d3f740(0000) GS:ffff888860040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 5695.152899] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 5695.164388] CR2: 0000560ceaab6ac0 CR3: 000000001c06c001 CR4: 00000000007706e0
[ 5695.178659] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 5695.192927] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 5695.207197] PKRU: 55555554
[ 5695.212602] Call Trace:
[ 5695.217486] <TASK>
[ 5695.221674] zs_map_object+0x91/0x270
[ 5695.229000] zswap_frontswap_store+0x33d/0x870
[ 5695.237885] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x5d/0xa0
[ 5695.245899] __frontswap_store+0x51/0xb0
[ 5695.253742] swap_writepage+0x3c/0x60
[ 5695.261063] shrink_page_list+0x738/0x1230
[ 5695.269255] shrink_lruvec+0x5ec/0xcd0
[ 5695.276749] ? shrink_slab+0x187/0x5f0
[ 5695.284240] ? mem_cgroup_iter+0x6e/0x120
[ 5695.292255] shrink_node+0x293/0x7b0
[ 5695.299402] do_try_to_free_pages+0xea/0x550
[ 5695.307940] try_to_free_pages+0x19a/0x490
[ 5695.316126] __folio_alloc+0x19ff/0x3e40
[ 5695.323971] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0
[ 5695.332681] ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50
[ 5695.340697] ? generic_permission+0xda/0x2a0
[ 5695.349231] ? __filemap_get_folio+0x8a/0x4e0
[ 5695.357940] ? walk_component+0x2a8/0xb50
[ 5695.365955] vma_alloc_folio+0x10e/0x570
[ 5695.373796] ? walk_component+0x52/0xb50
[ 5695.381634] wp_page_copy+0x38c/0xc10
[ 5695.388953] ? filename_lookup+0x378/0xbc0
[ 5695.397140] handle_mm_fault+0x87f/0x1800
[ 5695.405157] do_user_addr_fault+0x1bd/0x570
[ 5695.413520] exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110
[ 5695.421017] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
After some investigation, I have found the following issue: unlike other
zswap backends, zsmalloc performs the LRU list update at the object
mapping time, rather than when the slot for the object is allocated.
This deviation was discussed and agreed upon during the review process
of the zsmalloc writeback patch series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3flcAXNxxrvy3ZH@cmpxchg.org/
Unfortunately, this introduces a subtle bug that occurs when there is a
concurrent store and reclaim, which interleave as follows:
zswap_frontswap_store() shrink_worker()
zs_malloc() zs_zpool_shrink()
spin_lock(&pool->lock) zs_reclaim_page()
zspage = find_get_zspage()
spin_unlock(&pool->lock)
spin_lock(&pool->lock)
zspage = list_first_entry(&pool->lru)
list_del(&zspage->lru)
zspage->lru.next = LIST_POISON1
zspage->lru.prev = LIST_POISON2
spin_unlock(&pool->lock)
zs_map_object()
spin_lock(&pool->lock)
if (!list_empty(&zspage->lru))
list_del(&zspage->lru)
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1) /* BOOM */
With the current upstream code, this issue rarely happens. zswap only
triggers writeback when the pool is already full, at which point all
further store attempts are short-circuited. This creates an implicit
pseudo-serialization between reclaim and store. I am working on a new
zswap shrinking mechanism, which makes interleaving reclaim and store
more likely, exposing this bug.
zbud and z3fold do not have this problem, because they perform the LRU
list update in the alloc function, while still holding the pool's lock.
This patch fixes the aforementioned bug by moving the LRU update back to
zs_malloc(), analogous to zbud and z3fold.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230505185054.2417128-1-nphamcs@gmail.com
Fixes: 64f768c6b32e ("zsmalloc: add a LRU to zs_pool to keep track of zspages in LRU order")
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-05-06 02:50:54 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return handle;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_malloc);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
static void obj_free(int class_size, unsigned long obj)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct link_free *link;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
|
|
|
struct page *f_page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long f_offset;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int f_objidx;
|
2014-12-13 08:56:58 +08:00
|
|
|
void *vaddr;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_to_location(obj, &f_page, &f_objidx);
|
2023-05-16 17:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
f_offset = offset_in_page(class_size * f_objidx);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage = get_zspage(f_page);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
vaddr = kmap_atomic(f_page);
|
2014-12-13 08:56:58 +08:00
|
|
|
link = (struct link_free *)(vaddr + f_offset);
|
2023-01-11 07:17:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Insert this object in containing zspage's freelist */
|
|
|
|
if (likely(!ZsHugePage(zspage)))
|
|
|
|
link->next = get_freeobj(zspage) << OBJ_TAG_BITS;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
f_page->index = 0;
|
|
|
|
set_freeobj(zspage, f_objidx);
|
2023-01-11 07:17:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-13 08:56:58 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
mod_zspage_inuse(zspage, -1);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void zs_free(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
|
|
|
struct page *f_page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long obj;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int fullness;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-08-16 13:09:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)handle))
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* The pool->lock protects the race with zpage's migration
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* so it's safe to get the page from handle.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_to_page(obj, &f_page);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
zspage = get_zspage(f_page);
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
class_stat_dec(class, ZS_OBJS_INUSE, 1);
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_free(class->size, obj);
|
2023-01-11 07:17:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
fullness = fix_fullness_group(class, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fullness == ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0)
|
2022-11-29 03:16:15 +08:00
|
|
|
free_zspage(pool, class, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
cache_free_handle(pool, handle);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_free);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-21 07:59:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static void zs_object_copy(struct size_class *class, unsigned long dst,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long src)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page *s_page, *d_page;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int s_objidx, d_objidx;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long s_off, d_off;
|
|
|
|
void *s_addr, *d_addr;
|
|
|
|
int s_size, d_size, size;
|
|
|
|
int written = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s_size = d_size = class->size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
obj_to_location(src, &s_page, &s_objidx);
|
|
|
|
obj_to_location(dst, &d_page, &d_objidx);
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-16 17:50:29 +08:00
|
|
|
s_off = offset_in_page(class->size * s_objidx);
|
|
|
|
d_off = offset_in_page(class->size * d_objidx);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (s_off + class->size > PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
s_size = PAGE_SIZE - s_off;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (d_off + class->size > PAGE_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
d_size = PAGE_SIZE - d_off;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s_addr = kmap_atomic(s_page);
|
|
|
|
d_addr = kmap_atomic(d_page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
|
|
|
size = min(s_size, d_size);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(d_addr + d_off, s_addr + s_off, size);
|
|
|
|
written += size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (written == class->size)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:16:15 +08:00
|
|
|
s_off += size;
|
|
|
|
s_size -= size;
|
|
|
|
d_off += size;
|
|
|
|
d_size -= size;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-11 23:37:54 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Calling kunmap_atomic(d_addr) is necessary. kunmap_atomic()
|
|
|
|
* calls must occurs in reverse order of calls to kmap_atomic().
|
|
|
|
* So, to call kunmap_atomic(s_addr) we should first call
|
2022-08-15 22:48:25 +08:00
|
|
|
* kunmap_atomic(d_addr). For more details see
|
|
|
|
* Documentation/mm/highmem.rst.
|
2022-08-11 23:37:54 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-04-16 07:16:15 +08:00
|
|
|
if (s_off >= PAGE_SIZE) {
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(d_addr);
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
|
|
|
|
s_page = get_next_page(s_page);
|
|
|
|
s_addr = kmap_atomic(s_page);
|
|
|
|
d_addr = kmap_atomic(d_page);
|
|
|
|
s_size = class->size - written;
|
|
|
|
s_off = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:16:15 +08:00
|
|
|
if (d_off >= PAGE_SIZE) {
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(d_addr);
|
|
|
|
d_page = get_next_page(d_page);
|
|
|
|
d_addr = kmap_atomic(d_page);
|
|
|
|
d_size = class->size - written;
|
|
|
|
d_off = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(d_addr);
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2023-07-09 10:56:26 +08:00
|
|
|
* Find alloced object in zspage from index object and
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
* return handle.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2023-07-09 10:56:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long find_alloced_obj(struct size_class *class,
|
|
|
|
struct page *page, int *obj_idx)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-09-09 16:37:22 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int offset;
|
2016-07-29 06:47:46 +08:00
|
|
|
int index = *obj_idx;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long handle = 0;
|
|
|
|
void *addr = kmap_atomic(page);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
offset = get_first_obj_offset(page);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
offset += class->size * index;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (offset < PAGE_SIZE) {
|
2023-07-09 10:56:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (obj_allocated(page, addr + offset, &handle))
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
offset += class->size;
|
|
|
|
index++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(addr);
|
2016-07-29 06:47:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*obj_idx = index;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
return handle;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-24 13:12:16 +08:00
|
|
|
static void migrate_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *src_zspage,
|
|
|
|
struct zspage *dst_zspage)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long used_obj, free_obj;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long handle;
|
2023-06-24 13:12:16 +08:00
|
|
|
int obj_idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
struct page *s_page = get_first_page(src_zspage);
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[src_zspage->class];
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
2016-07-29 06:47:46 +08:00
|
|
|
handle = find_alloced_obj(class, s_page, &obj_idx);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!handle) {
|
|
|
|
s_page = get_next_page(s_page);
|
|
|
|
if (!s_page)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2016-07-29 06:47:43 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_idx = 0;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used_obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
|
2023-06-24 13:12:16 +08:00
|
|
|
free_obj = obj_malloc(pool, dst_zspage, handle);
|
2016-05-21 07:59:42 +08:00
|
|
|
zs_object_copy(class, free_obj, used_obj);
|
2016-07-29 06:47:43 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_idx++;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
record_obj(handle, free_obj);
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_free(class->size, used_obj);
|
2023-06-24 13:12:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-24 13:12:15 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Stop if there is no more space */
|
2023-06-24 13:12:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (zspage_full(class, dst_zspage))
|
2023-06-24 13:12:15 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-24 13:12:14 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Stop if there are no more objects to migrate */
|
2023-06-24 13:12:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (zspage_empty(src_zspage))
|
2023-06-24 13:12:14 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct zspage *isolate_src_zspage(struct size_class *class)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int fg;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10; fg <= ZS_INUSE_RATIO_99; fg++) {
|
|
|
|
zspage = list_first_entry_or_null(&class->fullness_list[fg],
|
|
|
|
struct zspage, list);
|
|
|
|
if (zspage) {
|
2024-02-20 14:53:01 +08:00
|
|
|
remove_zspage(class, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct zspage *isolate_dst_zspage(struct size_class *class)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
|
|
|
int fg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_99; fg >= ZS_INUSE_RATIO_10; fg--) {
|
|
|
|
zspage = list_first_entry_or_null(&class->fullness_list[fg],
|
|
|
|
struct zspage, list);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (zspage) {
|
2024-02-20 14:53:01 +08:00
|
|
|
remove_zspage(class, zspage);
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return zspage;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:38 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* putback_zspage - add @zspage into right class's fullness list
|
2015-09-09 06:04:38 +08:00
|
|
|
* @class: destination class
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
* @zspage: target page
|
2015-09-09 06:04:38 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* Return @zspage's fullness status
|
2015-09-09 06:04:38 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static int putback_zspage(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int fullness;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
fullness = get_fullness_group(class, zspage);
|
|
|
|
insert_zspage(class, zspage, fullness);
|
2015-04-16 07:16:18 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:38 +08:00
|
|
|
return fullness;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* To prevent zspage destroy during migration, zspage freeing should
|
|
|
|
* hold locks of all pages in the zspage.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void lock_zspage(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-05-14 06:11:26 +08:00
|
|
|
struct page *curr_page, *page;
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-14 06:11:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Pages we haven't locked yet can be migrated off the list while we're
|
|
|
|
* trying to lock them, so we need to be careful and only attempt to
|
|
|
|
* lock each page under migrate_read_lock(). Otherwise, the page we lock
|
|
|
|
* may no longer belong to the zspage. This means that we may wait for
|
|
|
|
* the wrong page to unlock, so we must take a reference to the page
|
|
|
|
* prior to waiting for it to unlock outside migrate_read_lock().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
|
|
|
migrate_read_lock(zspage);
|
|
|
|
page = get_first_page(zspage);
|
|
|
|
if (trylock_page(page))
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
get_page(page);
|
|
|
|
migrate_read_unlock(zspage);
|
|
|
|
wait_on_page_locked(page);
|
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
curr_page = page;
|
|
|
|
while ((page = get_next_page(curr_page))) {
|
|
|
|
if (trylock_page(page)) {
|
|
|
|
curr_page = page;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
get_page(page);
|
|
|
|
migrate_read_unlock(zspage);
|
|
|
|
wait_on_page_locked(page);
|
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
|
|
|
migrate_read_lock(zspage);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
migrate_read_unlock(zspage);
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-06-12 17:38:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void migrate_lock_init(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
rwlock_init(&zspage->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-07 11:08:21 +08:00
|
|
|
static void migrate_read_lock(struct zspage *zspage) __acquires(&zspage->lock)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-07 11:08:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static void migrate_read_unlock(struct zspage *zspage) __releases(&zspage->lock)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
read_unlock(&zspage->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void migrate_write_lock(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
write_lock(&zspage->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void migrate_write_unlock(struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
write_unlock(&zspage->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-19 21:33:51 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops;
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
|
|
|
|
struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
|
|
|
struct page *pages[ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE] = {NULL, };
|
|
|
|
int idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page = get_first_page(zspage);
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
if (page == oldpage)
|
|
|
|
pages[idx] = newpage;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
pages[idx] = page;
|
|
|
|
idx++;
|
|
|
|
} while ((page = get_next_page(page)) != NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
create_page_chain(class, zspage, pages);
|
|
|
|
set_first_obj_offset(newpage, get_first_obj_offset(oldpage));
|
2022-01-22 14:14:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (unlikely(ZsHugePage(zspage)))
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
newpage->index = oldpage->index;
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
__SetPageMovable(newpage, &zsmalloc_mops);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Page is locked so zspage couldn't be destroyed. For detail, look at
|
|
|
|
* lock_zspage in free_zspage.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageIsolated(page), page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
|
|
|
|
enum migrate_mode mode)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage;
|
|
|
|
struct page *dummy;
|
|
|
|
void *s_addr, *d_addr, *addr;
|
2022-09-09 16:37:22 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int offset;
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long handle;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long old_obj, new_obj;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int obj_idx;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-09 07:12:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We cannot support the _NO_COPY case here, because copy needs to
|
|
|
|
* happen under the zs lock, which does not work with
|
|
|
|
* MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY workflow.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (mode == MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
/* The page is locked, so this pointer must remain valid */
|
|
|
|
zspage = get_zspage(page);
|
|
|
|
pool = zspage->pool;
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* The pool's lock protects the race between zpage migration
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
* and zs_free.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
2022-01-22 14:13:51 +08:00
|
|
|
class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/* the migrate_write_lock protects zpage access via zs_map_object */
|
|
|
|
migrate_write_lock(zspage);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
offset = get_first_obj_offset(page);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
s_addr = kmap_atomic(page);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Here, any user cannot access all objects in the zspage so let's move.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
d_addr = kmap_atomic(newpage);
|
2023-10-06 14:02:40 +08:00
|
|
|
copy_page(d_addr, s_addr);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(d_addr);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
for (addr = s_addr + offset; addr < s_addr + PAGE_SIZE;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
addr += class->size) {
|
2022-01-22 14:14:01 +08:00
|
|
|
if (obj_allocated(page, addr, &handle)) {
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
old_obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
|
|
|
|
obj_to_location(old_obj, &dummy, &obj_idx);
|
|
|
|
new_obj = (unsigned long)location_to_obj(newpage,
|
|
|
|
obj_idx);
|
|
|
|
record_obj(handle, new_obj);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
replace_sub_page(class, zspage, newpage, page);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* it's okay to release the pool's lock.
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
get_page(newpage);
|
2020-01-05 04:59:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (page_zone(newpage) != page_zone(page)) {
|
|
|
|
dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZSPAGES);
|
|
|
|
inc_zone_page_state(newpage, NR_ZSPAGES);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
reset_page(page);
|
|
|
|
put_page(page);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
return MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS;
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-18 06:46:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static void zs_page_putback(struct page *page)
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops = {
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
.isolate_page = zs_page_isolate,
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
.migrate_page = zs_page_migrate,
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
.putback_page = zs_page_putback,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Caller should hold page_lock of all pages in the zspage
|
|
|
|
* In here, we cannot use zspage meta data.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void async_free_zspage(struct work_struct *work)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
struct zspage *zspage, *tmp;
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD(free_pages);
|
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool = container_of(work, struct zs_pool,
|
|
|
|
free_work);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ZS_SIZE_CLASSES; i++) {
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[i];
|
|
|
|
if (class->index != i)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
list_splice_init(&class->fullness_list[ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0],
|
|
|
|
&free_pages);
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry_safe(zspage, tmp, &free_pages, list) {
|
|
|
|
list_del(&zspage->list);
|
|
|
|
lock_zspage(zspage);
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
2024-02-20 14:53:02 +08:00
|
|
|
class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
|
2021-07-01 09:53:04 +08:00
|
|
|
__free_zspage(pool, class, zspage);
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void kick_deferred_free(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
schedule_work(&pool->free_work);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
static void zs_flush_migration(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
flush_work(&pool->free_work);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static void init_deferred_free(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
INIT_WORK(&pool->free_work, async_free_zspage);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void SetZsPageMovable(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zspage *zspage)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = get_first_page(zspage);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON(!trylock_page(page));
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
__SetPageMovable(page, &zsmalloc_mops);
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unlock_page(page);
|
|
|
|
} while ((page = get_next_page(page)) != NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
static inline void zs_flush_migration(struct zs_pool *pool) { }
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:30 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Based on the number of unused allocated objects calculate
|
|
|
|
* and return the number of pages that we can free.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static unsigned long zs_can_compact(struct size_class *class)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long obj_wasted;
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long obj_allocated = zs_stat_get(class, ZS_OBJS_ALLOCATED);
|
|
|
|
unsigned long obj_used = zs_stat_get(class, ZS_OBJS_INUSE);
|
2015-09-09 06:04:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fix zs_can_compact() integer overflow
zs_can_compact() has two race conditions in its core calculation:
unsigned long obj_wasted = zs_stat_get(class, OBJ_ALLOCATED) -
zs_stat_get(class, OBJ_USED);
1) classes are not locked, so the numbers of allocated and used
objects can change by the concurrent ops happening on other CPUs
2) shrinker invokes it from preemptible context
Depending on the circumstances, thus, OBJ_ALLOCATED can become
less than OBJ_USED, which can result in either very high or
negative `total_scan' value calculated later in do_shrink_slab().
do_shrink_slab() has some logic to prevent those cases:
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-64
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
However, due to the way `total_scan' is calculated, not every
shrinker->count_objects() overflow can be spotted and handled.
To demonstrate the latter, I added some debugging code to do_shrink_slab()
(x86_64) and the results were:
vmscan: OVERFLOW: shrinker->count_objects() == -1 [18446744073709551615]
vmscan: but total_scan > 0: 92679974445502
vmscan: resulting total_scan: 92679974445502
[..]
vmscan: OVERFLOW: shrinker->count_objects() == -1 [18446744073709551615]
vmscan: but total_scan > 0: 22634041808232578
vmscan: resulting total_scan: 22634041808232578
Even though shrinker->count_objects() has returned an overflowed value,
the resulting `total_scan' is positive, and, what is more worrisome, it
is insanely huge. This value is getting used later on in
shrinker->scan_objects() loop:
while (total_scan >= batch_size ||
total_scan >= freeable) {
unsigned long ret;
unsigned long nr_to_scan = min(batch_size, total_scan);
shrinkctl->nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan;
ret = shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
if (ret == SHRINK_STOP)
break;
freed += ret;
count_vm_events(SLABS_SCANNED, nr_to_scan);
total_scan -= nr_to_scan;
cond_resched();
}
`total_scan >= batch_size' is true for a very-very long time and
'total_scan >= freeable' is also true for quite some time, because
`freeable < 0' and `total_scan' is large enough, for example,
22634041808232578. The only break condition, in the given scheme of
things, is shrinker->scan_objects() == SHRINK_STOP test, which is a
bit too weak to rely on, especially in heavy zsmalloc-usage scenarios.
To fix the issue, take a pool stat snapshot and use it instead of
racy zs_stat_get() calls.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160509140052.3389-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.3+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-10 07:28:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (obj_allocated <= obj_used)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fix zs_can_compact() integer overflow
zs_can_compact() has two race conditions in its core calculation:
unsigned long obj_wasted = zs_stat_get(class, OBJ_ALLOCATED) -
zs_stat_get(class, OBJ_USED);
1) classes are not locked, so the numbers of allocated and used
objects can change by the concurrent ops happening on other CPUs
2) shrinker invokes it from preemptible context
Depending on the circumstances, thus, OBJ_ALLOCATED can become
less than OBJ_USED, which can result in either very high or
negative `total_scan' value calculated later in do_shrink_slab().
do_shrink_slab() has some logic to prevent those cases:
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-64
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
vmscan: shrink_slab: zs_shrinker_scan+0x0/0x28 [zsmalloc] negative objects to delete nr=-62
However, due to the way `total_scan' is calculated, not every
shrinker->count_objects() overflow can be spotted and handled.
To demonstrate the latter, I added some debugging code to do_shrink_slab()
(x86_64) and the results were:
vmscan: OVERFLOW: shrinker->count_objects() == -1 [18446744073709551615]
vmscan: but total_scan > 0: 92679974445502
vmscan: resulting total_scan: 92679974445502
[..]
vmscan: OVERFLOW: shrinker->count_objects() == -1 [18446744073709551615]
vmscan: but total_scan > 0: 22634041808232578
vmscan: resulting total_scan: 22634041808232578
Even though shrinker->count_objects() has returned an overflowed value,
the resulting `total_scan' is positive, and, what is more worrisome, it
is insanely huge. This value is getting used later on in
shrinker->scan_objects() loop:
while (total_scan >= batch_size ||
total_scan >= freeable) {
unsigned long ret;
unsigned long nr_to_scan = min(batch_size, total_scan);
shrinkctl->nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan;
ret = shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
if (ret == SHRINK_STOP)
break;
freed += ret;
count_vm_events(SLABS_SCANNED, nr_to_scan);
total_scan -= nr_to_scan;
cond_resched();
}
`total_scan >= batch_size' is true for a very-very long time and
'total_scan >= freeable' is also true for quite some time, because
`freeable < 0' and `total_scan' is large enough, for example,
22634041808232578. The only break condition, in the given scheme of
things, is shrinker->scan_objects() == SHRINK_STOP test, which is a
bit too weak to rely on, especially in heavy zsmalloc-usage scenarios.
To fix the issue, take a pool stat snapshot and use it instead of
racy zs_stat_get() calls.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160509140052.3389-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.3+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-10 07:28:49 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_wasted = obj_allocated - obj_used;
|
2016-07-29 06:47:49 +08:00
|
|
|
obj_wasted /= class->objs_per_zspage;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:49 +08:00
|
|
|
return obj_wasted * class->pages_per_zspage;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long __zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool,
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class)
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *src_zspage = NULL;
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zspage *dst_zspage = NULL;
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long pages_freed = 0;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* protect the race between zpage migration and zs_free
|
|
|
|
* as well as zpage allocation/free
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
while (zs_can_compact(class)) {
|
|
|
|
int fg;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!dst_zspage) {
|
|
|
|
dst_zspage = isolate_dst_zspage(class);
|
|
|
|
if (!dst_zspage)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
src_zspage = isolate_src_zspage(class);
|
|
|
|
if (!src_zspage)
|
2015-09-09 06:04:30 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-19 21:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
migrate_write_lock(src_zspage);
|
2023-06-24 13:12:16 +08:00
|
|
|
migrate_zspage(pool, src_zspage, dst_zspage);
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
migrate_write_unlock(src_zspage);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-02-19 21:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
fg = putback_zspage(class, src_zspage);
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fg == ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0) {
|
|
|
|
free_zspage(pool, class, src_zspage);
|
|
|
|
pages_freed += class->pages_per_zspage;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-04-17 21:08:50 +08:00
|
|
|
src_zspage = NULL;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
if (get_fullness_group(class, dst_zspage) == ZS_INUSE_RATIO_100
|
|
|
|
|| spin_is_contended(&pool->lock)) {
|
2016-07-27 06:23:26 +08:00
|
|
|
putback_zspage(class, dst_zspage);
|
2022-01-22 14:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
dst_zspage = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
|
|
|
cond_resched();
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-19 21:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (src_zspage)
|
2016-07-27 06:23:26 +08:00
|
|
|
putback_zspage(class, src_zspage);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-02-19 21:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (dst_zspage)
|
zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm
The zsmalloc compaction algorithm has the potential to waste some CPU
cycles, particularly when compacting pages within the same fullness group.
This is due to the way it selects the head page of the fullness list for
source and destination pages, and how it reinserts those pages during each
iteration. The algorithm may first use a page as a migration destination
and then as a migration source, leading to an unnecessary back-and-forth
movement of objects.
Consider the following fullness list:
PageA PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the first iteration, the compaction algorithm will select PageA as
the source and PageB as the destination. All of PageA's objects will be
moved to PageB, and then PageA will be released while PageB is reinserted
into the fullness list.
PageB PageC PageD PageE
During the next iteration, the compaction algorithm will again select the
head of the list as the source and destination, meaning that PageB will
now serve as the source and PageC as the destination. This will result in
the objects being moved away from PageB, the same objects that were just
moved to PageB in the previous iteration.
To prevent this avalanche effect, the compaction algorithm should not
reinsert the destination page between iterations. By doing so, the most
optimal page will continue to be used and its usage ratio will increase,
reducing internal fragmentation. The destination page should only be
reinserted into the fullness list if:
- It becomes full
- No source page is available.
TEST
====
It's very challenging to reliably test this series. I ended up developing
my own synthetic test that has 100% reproducibility. The test generates
significan fragmentation (for each size class) and then performs
compaction for each class individually and tracks the number of memcpy()
in zs_object_copy(), so that we can compare the amount work compaction
does on per-class basis.
Total amount of work (zram mm_stat objs_moved)
----------------------------------------------
Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm:
323977 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
262944 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm:
213978 memcpy() in zs_object_copy().
Per-class compaction memcpy() comparison (T-test)
-------------------------------------------------
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ Old fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 289 2778 2006 1878.1714 641.02073
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-435.95 +/- 170.595
-18.8387% +/- 7.37193%
(Student's t, pooled s = 728.216)
x Old fullness grouping, old compaction algorithm
+ New fullness grouping, new compaction algorithm
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 140 349 3513 2461 2314.1214 806.03271
+ 140 226 2279 1644 1528.4143 524.85268
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-785.707 +/- 159.331
-33.9527% +/- 6.88516%
(Student's t, pooled s = 680.132)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:34 +08:00
|
|
|
putback_zspage(class, dst_zspage);
|
2024-02-19 21:33:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return pages_freed;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long pages_freed = 0;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 15:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Pool compaction is performed under pool->lock so it is basically
|
|
|
|
* single-threaded. Having more than one thread in __zs_compact()
|
|
|
|
* will increase pool->lock contention, which will impact other
|
|
|
|
* zsmalloc operations that need pool->lock.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (atomic_xchg(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 1))
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[i];
|
|
|
|
if (class->index != i)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
pages_freed += __zs_compact(pool, class);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_long_add(pages_freed, &pool->stats.pages_compacted);
|
2023-04-18 15:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_set(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 0);
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return pages_freed;
|
2015-04-16 07:15:30 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_compact);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:35 +08:00
|
|
|
void zs_pool_stats(struct zs_pool *pool, struct zs_pool_stats *stats)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
memcpy(stats, &pool->stats, sizeof(struct zs_pool_stats));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_pool_stats);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long zs_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
|
|
|
|
struct shrink_control *sc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long pages_freed;
|
2023-09-11 17:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool = shrinker->private_data;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Compact classes and calculate compaction delta.
|
|
|
|
* Can run concurrently with a manually triggered
|
|
|
|
* (by user) compaction.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-02-26 09:18:31 +08:00
|
|
|
pages_freed = zs_compact(pool);
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return pages_freed ? pages_freed : SHRINK_STOP;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
|
|
|
|
struct shrink_control *sc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long pages_to_free = 0;
|
2023-09-11 17:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool = shrinker->private_data;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
class = pool->size_class[i];
|
|
|
|
if (class->index != i)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pages_to_free += zs_can_compact(class);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return pages_to_free;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void zs_unregister_shrinker(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2023-09-11 17:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
shrinker_free(pool->shrinker);
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int zs_register_shrinker(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2023-09-11 17:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
pool->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "mm-zspool:%s", pool->name);
|
|
|
|
if (!pool->shrinker)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pool->shrinker->scan_objects = zs_shrinker_scan;
|
|
|
|
pool->shrinker->count_objects = zs_shrinker_count;
|
|
|
|
pool->shrinker->batch = 0;
|
|
|
|
pool->shrinker->private_data = pool;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-11 17:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
shrinker_register(pool->shrinker);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 08:52:07 +08:00
|
|
|
static int calculate_zspage_chain_size(int class_size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i, min_waste = INT_MAX;
|
|
|
|
int chain_size = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 08:52:08 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_power_of_2(class_size))
|
|
|
|
return chain_size;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 08:52:07 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 1; i <= ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE; i++) {
|
|
|
|
int waste;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
waste = (i * PAGE_SIZE) % class_size;
|
|
|
|
if (waste < min_waste) {
|
|
|
|
min_waste = waste;
|
|
|
|
chain_size = i;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return chain_size;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-03 14:40:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* zs_create_pool - Creates an allocation pool to work from.
|
2016-07-29 06:47:54 +08:00
|
|
|
* @name: pool name to be created
|
2012-07-03 05:15:51 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* This function must be called before anything when using
|
|
|
|
* the zsmalloc allocator.
|
2012-07-03 05:15:51 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* On success, a pointer to the newly created pool is returned,
|
|
|
|
* otherwise NULL.
|
2013-05-21 03:18:14 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-05-21 07:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct zs_pool *pool;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *prev_class = NULL;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
pool = kzalloc(sizeof(*pool), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!pool)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
init_deferred_free(pool);
|
zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks
Currently, zsmalloc has a hierarchy of locks, which includes a pool-level
migrate_lock, and a lock for each size class. We have to obtain both
locks in the hotpath in most cases anyway, except for zs_malloc. This
exception will no longer exist when we introduce a LRU into the zs_pool
for the new writeback functionality - we will need to obtain a pool-level
lock to synchronize LRU handling even in zs_malloc.
In preparation for zsmalloc writeback, consolidate these locks into a
single pool-level lock, which drastically reduces the complexity of
synchronization in zsmalloc.
We have also benchmarked the lock consolidation to see the performance
effect of this change on zram.
First, we ran a synthetic FS workload on a server machine with 36 cores
(same machine for all runs), using
fs_mark -d ../zram1mnt -s 100000 -n 2500 -t 32 -k
before and after for btrfs and ext4 on zram (FS usage is 80%).
Here is the result (unit is file/second):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13520.2, Median: 13531.0, Stddev: 137.5961482019028
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
Average: 13487.2, Median: 13575.0, Stddev: 309.08283679298665
With lock consolidation (ext4):
Average: 16824.4, Median: 16839.0, Stddev: 89.97388510006668
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
Average: 16958.0, Median: 16986.0, Stddev: 194.7370021336469
As you can see, we observe a 0.3% regression for btrfs, and a 0.9%
regression for ext4. This is a small, barely measurable difference in my
opinion.
For a more realistic scenario, we also tries building the kernel on zram.
Here is the time it takes (in seconds):
With lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6894.2, Median: 6895.0, Stddev: 25.528415540334656
sys
Average: 521.4, Median: 522.0, Stddev: 1.51657508881031
Without lock consolidation (btrfs):
real
Average: 319.8, Median: 320.0, Stddev: 0.8366600265340756
user
Average: 6896.6, Median: 6899.0, Stddev: 16.04057355583023
sys
Average: 520.6, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
With lock consolidation (ext4):
real
Average: 320.0, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 1.4142135623730951
user
Average: 6896.8, Median: 6878.0, Stddev: 28.621670111997307
sys
Average: 521.2, Median: 521.0, Stddev: 1.7888543819998317
Without lock consolidation (ext4)
real
Average: 319.6, Median: 319.0, Stddev: 0.8944271909999159
user
Average: 6886.2, Median: 6887.0, Stddev: 16.93221781102523
sys
Average: 520.4, Median: 520.0, Stddev: 1.140175425099138
The difference is entirely within the noise of a typical run on zram.
This hardly justifies the complexity of maintaining both the pool lock and
the class lock. In fact, for writeback, we would need to introduce yet
another lock to prevent data races on the pool's LRU, further complicating
the lock handling logic. IMHO, it is just better to collapse all of these
into a single pool-level lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221128191616.1261026-4-nphamcs@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-29 03:16:12 +08:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_init(&pool->lock);
|
2023-04-18 15:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
atomic_set(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 0);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
pool->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!pool->name)
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (create_cache(pool))
|
zsmalloc: decouple handle and object
Recently, we started to use zram heavily and some of issues
popped.
1) external fragmentation
I got a report from Juneho Choi that fork failed although there are plenty
of free pages in the system. His investigation revealed zram is one of
the culprit to make heavy fragmentation so there was no more contiguous
16K page for pgd to fork in the ARM.
2) non-movable pages
Other problem of zram now is that inherently, user want to use zram as
swap in small memory system so they use zRAM with CMA to use memory
efficiently. However, unfortunately, it doesn't work well because zRAM
cannot use CMA's movable pages unless it doesn't support compaction. I
got several reports about that OOM happened with zram although there are
lots of swap space and free space in CMA area.
3) internal fragmentation
zRAM has started support memory limitation feature to limit memory usage
and I sent a patchset(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/21/148) for VM to be
harmonized with zram-swap to stop anonymous page reclaim if zram consumed
memory up to the limit although there are free space on the swap. One
problem for that direction is zram has no way to know any hole in memory
space zsmalloc allocated by internal fragmentation so zram would regard
swap is full although there are free space in zsmalloc. For solving the
issue, zram want to trigger compaction of zsmalloc before it decides full
or not.
This patchset is first step to support above issues. For that, it adds
indirect layer between handle and object location and supports manual
compaction to solve 3th problem first of all.
After this patchset got merged, next step is to make VM aware of zsmalloc
compaction so that generic compaction will move zsmalloced-pages
automatically in runtime.
In my imaginary experiment(ie, high compress ratio data with heavy swap
in/out on 8G zram-swap), data is as follows,
Before =
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 140103680 bytes
ratio: 42.98 percent
MemFree: 840192 kB
Compaction
After =
frag ratio after compaction
zram allocated object : 60212066 bytes
zram total used: 76185600 bytes
ratio: 79.03 percent
MemFree: 901932 kB
Juneho reported below in his real platform with small aging.
So, I think the benefit would be bigger in real aging system
for a long time.
- frag_ratio increased 3% (ie, higher is better)
- memfree increased about 6MB
- In buddy info, Normal 2^3: 4, 2^2: 1: 2^1 increased, Highmem: 2^1 21 increased
frag ratio after swap fragment
used : 156677 kbytes
total: 166092 kbytes
frag_ratio : 94
meminfo before compaction
MemFree: 83724 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 13642 1364 57 10 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 425 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
num_migrated : 23630
compaction done
frag ratio after compaction
used : 156673 kbytes
total: 160564 kbytes
frag_ratio : 97
meminfo after compaction
MemFree: 89060 kB
Node 0, zone Normal 14076 1544 67 14 61 17 9 5 4 0 0
Node 0, zone HighMem 863 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
This patchset adds more logics(about 480 lines) in zsmalloc but when I
tested heavy swapin/out program, the regression for swapin/out speed is
marginal because most of overheads were caused by compress/decompress and
other MM reclaim stuff.
This patch (of 7):
Currently, handle of zsmalloc encodes object's location directly so it
makes support of migration hard.
This patch decouples handle and object via adding indirect layer. For
that, it allocates handle dynamically and returns it to user. The handle
is the address allocated by slab allocation so it's unique and we could
keep object's location in the memory space allocated for handle.
With it, we can change object's position without changing handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Gunho Lee <gunho.lee@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 07:15:23 +08:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-19 00:55:55 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2017-02-23 07:45:01 +08:00
|
|
|
* Iterate reversely, because, size of size_class that we want to use
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* for merging should be larger or equal to current size.
|
2012-07-19 00:55:55 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
int size;
|
|
|
|
int pages_per_zspage;
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
int objs_per_zspage;
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
struct size_class *class;
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
int fullness;
|
2012-07-19 00:55:55 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
size = ZS_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE + i * ZS_SIZE_CLASS_DELTA;
|
|
|
|
if (size > ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE)
|
|
|
|
size = ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE;
|
2023-01-18 08:52:07 +08:00
|
|
|
pages_per_zspage = calculate_zspage_chain_size(size);
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
objs_per_zspage = pages_per_zspage * PAGE_SIZE / size;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: introduce zs_huge_class_size()
Patch series "zsmalloc/zram: drop zram's max_zpage_size", v3.
ZRAM's max_zpage_size is a bad thing. It forces zsmalloc to store
normal objects as huge ones, which results in bigger zsmalloc memory
usage. Drop it and use actual zsmalloc huge-class value when decide if
the object is huge or not.
This patch (of 2):
Not every object can be share its zspage with other objects, e.g. when
the object is as big as zspage or nearly as big a zspage. For such
objects zsmalloc has a so called huge class - every object which belongs
to huge class consumes the entire zspage (which consists of a physical
page). On x86_64, PAGE_SHIFT 12 box, the first non-huge class size is
3264, so starting down from size 3264, objects can share page(-s) and
thus minimize memory wastage.
ZRAM, however, has its own statically defined watermark for huge
objects, namely "3 * PAGE_SIZE / 4 = 3072", and forcibly stores every
object larger than this watermark (3072) as a PAGE_SIZE object, in other
words, to a huge class, while zsmalloc can keep some of those objects in
non-huge classes. This results in increased memory consumption.
zsmalloc knows better if the object is huge or not. Introduce
zs_huge_class_size() function which tells if the given object can be
stored in one of non-huge classes or not. This will let us to drop
ZRAM's huge object watermark and fully rely on zsmalloc when we decide
if the object is huge.
[sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com: add pool param to zs_huge_class_size()]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180314081833.1096-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180306070639.7389-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-06 07:24:43 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We iterate from biggest down to smallest classes,
|
|
|
|
* so huge_class_size holds the size of the first huge
|
|
|
|
* class. Any object bigger than or equal to that will
|
|
|
|
* endup in the huge class.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (pages_per_zspage != 1 && objs_per_zspage != 1 &&
|
|
|
|
!huge_class_size) {
|
|
|
|
huge_class_size = size;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The object uses ZS_HANDLE_SIZE bytes to store the
|
|
|
|
* handle. We need to subtract it, because zs_malloc()
|
|
|
|
* unconditionally adds handle size before it performs
|
|
|
|
* size class search - so object may be smaller than
|
|
|
|
* huge class size, yet it still can end up in the huge
|
|
|
|
* class because it grows by ZS_HANDLE_SIZE extra bytes
|
|
|
|
* right before class lookup.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
huge_class_size -= (ZS_HANDLE_SIZE - 1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* size_class is used for normal zsmalloc operation such
|
|
|
|
* as alloc/free for that size. Although it is natural that we
|
|
|
|
* have one size_class for each size, there is a chance that we
|
|
|
|
* can get more memory utilization if we use one size_class for
|
|
|
|
* many different sizes whose size_class have same
|
|
|
|
* characteristics. So, we makes size_class point to
|
|
|
|
* previous size_class if possible.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (prev_class) {
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if (can_merge(prev_class, pages_per_zspage, objs_per_zspage)) {
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
pool->size_class[i] = prev_class;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class = kzalloc(sizeof(struct size_class), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!class)
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class->size = size;
|
|
|
|
class->index = i;
|
|
|
|
class->pages_per_zspage = pages_per_zspage;
|
2016-07-29 06:47:51 +08:00
|
|
|
class->objs_per_zspage = objs_per_zspage;
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
pool->size_class[i] = class;
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fullness = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0;
|
|
|
|
while (fullness < NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS) {
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->fullness_list[fullness]);
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
fullness++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prev_class = class;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-21 07:59:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* debug only, don't abort if it fails */
|
|
|
|
zs_pool_stat_create(pool, name);
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2018-02-01 08:18:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* Not critical since shrinker is only used to trigger internal
|
|
|
|
* defragmentation of the pool which is pretty optional thing. If
|
|
|
|
* registration fails we still can use the pool normally and user can
|
|
|
|
* trigger compaction manually. Thus, ignore return code.
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-02-01 08:18:40 +08:00
|
|
|
zs_register_shrinker(pool);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
return pool;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err:
|
|
|
|
zs_destroy_pool(pool);
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_create_pool);
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-09 06:04:41 +08:00
|
|
|
zs_unregister_shrinker(pool);
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
zs_flush_migration(pool);
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
zs_pool_stat_destroy(pool);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-07-11 06:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ZS_SIZE_CLASSES; i++) {
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
int fg;
|
|
|
|
struct size_class *class = pool->size_class[i];
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-10-13 19:28:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!class)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
if (class->index != i)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping
Each zspage maintains ->inuse counter which keeps track of the number of
objects stored in the zspage. The ->inuse counter also determines the
zspage's "fullness group" which is calculated as the ratio of the "inuse"
objects to the total number of objects the zspage can hold
(objs_per_zspage). The closer the ->inuse counter is to objs_per_zspage,
the better.
Each size class maintains several fullness lists, that keep track of
zspages of particular "fullness". Pages within each fullness list are
stored in random order with regard to the ->inuse counter. This is
because sorting the zspages by ->inuse counter each time obj_malloc() or
obj_free() is called would be too expensive. However, the ->inuse counter
is still a crucial factor in many situations.
For the two major zsmalloc operations, zs_malloc() and zs_compact(), we
typically select the head zspage from the corresponding fullness list as
the best candidate zspage. However, this assumption is not always
accurate.
For the zs_malloc() operation, the optimal candidate zspage should have
the highest ->inuse counter. This is because the goal is to maximize the
number of ZS_FULL zspages and make full use of all allocated memory.
For the zs_compact() operation, the optimal source zspage should have the
lowest ->inuse counter. This is because compaction needs to move objects
in use to another page before it can release the zspage and return its
physical pages to the buddy allocator. The fewer objects in use, the
quicker compaction can release the zspage. Additionally, compaction is
measured by the number of pages it releases.
This patch reworks the fullness grouping mechanism. Instead of having two
groups - ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY (usage ratio below 3/4) and ZS_ALMOST_FULL (usage
ration above 3/4) - that result in too many zspages being included in the
ALMOST_EMPTY group for specific classes, size classes maintain a larger
number of fullness lists that give strict guarantees on the minimum and
maximum ->inuse values within each group. Each group represents a 10%
change in the ->inuse ratio compared to neighboring groups. In essence,
there are groups for zspages with 0%, 10%, 20% usage ratios, and so on, up
to 100%.
This enhances the selection of candidate zspages for both zs_malloc() and
zs_compact(). A printout of the ->inuse counters of the first 7 zspages
per (random) class fullness group:
class-768 objs_per_zspage 16:
fullness 100%: empty
fullness 99%: empty
fullness 90%: empty
fullness 80%: empty
fullness 70%: empty
fullness 60%: 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
fullness 50%: empty
fullness 40%: 5 5 6 5 5 5 5
fullness 30%: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fullness 20%: 2 3 2 3 3 2 2
fullness 10%: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fullness 0%: empty
The zs_malloc() function searches through the groups of pages starting
with the one having the highest usage ratio. This means that it always
selects a zspage from the group with the least internal fragmentation
(highest usage ratio) and makes it even less fragmented by increasing its
usage ratio.
The zs_compact() function, on the other hand, begins by scanning the group
with the highest fragmentation (lowest usage ratio) to locate the source
page. The first available zspage is selected, and then the function moves
downward to find a destination zspage in the group with the lowest
internal fragmentation (highest usage ratio).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230304034835.2082479-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-04 11:48:33 +08:00
|
|
|
for (fg = ZS_INUSE_RATIO_0; fg < NR_FULLNESS_GROUPS; fg++) {
|
|
|
|
if (list_empty(&class->fullness_list[fg]))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Class-%d fullness group %d is not empty\n",
|
|
|
|
class->size, fg);
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
kfree(class);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-07-19 00:55:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-07-27 06:23:23 +08:00
|
|
|
destroy_cache(pool);
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(pool->name);
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(pool);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_destroy_pool);
|
2012-07-03 05:15:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
static int __init zs_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_MM_ZS_PREPARE, "mm/zsmalloc:prepare",
|
|
|
|
zs_cpu_prepare, zs_cpu_dead);
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
2022-06-08 03:38:48 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ZPOOL
|
|
|
|
zpool_register_driver(&zs_zpool_driver);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-27 06:16:27 +08:00
|
|
|
zs_stat_init();
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
zsmalloc: page migration support
This patch introduces run-time migration feature for zspage.
For migration, VM uses page.lru field so it would be better to not use
page.next field which is unified with page.lru for own purpose. For
that, firstly, we can get first object offset of the page via runtime
calculation instead of using page.index so we can use page.index as link
for page chaining instead of page.next.
In case of huge object, it stores handle to page.index instead of next
link of page chaining because huge object doesn't need to next link for
page chaining. So get_next_page need to identify huge object to return
NULL. For it, this patch uses PG_owner_priv_1 flag of the page flag.
For migration, it supports three functions
* zs_page_isolate
It isolates a zspage which includes a subpage VM want to migrate from
class so anyone cannot allocate new object from the zspage.
We could try to isolate a zspage by the number of subpage so subsequent
isolation trial of other subpage of the zpsage shouldn't fail. For
that, we introduce zspage.isolated count. With that, zs_page_isolate
can know whether zspage is already isolated or not for migration so if
it is isolated for migration, subsequent isolation trial can be
successful without trying further isolation.
* zs_page_migrate
First of all, it holds write-side zspage->lock to prevent migrate other
subpage in zspage. Then, lock all objects in the page VM want to
migrate. The reason we should lock all objects in the page is due to
race between zs_map_object and zs_page_migrate.
zs_map_object zs_page_migrate
pin_tag(handle)
obj = handle_to_obj(handle)
obj_to_location(obj, &page, &obj_idx);
write_lock(&zspage->lock)
if (!trypin_tag(handle))
goto unpin_object
zspage = get_zspage(page);
read_lock(&zspage->lock);
If zs_page_migrate doesn't do trypin_tag, zs_map_object's page can be
stale by migration so it goes crash.
If it locks all of objects successfully, it copies content from old page
to new one, finally, create new zspage chain with new page. And if it's
last isolated subpage in the zspage, put the zspage back to class.
* zs_page_putback
It returns isolated zspage to right fullness_group list if it fails to
migrate a page. If it find a zspage is ZS_EMPTY, it queues zspage
freeing to workqueue. See below about async zspage freeing.
This patch introduces asynchronous zspage free. The reason to need it
is we need page_lock to clear PG_movable but unfortunately, zs_free path
should be atomic so the apporach is try to grab page_lock. If it got
page_lock of all of pages successfully, it can free zspage immediately.
Otherwise, it queues free request and free zspage via workqueue in
process context.
If zs_free finds the zspage is isolated when it try to free zspage, it
delays the freeing until zs_page_putback finds it so it will free free
the zspage finally.
In this patch, we expand fullness_list from ZS_EMPTY to ZS_FULL. First
of all, it will use ZS_EMPTY list for delay freeing. And with adding
ZS_FULL list, it makes to identify whether zspage is isolated or not via
list_empty(&zspage->list) test.
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465788015-23195-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
[minchan@kernel.org: zsmalloc: zspage sanity check]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160603010129.GC3304@bbox
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464736881-24886-12-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-07-27 06:23:31 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __exit zs_exit(void)
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-12-19 08:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_ZPOOL
|
|
|
|
zpool_unregister_driver(&zs_zpool_driver);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2016-11-27 07:13:38 +08:00
|
|
|
cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_MM_ZS_PREPARE);
|
2015-02-13 07:00:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zs_stat_exit();
|
2012-01-10 06:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-06-20 09:31:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module_init(zs_init);
|
|
|
|
module_exit(zs_exit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_AUTHOR("Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>");
|