linux/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c

2032 lines
48 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/******************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************
**
** Copyright (C) Sistina Software, Inc. 1997-2003 All rights reserved.
** Copyright (C) 2004-2009 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
**
**
*******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************/
/*
* lowcomms.c
*
* This is the "low-level" comms layer.
*
* It is responsible for sending/receiving messages
* from other nodes in the cluster.
*
* Cluster nodes are referred to by their nodeids. nodeids are
* simply 32 bit numbers to the locking module - if they need to
* be expanded for the cluster infrastructure then that is its
* responsibility. It is this layer's
* responsibility to resolve these into IP address or
* whatever it needs for inter-node communication.
*
* The comms level is two kernel threads that deal mainly with
* the receiving of messages from other nodes and passing them
* up to the mid-level comms layer (which understands the
* message format) for execution by the locking core, and
* a send thread which does all the setting up of connections
* to remote nodes and the sending of data. Threads are not allowed
* to send their own data because it may cause them to wait in times
* of high load. Also, this way, the sending thread can collect together
* messages bound for one node and send them in one block.
*
* lowcomms will choose to use either TCP or SCTP as its transport layer
* depending on the configuration variable 'protocol'. This should be set
* to 0 (default) for TCP or 1 for SCTP. It should be configured using a
* cluster-wide mechanism as it must be the same on all nodes of the cluster
* for the DLM to function.
*
*/
#include <asm/ioctls.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/tcp.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/sctp.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 16:04:11 +08:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <net/sctp/sctp.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
#include <trace/events/dlm.h>
#include <trace/events/sock.h>
#include "dlm_internal.h"
#include "lowcomms.h"
#include "midcomms.h"
#include "memory.h"
#include "config.h"
#define DLM_SHUTDOWN_WAIT_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(5000)
#define NEEDED_RMEM (4*1024*1024)
struct connection {
struct socket *sock; /* NULL if not connected */
uint32_t nodeid; /* So we know who we are in the list */
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* this semaphore is used to allow parallel recv/send in read
* lock mode. When we release a sock we need to held the write lock.
*
* However this is locking code and not nice. When we remove the
* othercon handling we can look into other mechanism to synchronize
* io handling to call sock_release() at the right time.
*/
struct rw_semaphore sock_lock;
unsigned long flags;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
#define CF_APP_LIMITED 0
#define CF_RECV_PENDING 1
#define CF_SEND_PENDING 2
#define CF_RECV_INTR 3
#define CF_IO_STOP 4
#define CF_IS_OTHERCON 5
[DLM] Clean up lowcomms This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek with comments below indicating why some things have been left: Andrew Morton wrote: > >> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc) >> +{ >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + int r; >> + int n; >> + >> + down_read(&nodeinfo_lock); > > Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful. > > I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'. That's in fact > a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH). I doubt if that's what you really > meant. Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka > GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0". In fact "0" is the > least reliable mode possible. > > IOW, this is all bollixed up. When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance. I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!) >> +/* Data received from remote end */ >> +static int receive_from_sock(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct msghdr msg; >> + struct kvec iov[2]; >> + unsigned len; >> + int r; >> + struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo; >> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + >> + /* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this >> + * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be >> + * OK. >> + */ >> + static struct sockaddr_storage msgname; >> + static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > whoa. This is globally singly-threaded code?? Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd. >> >> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid) >> +{ >> + struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Another static buffer to worry about. Globally singly-threaded code? Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd. >> + >> +/* Send a message */ >> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct writequeue_entry *e; >> + int len, offset; >> + struct msghdr outmsg; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Singly-threaded? Yep. >> >> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) { >> + struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0); >> + if (ni) { >> + idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i); > > Didn't that need locking? Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads have been stopped. >> >> +static int write_list_empty(void) >> +{ >> + int status; >> + >> + spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + status = list_empty(&write_nodes); >> + spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + >> + return status; >> +} > > This function's return value is meaningless. As soon as the lock gets > dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality. > > Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and > dangerous thing. Really the locking should be moved into the caller. It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival). The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other startup or shutdown bug to be honest. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-06 23:10:37 +08:00
struct list_head writequeue; /* List of outgoing writequeue_entries */
spinlock_t writequeue_lock;
int retries;
struct hlist_node list;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* due some connect()/accept() races we currently have this cross over
* connection attempt second connection for one node.
*
* There is a solution to avoid the race by introducing a connect
* rule as e.g. our_nodeid > nodeid_to_connect who is allowed to
* connect. Otherside can connect but will only be considered that
* the other side wants to have a reconnect.
*
* However changing to this behaviour will break backwards compatible.
* In a DLM protocol major version upgrade we should remove this!
*/
struct connection *othercon;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
struct work_struct rwork; /* receive worker */
struct work_struct swork; /* send worker */
wait_queue_head_t shutdown_wait;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
unsigned char rx_leftover_buf[DLM_MAX_SOCKET_BUFSIZE];
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
int rx_leftover;
int mark;
int addr_count;
int curr_addr_index;
struct sockaddr_storage addr[DLM_MAX_ADDR_COUNT];
spinlock_t addrs_lock;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
#define sock2con(x) ((struct connection *)(x)->sk_user_data)
struct listen_connection {
struct socket *sock;
struct work_struct rwork;
};
#define DLM_WQ_REMAIN_BYTES(e) (PAGE_SIZE - e->end)
#define DLM_WQ_LENGTH_BYTES(e) (e->end - e->offset)
/* An entry waiting to be sent */
struct writequeue_entry {
struct list_head list;
struct page *page;
int offset;
int len;
int end;
int users;
bool dirty;
struct connection *con;
struct list_head msgs;
struct kref ref;
};
struct dlm_msg {
struct writequeue_entry *entry;
struct dlm_msg *orig_msg;
bool retransmit;
void *ppc;
int len;
int idx; /* new()/commit() idx exchange */
struct list_head list;
struct kref ref;
};
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
struct processqueue_entry {
unsigned char *buf;
int nodeid;
int buflen;
struct list_head list;
};
struct dlm_proto_ops {
bool try_new_addr;
const char *name;
int proto;
int (*connect)(struct connection *con, struct socket *sock,
struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len);
void (*sockopts)(struct socket *sock);
int (*bind)(struct socket *sock);
int (*listen_validate)(void);
void (*listen_sockopts)(struct socket *sock);
int (*listen_bind)(struct socket *sock);
};
static struct listen_sock_callbacks {
void (*sk_error_report)(struct sock *);
void (*sk_data_ready)(struct sock *);
void (*sk_state_change)(struct sock *);
void (*sk_write_space)(struct sock *);
} listen_sock;
static struct listen_connection listen_con;
static struct sockaddr_storage dlm_local_addr[DLM_MAX_ADDR_COUNT];
static int dlm_local_count;
/* Work queues */
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static struct workqueue_struct *io_workqueue;
static struct workqueue_struct *process_workqueue;
static struct hlist_head connection_hash[CONN_HASH_SIZE];
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(connections_lock);
DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(connections_srcu);
static const struct dlm_proto_ops *dlm_proto_ops;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
#define DLM_IO_SUCCESS 0
#define DLM_IO_END 1
#define DLM_IO_EOF 2
#define DLM_IO_RESCHED 3
static void process_recv_sockets(struct work_struct *work);
static void process_send_sockets(struct work_struct *work);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void process_dlm_messages(struct work_struct *work);
static DECLARE_WORK(process_work, process_dlm_messages);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(processqueue_lock);
static bool process_dlm_messages_pending;
static LIST_HEAD(processqueue);
bool dlm_lowcomms_is_running(void)
{
return !!listen_con.sock;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void lowcomms_queue_swork(struct connection *con)
{
assert_spin_locked(&con->writequeue_lock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (!test_bit(CF_IO_STOP, &con->flags) &&
!test_bit(CF_APP_LIMITED, &con->flags) &&
!test_and_set_bit(CF_SEND_PENDING, &con->flags))
queue_work(io_workqueue, &con->swork);
}
static void lowcomms_queue_rwork(struct connection *con)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(!lockdep_sock_is_held(con->sock->sk));
#endif
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (!test_bit(CF_IO_STOP, &con->flags) &&
!test_and_set_bit(CF_RECV_PENDING, &con->flags))
queue_work(io_workqueue, &con->rwork);
}
static void writequeue_entry_ctor(void *data)
{
struct writequeue_entry *entry = data;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->msgs);
}
struct kmem_cache *dlm_lowcomms_writequeue_cache_create(void)
{
return kmem_cache_create("dlm_writequeue", sizeof(struct writequeue_entry),
0, 0, writequeue_entry_ctor);
}
struct kmem_cache *dlm_lowcomms_msg_cache_create(void)
{
return kmem_cache_create("dlm_msg", sizeof(struct dlm_msg), 0, 0, NULL);
}
/* need to held writequeue_lock */
static struct writequeue_entry *con_next_wq(struct connection *con)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e;
e = list_first_entry_or_null(&con->writequeue, struct writequeue_entry,
list);
/* if len is zero nothing is to send, if there are users filling
* buffers we wait until the users are done so we can send more.
*/
if (!e || e->users || e->len == 0)
return NULL;
return e;
}
static struct connection *__find_con(int nodeid, int r)
{
struct connection *con;
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(con, &connection_hash[r], list) {
if (con->nodeid == nodeid)
return con;
}
return NULL;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void dlm_con_init(struct connection *con, int nodeid)
{
con->nodeid = nodeid;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
init_rwsem(&con->sock_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&con->writequeue);
spin_lock_init(&con->writequeue_lock);
INIT_WORK(&con->swork, process_send_sockets);
INIT_WORK(&con->rwork, process_recv_sockets);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_init(&con->addrs_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&con->shutdown_wait);
}
/*
* If 'allocation' is zero then we don't attempt to create a new
* connection structure for this node.
*/
static struct connection *nodeid2con(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc)
{
struct connection *con, *tmp;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
int r;
r = nodeid_hash(nodeid);
con = __find_con(nodeid, r);
if (con || !alloc)
return con;
con = kzalloc(sizeof(*con), alloc);
if (!con)
return NULL;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
dlm_con_init(con, nodeid);
spin_lock(&connections_lock);
/* Because multiple workqueues/threads calls this function it can
* race on multiple cpu's. Instead of locking hot path __find_con()
* we just check in rare cases of recently added nodes again
* under protection of connections_lock. If this is the case we
* abort our connection creation and return the existing connection.
*/
tmp = __find_con(nodeid, r);
if (tmp) {
spin_unlock(&connections_lock);
kfree(con);
return tmp;
}
hlist_add_head_rcu(&con->list, &connection_hash[r]);
spin_unlock(&connections_lock);
return con;
}
static int addr_compare(const struct sockaddr_storage *x,
const struct sockaddr_storage *y)
{
switch (x->ss_family) {
case AF_INET: {
struct sockaddr_in *sinx = (struct sockaddr_in *)x;
struct sockaddr_in *siny = (struct sockaddr_in *)y;
if (sinx->sin_addr.s_addr != siny->sin_addr.s_addr)
return 0;
if (sinx->sin_port != siny->sin_port)
return 0;
break;
}
case AF_INET6: {
struct sockaddr_in6 *sinx = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)x;
struct sockaddr_in6 *siny = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)y;
if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sinx->sin6_addr, &siny->sin6_addr))
return 0;
if (sinx->sin6_port != siny->sin6_port)
return 0;
break;
}
default:
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
static int nodeid_to_addr(int nodeid, struct sockaddr_storage *sas_out,
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
struct sockaddr *sa_out, bool try_new_addr,
unsigned int *mark)
{
struct sockaddr_storage sas;
struct connection *con;
int idx;
if (!dlm_local_count)
return -1;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, 0);
if (!con) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOENT;
}
spin_lock(&con->addrs_lock);
if (!con->addr_count) {
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOENT;
}
memcpy(&sas, &con->addr[con->curr_addr_index],
sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage));
if (try_new_addr) {
con->curr_addr_index++;
if (con->curr_addr_index == con->addr_count)
con->curr_addr_index = 0;
}
*mark = con->mark;
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
if (sas_out)
memcpy(sas_out, &sas, sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage));
if (!sa_out) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
if (dlm_local_addr[0].ss_family == AF_INET) {
struct sockaddr_in *in4 = (struct sockaddr_in *) &sas;
struct sockaddr_in *ret4 = (struct sockaddr_in *) sa_out;
ret4->sin_addr.s_addr = in4->sin_addr.s_addr;
} else {
struct sockaddr_in6 *in6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &sas;
struct sockaddr_in6 *ret6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) sa_out;
ret6->sin6_addr = in6->sin6_addr;
}
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
static int addr_to_nodeid(struct sockaddr_storage *addr, int *nodeid,
unsigned int *mark)
{
struct connection *con;
int i, idx, addr_i;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
for (i = 0; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(con, &connection_hash[i], list) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!con->addr_count);
spin_lock(&con->addrs_lock);
for (addr_i = 0; addr_i < con->addr_count; addr_i++) {
if (addr_compare(&con->addr[addr_i], addr)) {
*nodeid = con->nodeid;
*mark = con->mark;
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
}
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
}
}
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOENT;
}
static bool dlm_lowcomms_con_has_addr(const struct connection *con,
const struct sockaddr_storage *addr)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < con->addr_count; i++) {
if (addr_compare(&con->addr[i], addr))
return true;
}
return false;
}
int dlm_lowcomms_addr(int nodeid, struct sockaddr_storage *addr, int len)
{
struct connection *con;
bool ret, idx;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, GFP_NOFS);
if (!con) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOMEM;
}
spin_lock(&con->addrs_lock);
if (!con->addr_count) {
memcpy(&con->addr[0], addr, sizeof(*addr));
con->addr_count = 1;
con->mark = dlm_config.ci_mark;
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return 0;
}
ret = dlm_lowcomms_con_has_addr(con, addr);
if (ret) {
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -EEXIST;
}
if (con->addr_count >= DLM_MAX_ADDR_COUNT) {
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOSPC;
}
memcpy(&con->addr[con->addr_count++], addr, sizeof(*addr));
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
return 0;
}
/* Data available on socket or listen socket received a connect */
static void lowcomms_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
{
struct connection *con = sock2con(sk);
trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
set_bit(CF_RECV_INTR, &con->flags);
lowcomms_queue_rwork(con);
}
static void lowcomms_write_space(struct sock *sk)
{
struct connection *con = sock2con(sk);
clear_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &con->sock->flags);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
if (test_and_clear_bit(CF_APP_LIMITED, &con->flags)) {
con->sock->sk->sk_write_pending--;
clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &con->sock->flags);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
lowcomms_queue_swork(con);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
}
static void lowcomms_state_change(struct sock *sk)
{
/* SCTP layer is not calling sk_data_ready when the connection
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
* is done, so we catch the signal through here.
*/
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (sk->sk_shutdown == RCV_SHUTDOWN)
lowcomms_data_ready(sk);
}
static void lowcomms_listen_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
{
trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
queue_work(io_workqueue, &listen_con.rwork);
}
int dlm_lowcomms_connect_node(int nodeid)
{
struct connection *con;
int idx;
if (nodeid == dlm_our_nodeid())
return 0;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, 0);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!con)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOENT;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
down_read(&con->sock_lock);
if (!con->sock) {
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
lowcomms_queue_swork(con);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
}
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
cond_resched();
return 0;
}
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
int dlm_lowcomms_nodes_set_mark(int nodeid, unsigned int mark)
{
struct connection *con;
int idx;
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, 0);
if (!con) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
return -ENOENT;
}
spin_lock(&con->addrs_lock);
con->mark = mark;
spin_unlock(&con->addrs_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
return 0;
}
static void lowcomms_error_report(struct sock *sk)
{
struct connection *con = sock2con(sk);
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
struct inet_sock *inet;
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
inet = inet_sk(sk);
switch (sk->sk_family) {
case AF_INET:
printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
"sending to node %d at %pI4, dport %d, "
"sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
con->nodeid, &inet->inet_daddr,
ntohs(inet->inet_dport), sk->sk_err,
READ_ONCE(sk->sk_err_soft));
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
break;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
case AF_INET6:
printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
"sending to node %d at %pI6c, "
"dport %d, sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
con->nodeid, &sk->sk_v6_daddr,
ntohs(inet->inet_dport), sk->sk_err,
READ_ONCE(sk->sk_err_soft));
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
break;
#endif
fs: dlm: don't call kernel_getpeername() in error_report() In some cases kernel_getpeername() will held the socket lock which is already held when the socket layer calls error_report() callback. Since commit 9dfc685e0262 ("inet: remove races in inet{6}_getname()") this problem becomes more likely because the socket lock will be held always. You will see something like: bob9-u5 login: [ 562.316860] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#7, swapper/7/0 [ 562.318562] lock: 0xffff8f2284720088, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/7/0, .owner_cpu: 7 [ 562.319522] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Not tainted 5.15.0+ #135 [ 562.320346] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 [ 562.321277] Call Trace: [ 562.321529] <IRQ> [ 562.321734] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42 [ 562.322282] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8b/0xc0 [ 562.322674] lock_sock_nested+0x1e/0x50 [ 562.323057] inet_getname+0x39/0x110 [ 562.323425] ? sock_def_readable+0x80/0x80 [ 562.323838] lowcomms_error_report+0x63/0x260 [dlm] [ 562.324338] ? wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout+0xd2/0x120 [ 562.324949] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 562.325330] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 562.325735] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x40 [ 562.326218] ? del_timer+0x54/0x80 [ 562.326549] sk_error_report+0x12/0x70 [ 562.326919] tcp_validate_incoming+0x3c8/0x530 [ 562.327347] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 562.327718] ? ktime_get+0x3b/0xa0 [ 562.328055] tcp_rcv_established+0x121/0x660 [ 562.328466] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x132/0x260 [ 562.328835] tcp_v4_rcv+0xcea/0xe20 [ 562.329173] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1f0 [ 562.329615] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60 [ 562.330050] ip_local_deliver+0xf7/0x110 [ 562.330431] ? inet_rtm_getroute+0x211/0x840 [ 562.330848] ? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 562.331310] ip_rcv+0xe1/0xf0 [ 562.331603] ? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110 [ 562.332011] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x46a/0x1040 [ 562.332476] ? inet_gro_receive+0x263/0x2e0 [ 562.332885] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x13b/0x2c0 [ 562.333383] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1c8/0x2f0 [ 562.333896] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5e0 [ 562.334285] gro_normal_list.part.149+0x19/0x40 [ 562.334722] napi_complete_done+0x67/0x160 [ 562.335134] virtnet_poll+0x2ad/0x408 [virtio_net] [ 562.335644] __napi_poll+0x28/0x140 [ 562.336012] net_rx_action+0x23d/0x300 [ 562.336414] __do_softirq+0xf2/0x2ea [ 562.336803] irq_exit_rcu+0xc1/0xf0 [ 562.337173] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0 It is and was always forbidden to call kernel_getpeername() in context of error_report(). To get rid of the problem we access the destination address for the peer over the socket structure. While on it we fix to print out the destination port of the inet socket. Fixes: 1a31833d085a ("DLM: Replace nodeid_to_addr with kernel_getpeername") Reported-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-15 21:57:05 +08:00
default:
printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "dlm: node %d: socket error "
"invalid socket family %d set, "
"sk_err=%d/%d\n", dlm_our_nodeid(),
sk->sk_family, sk->sk_err,
READ_ONCE(sk->sk_err_soft));
break;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
dlm_midcomms_unack_msg_resend(con->nodeid);
listen_sock.sk_error_report(sk);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void restore_callbacks(struct sock *sk)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(!lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
#endif
sk->sk_user_data = NULL;
sk->sk_data_ready = listen_sock.sk_data_ready;
sk->sk_state_change = listen_sock.sk_state_change;
sk->sk_write_space = listen_sock.sk_write_space;
sk->sk_error_report = listen_sock.sk_error_report;
}
/* Make a socket active */
static void add_sock(struct socket *sock, struct connection *con)
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
lock_sock(sk);
con->sock = sock;
sk->sk_user_data = con;
sk->sk_data_ready = lowcomms_data_ready;
sk->sk_write_space = lowcomms_write_space;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (dlm_config.ci_protocol == DLM_PROTO_SCTP)
sk->sk_state_change = lowcomms_state_change;
sk->sk_allocation = GFP_NOFS;
Treewide: Stop corrupting socket's task_frag Since moving to memalloc_nofs_save/restore, SUNRPC has stopped setting the GFP_NOIO flag on sk_allocation which the networking system uses to decide when it is safe to use current->task_frag. The results of this are unexpected corruption in task_frag when SUNRPC is involved in memory reclaim. The corruption can be seen in crashes, but the root cause is often difficult to ascertain as a crashing machine's stack trace will have no evidence of being near NFS or SUNRPC code. I believe this problem to be much more pervasive than reports to the community may indicate. Fix this by having kernel users of sockets that may corrupt task_frag due to reclaim set sk_use_task_frag = false. Preemptively correcting this situation for users that still set sk_allocation allows them to convert to memalloc_nofs_save/restore without the same unexpected corruptions that are sure to follow, unlikely to show up in testing, and difficult to bisect. CC: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> CC: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> CC: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> CC: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> CC: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> CC: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> CC: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com> CC: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> CC: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com> CC: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> CC: Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com> CC: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> CC: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> CC: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> CC: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com> CC: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> CC: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> CC: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> CC: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> CC: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net> CC: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> CC: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> CC: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> CC: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org> CC: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Suggested-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-12-16 20:45:27 +08:00
sk->sk_use_task_frag = false;
sk->sk_error_report = lowcomms_error_report;
release_sock(sk);
}
/* Add the port number to an IPv6 or 4 sockaddr and return the address
length */
static void make_sockaddr(struct sockaddr_storage *saddr, uint16_t port,
int *addr_len)
{
saddr->ss_family = dlm_local_addr[0].ss_family;
[DLM] Clean up lowcomms This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek with comments below indicating why some things have been left: Andrew Morton wrote: > >> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc) >> +{ >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + int r; >> + int n; >> + >> + down_read(&nodeinfo_lock); > > Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful. > > I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'. That's in fact > a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH). I doubt if that's what you really > meant. Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka > GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0". In fact "0" is the > least reliable mode possible. > > IOW, this is all bollixed up. When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance. I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!) >> +/* Data received from remote end */ >> +static int receive_from_sock(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct msghdr msg; >> + struct kvec iov[2]; >> + unsigned len; >> + int r; >> + struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo; >> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + >> + /* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this >> + * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be >> + * OK. >> + */ >> + static struct sockaddr_storage msgname; >> + static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > whoa. This is globally singly-threaded code?? Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd. >> >> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid) >> +{ >> + struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Another static buffer to worry about. Globally singly-threaded code? Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd. >> + >> +/* Send a message */ >> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct writequeue_entry *e; >> + int len, offset; >> + struct msghdr outmsg; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Singly-threaded? Yep. >> >> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) { >> + struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0); >> + if (ni) { >> + idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i); > > Didn't that need locking? Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads have been stopped. >> >> +static int write_list_empty(void) >> +{ >> + int status; >> + >> + spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + status = list_empty(&write_nodes); >> + spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + >> + return status; >> +} > > This function's return value is meaningless. As soon as the lock gets > dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality. > > Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and > dangerous thing. Really the locking should be moved into the caller. It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival). The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other startup or shutdown bug to be honest. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-06 23:10:37 +08:00
if (saddr->ss_family == AF_INET) {
struct sockaddr_in *in4_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)saddr;
in4_addr->sin_port = cpu_to_be16(port);
*addr_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
memset(&in4_addr->sin_zero, 0, sizeof(in4_addr->sin_zero));
[DLM] Clean up lowcomms This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek with comments below indicating why some things have been left: Andrew Morton wrote: > >> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc) >> +{ >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + int r; >> + int n; >> + >> + down_read(&nodeinfo_lock); > > Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful. > > I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'. That's in fact > a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH). I doubt if that's what you really > meant. Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka > GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0". In fact "0" is the > least reliable mode possible. > > IOW, this is all bollixed up. When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance. I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!) >> +/* Data received from remote end */ >> +static int receive_from_sock(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct msghdr msg; >> + struct kvec iov[2]; >> + unsigned len; >> + int r; >> + struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo; >> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + >> + /* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this >> + * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be >> + * OK. >> + */ >> + static struct sockaddr_storage msgname; >> + static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > whoa. This is globally singly-threaded code?? Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd. >> >> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid) >> +{ >> + struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Another static buffer to worry about. Globally singly-threaded code? Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd. >> + >> +/* Send a message */ >> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct writequeue_entry *e; >> + int len, offset; >> + struct msghdr outmsg; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Singly-threaded? Yep. >> >> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) { >> + struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0); >> + if (ni) { >> + idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i); > > Didn't that need locking? Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads have been stopped. >> >> +static int write_list_empty(void) >> +{ >> + int status; >> + >> + spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + status = list_empty(&write_nodes); >> + spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + >> + return status; >> +} > > This function's return value is meaningless. As soon as the lock gets > dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality. > > Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and > dangerous thing. Really the locking should be moved into the caller. It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival). The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other startup or shutdown bug to be honest. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-06 23:10:37 +08:00
} else {
struct sockaddr_in6 *in6_addr = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)saddr;
in6_addr->sin6_port = cpu_to_be16(port);
*addr_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6);
}
memset((char *)saddr + *addr_len, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage) - *addr_len);
}
static void dlm_page_release(struct kref *kref)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e = container_of(kref, struct writequeue_entry,
ref);
__free_page(e->page);
dlm_free_writequeue(e);
}
static void dlm_msg_release(struct kref *kref)
{
struct dlm_msg *msg = container_of(kref, struct dlm_msg, ref);
kref_put(&msg->entry->ref, dlm_page_release);
dlm_free_msg(msg);
}
static void free_entry(struct writequeue_entry *e)
{
struct dlm_msg *msg, *tmp;
list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, tmp, &e->msgs, list) {
if (msg->orig_msg) {
msg->orig_msg->retransmit = false;
kref_put(&msg->orig_msg->ref, dlm_msg_release);
}
list_del(&msg->list);
kref_put(&msg->ref, dlm_msg_release);
}
list_del(&e->list);
kref_put(&e->ref, dlm_page_release);
}
static void dlm_close_sock(struct socket **sock)
{
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
lock_sock((*sock)->sk);
restore_callbacks((*sock)->sk);
release_sock((*sock)->sk);
sock_release(*sock);
*sock = NULL;
}
static void allow_connection_io(struct connection *con)
{
if (con->othercon)
clear_bit(CF_IO_STOP, &con->othercon->flags);
clear_bit(CF_IO_STOP, &con->flags);
}
static void stop_connection_io(struct connection *con)
{
if (con->othercon)
stop_connection_io(con->othercon);
down_write(&con->sock_lock);
if (con->sock) {
lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
restore_callbacks(con->sock->sk);
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
set_bit(CF_IO_STOP, &con->flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
release_sock(con->sock->sk);
} else {
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
set_bit(CF_IO_STOP, &con->flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
up_write(&con->sock_lock);
cancel_work_sync(&con->swork);
cancel_work_sync(&con->rwork);
}
/* Close a remote connection and tidy up */
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void close_connection(struct connection *con, bool and_other)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (con->othercon && and_other)
close_connection(con->othercon, false);
down_write(&con->sock_lock);
if (!con->sock) {
up_write(&con->sock_lock);
return;
}
dlm_close_sock(&con->sock);
/* if we send a writequeue entry only a half way, we drop the
* whole entry because reconnection and that we not start of the
* middle of a msg which will confuse the other end.
*
* we can always drop messages because retransmits, but what we
* cannot allow is to transmit half messages which may be processed
* at the other side.
*
* our policy is to start on a clean state when disconnects, we don't
* know what's send/received on transport layer in this case.
*/
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
if (!list_empty(&con->writequeue)) {
e = list_first_entry(&con->writequeue, struct writequeue_entry,
list);
if (e->dirty)
free_entry(e);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
con->rx_leftover = 0;
con->retries = 0;
clear_bit(CF_APP_LIMITED, &con->flags);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
clear_bit(CF_RECV_PENDING, &con->flags);
clear_bit(CF_SEND_PENDING, &con->flags);
up_write(&con->sock_lock);
}
static void shutdown_connection(struct connection *con, bool and_other)
{
int ret;
if (con->othercon && and_other)
shutdown_connection(con->othercon, false);
flush_workqueue(io_workqueue);
down_read(&con->sock_lock);
/* nothing to shutdown */
if (!con->sock) {
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
return;
}
ret = kernel_sock_shutdown(con->sock, SHUT_WR);
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
if (ret) {
log_print("Connection %p failed to shutdown: %d will force close",
con, ret);
goto force_close;
} else {
ret = wait_event_timeout(con->shutdown_wait, !con->sock,
DLM_SHUTDOWN_WAIT_TIMEOUT);
if (ret == 0) {
log_print("Connection %p shutdown timed out, will force close",
con);
goto force_close;
}
}
return;
force_close:
close_connection(con, false);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static struct processqueue_entry *new_processqueue_entry(int nodeid,
int buflen)
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
{
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
struct processqueue_entry *pentry;
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
pentry = kmalloc(sizeof(*pentry), GFP_NOFS);
if (!pentry)
return NULL;
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
pentry->buf = kmalloc(buflen, GFP_NOFS);
if (!pentry->buf) {
kfree(pentry);
return NULL;
}
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
pentry->nodeid = nodeid;
return pentry;
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void free_processqueue_entry(struct processqueue_entry *pentry)
{
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
kfree(pentry->buf);
kfree(pentry);
}
struct dlm_processed_nodes {
int nodeid;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
struct list_head list;
};
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static void add_processed_node(int nodeid, struct list_head *processed_nodes)
{
struct dlm_processed_nodes *n;
list_for_each_entry(n, processed_nodes, list) {
/* we already remembered this node */
if (n->nodeid == nodeid)
return;
}
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* if it's fails in worst case we simple don't send an ack back.
* We try it next time.
*/
n = kmalloc(sizeof(*n), GFP_NOFS);
if (!n)
return;
n->nodeid = nodeid;
list_add(&n->list, processed_nodes);
}
static void process_dlm_messages(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct dlm_processed_nodes *n, *n_tmp;
struct processqueue_entry *pentry;
LIST_HEAD(processed_nodes);
spin_lock(&processqueue_lock);
pentry = list_first_entry_or_null(&processqueue,
struct processqueue_entry, list);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pentry)) {
spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
return;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
list_del(&pentry->list);
spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
for (;;) {
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
dlm_process_incoming_buffer(pentry->nodeid, pentry->buf,
pentry->buflen);
add_processed_node(pentry->nodeid, &processed_nodes);
free_processqueue_entry(pentry);
spin_lock(&processqueue_lock);
pentry = list_first_entry_or_null(&processqueue,
struct processqueue_entry, list);
if (!pentry) {
process_dlm_messages_pending = false;
spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
break;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
list_del(&pentry->list);
spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
}
/* send ack back after we processed couple of messages */
list_for_each_entry_safe(n, n_tmp, &processed_nodes, list) {
list_del(&n->list);
dlm_midcomms_receive_done(n->nodeid);
kfree(n);
}
}
/* Data received from remote end */
static int receive_from_sock(struct connection *con, int buflen)
{
struct processqueue_entry *pentry;
int ret, buflen_real;
struct msghdr msg;
struct kvec iov;
pentry = new_processqueue_entry(con->nodeid, buflen);
if (!pentry)
return DLM_IO_RESCHED;
memcpy(pentry->buf, con->rx_leftover_buf, con->rx_leftover);
/* calculate new buffer parameter regarding last receive and
* possible leftover bytes
*/
iov.iov_base = pentry->buf + con->rx_leftover;
iov.iov_len = buflen - con->rx_leftover;
memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
msg.msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL;
clear_bit(CF_RECV_INTR, &con->flags);
again:
ret = kernel_recvmsg(con->sock, &msg, &iov, 1, iov.iov_len,
msg.msg_flags);
trace_dlm_recv(con->nodeid, ret);
if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
if (test_and_clear_bit(CF_RECV_INTR, &con->flags)) {
release_sock(con->sock->sk);
goto again;
}
clear_bit(CF_RECV_PENDING, &con->flags);
release_sock(con->sock->sk);
free_processqueue_entry(pentry);
return DLM_IO_END;
} else if (ret == 0) {
/* close will clear CF_RECV_PENDING */
free_processqueue_entry(pentry);
return DLM_IO_EOF;
} else if (ret < 0) {
free_processqueue_entry(pentry);
return ret;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* new buflen according readed bytes and leftover from last receive */
buflen_real = ret + con->rx_leftover;
ret = dlm_validate_incoming_buffer(con->nodeid, pentry->buf,
buflen_real);
if (ret < 0) {
free_processqueue_entry(pentry);
return ret;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
pentry->buflen = ret;
/* calculate leftover bytes from process and put it into begin of
* the receive buffer, so next receive we have the full message
* at the start address of the receive buffer.
*/
con->rx_leftover = buflen_real - ret;
memmove(con->rx_leftover_buf, pentry->buf + ret,
con->rx_leftover);
spin_lock(&processqueue_lock);
list_add_tail(&pentry->list, &processqueue);
if (!process_dlm_messages_pending) {
process_dlm_messages_pending = true;
queue_work(process_workqueue, &process_work);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_unlock(&processqueue_lock);
return DLM_IO_SUCCESS;
}
/* Listening socket is busy, accept a connection */
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static int accept_from_sock(void)
{
struct sockaddr_storage peeraddr;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
int len, idx, result, nodeid;
struct connection *newcon;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
struct socket *newsock;
unsigned int mark;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
result = kernel_accept(listen_con.sock, &newsock, O_NONBLOCK);
if (result == -EAGAIN)
return DLM_IO_END;
else if (result < 0)
goto accept_err;
/* Get the connected socket's peer */
memset(&peeraddr, 0, sizeof(peeraddr));
net: make getname() functions return length rather than use int* parameter Changes since v1: Added changes in these files: drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_transport.c drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-socket.c drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c drivers/vhost/net.c fs/dlm/lowcomms.c fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c security/tomoyo/network.c Before: All these functions either return a negative error indicator, or store length of sockaddr into "int *socklen" parameter and return zero on success. "int *socklen" parameter is awkward. For example, if caller does not care, it still needs to provide on-stack storage for the value it does not need. None of the many FOO_getname() functions of various protocols ever used old value of *socklen. They always just overwrite it. This change drops this parameter, and makes all these functions, on success, return length of sockaddr. It's always >= 0 and can be differentiated from an error. Tests in callers are changed from "if (err)" to "if (err < 0)", where needed. rpc_sockname() lost "int buflen" parameter, since its only use was to be passed to kernel_getsockname() as &buflen and subsequently not used in any way. Userspace API is not changed. text data bss dec hex filename 30108430 2633624 873672 33615726 200ef6e vmlinux.before.o 30108109 2633612 873672 33615393 200ee21 vmlinux.o Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-x25@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-02-13 03:00:20 +08:00
len = newsock->ops->getname(newsock, (struct sockaddr *)&peeraddr, 2);
if (len < 0) {
result = -ECONNABORTED;
goto accept_err;
}
/* Get the new node's NODEID */
make_sockaddr(&peeraddr, 0, &len);
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
if (addr_to_nodeid(&peeraddr, &nodeid, &mark)) {
switch (peeraddr.ss_family) {
case AF_INET: {
struct sockaddr_in *sin = (struct sockaddr_in *)&peeraddr;
log_print("connect from non cluster IPv4 node %pI4",
&sin->sin_addr);
break;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
case AF_INET6: {
struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&peeraddr;
log_print("connect from non cluster IPv6 node %pI6c",
&sin6->sin6_addr);
break;
}
#endif
default:
log_print("invalid family from non cluster node");
break;
}
sock_release(newsock);
return -1;
}
log_print("got connection from %d", nodeid);
/* Check to see if we already have a connection to this node. This
* could happen if the two nodes initiate a connection at roughly
* the same time and the connections cross on the wire.
* In this case we store the incoming one in "othercon"
*/
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
newcon = nodeid2con(nodeid, 0);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!newcon)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
result = -ENOENT;
goto accept_err;
}
fs: dlm: fix mark setting deadlock This patch fixes an deadlock issue when dlm_lowcomms_close() is called. When dlm_lowcomms_close() is called the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex is held to remove configfs items. At this time we flushing (e.g. cancel_work_sync()) the workers of send and recv workqueue. Due the fact that we accessing configfs items (mark values), these workers will lock clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex as well which are already hold by dlm_lowcomms_close() and ends in a deadlock situation. [67170.703046] ====================================================== [67170.703965] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [67170.704758] 5.11.0-rc4+ #22 Tainted: G W [67170.705433] ------------------------------------------------------ [67170.706228] dlm_controld/280 is trying to acquire lock: [67170.706915] ffff9f2f475a6948 ((wq_completion)dlm_recv){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x203/0x4c0 [67170.708026] but task is already holding lock: [67170.708758] ffffffffa132f878 (&clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: configfs_rmdir+0x29b/0x310 [67170.710016] which lock already depends on the new lock. The new behaviour adds the mark value to the node address configuration which doesn't require to held the clusters_root.subsys.su_mutex by accessing mark values in a separate datastructure. However the mark values can be set now only after a node address was set which is the case when the user is using dlm_controld. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:09 +08:00
sock_set_mark(newsock->sk, mark);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
down_write(&newcon->sock_lock);
if (newcon->sock) {
[DLM] Clean up lowcomms This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek with comments below indicating why some things have been left: Andrew Morton wrote: > >> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc) >> +{ >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + int r; >> + int n; >> + >> + down_read(&nodeinfo_lock); > > Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful. > > I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'. That's in fact > a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH). I doubt if that's what you really > meant. Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka > GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0". In fact "0" is the > least reliable mode possible. > > IOW, this is all bollixed up. When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance. I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!) >> +/* Data received from remote end */ >> +static int receive_from_sock(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct msghdr msg; >> + struct kvec iov[2]; >> + unsigned len; >> + int r; >> + struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo; >> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + >> + /* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this >> + * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be >> + * OK. >> + */ >> + static struct sockaddr_storage msgname; >> + static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > whoa. This is globally singly-threaded code?? Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd. >> >> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid) >> +{ >> + struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Another static buffer to worry about. Globally singly-threaded code? Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd. >> + >> +/* Send a message */ >> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct writequeue_entry *e; >> + int len, offset; >> + struct msghdr outmsg; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Singly-threaded? Yep. >> >> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) { >> + struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0); >> + if (ni) { >> + idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i); > > Didn't that need locking? Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads have been stopped. >> >> +static int write_list_empty(void) >> +{ >> + int status; >> + >> + spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + status = list_empty(&write_nodes); >> + spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + >> + return status; >> +} > > This function's return value is meaningless. As soon as the lock gets > dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality. > > Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and > dangerous thing. Really the locking should be moved into the caller. It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival). The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other startup or shutdown bug to be honest. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-06 23:10:37 +08:00
struct connection *othercon = newcon->othercon;
if (!othercon) {
othercon = kzalloc(sizeof(*othercon), GFP_NOFS);
if (!othercon) {
log_print("failed to allocate incoming socket");
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
up_write(&newcon->sock_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
result = -ENOMEM;
goto accept_err;
}
fs: dlm: rework receive handling This patch reworks the current receive handling of dlm. As I tried to change the send handling to fix reorder issues I took a look into the receive handling and simplified it, it works as the following: Each connection has a preallocated receive buffer with a minimum length of 4096. On receive, the upper layer protocol will process all dlm message until there is not enough data anymore. If there exists "leftover" data at the end of the receive buffer because the dlm message wasn't fully received it will be copied to the begin of the preallocated receive buffer. Next receive more data will be appended to the previous "leftover" data and processing will begin again. This will remove a lot of code of the current mechanism. Inside the processing functionality we will ensure with a memmove() that the dlm message should be memory aligned. To have a dlm message always started at the beginning of the buffer will reduce some amount of memmove() calls because src and dest pointers are the same. The cluster attribute "buffer_size" becomes a new meaning, it's now the size of application layer receive buffer size. If this is changed during runtime the receive buffer will be reallocated. It's important that the receive buffer size has at minimum the size of the maximum possible dlm message size otherwise the received message cannot be placed inside the receive buffer size. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2020-09-24 22:31:26 +08:00
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
dlm_con_init(othercon, nodeid);
lockdep_set_subclass(&othercon->sock_lock, 1);
newcon->othercon = othercon;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
set_bit(CF_IS_OTHERCON, &othercon->flags);
} else {
/* close other sock con if we have something new */
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
close_connection(othercon, false);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
down_write(&othercon->sock_lock);
add_sock(newsock, othercon);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* check if we receved something while adding */
lock_sock(othercon->sock->sk);
lowcomms_queue_rwork(othercon);
release_sock(othercon->sock->sk);
up_write(&othercon->sock_lock);
}
else {
/* accept copies the sk after we've saved the callbacks, so we
don't want to save them a second time or comm errors will
result in calling sk_error_report recursively. */
add_sock(newsock, newcon);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* check if we receved something while adding */
lock_sock(newcon->sock->sk);
lowcomms_queue_rwork(newcon);
release_sock(newcon->sock->sk);
}
up_write(&newcon->sock_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return DLM_IO_SUCCESS;
[DLM] Clean up lowcomms This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek with comments below indicating why some things have been left: Andrew Morton wrote: > >> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc) >> +{ >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + int r; >> + int n; >> + >> + down_read(&nodeinfo_lock); > > Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful. > > I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'. That's in fact > a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH). I doubt if that's what you really > meant. Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka > GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0". In fact "0" is the > least reliable mode possible. > > IOW, this is all bollixed up. When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance. I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!) >> +/* Data received from remote end */ >> +static int receive_from_sock(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct msghdr msg; >> + struct kvec iov[2]; >> + unsigned len; >> + int r; >> + struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo; >> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + >> + /* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this >> + * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be >> + * OK. >> + */ >> + static struct sockaddr_storage msgname; >> + static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > whoa. This is globally singly-threaded code?? Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd. >> >> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid) >> +{ >> + struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Another static buffer to worry about. Globally singly-threaded code? Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd. >> + >> +/* Send a message */ >> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct writequeue_entry *e; >> + int len, offset; >> + struct msghdr outmsg; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Singly-threaded? Yep. >> >> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) { >> + struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0); >> + if (ni) { >> + idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i); > > Didn't that need locking? Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads have been stopped. >> >> +static int write_list_empty(void) >> +{ >> + int status; >> + >> + spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + status = list_empty(&write_nodes); >> + spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + >> + return status; >> +} > > This function's return value is meaningless. As soon as the lock gets > dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality. > > Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and > dangerous thing. Really the locking should be moved into the caller. It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival). The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other startup or shutdown bug to be honest. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-06 23:10:37 +08:00
accept_err:
if (newsock)
sock_release(newsock);
return result;
}
/*
* writequeue_entry_complete - try to delete and free write queue entry
* @e: write queue entry to try to delete
* @completed: bytes completed
*
* writequeue_lock must be held.
*/
static void writequeue_entry_complete(struct writequeue_entry *e, int completed)
{
e->offset += completed;
e->len -= completed;
/* signal that page was half way transmitted */
e->dirty = true;
if (e->len == 0 && e->users == 0)
free_entry(e);
}
/*
* sctp_bind_addrs - bind a SCTP socket to all our addresses
*/
static int sctp_bind_addrs(struct socket *sock, uint16_t port)
{
struct sockaddr_storage localaddr;
struct sockaddr *addr = (struct sockaddr *)&localaddr;
int i, addr_len, result = 0;
for (i = 0; i < dlm_local_count; i++) {
memcpy(&localaddr, &dlm_local_addr[i], sizeof(localaddr));
make_sockaddr(&localaddr, port, &addr_len);
if (!i)
result = kernel_bind(sock, addr, addr_len);
else
result = sock_bind_add(sock->sk, addr, addr_len);
if (result < 0) {
log_print("Can't bind to %d addr number %d, %d.\n",
port, i + 1, result);
break;
}
}
return result;
}
/* Get local addresses */
static void init_local(void)
{
struct sockaddr_storage sas;
int i;
dlm_local_count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < DLM_MAX_ADDR_COUNT; i++) {
if (dlm_our_addr(&sas, i))
break;
memcpy(&dlm_local_addr[dlm_local_count++], &sas, sizeof(sas));
}
}
static struct writequeue_entry *new_writequeue_entry(struct connection *con)
{
struct writequeue_entry *entry;
entry = dlm_allocate_writequeue();
if (!entry)
return NULL;
entry->page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
if (!entry->page) {
dlm_free_writequeue(entry);
return NULL;
}
entry->offset = 0;
entry->len = 0;
entry->end = 0;
entry->dirty = false;
entry->con = con;
entry->users = 1;
kref_init(&entry->ref);
return entry;
}
static struct writequeue_entry *new_wq_entry(struct connection *con, int len,
char **ppc, void (*cb)(void *data),
void *data)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
if (!list_empty(&con->writequeue)) {
e = list_last_entry(&con->writequeue, struct writequeue_entry, list);
if (DLM_WQ_REMAIN_BYTES(e) >= len) {
kref_get(&e->ref);
*ppc = page_address(e->page) + e->end;
if (cb)
cb(data);
e->end += len;
e->users++;
goto out;
}
}
e = new_writequeue_entry(con);
if (!e)
goto out;
kref_get(&e->ref);
*ppc = page_address(e->page);
e->end += len;
if (cb)
cb(data);
list_add_tail(&e->list, &con->writequeue);
out:
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
return e;
};
static struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg_con(struct connection *con, int len,
gfp_t allocation, char **ppc,
void (*cb)(void *data),
void *data)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e;
struct dlm_msg *msg;
msg = dlm_allocate_msg(allocation);
if (!msg)
return NULL;
kref_init(&msg->ref);
e = new_wq_entry(con, len, ppc, cb, data);
if (!e) {
dlm_free_msg(msg);
return NULL;
}
msg->retransmit = false;
msg->orig_msg = NULL;
msg->ppc = *ppc;
msg->len = len;
msg->entry = e;
return msg;
}
/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, unlock happens in
* dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg which is a must call if success
*/
#ifndef __CHECKER__
struct dlm_msg *dlm_lowcomms_new_msg(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation,
char **ppc, void (*cb)(void *data),
void *data)
{
struct connection *con;
struct dlm_msg *msg;
int idx;
if (len > DLM_MAX_SOCKET_BUFSIZE ||
len < sizeof(struct dlm_header)) {
BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE < DLM_MAX_SOCKET_BUFSIZE);
log_print("failed to allocate a buffer of size %d", len);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return NULL;
}
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, 0);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!con)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return NULL;
}
msg = dlm_lowcomms_new_msg_con(con, len, allocation, ppc, cb, data);
if (!msg) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return NULL;
}
fs: dlm: fix race in lowcomms This patch fixes a race between queue_work() in _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg() and srcu_read_unlock(). The queue_work() can take the final reference of a dlm_msg and so msg->idx can contain garbage which is signaled by the following warning: [ 676.237050] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 676.237052] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1060 at include/linux/srcu.h:189 dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg+0x41/0x50 [ 676.238945] Modules linked in: dlm_locktorture torture rpcsec_gss_krb5 intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support qxl kvm_intel drm_ttm_helper vmw_vsock_virtio_transport kvm vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common ttm irqbypass crc32_pclmul joydev crc32c_intel serio_raw drm_kms_helper vsock virtio_scsi virtio_console virtio_balloon snd_pcm drm syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt snd_timer fb_sys_fops i2c_i801 lpc_ich snd i2c_smbus soundcore pcspkr [ 676.244227] CPU: 0 PID: 1060 Comm: lock_torture_wr Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3+ #1546 [ 676.245216] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.16.0-2.module+el8.7.0+15506+033991b0 04/01/2014 [ 676.246460] RIP: 0010:dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg+0x41/0x50 [ 676.247132] Code: fe ff ff ff 75 24 48 c7 c6 bd 0f 49 bb 48 c7 c7 38 7c 01 bd e8 00 e7 ca ff 89 de 48 c7 c7 60 78 01 bd e8 42 3d cd ff 5b 5d c3 <0f> 0b eb d8 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 [ 676.249253] RSP: 0018:ffffa401c18ffc68 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 676.249855] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 00000000ffff8b76 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 676.250713] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffbccf3a10 RDI: ffffffffbcc7b62e [ 676.251610] RBP: ffffa401c18ffc70 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 676.252481] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 676.253421] R13: ffff8b76786ec370 R14: ffff8b76786ec370 R15: ffff8b76786ec480 [ 676.254257] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8b7777800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 676.255239] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 676.255897] CR2: 00005590205d88b8 CR3: 000000017656c003 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [ 676.256734] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 676.257567] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 676.258397] PKRU: 55555554 [ 676.258729] Call Trace: [ 676.259063] <TASK> [ 676.259354] dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle+0xcc/0x110 [ 676.259964] queue_bast+0x8b/0xb0 [ 676.260423] grant_pending_locks+0x166/0x1b0 [ 676.261007] _unlock_lock+0x75/0x90 [ 676.261469] unlock_lock.isra.57+0x62/0xa0 [ 676.262009] dlm_unlock+0x21e/0x330 [ 676.262457] ? lock_torture_stats+0x80/0x80 [dlm_locktorture] [ 676.263183] torture_unlock+0x5a/0x90 [dlm_locktorture] [ 676.263815] ? preempt_count_sub+0xba/0x100 [ 676.264361] ? complete+0x1d/0x60 [ 676.264777] lock_torture_writer+0xb8/0x150 [dlm_locktorture] [ 676.265555] kthread+0x10a/0x130 [ 676.266007] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 676.266616] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 676.267097] </TASK> [ 676.267381] irq event stamp: 9579855 [ 676.267824] hardirqs last enabled at (9579863): [<ffffffffbb14e6f8>] __up_console_sem+0x58/0x60 [ 676.268896] hardirqs last disabled at (9579872): [<ffffffffbb14e6dd>] __up_console_sem+0x3d/0x60 [ 676.270008] softirqs last enabled at (9579798): [<ffffffffbc200349>] __do_softirq+0x349/0x4c7 [ 676.271438] softirqs last disabled at (9579897): [<ffffffffbb0d54c0>] irq_exit_rcu+0xb0/0xf0 [ 676.272796] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- I reproduced this warning with dlm_locktorture test which is currently not upstream. However this patch fix the issue by make a additional refcount between dlm_lowcomms_new_msg() and dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(). In case of the race the kref_put() in dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg() will be the final put. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-08-16 03:43:13 +08:00
/* for dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg() */
kref_get(&msg->ref);
/* we assume if successful commit must called */
msg->idx = idx;
return msg;
}
#endif
static void _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e = msg->entry;
struct connection *con = e->con;
int users;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
kref_get(&msg->ref);
list_add(&msg->list, &e->msgs);
users = --e->users;
if (users)
goto out;
e->len = DLM_WQ_LENGTH_BYTES(e);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
lowcomms_queue_swork(con);
[DLM] Clean up lowcomms This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek with comments below indicating why some things have been left: Andrew Morton wrote: > >> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc) >> +{ >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + int r; >> + int n; >> + >> + down_read(&nodeinfo_lock); > > Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful. > > I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'. That's in fact > a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH). I doubt if that's what you really > meant. Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka > GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0". In fact "0" is the > least reliable mode possible. > > IOW, this is all bollixed up. When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance. I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!) >> +/* Data received from remote end */ >> +static int receive_from_sock(void) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct msghdr msg; >> + struct kvec iov[2]; >> + unsigned len; >> + int r; >> + struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo; >> + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; >> + struct nodeinfo *ni; >> + >> + /* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this >> + * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be >> + * OK. >> + */ >> + static struct sockaddr_storage msgname; >> + static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > whoa. This is globally singly-threaded code?? Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd. >> >> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid) >> +{ >> + struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Another static buffer to worry about. Globally singly-threaded code? Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd. >> + >> +/* Send a message */ >> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + struct writequeue_entry *e; >> + int len, offset; >> + struct msghdr outmsg; >> + static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))]; > > Singly-threaded? Yep. >> >> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) { >> + struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0); >> + if (ni) { >> + idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i); > > Didn't that need locking? Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads have been stopped. >> >> +static int write_list_empty(void) >> +{ >> + int status; >> + >> + spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + status = list_empty(&write_nodes); >> + spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock); >> + >> + return status; >> +} > > This function's return value is meaningless. As soon as the lock gets > dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality. > > Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and > dangerous thing. Really the locking should be moved into the caller. It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival). The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other startup or shutdown bug to be honest. Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-06 23:10:37 +08:00
out:
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
return;
}
/* avoid false positive for nodes_srcu, lock was happen in
* dlm_lowcomms_new_msg
*/
#ifndef __CHECKER__
void dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
_dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(msg);
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, msg->idx);
fs: dlm: fix race in lowcomms This patch fixes a race between queue_work() in _dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg() and srcu_read_unlock(). The queue_work() can take the final reference of a dlm_msg and so msg->idx can contain garbage which is signaled by the following warning: [ 676.237050] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 676.237052] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1060 at include/linux/srcu.h:189 dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg+0x41/0x50 [ 676.238945] Modules linked in: dlm_locktorture torture rpcsec_gss_krb5 intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support qxl kvm_intel drm_ttm_helper vmw_vsock_virtio_transport kvm vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common ttm irqbypass crc32_pclmul joydev crc32c_intel serio_raw drm_kms_helper vsock virtio_scsi virtio_console virtio_balloon snd_pcm drm syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt snd_timer fb_sys_fops i2c_i801 lpc_ich snd i2c_smbus soundcore pcspkr [ 676.244227] CPU: 0 PID: 1060 Comm: lock_torture_wr Not tainted 5.19.0-rc3+ #1546 [ 676.245216] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.16.0-2.module+el8.7.0+15506+033991b0 04/01/2014 [ 676.246460] RIP: 0010:dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg+0x41/0x50 [ 676.247132] Code: fe ff ff ff 75 24 48 c7 c6 bd 0f 49 bb 48 c7 c7 38 7c 01 bd e8 00 e7 ca ff 89 de 48 c7 c7 60 78 01 bd e8 42 3d cd ff 5b 5d c3 <0f> 0b eb d8 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 [ 676.249253] RSP: 0018:ffffa401c18ffc68 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 676.249855] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 00000000ffff8b76 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 676.250713] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffbccf3a10 RDI: ffffffffbcc7b62e [ 676.251610] RBP: ffffa401c18ffc70 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 676.252481] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 676.253421] R13: ffff8b76786ec370 R14: ffff8b76786ec370 R15: ffff8b76786ec480 [ 676.254257] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8b7777800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 676.255239] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 676.255897] CR2: 00005590205d88b8 CR3: 000000017656c003 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 [ 676.256734] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 676.257567] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 676.258397] PKRU: 55555554 [ 676.258729] Call Trace: [ 676.259063] <TASK> [ 676.259354] dlm_midcomms_commit_mhandle+0xcc/0x110 [ 676.259964] queue_bast+0x8b/0xb0 [ 676.260423] grant_pending_locks+0x166/0x1b0 [ 676.261007] _unlock_lock+0x75/0x90 [ 676.261469] unlock_lock.isra.57+0x62/0xa0 [ 676.262009] dlm_unlock+0x21e/0x330 [ 676.262457] ? lock_torture_stats+0x80/0x80 [dlm_locktorture] [ 676.263183] torture_unlock+0x5a/0x90 [dlm_locktorture] [ 676.263815] ? preempt_count_sub+0xba/0x100 [ 676.264361] ? complete+0x1d/0x60 [ 676.264777] lock_torture_writer+0xb8/0x150 [dlm_locktorture] [ 676.265555] kthread+0x10a/0x130 [ 676.266007] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 676.266616] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 676.267097] </TASK> [ 676.267381] irq event stamp: 9579855 [ 676.267824] hardirqs last enabled at (9579863): [<ffffffffbb14e6f8>] __up_console_sem+0x58/0x60 [ 676.268896] hardirqs last disabled at (9579872): [<ffffffffbb14e6dd>] __up_console_sem+0x3d/0x60 [ 676.270008] softirqs last enabled at (9579798): [<ffffffffbc200349>] __do_softirq+0x349/0x4c7 [ 676.271438] softirqs last disabled at (9579897): [<ffffffffbb0d54c0>] irq_exit_rcu+0xb0/0xf0 [ 676.272796] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- I reproduced this warning with dlm_locktorture test which is currently not upstream. However this patch fix the issue by make a additional refcount between dlm_lowcomms_new_msg() and dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(). In case of the race the kref_put() in dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg() will be the final put. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-08-16 03:43:13 +08:00
/* because dlm_lowcomms_new_msg() */
kref_put(&msg->ref, dlm_msg_release);
}
#endif
void dlm_lowcomms_put_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
kref_put(&msg->ref, dlm_msg_release);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* does not held connections_srcu, usage lowcomms_error_report only */
int dlm_lowcomms_resend_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
{
struct dlm_msg *msg_resend;
char *ppc;
if (msg->retransmit)
return 1;
msg_resend = dlm_lowcomms_new_msg_con(msg->entry->con, msg->len,
GFP_ATOMIC, &ppc, NULL, NULL);
if (!msg_resend)
return -ENOMEM;
msg->retransmit = true;
kref_get(&msg->ref);
msg_resend->orig_msg = msg;
memcpy(ppc, msg->ppc, msg->len);
_dlm_lowcomms_commit_msg(msg_resend);
dlm_lowcomms_put_msg(msg_resend);
return 0;
}
/* Send a message */
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static int send_to_sock(struct connection *con)
{
const int msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL;
struct writequeue_entry *e;
int len, offset, ret;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
e = con_next_wq(con);
if (!e) {
clear_bit(CF_SEND_PENDING, &con->flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
return DLM_IO_END;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
len = e->len;
offset = e->offset;
WARN_ON_ONCE(len == 0 && e->users == 0);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
ret = kernel_sendpage(con->sock, e->page, offset, len,
msg_flags);
trace_dlm_send(con->nodeid, ret);
if (ret == -EAGAIN || ret == 0) {
lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
if (test_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &con->sock->flags) &&
!test_and_set_bit(CF_APP_LIMITED, &con->flags)) {
/* Notify TCP that we're limited by the
* application window size.
*/
set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &con->sock->sk->sk_socket->flags);
con->sock->sk->sk_write_pending++;
clear_bit(CF_SEND_PENDING, &con->flags);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
release_sock(con->sock->sk);
/* wait for write_space() event */
return DLM_IO_END;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
release_sock(con->sock->sk);
return DLM_IO_RESCHED;
} else if (ret < 0) {
return ret;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
writequeue_entry_complete(e, ret);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return DLM_IO_SUCCESS;
}
static void clean_one_writequeue(struct connection *con)
{
struct writequeue_entry *e, *safe;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(e, safe, &con->writequeue, list) {
free_entry(e);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
}
static void connection_release(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct connection *con = container_of(rcu, struct connection, rcu);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&con->writequeue));
WARN_ON_ONCE(con->sock);
kfree(con);
}
/* Called from recovery when it knows that a node has
left the cluster */
int dlm_lowcomms_close(int nodeid)
{
struct connection *con;
int idx;
log_print("closing connection to node %d", nodeid);
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
con = nodeid2con(nodeid, 0);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!con)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
return -ENOENT;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
stop_connection_io(con);
log_print("io handling for node: %d stopped", nodeid);
close_connection(con, true);
spin_lock(&connections_lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&con->list);
spin_unlock(&connections_lock);
clean_one_writequeue(con);
call_srcu(&connections_srcu, &con->rcu, connection_release);
if (con->othercon) {
clean_one_writequeue(con->othercon);
if (con->othercon)
call_srcu(&connections_srcu, &con->othercon->rcu, connection_release);
}
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* for debugging we print when we are done to compare with other
* messages in between. This function need to be correctly synchronized
* with io handling
*/
log_print("closing connection to node %d done", nodeid);
return 0;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* Receive worker function */
static void process_recv_sockets(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct connection *con = container_of(work, struct connection, rwork);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
int ret, buflen;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
down_read(&con->sock_lock);
if (!con->sock) {
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
return;
}
buflen = READ_ONCE(dlm_config.ci_buffer_size);
do {
ret = receive_from_sock(con, buflen);
} while (ret == DLM_IO_SUCCESS);
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
switch (ret) {
case DLM_IO_END:
/* CF_RECV_PENDING cleared */
break;
case DLM_IO_EOF:
close_connection(con, false);
wake_up(&con->shutdown_wait);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* CF_RECV_PENDING cleared */
break;
case DLM_IO_RESCHED:
cond_resched();
queue_work(io_workqueue, &con->rwork);
/* CF_RECV_PENDING not cleared */
break;
default:
if (ret < 0) {
if (test_bit(CF_IS_OTHERCON, &con->flags)) {
close_connection(con, false);
} else {
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
lowcomms_queue_swork(con);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
}
/* CF_RECV_PENDING cleared for othercon
* we trigger send queue if not already done
* and process_send_sockets will handle it
*/
break;
}
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
break;
}
}
static void process_listen_recv_socket(struct work_struct *work)
{
int ret;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!listen_con.sock))
return;
do {
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
ret = accept_from_sock();
} while (ret == DLM_IO_SUCCESS);
if (ret < 0)
log_print("critical error accepting connection: %d", ret);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
static int dlm_connect(struct connection *con)
{
struct sockaddr_storage addr;
int result, addr_len;
struct socket *sock;
unsigned int mark;
memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr));
result = nodeid_to_addr(con->nodeid, &addr, NULL,
dlm_proto_ops->try_new_addr, &mark);
if (result < 0) {
log_print("no address for nodeid %d", con->nodeid);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return result;
}
/* Create a socket to communicate with */
result = sock_create_kern(&init_net, dlm_local_addr[0].ss_family,
SOCK_STREAM, dlm_proto_ops->proto, &sock);
if (result < 0)
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return result;
sock_set_mark(sock->sk, mark);
dlm_proto_ops->sockopts(sock);
result = dlm_proto_ops->bind(sock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (result < 0) {
sock_release(sock);
return result;
}
add_sock(sock, con);
log_print_ratelimited("connecting to %d", con->nodeid);
make_sockaddr(&addr, dlm_config.ci_tcp_port, &addr_len);
result = dlm_proto_ops->connect(con, sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr,
addr_len);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
switch (result) {
case -EINPROGRESS:
/* not an error */
fallthrough;
case 0:
break;
default:
if (result < 0)
dlm_close_sock(&con->sock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
break;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return result;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* Send worker function */
static void process_send_sockets(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct connection *con = container_of(work, struct connection, swork);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
int ret;
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(CF_IS_OTHERCON, &con->flags));
down_read(&con->sock_lock);
if (!con->sock) {
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
down_write(&con->sock_lock);
if (!con->sock) {
ret = dlm_connect(con);
switch (ret) {
case 0:
break;
case -EINPROGRESS:
/* avoid spamming resched on connection
* we might can switch to a state_change
* event based mechanism if established
*/
msleep(100);
break;
default:
/* CF_SEND_PENDING not cleared */
up_write(&con->sock_lock);
log_print("connect to node %d try %d error %d",
con->nodeid, con->retries++, ret);
msleep(1000);
/* For now we try forever to reconnect. In
* future we should send a event to cluster
* manager to fence itself after certain amount
* of retries.
*/
queue_work(io_workqueue, &con->swork);
return;
}
}
downgrade_write(&con->sock_lock);
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
do {
ret = send_to_sock(con);
} while (ret == DLM_IO_SUCCESS);
up_read(&con->sock_lock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
switch (ret) {
case DLM_IO_END:
/* CF_SEND_PENDING cleared */
break;
case DLM_IO_RESCHED:
/* CF_SEND_PENDING not cleared */
cond_resched();
queue_work(io_workqueue, &con->swork);
break;
default:
if (ret < 0) {
close_connection(con, false);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* CF_SEND_PENDING cleared */
spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
lowcomms_queue_swork(con);
spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
break;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
break;
}
}
static void work_stop(void)
{
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (io_workqueue) {
destroy_workqueue(io_workqueue);
io_workqueue = NULL;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (process_workqueue) {
destroy_workqueue(process_workqueue);
process_workqueue = NULL;
}
}
static int work_start(void)
{
fs: dlm: add unbound flag to dlm_io workqueue This patch will add the WQ_UNBOUND flag to the lowcomms dlm_io workqueue which handles socket io handling to send and receive dlm messages. The amount of sockets will be 2 for a 3 node cluster. Each socket has two different workers for doing send and receive work by calling socket API functionality. Each worker will do their task in order to send dlm messages in a ordered stream based socket communication. On receive side the receive buffer will be queued up for an ordered dlm_process workqueue to parse received dlm messages. The parsing need to be done currently in an ordered synchronized way because the dlm message processing is not being made to parse parallel. After explaining all those workqueue behaviours in lowcomms, the dlm_io workqueue is only being used for socket handling. Each socket handling has 2 workers (send and receive). In a 3 cluster node we will end up with 4 workers. Without the WQ_UNBOUND flag the workers are tight to a CPU and can never switch, this could be an advantage because local CPU execution. However with dlm_locktorture testcase I expierenced not all workers are always in use and my assumption is that some workers are bound to the same CPU. We should always send or receive when we are ready to do so, one reason why we disable nigel algorithm on sockets. We should be safe to do the socket io handling on any CPU which can be switched during runtime. There is no assumption that the worker stays on the same CPU. There is no need to respect any workqueue concurrency model that each worker can only run on one CPU. Lowcomms queue_work() mechanism has an higher level flag to be sure that it can't schedule work if the previous worker did not signal it to keep ordered socket handling. Therefore this patch sets the WQ_UNBOUND flag to allow workers being executed by any available CPU. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2023-03-07 04:48:09 +08:00
io_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("dlm_io", WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
if (!io_workqueue) {
log_print("can't start dlm_io");
return -ENOMEM;
}
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
/* ordered dlm message process queue,
* should be converted to a tasklet
*/
process_workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("dlm_process",
WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
if (!process_workqueue) {
log_print("can't start dlm_process");
destroy_workqueue(io_workqueue);
io_workqueue = NULL;
return -ENOMEM;
}
return 0;
}
fs: dlm: add shutdown hook This patch fixes issues which occurs when dlm lowcomms synchronize their workqueues but dlm application layer already released the lockspace. In such cases messages like: dlm: gfs2: release_lockspace final free dlm: invalid lockspace 3841231384 from 1 cmd 1 type 11 are printed on the kernel log. This patch is solving this issue by introducing a new "shutdown" hook before calling "stop" hook when the lockspace is going to be released finally. This should pretend any dlm messages sitting in the workqueues during or after lockspace removal. It's necessary to call dlm_scand_stop() as I instrumented dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer() code to report a warning after it's called after dlm_midcomms_shutdown() functionality, see below: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3794 at fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1003 dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Modules linked in: joydev iTCO_wdt intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support drm_ttm_helper ttm pcspkr serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_smbus drm_kms_helper virtio_scsi lpc_ich virtio_balloon virtio_console xhci_pci xhci_pci_renesas cec qemu_fw_cfg drm [last unloaded: qxl] CPU: 1 PID: 3794 Comm: dlm_scand Tainted: G W 5.11.0+ #26 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Code: 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 0f 0b 45 31 e4 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 3b f1 ec ff eb 86 <0f> 0b 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 2c f1 ec ff e9 74 ff ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa81503f8fe60 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8f969827f200 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffad1e89a0 RDI: ffff8f96a5294160 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8f96a250bc60 R10: 00000000000045d3 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f96a250bc60 R13: ffffa81503f8fec8 R14: 0000000000000070 R15: 0000000000000c40 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f96fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055aa3351c000 CR3: 000000010bf22000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: dlm_scan_rsbs+0x420/0x670 ? dlm_uevent+0x20/0x20 dlm_scand+0xbf/0xe0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 To synchronize all dlm scand messages we stop it right before shutdown hook. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:20 +08:00
void dlm_lowcomms_shutdown(void)
{
struct connection *con;
int i, idx;
/* stop lowcomms_listen_data_ready calls */
lock_sock(listen_con.sock->sk);
listen_con.sock->sk->sk_data_ready = listen_sock.sk_data_ready;
release_sock(listen_con.sock->sk);
fs: dlm: add shutdown hook This patch fixes issues which occurs when dlm lowcomms synchronize their workqueues but dlm application layer already released the lockspace. In such cases messages like: dlm: gfs2: release_lockspace final free dlm: invalid lockspace 3841231384 from 1 cmd 1 type 11 are printed on the kernel log. This patch is solving this issue by introducing a new "shutdown" hook before calling "stop" hook when the lockspace is going to be released finally. This should pretend any dlm messages sitting in the workqueues during or after lockspace removal. It's necessary to call dlm_scand_stop() as I instrumented dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer() code to report a warning after it's called after dlm_midcomms_shutdown() functionality, see below: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3794 at fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1003 dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Modules linked in: joydev iTCO_wdt intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support drm_ttm_helper ttm pcspkr serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_smbus drm_kms_helper virtio_scsi lpc_ich virtio_balloon virtio_console xhci_pci xhci_pci_renesas cec qemu_fw_cfg drm [last unloaded: qxl] CPU: 1 PID: 3794 Comm: dlm_scand Tainted: G W 5.11.0+ #26 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Code: 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 0f 0b 45 31 e4 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 3b f1 ec ff eb 86 <0f> 0b 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 2c f1 ec ff e9 74 ff ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa81503f8fe60 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8f969827f200 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffad1e89a0 RDI: ffff8f96a5294160 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8f96a250bc60 R10: 00000000000045d3 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f96a250bc60 R13: ffffa81503f8fec8 R14: 0000000000000070 R15: 0000000000000c40 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f96fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055aa3351c000 CR3: 000000010bf22000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: dlm_scan_rsbs+0x420/0x670 ? dlm_uevent+0x20/0x20 dlm_scand+0xbf/0xe0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 To synchronize all dlm scand messages we stop it right before shutdown hook. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:20 +08:00
cancel_work_sync(&listen_con.rwork);
fs: dlm: add shutdown hook This patch fixes issues which occurs when dlm lowcomms synchronize their workqueues but dlm application layer already released the lockspace. In such cases messages like: dlm: gfs2: release_lockspace final free dlm: invalid lockspace 3841231384 from 1 cmd 1 type 11 are printed on the kernel log. This patch is solving this issue by introducing a new "shutdown" hook before calling "stop" hook when the lockspace is going to be released finally. This should pretend any dlm messages sitting in the workqueues during or after lockspace removal. It's necessary to call dlm_scand_stop() as I instrumented dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer() code to report a warning after it's called after dlm_midcomms_shutdown() functionality, see below: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3794 at fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1003 dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Modules linked in: joydev iTCO_wdt intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support drm_ttm_helper ttm pcspkr serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_smbus drm_kms_helper virtio_scsi lpc_ich virtio_balloon virtio_console xhci_pci xhci_pci_renesas cec qemu_fw_cfg drm [last unloaded: qxl] CPU: 1 PID: 3794 Comm: dlm_scand Tainted: G W 5.11.0+ #26 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Code: 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 0f 0b 45 31 e4 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 3b f1 ec ff eb 86 <0f> 0b 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 2c f1 ec ff e9 74 ff ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa81503f8fe60 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8f969827f200 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffad1e89a0 RDI: ffff8f96a5294160 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8f96a250bc60 R10: 00000000000045d3 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f96a250bc60 R13: ffffa81503f8fec8 R14: 0000000000000070 R15: 0000000000000c40 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f96fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055aa3351c000 CR3: 000000010bf22000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: dlm_scan_rsbs+0x420/0x670 ? dlm_uevent+0x20/0x20 dlm_scand+0xbf/0xe0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 To synchronize all dlm scand messages we stop it right before shutdown hook. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:20 +08:00
dlm_close_sock(&listen_con.sock);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
for (i = 0; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(con, &connection_hash[i], list) {
shutdown_connection(con, true);
stop_connection_io(con);
flush_workqueue(process_workqueue);
close_connection(con, true);
clean_one_writequeue(con);
if (con->othercon)
clean_one_writequeue(con->othercon);
allow_connection_io(con);
}
fs: dlm: remove socket shutdown handling Since commit 489d8e559c65 ("fs: dlm: add reliable connection if reconnect") we have functionality like TCP offers for half-closed sockets on dlm application protocol layer. This feature is required because the cluster manager events about leaving resource memberships can be locally already occurred but other cluster nodes having a pending leaving membership over the cluster manager protocol happening. In this time the local dlm node already shutdown it's connection and don't transmit anymore any new dlm messages, but however it still needs to be able to accept dlm messages because the pending leave membership request of the cluster manager protocol which the dlm kernel implementation has no control about it. We have this functionality on the application for two reasons, the main reason is that SCTP does not support such functionality on socket layer. But we can do it inside application layer. Another small issue is that this feature is broken in the TCP world because some NAT devices does not implement such functionality correctly. This is the same reason why the reliable connection session layer in DLM exists. We give up on middle devices in the networking which sends e.g. TCP resets out. In DLM we cannot have any message dropping and we ensure it over a session layer that it can't happen. Back to the half-closed grace shutdown handling. It's not necessary anymore to do it on socket layer (which is only support for TCP sockets) because we do it on application layer. This patch removes this handling, if there are still issues then we have a problem on the application layer for such handling. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:50 +08:00
}
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
fs: dlm: add shutdown hook This patch fixes issues which occurs when dlm lowcomms synchronize their workqueues but dlm application layer already released the lockspace. In such cases messages like: dlm: gfs2: release_lockspace final free dlm: invalid lockspace 3841231384 from 1 cmd 1 type 11 are printed on the kernel log. This patch is solving this issue by introducing a new "shutdown" hook before calling "stop" hook when the lockspace is going to be released finally. This should pretend any dlm messages sitting in the workqueues during or after lockspace removal. It's necessary to call dlm_scand_stop() as I instrumented dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer() code to report a warning after it's called after dlm_midcomms_shutdown() functionality, see below: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3794 at fs/dlm/midcomms.c:1003 dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Modules linked in: joydev iTCO_wdt intel_pmc_bxt iTCO_vendor_support drm_ttm_helper ttm pcspkr serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_smbus drm_kms_helper virtio_scsi lpc_ich virtio_balloon virtio_console xhci_pci xhci_pci_renesas cec qemu_fw_cfg drm [last unloaded: qxl] CPU: 1 PID: 3794 Comm: dlm_scand Tainted: G W 5.11.0+ #26 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:dlm_midcomms_get_buffer+0x167/0x180 Code: 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 0f 0b 45 31 e4 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 3b f1 ec ff eb 86 <0f> 0b 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 e8 2c f1 ec ff e9 74 ff ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 RSP: 0018:ffffa81503f8fe60 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8f969827f200 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffad1e89a0 RDI: ffff8f96a5294160 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8f96a250bc60 R10: 00000000000045d3 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f96a250bc60 R13: ffffa81503f8fec8 R14: 0000000000000070 R15: 0000000000000c40 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f96fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055aa3351c000 CR3: 000000010bf22000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: dlm_scan_rsbs+0x420/0x670 ? dlm_uevent+0x20/0x20 dlm_scand+0xbf/0xe0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 To synchronize all dlm scand messages we stop it right before shutdown hook. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-03-02 06:05:20 +08:00
}
void dlm_lowcomms_stop(void)
{
work_stop();
dlm_proto_ops = NULL;
}
static int dlm_listen_for_all(void)
{
struct socket *sock;
int result;
log_print("Using %s for communications",
dlm_proto_ops->name);
result = dlm_proto_ops->listen_validate();
if (result < 0)
return result;
result = sock_create_kern(&init_net, dlm_local_addr[0].ss_family,
SOCK_STREAM, dlm_proto_ops->proto, &sock);
if (result < 0) {
log_print("Can't create comms socket: %d", result);
return result;
}
sock_set_mark(sock->sk, dlm_config.ci_mark);
dlm_proto_ops->listen_sockopts(sock);
result = dlm_proto_ops->listen_bind(sock);
if (result < 0)
goto out;
lock_sock(sock->sk);
listen_sock.sk_data_ready = sock->sk->sk_data_ready;
listen_sock.sk_write_space = sock->sk->sk_write_space;
listen_sock.sk_error_report = sock->sk->sk_error_report;
listen_sock.sk_state_change = sock->sk->sk_state_change;
listen_con.sock = sock;
sock->sk->sk_allocation = GFP_NOFS;
Treewide: Stop corrupting socket's task_frag Since moving to memalloc_nofs_save/restore, SUNRPC has stopped setting the GFP_NOIO flag on sk_allocation which the networking system uses to decide when it is safe to use current->task_frag. The results of this are unexpected corruption in task_frag when SUNRPC is involved in memory reclaim. The corruption can be seen in crashes, but the root cause is often difficult to ascertain as a crashing machine's stack trace will have no evidence of being near NFS or SUNRPC code. I believe this problem to be much more pervasive than reports to the community may indicate. Fix this by having kernel users of sockets that may corrupt task_frag due to reclaim set sk_use_task_frag = false. Preemptively correcting this situation for users that still set sk_allocation allows them to convert to memalloc_nofs_save/restore without the same unexpected corruptions that are sure to follow, unlikely to show up in testing, and difficult to bisect. CC: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> CC: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> CC: "Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> CC: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> CC: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> CC: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> CC: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com> CC: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> CC: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com> CC: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> CC: Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com> CC: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> CC: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> CC: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> CC: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com> CC: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> CC: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> CC: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> CC: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> CC: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net> CC: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> CC: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> CC: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> CC: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org> CC: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Suggested-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-12-16 20:45:27 +08:00
sock->sk->sk_use_task_frag = false;
sock->sk->sk_data_ready = lowcomms_listen_data_ready;
release_sock(sock->sk);
DLM: increase socket backlog to avoid hangs with 16 nodes On a 16 node virtual cluster with e1000 NICs joining the 12th node prints SYN flood warnings for the DLM port: Dec 21 01:46:41 localhost kernel: [ 2146.516664] TCP: request_sock_TCP: Possible SYN flooding on port 21064. Sending cookies. Check SNMP counters. And then joining a DLM lockspace hangs: ``` Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.780913] INFO: task xapi-clusterd:17638 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.786476] Not tainted 4.4.0+10 #1 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.789043] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794611] xapi-clusterd D ffff88001930bc58 0 17638 1 0x00000000 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794615] ffff88001930bc58 ffff880025593800 ffff880022433800 ffff88001930c000 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794617] ffff88000ef4a660 ffff88000ef4a658 ffff880022433800 ffff88000ef4a000 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794619] ffff88001930bc70 ffffffff8159f6b4 7fffffffffffffff ffff88001930bd10 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794644] [<ffffffff811570fe>] ? printk+0x4d/0x4f Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794647] [<ffffffff810b1741>] ? __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x20 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794649] [<ffffffff815a085d>] wait_for_completion+0x9d/0x110 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794653] [<ffffffff810979e0>] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794661] [<ffffffffa03fa4b8>] dlm_new_lockspace+0x908/0xac0 [dlm] Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794665] [<ffffffff810aaa60>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0x100/0x100 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794670] [<ffffffffa0402e37>] device_write+0x497/0x6b0 [dlm] Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794673] [<ffffffff811834f0>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x7f0/0x13b0 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794677] [<ffffffff811b4438>] __vfs_write+0x28/0xd0 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794679] [<ffffffff811b4b7f>] ? rw_verify_area+0x6f/0xd0 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794681] [<ffffffff811b4dc1>] vfs_write+0xb1/0x190 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794686] [<ffffffff8105ffc2>] ? __do_page_fault+0x302/0x420 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794688] [<ffffffff811b5986>] SyS_write+0x46/0xa0 Dec 21 01:49:00 localhost kernel: [ 2285.794690] [<ffffffff815a31ae>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 ``` The previous limit of 5 seems like an arbitrary number, that doesn't match any known DLM cluster size upper bound limit. Signed-off-by: Edwin Török <edvin.torok@citrix.com> Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com> Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2023-03-07 04:48:10 +08:00
result = sock->ops->listen(sock, 128);
if (result < 0) {
dlm_close_sock(&listen_con.sock);
return result;
}
return 0;
out:
sock_release(sock);
return result;
}
static int dlm_tcp_bind(struct socket *sock)
{
struct sockaddr_storage src_addr;
int result, addr_len;
/* Bind to our cluster-known address connecting to avoid
* routing problems.
*/
memcpy(&src_addr, &dlm_local_addr[0], sizeof(src_addr));
make_sockaddr(&src_addr, 0, &addr_len);
result = sock->ops->bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&src_addr,
addr_len);
if (result < 0) {
/* This *may* not indicate a critical error */
log_print("could not bind for connect: %d", result);
}
return 0;
}
static int dlm_tcp_connect(struct connection *con, struct socket *sock,
struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
{
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return sock->ops->connect(sock, addr, addr_len, O_NONBLOCK);
}
static int dlm_tcp_listen_validate(void)
{
/* We don't support multi-homed hosts */
if (dlm_local_count > 1) {
log_print("TCP protocol can't handle multi-homed hosts, try SCTP");
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static void dlm_tcp_sockopts(struct socket *sock)
{
/* Turn off Nagle's algorithm */
tcp_sock_set_nodelay(sock->sk);
}
static void dlm_tcp_listen_sockopts(struct socket *sock)
{
dlm_tcp_sockopts(sock);
sock_set_reuseaddr(sock->sk);
}
static int dlm_tcp_listen_bind(struct socket *sock)
{
int addr_len;
/* Bind to our port */
make_sockaddr(&dlm_local_addr[0], dlm_config.ci_tcp_port, &addr_len);
return sock->ops->bind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&dlm_local_addr[0],
addr_len);
}
static const struct dlm_proto_ops dlm_tcp_ops = {
.name = "TCP",
.proto = IPPROTO_TCP,
.connect = dlm_tcp_connect,
.sockopts = dlm_tcp_sockopts,
.bind = dlm_tcp_bind,
.listen_validate = dlm_tcp_listen_validate,
.listen_sockopts = dlm_tcp_listen_sockopts,
.listen_bind = dlm_tcp_listen_bind,
};
static int dlm_sctp_bind(struct socket *sock)
{
return sctp_bind_addrs(sock, 0);
}
static int dlm_sctp_connect(struct connection *con, struct socket *sock,
struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
{
int ret;
/*
* Make sock->ops->connect() function return in specified time,
* since O_NONBLOCK argument in connect() function does not work here,
* then, we should restore the default value of this attribute.
*/
sock_set_sndtimeo(sock->sk, 5);
ret = sock->ops->connect(sock, addr, addr_len, 0);
sock_set_sndtimeo(sock->sk, 0);
fs: dlm: parallelize lowcomms socket handling This patch is rework of lowcomms handling, the main goal was here to handle recvmsg() and sendpage() to run parallel. Parallel in two senses: 1. per connection and 2. that recvmsg()/sendpage() doesn't block each other. Currently recvmsg()/sendpage() cannot run parallel because two workqueues "dlm_recv" and "dlm_send" are ordered workqueues. That means only one work item can be executed. The amount of queue items will be increased about the amount of nodes being inside the cluster. The current two workqueues for sending and receiving can also block each other if the same connection is executed at the same time in dlm_recv and dlm_send workqueue because a per connection mutex for the socket handling. To make it more parallel we introduce one "dlm_io" workqueue which is not an ordered workqueue, the amount of workers are not limited. Due per connection flags SEND/RECV pending we schedule workers ordered per connection and per send and receive task. To get rid of the mutex blocking same workers to do socket handling we switched to a semaphore which handles socket operations as read lock and sock releases as write operations, to prevent sock_release() being called while the socket is being used. There might be more optimization removing the semaphore and replacing it with other synchronization mechanism, however due other circumstances e.g. othercon behaviour it seems complicated to doing this change. I added comments to remove the othercon handling and moving to a different synchronization mechanism as this is done. We need to do that to the next dlm major version upgrade because it is not backwards compatible with the current connect mechanism. The processing of dlm messages need to be still handled by a ordered workqueue. An dlm_process ordered workqueue was introduced which gets filled by the receive worker. This is probably the next bottleneck of DLM but the application can't currently parse dlm messages parallel. A comment was introduced to lift the workqueue context of dlm processing in a non-sleepable softirq to get messages processing done fast. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 06:11:57 +08:00
return ret;
}
static int dlm_sctp_listen_validate(void)
{
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP_SCTP)) {
log_print("SCTP is not enabled by this kernel");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
request_module("sctp");
return 0;
}
static int dlm_sctp_bind_listen(struct socket *sock)
{
return sctp_bind_addrs(sock, dlm_config.ci_tcp_port);
}
static void dlm_sctp_sockopts(struct socket *sock)
{
/* Turn off Nagle's algorithm */
sctp_sock_set_nodelay(sock->sk);
sock_set_rcvbuf(sock->sk, NEEDED_RMEM);
}
static const struct dlm_proto_ops dlm_sctp_ops = {
.name = "SCTP",
.proto = IPPROTO_SCTP,
.try_new_addr = true,
.connect = dlm_sctp_connect,
.sockopts = dlm_sctp_sockopts,
.bind = dlm_sctp_bind,
.listen_validate = dlm_sctp_listen_validate,
.listen_sockopts = dlm_sctp_sockopts,
.listen_bind = dlm_sctp_bind_listen,
};
int dlm_lowcomms_start(void)
{
int error;
init_local();
if (!dlm_local_count) {
error = -ENOTCONN;
log_print("no local IP address has been set");
goto fail;
}
error = work_start();
if (error)
goto fail;
/* Start listening */
switch (dlm_config.ci_protocol) {
case DLM_PROTO_TCP:
dlm_proto_ops = &dlm_tcp_ops;
break;
case DLM_PROTO_SCTP:
dlm_proto_ops = &dlm_sctp_ops;
break;
default:
log_print("Invalid protocol identifier %d set",
dlm_config.ci_protocol);
error = -EINVAL;
goto fail_proto_ops;
}
error = dlm_listen_for_all();
if (error)
goto fail_listen;
return 0;
fail_listen:
dlm_proto_ops = NULL;
fail_proto_ops:
work_stop();
fail:
return error;
}
void dlm_lowcomms_init(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++)
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&connection_hash[i]);
INIT_WORK(&listen_con.rwork, process_listen_recv_socket);
}
void dlm_lowcomms_exit(void)
{
struct connection *con;
int i, idx;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&connections_srcu);
for (i = 0; i < CONN_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(con, &connection_hash[i], list) {
spin_lock(&connections_lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&con->list);
spin_unlock(&connections_lock);
if (con->othercon)
call_srcu(&connections_srcu, &con->othercon->rcu,
connection_release);
call_srcu(&connections_srcu, &con->rcu, connection_release);
}
}
srcu_read_unlock(&connections_srcu, idx);
}