linux/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c

570 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Intel Corporation <naveen.b.s@intel.com>
*
* All rights reserved.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
* your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, GOOD TITLE or
* NON INFRINGEMENT. See the GNU General Public License for more
* details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*
*
* ACPI based HotPlug driver that supports Memory Hotplug
* This driver fields notifications from firmware for memory add
* and remove operations and alerts the VM of the affected memory
* ranges.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 16:04:11 +08:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
#define ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_CLASS "memory"
#define ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_HID "PNP0C80"
#define ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_NAME "Hotplug Mem Device"
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_COMPONENT
#undef PREFIX
#define PREFIX "ACPI:memory_hp:"
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi_memhotplug");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Naveen B S <naveen.b.s@intel.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Hotplug Mem Driver");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
/* Memory Device States */
#define MEMORY_INVALID_STATE 0
#define MEMORY_POWER_ON_STATE 1
#define MEMORY_POWER_OFF_STATE 2
static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device);
static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device);
static const struct acpi_device_id memory_device_ids[] = {
{ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_HID, 0},
{"", 0},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, memory_device_ids);
static struct acpi_driver acpi_memory_device_driver = {
.name = "acpi_memhotplug",
.class = ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_CLASS,
.ids = memory_device_ids,
.ops = {
.add = acpi_memory_device_add,
.remove = acpi_memory_device_remove,
},
};
struct acpi_memory_info {
struct list_head list;
u64 start_addr; /* Memory Range start physical addr */
u64 length; /* Memory Range length */
unsigned short caching; /* memory cache attribute */
unsigned short write_protect; /* memory read/write attribute */
unsigned int enabled:1;
unsigned int failed:1;
};
struct acpi_memory_device {
struct acpi_device * device;
unsigned int state; /* State of the memory device */
struct list_head res_list;
};
static acpi_status
acpi_memory_get_resource(struct acpi_resource *resource, void *context)
{
struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = context;
struct acpi_resource_address64 address64;
struct acpi_memory_info *info, *new;
acpi_status status;
status = acpi_resource_to_address64(resource, &address64);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) ||
(address64.resource_type != ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE))
return AE_OK;
list_for_each_entry(info, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
/* Can we combine the resource range information? */
if ((info->caching == address64.info.mem.caching) &&
(info->write_protect == address64.info.mem.write_protect) &&
(info->start_addr + info->length == address64.minimum)) {
info->length += address64.address_length;
return AE_OK;
}
}
new = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_memory_info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new)
return AE_ERROR;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
new->caching = address64.info.mem.caching;
new->write_protect = address64.info.mem.write_protect;
new->start_addr = address64.minimum;
new->length = address64.address_length;
list_add_tail(&new->list, &mem_device->res_list);
return AE_OK;
}
static void
acpi_memory_free_device_resources(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
struct acpi_memory_info *info, *n;
list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list)
kfree(info);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem_device->res_list);
}
static int
acpi_memory_get_device_resources(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
acpi_status status;
if (!list_empty(&mem_device->res_list))
return 0;
status = acpi_walk_resources(mem_device->device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
acpi_memory_get_resource, mem_device);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_memory_free_device_resources(mem_device);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
static int acpi_memory_get_device(acpi_handle handle,
struct acpi_memory_device **mem_device)
{
struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
int result = 0;
acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
if (device)
goto end;
/*
* Now add the notified device. This creates the acpi_device
* and invokes .add function
*/
result = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
if (result) {
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "ACPI namespace scan failed\n");
result = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
result = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
if (result) {
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Missing device object\n");
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
result = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
end:
*mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
if (!(*mem_device)) {
dev_err(&device->dev, "driver data not found\n");
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
result = -ENODEV;
goto out;
}
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
out:
acpi_scan_lock_release();
return result;
}
static int acpi_memory_check_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
unsigned long long current_status;
/* Get device present/absent information from the _STA */
if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_integer(mem_device->device->handle, "_STA",
NULL, &current_status)))
return -ENODEV;
/*
* Check for device status. Device should be
* present/enabled/functioning.
*/
if (!((current_status & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT)
&& (current_status & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED)
&& (current_status & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING)))
return -ENODEV;
return 0;
}
static int acpi_memory_enable_device(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
int result, num_enabled = 0;
struct acpi_memory_info *info;
int node;
node = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);
/*
* Tell the VM there is more memory here...
* Note: Assume that this function returns zero on success
* We don't have memory-hot-add rollback function,now.
* (i.e. memory-hot-remove function)
*/
list_for_each_entry(info, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
if (info->enabled) { /* just sanity check...*/
num_enabled++;
continue;
}
/*
* If the memory block size is zero, please ignore it.
* Don't try to do the following memory hotplug flowchart.
*/
if (!info->length)
continue;
if (node < 0)
node = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
result = add_memory(node, info->start_addr, info->length);
/*
* If the memory block has been used by the kernel, add_memory()
* returns -EEXIST. If add_memory() returns the other error, it
* means that this memory block is not used by the kernel.
*/
if (result && result != -EEXIST) {
info->failed = 1;
continue;
}
if (!result)
info->enabled = 1;
/*
* Add num_enable even if add_memory() returns -EEXIST, so the
* device is bound to this driver.
*/
num_enabled++;
}
if (!num_enabled) {
dev_err(&mem_device->device->dev, "add_memory failed\n");
mem_device->state = MEMORY_INVALID_STATE;
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* Sometimes the memory device will contain several memory blocks.
* When one memory block is hot-added to the system memory, it will
* be regarded as a success.
* Otherwise if the last memory block can't be hot-added to the system
* memory, it will be failure and the memory device can't be bound with
* driver.
*/
return 0;
}
static int acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
int result = 0, nid;
struct acpi_memory_info *info, *n;
nid = acpi_get_node(mem_device->device->handle);
list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
if (info->failed)
/* The kernel does not use this memory block */
continue;
if (!info->enabled)
/*
* The kernel uses this memory block, but it may be not
* managed by us.
*/
return -EBUSY;
if (nid < 0)
nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
result = remove_memory(nid, info->start_addr, info->length);
if (result)
return result;
list_del(&info->list);
kfree(info);
}
return result;
}
static void acpi_memory_device_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
{
struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device;
struct acpi_device *device;
struct acpi_eject_event *ej_event = NULL;
u32 ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE; /* default */
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
acpi_status status;
switch (event) {
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
"\nReceived BUS CHECK notification for device\n"));
/* Fall Through */
case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
if (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK)
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
"\nReceived DEVICE CHECK notification for device\n"));
if (acpi_memory_get_device(handle, &mem_device)) {
acpi_handle_err(handle, "Cannot find driver data\n");
break;
}
ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
break;
case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
"\nReceived EJECT REQUEST notification for device\n"));
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
status = AE_ERROR;
acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
acpi_handle_err(handle, "Device doesn't exist\n");
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
goto unlock;
}
mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
if (!mem_device) {
acpi_handle_err(handle, "Driver Data is NULL\n");
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
goto unlock;
}
ej_event = kmalloc(sizeof(*ej_event), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ej_event) {
pr_err(PREFIX "No memory, dropping EJECT\n");
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
goto unlock;
}
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
get_device(&device->dev);
ej_event->device = device;
ej_event->event = ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST;
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
/* The eject is carried out asynchronously. */
status = acpi_os_hotplug_execute(acpi_bus_hot_remove_device,
ej_event);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
put_device(&device->dev);
kfree(ej_event);
}
ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-02-13 21:36:47 +08:00
unlock:
acpi_scan_lock_release();
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
return;
default:
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
"Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event));
/* non-hotplug event; possibly handled by other handler */
return;
}
/* Inform firmware that the hotplug operation has completed */
(void) acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(handle, event, ost_code, NULL);
}
static void acpi_memory_device_free(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
if (!mem_device)
return;
acpi_memory_free_device_resources(mem_device);
kfree(mem_device);
}
static int acpi_memory_device_add(struct acpi_device *device)
{
int result;
struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
if (!device)
return -EINVAL;
mem_device = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_memory_device), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mem_device)
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mem_device->res_list);
mem_device->device = device;
sprintf(acpi_device_name(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_NAME);
sprintf(acpi_device_class(device), "%s", ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_CLASS);
device->driver_data = mem_device;
/* Get the range from the _CRS */
result = acpi_memory_get_device_resources(mem_device);
if (result) {
kfree(mem_device);
return result;
}
/* Set the device state */
mem_device->state = MEMORY_POWER_ON_STATE;
pr_debug("%s\n", acpi_device_name(device));
if (!acpi_memory_check_device(mem_device)) {
/* call add_memory func */
result = acpi_memory_enable_device(mem_device);
if (result) {
dev_err(&device->dev,
"Error in acpi_memory_enable_device\n");
acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device);
}
}
return result;
}
static int acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device = NULL;
int result;
if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
return -EINVAL;
mem_device = acpi_driver_data(device);
result = acpi_memory_remove_memory(mem_device);
if (result)
return result;
acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device);
return 0;
}
/*
* Helper function to check for memory device
*/
static acpi_status is_memory_device(acpi_handle handle)
{
char *hardware_id;
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_device_info *info;
status = acpi_get_object_info(handle, &info);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
if (!(info->valid & ACPI_VALID_HID)) {
kfree(info);
return AE_ERROR;
}
hardware_id = info->hardware_id.string;
if ((hardware_id == NULL) ||
(strcmp(hardware_id, ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_HID)))
status = AE_ERROR;
kfree(info);
return status;
}
static acpi_status
acpi_memory_register_notify_handler(acpi_handle handle,
u32 level, void *ctxt, void **retv)
{
acpi_status status;
status = is_memory_device(handle);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return AE_OK; /* continue */
status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
acpi_memory_device_notify, NULL);
/* continue */
return AE_OK;
}
static acpi_status
acpi_memory_deregister_notify_handler(acpi_handle handle,
u32 level, void *ctxt, void **retv)
{
acpi_status status;
status = is_memory_device(handle);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return AE_OK; /* continue */
status = acpi_remove_notify_handler(handle,
ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
acpi_memory_device_notify);
return AE_OK; /* continue */
}
static int __init acpi_memory_device_init(void)
{
int result;
acpi_status status;
result = acpi_bus_register_driver(&acpi_memory_device_driver);
if (result < 0)
return -ENODEV;
status = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
acpi_memory_register_notify_handler, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "walk_namespace failed"));
acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&acpi_memory_device_driver);
return -ENODEV;
}
return 0;
}
static void __exit acpi_memory_device_exit(void)
{
acpi_status status;
/*
* Adding this to un-install notification handlers for all the device
* handles.
*/
status = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
acpi_memory_deregister_notify_handler, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "walk_namespace failed"));
acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&acpi_memory_device_driver);
return;
}
module_init(acpi_memory_device_init);
module_exit(acpi_memory_device_exit);