linux/include/net/switchdev.h

383 lines
9.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
/*
* include/net/switchdev.h - Switch device API
* Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
* Copyright (c) 2014-2015 Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_SWITCHDEV_H_
#define _LINUX_SWITCHDEV_H_
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <net/ip_fib.h>
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
#define SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE BIT(0)
#define SWITCHDEV_F_SKIP_EOPNOTSUPP BIT(1)
#define SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER BIT(2)
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
enum switchdev_attr_id {
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_UNDEFINED,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_MROUTER,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MC_DISABLED,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MROUTER,
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_MRP_PORT_ROLE,
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
};
struct switchdev_brport_flags {
unsigned long val;
unsigned long mask;
};
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
struct switchdev_attr {
struct net_device *orig_dev;
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
enum switchdev_attr_id id;
u32 flags;
void *complete_priv;
void (*complete)(struct net_device *dev, int err, void *priv);
union {
u8 stp_state; /* PORT_STP_STATE */
struct switchdev_brport_flags brport_flags; /* PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS */
bool mrouter; /* PORT_MROUTER */
clock_t ageing_time; /* BRIDGE_AGEING_TIME */
bool vlan_filtering; /* BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING */
u16 vlan_protocol; /* BRIDGE_VLAN_PROTOCOL */
bool mc_disabled; /* MC_DISABLED */
u8 mrp_port_role; /* MRP_PORT_ROLE */
} u;
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
};
enum switchdev_obj_id {
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_UNDEFINED,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_TEST_MRP,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_STATE_MRP,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_IN_TEST_MRP,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_IN_ROLE_MRP,
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_IN_STATE_MRP,
};
struct switchdev_obj {
struct net_device *orig_dev;
enum switchdev_obj_id id;
u32 flags;
void *complete_priv;
void (*complete)(struct net_device *dev, int err, void *priv);
};
/* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN */
struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
u16 flags;
net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects The call path of a switchdev VLAN addition to the bridge looks something like this today: nbp_vlan_init | __br_vlan_set_default_pvid | | | | | br_afspec | | | | | | | v | | | br_process_vlan_info | | | | | | | v | | | br_vlan_info | | | / \ / | | / \ / | | / \ / | | / \ / v v v v v nbp_vlan_add br_vlan_add ------+ | ^ ^ | | | / | | | | / / / | \ br_vlan_get_master/ / v \ ^ / / br_vlan_add_existing \ | / / | \ | / / / \ | / / / \ | / / / \ | / / / v | | v / __vlan_add / / | / / | / v | / __vlan_vid_add | / \ | / v v v br_switchdev_port_vlan_add The ranges UAPI was introduced to the bridge in commit bdced7ef7838 ("bridge: support for multiple vlans and vlan ranges in setlink and dellink requests") (Jan 10 2015). But the VLAN ranges (parsed in br_afspec) have always been passed one by one, through struct bridge_vlan_info tmp_vinfo, to br_vlan_info. So the range never went too far in depth. Then Scott Feldman introduced the switchdev_port_bridge_setlink function in commit 47f8328bb1a4 ("switchdev: add new switchdev bridge setlink"). That marked the introduction of the SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN, which made full use of the range. But switchdev_port_bridge_setlink was called like this: br_setlink -> br_afspec -> switchdev_port_bridge_setlink Basically, the switchdev and the bridge code were not tightly integrated. Then commit 41c498b9359e ("bridge: restore br_setlink back to original") came, and switchdev drivers were required to implement .ndo_bridge_setlink = switchdev_port_bridge_setlink for a while. In the meantime, commits such as 0944d6b5a2fa ("bridge: try switchdev op first in __vlan_vid_add/del") finally made switchdev penetrate the br_vlan_info() barrier and start to develop the call path we have today. But remember, br_vlan_info() still receives VLANs one by one. Then Arkadi Sharshevsky refactored the switchdev API in 2017 in commit 29ab586c3d83 ("net: switchdev: Remove bridge bypass support from switchdev") so that drivers would not implement .ndo_bridge_setlink any longer. The switchdev_port_bridge_setlink also got deleted. This refactoring removed the parallel bridge_setlink implementation from switchdev, and left the only switchdev VLAN objects to be the ones offloaded from __vlan_vid_add (basically RX filtering) and __vlan_add (the latter coming from commit 9c86ce2c1ae3 ("net: bridge: Notify about bridge VLANs")). That is to say, today the switchdev VLAN object ranges are not used in the kernel. Refactoring the above call path is a bit complicated, when the bridge VLAN call path is already a bit complicated. Let's go off and finish the job of commit 29ab586c3d83 by deleting the bogus iteration through the VLAN ranges from the drivers. Some aspects of this feature never made too much sense in the first place. For example, what is a range of VLANs all having the BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID flag supposed to mean, when a port can obviously have a single pvid? This particular configuration _is_ denied as of commit 6623c60dc28e ("bridge: vlan: enforce no pvid flag in vlan ranges"), but from an API perspective, the driver still has to play pretend, and only offload the vlan->vid_end as pvid. And the addition of a switchdev VLAN object can modify the flags of another, completely unrelated, switchdev VLAN object! (a VLAN that is PVID will invalidate the PVID flag from whatever other VLAN had previously been offloaded with switchdev and had that flag. Yet switchdev never notifies about that change, drivers are supposed to guess). Nonetheless, having a VLAN range in the API makes error handling look scarier than it really is - unwinding on errors and all of that. When in reality, no one really calls this API with more than one VLAN. It is all unnecessary complexity. And despite appearing pretentious (two-phase transactional model and all), the switchdev API is really sloppy because the VLAN addition and removal operations are not paired with one another (you can add a VLAN 100 times and delete it just once). The bridge notifies through switchdev of a VLAN addition not only when the flags of an existing VLAN change, but also when nothing changes. There are switchdev drivers out there who don't like adding a VLAN that has already been added, and those checks don't really belong at driver level. But the fact that the API contains ranges is yet another factor that prevents this from being addressed in the future. Of the existing switchdev pieces of hardware, it appears that only Mellanox Spectrum supports offloading more than one VLAN at a time, through mlxsw_sp_port_vlan_set. I have kept that code internal to the driver, because there is some more bookkeeping that makes use of it, but I deleted it from the switchdev API. But since the switchdev support for ranges has already been de facto deleted by a Mellanox employee and nobody noticed for 4 years, I'm going to assume it's not a biggie. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> # switchdev and mlxsw Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> # hellcreek Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-09 08:01:46 +08:00
u16 vid;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan, obj)
/* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB */
struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
unsigned char addr[ETH_ALEN];
u16 vid;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb, obj)
/* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP */
struct switchdev_obj_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
struct net_device *p_port;
struct net_device *s_port;
u32 ring_id;
u16 prio;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_mrp, obj)
/* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_TEST_MRP */
struct switchdev_obj_ring_test_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
/* The value is in us and a value of 0 represents to stop */
u32 interval;
u8 max_miss;
u32 ring_id;
u32 period;
bool monitor;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_TEST_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_ring_test_mrp, obj)
/* SWICHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP */
struct switchdev_obj_ring_role_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
u8 ring_role;
u32 ring_id;
u8 sw_backup;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_ROLE_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_ring_role_mrp, obj)
struct switchdev_obj_ring_state_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
u8 ring_state;
u32 ring_id;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_STATE_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_ring_state_mrp, obj)
/* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_IN_TEST_MRP */
struct switchdev_obj_in_test_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
/* The value is in us and a value of 0 represents to stop */
u32 interval;
u32 in_id;
u32 period;
u8 max_miss;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IN_TEST_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_in_test_mrp, obj)
/* SWICHDEV_OBJ_ID_IN_ROLE_MRP */
struct switchdev_obj_in_role_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
struct net_device *i_port;
u32 ring_id;
u16 in_id;
u8 in_role;
u8 sw_backup;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IN_ROLE_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_in_role_mrp, obj)
struct switchdev_obj_in_state_mrp {
struct switchdev_obj obj;
u32 in_id;
u8 in_state;
};
#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IN_STATE_MRP(OBJ) \
container_of((OBJ), struct switchdev_obj_in_state_mrp, obj)
typedef int switchdev_obj_dump_cb_t(struct switchdev_obj *obj);
enum switchdev_notifier_type {
SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE = 1,
SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_BRIDGE,
SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE,
SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE,
SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED,
SWITCHDEV_FDB_FLUSH_TO_BRIDGE,
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL An offloading driver may need to have access to switchdev events on ports that aren't directly under its control. An example is a VXLAN port attached to a bridge offloaded by a driver. The driver needs to know about VLANs configured on the VXLAN device. However the VXLAN device isn't stashed between the bridge and a front-panel-port device (such as is the case e.g. for LAG devices), so the usual switchdev ops don't reach the driver. VXLAN is likely not the only device type like this: in theory any L2 tunnel device that needs offloading will prompt requirement of this sort. This falsifies the assumption that only the lower devices of a front panel port need to be notified to achieve flawless offloading. A way to fix this is to give up the notion of port object addition / deletion as a switchdev operation, which assumes somewhat tight coupling between the message producer and consumer. And instead send the message over a notifier chain. To that end, introduce two new switchdev notifier types, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL. These notifier types communicate the same event as the corresponding switchdev op, except in a form of a notification. struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info was added to carry the fields that the switchdev op carries. An additional field, handled, will be used to communicate back to switchdev that the event has reached an interested party, which will be important for the two-phase commit. The two switchdev operations themselves are kept in place. Following patches first convert individual clients to the notifier protocol, and only then are the operations removed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:28:38 +08:00
SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD, /* Blocking. */
SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL, /* Blocking. */
SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET, /* May be blocking . */
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL An offloading driver may need to have access to switchdev events on ports that aren't directly under its control. An example is a VXLAN port attached to a bridge offloaded by a driver. The driver needs to know about VLANs configured on the VXLAN device. However the VXLAN device isn't stashed between the bridge and a front-panel-port device (such as is the case e.g. for LAG devices), so the usual switchdev ops don't reach the driver. VXLAN is likely not the only device type like this: in theory any L2 tunnel device that needs offloading will prompt requirement of this sort. This falsifies the assumption that only the lower devices of a front panel port need to be notified to achieve flawless offloading. A way to fix this is to give up the notion of port object addition / deletion as a switchdev operation, which assumes somewhat tight coupling between the message producer and consumer. And instead send the message over a notifier chain. To that end, introduce two new switchdev notifier types, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL. These notifier types communicate the same event as the corresponding switchdev op, except in a form of a notification. struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info was added to carry the fields that the switchdev op carries. An additional field, handled, will be used to communicate back to switchdev that the event has reached an interested party, which will be important for the two-phase commit. The two switchdev operations themselves are kept in place. Following patches first convert individual clients to the notifier protocol, and only then are the operations removed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:28:38 +08:00
SWITCHDEV_VXLAN_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE,
SWITCHDEV_VXLAN_FDB_DEL_TO_BRIDGE,
SWITCHDEV_VXLAN_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE,
SWITCHDEV_VXLAN_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE,
SWITCHDEV_VXLAN_FDB_OFFLOADED,
};
struct switchdev_notifier_info {
struct net_device *dev;
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
};
struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info {
struct switchdev_notifier_info info; /* must be first */
const unsigned char *addr;
u16 vid;
u8 added_by_user:1,
offloaded:1;
};
switchdev: Add SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL An offloading driver may need to have access to switchdev events on ports that aren't directly under its control. An example is a VXLAN port attached to a bridge offloaded by a driver. The driver needs to know about VLANs configured on the VXLAN device. However the VXLAN device isn't stashed between the bridge and a front-panel-port device (such as is the case e.g. for LAG devices), so the usual switchdev ops don't reach the driver. VXLAN is likely not the only device type like this: in theory any L2 tunnel device that needs offloading will prompt requirement of this sort. This falsifies the assumption that only the lower devices of a front panel port need to be notified to achieve flawless offloading. A way to fix this is to give up the notion of port object addition / deletion as a switchdev operation, which assumes somewhat tight coupling between the message producer and consumer. And instead send the message over a notifier chain. To that end, introduce two new switchdev notifier types, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL. These notifier types communicate the same event as the corresponding switchdev op, except in a form of a notification. struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info was added to carry the fields that the switchdev op carries. An additional field, handled, will be used to communicate back to switchdev that the event has reached an interested party, which will be important for the two-phase commit. The two switchdev operations themselves are kept in place. Following patches first convert individual clients to the notifier protocol, and only then are the operations removed. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:28:38 +08:00
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info {
struct switchdev_notifier_info info; /* must be first */
const struct switchdev_obj *obj;
bool handled;
};
struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info {
struct switchdev_notifier_info info; /* must be first */
const struct switchdev_attr *attr;
bool handled;
};
static inline struct net_device *
switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(const struct switchdev_notifier_info *info)
{
return info->dev;
}
static inline struct netlink_ext_ack *
switchdev_notifier_info_to_extack(const struct switchdev_notifier_info *info)
{
return info->extack;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
void switchdev_deferred_process(void);
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
int switchdev_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_attr *attr,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int switchdev_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj);
int register_switchdev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
int unregister_switchdev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
int call_switchdev_notifiers(unsigned long val, struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_info *info,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int register_switchdev_blocking_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
int unregister_switchdev_blocking_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
int call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(unsigned long val, struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_info *info,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
void switchdev_port_fwd_mark_set(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *group_dev,
bool joining);
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:29:44 +08:00
int switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info,
bool (*check_cb)(const struct net_device *dev),
int (*add_cb)(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack));
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:29:44 +08:00
int switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info,
bool (*check_cb)(const struct net_device *dev),
int (*del_cb)(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj));
int switchdev_handle_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info *port_attr_info,
bool (*check_cb)(const struct net_device *dev),
int (*set_cb)(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_attr *attr,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack));
#else
static inline void switchdev_deferred_process(void)
{
}
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
static inline int switchdev_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_attr *attr,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
2015-05-11 00:47:48 +08:00
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static inline int switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static inline int switchdev_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static inline int register_switchdev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int unregister_switchdev_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int call_switchdev_notifiers(unsigned long val,
struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_info *info,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static inline int
register_switchdev_blocking_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int
unregister_switchdev_blocking_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int
call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(unsigned long val,
struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_info *info,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:29:44 +08:00
static inline int
switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info,
bool (*check_cb)(const struct net_device *dev),
int (*add_cb)(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack))
switchdev: Add helpers to aid traversal through lower devices After the transition from switchdev operations to notifier chain (which will take place in following patches), the onus is on the driver to find its own devices below possible layer of LAG or other uppers. The logic to do so is fairly repetitive: each driver is looking for its own devices among the lowers of the notified device. For those that it finds, it calls a handler. To indicate that the event was handled, struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info.handled is set. The differences lie only in what constitutes an "own" device and what handler to call. Therefore abstract this logic into two helpers, switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() and switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(). If a driver only supports physical ports under a bridge device, it will simply avoid this layer of indirection. One area where this helper diverges from the current switchdev behavior is the case of mixed lowers, some of which are switchdev ports and some of which are not. Previously, such scenario would fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. The helper could do that for lowers for which the passed-in predicate doesn't hold. That would however break the case that switchdev ports from several different drivers are stashed under one master, a scenario that switchdev currently happily supports. Therefore tolerate any and all unknown netdevices, whether they are backed by a switchdev driver or not. Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-23 07:29:44 +08:00
{
return 0;
}
static inline int
switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info *port_obj_info,
bool (*check_cb)(const struct net_device *dev),
int (*del_cb)(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_obj *obj))
{
return 0;
}
static inline int
switchdev_handle_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev,
struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info *port_attr_info,
bool (*check_cb)(const struct net_device *dev),
int (*set_cb)(struct net_device *dev,
const struct switchdev_attr *attr,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack))
{
return 0;
}
#endif
#endif /* _LINUX_SWITCHDEV_H_ */