linux/drivers/acpi/ioapic.c

236 lines
5.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* IOAPIC/IOxAPIC/IOSAPIC driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2009 Fujitsu Limited.
* (c) Copyright 2009 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Intel Corporation
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* Based on original drivers/pci/ioapic.c
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
* Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@intel.com>
*/
/*
* This driver manages I/O APICs added by hotplug after boot.
* We try to claim all I/O APIC devices, but those present at boot were
* registered when we parsed the ACPI MADT.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI : IOAPIC: " fmt
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <acpi/acpi.h>
struct acpi_pci_ioapic {
acpi_handle root_handle;
acpi_handle handle;
u32 gsi_base;
struct resource res;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
struct list_head list;
};
static LIST_HEAD(ioapic_list);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(ioapic_list_lock);
static acpi_status setup_res(struct acpi_resource *acpi_res, void *data)
{
struct resource *res = data;
struct resource_win win;
res->flags = 0;
if (acpi_dev_filter_resource_type(acpi_res, IORESOURCE_MEM))
return AE_OK;
if (!acpi_dev_resource_memory(acpi_res, res)) {
if (acpi_dev_resource_address_space(acpi_res, &win) ||
acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space(acpi_res, &win))
*res = win.res;
}
if ((res->flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) ||
(res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED))
res->flags = 0;
return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
}
static bool acpi_is_ioapic(acpi_handle handle, char **type)
{
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_device_info *info;
char *hid = NULL;
bool match = false;
if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_GSB"))
return false;
status = acpi_get_object_info(handle, &info);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_HID)
hid = info->hardware_id.string;
if (hid) {
if (strcmp(hid, "ACPI0009") == 0) {
*type = "IOxAPIC";
match = true;
} else if (strcmp(hid, "ACPI000A") == 0) {
*type = "IOAPIC";
match = true;
}
}
kfree(info);
}
return match;
}
static acpi_status handle_ioapic_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
void *context, void **rv)
{
acpi_status status;
unsigned long long gsi_base;
struct acpi_pci_ioapic *ioapic;
struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
struct resource *res = NULL, *pci_res = NULL, *crs_res;
char *type = NULL;
if (!acpi_is_ioapic(handle, &type))
return AE_OK;
mutex_lock(&ioapic_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ioapic, &ioapic_list, list)
if (ioapic->handle == handle) {
mutex_unlock(&ioapic_list_lock);
return AE_OK;
}
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GSB", NULL, &gsi_base);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "failed to evaluate _GSB method\n");
goto exit;
}
ioapic = kzalloc(sizeof(*ioapic), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ioapic) {
pr_err("cannot allocate memory for new IOAPIC\n");
goto exit;
} else {
ioapic->root_handle = (acpi_handle)context;
ioapic->handle = handle;
ioapic->gsi_base = (u32)gsi_base;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ioapic->list);
}
if (acpi_ioapic_registered(handle, (u32)gsi_base))
goto done;
dev = acpi_get_pci_dev(handle);
if (dev && pci_resource_len(dev, 0)) {
if (pci_enable_device(dev) < 0)
goto exit_put;
pci_set_master(dev);
if (pci_request_region(dev, 0, type))
goto exit_disable;
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
pci_res = &dev->resource[0];
ioapic->pdev = dev;
} else {
pci_dev_put(dev);
dev = NULL;
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
}
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
crs_res = &ioapic->res;
acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, setup_res, crs_res);
crs_res->name = type;
crs_res->flags |= IORESOURCE_BUSY;
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
if (crs_res->flags == 0) {
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "failed to get resource\n");
goto exit_release;
} else if (insert_resource(&iomem_resource, crs_res)) {
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "failed to insert resource\n");
goto exit_release;
}
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
/* try pci resource first, then "_CRS" resource */
res = pci_res;
if (!res || !res->flags)
res = crs_res;
if (acpi_register_ioapic(handle, res->start, (u32)gsi_base)) {
acpi_handle_warn(handle, "failed to register IOAPIC\n");
goto exit_release;
}
done:
list_add(&ioapic->list, &ioapic_list);
mutex_unlock(&ioapic_list_lock);
if (dev)
dev_info(&dev->dev, "%s at %pR, GSI %u\n",
type, res, (u32)gsi_base);
else
acpi_handle_info(handle, "%s at %pR, GSI %u\n",
type, res, (u32)gsi_base);
return AE_OK;
exit_release:
if (dev)
pci_release_region(dev, 0);
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
if (ioapic->res.flags && ioapic->res.parent)
release_resource(&ioapic->res);
exit_disable:
if (dev)
pci_disable_device(dev);
exit_put:
pci_dev_put(dev);
kfree(ioapic);
exit:
mutex_unlock(&ioapic_list_lock);
*(acpi_status *)rv = AE_ERROR;
return AE_OK;
}
int acpi_ioapic_add(acpi_handle root_handle)
{
acpi_status status, retval = AE_OK;
status = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, root_handle,
UINT_MAX, handle_ioapic_add, NULL,
root_handle, (void **)&retval);
return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && ACPI_SUCCESS(retval) ? 0 : -ENODEV;
}
int acpi_ioapic_remove(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
{
int retval = 0;
struct acpi_pci_ioapic *ioapic, *tmp;
mutex_lock(&ioapic_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(ioapic, tmp, &ioapic_list, list) {
if (root->device->handle != ioapic->root_handle)
continue;
if (acpi_unregister_ioapic(ioapic->handle, ioapic->gsi_base))
retval = -EBUSY;
if (ioapic->pdev) {
pci_release_region(ioapic->pdev, 0);
pci_disable_device(ioapic->pdev);
pci_dev_put(ioapic->pdev);
}
x86/ioapic: Fix lost IOAPIC resource after hot-removal and hotadd IOAPIC resource at 0xfecxxxxx gets lost from /proc/iomem after hot-removing and then hot-adding the IOAPIC device. After system boot, in /proc/iomem: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec40000-fec403ff : IOAPIC 2 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 Then hot-remove IOAPIC 2 and hot-add it again: fec00000-fecfffff : PNP0003:00 fec00000-fec003ff : IOAPIC 0 fec01000-fec013ff : IOAPIC 1 fec80000-fec803ff : IOAPIC 3 fecc0000-fecc03ff : IOAPIC 4 The range at 0xfec40000 is lost from /proc/iomem - which is a bug. This bug happens because handle_ioapic_add() requests resources from either PCI config BAR or ACPI "_CRS", not both. But Intel platforms map the IOxAPIC registers both at the PCI config BAR (called MBAR, dynamic), and at the ACPI "_CRS" (called ABAR, static). The 0xfecX_YZ00 to 0xfecX_YZFF range appears in "_CRS" of each IOAPIC device. Both ranges should be claimed from /proc/iomem for exclusive use. Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Cc: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471420837-31003-5-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-08-17 16:00:36 +08:00
if (ioapic->res.flags && ioapic->res.parent)
release_resource(&ioapic->res);
list_del(&ioapic->list);
kfree(ioapic);
}
mutex_unlock(&ioapic_list_lock);
return retval;
}