linux/fs/afs/fs_operation.c

254 lines
5.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/* Fileserver-directed operation handling.
*
* Copyright (C) 2020 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include "internal.h"
static atomic_t afs_operation_debug_counter;
/*
* Create an operation against a volume.
*/
struct afs_operation *afs_alloc_operation(struct key *key, struct afs_volume *volume)
{
struct afs_operation *op;
_enter("");
op = kzalloc(sizeof(*op), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!op)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (!key) {
key = afs_request_key(volume->cell);
if (IS_ERR(key)) {
kfree(op);
return ERR_CAST(key);
}
} else {
key_get(key);
}
op->key = key;
op->volume = afs_get_volume(volume, afs_volume_trace_get_new_op);
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->net = volume->cell->net;
op->cb_v_break = volume->cb_v_break;
op->debug_id = atomic_inc_return(&afs_operation_debug_counter);
op->error = -EDESTADDRREQ;
op->ac.error = SHRT_MAX;
_leave(" = [op=%08x]", op->debug_id);
return op;
}
/*
* Lock the vnode(s) being operated upon.
*/
static bool afs_get_io_locks(struct afs_operation *op)
{
struct afs_vnode *vnode = op->file[0].vnode;
struct afs_vnode *vnode2 = op->file[1].vnode;
_enter("");
if (op->flags & AFS_OPERATION_UNINTR) {
mutex_lock(&vnode->io_lock);
op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_LOCK_0;
_leave(" = t [1]");
return true;
}
if (!vnode2 || !op->file[1].need_io_lock || vnode == vnode2)
vnode2 = NULL;
if (vnode2 > vnode)
swap(vnode, vnode2);
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&vnode->io_lock) < 0) {
afs: Fix interruption of operations The afs filesystem driver allows unstarted operations to be cancelled by signal, but most of these can easily be restarted (mkdir for example). The primary culprits for reproducing this are those applications that use SIGALRM to display a progress counter. File lock-extension operation is marked uninterruptible as we have a limited time in which to do it, and the release op is marked uninterruptible also as if we fail to unlock a file, we'll have to wait 20 mins before anyone can lock it again. The store operation logs a warning if it gets interruption, e.g.: kAFS: Unexpected error from FS.StoreData -4 because it's run from the background - but it can also be run from fdatasync()-type things. However, store options aren't marked interruptible at the moment. Fix this in the following ways: (1) Mark store operations as uninterruptible. It might make sense to relax this for certain situations, but I'm not sure how to make sure that background store ops aren't affected by signals to foreground processes that happen to trigger them. (2) In afs_get_io_locks(), where we're getting the serialisation lock for talking to the fileserver, return ERESTARTSYS rather than EINTR because a lot of the operations (e.g. mkdir) are restartable if we haven't yet started sending the op to the server. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-07-08 16:27:07 +08:00
op->error = -ERESTARTSYS;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_STOP;
_leave(" = f [I 0]");
return false;
}
op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_LOCK_0;
if (vnode2) {
if (mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&vnode2->io_lock, 1) < 0) {
afs: Fix interruption of operations The afs filesystem driver allows unstarted operations to be cancelled by signal, but most of these can easily be restarted (mkdir for example). The primary culprits for reproducing this are those applications that use SIGALRM to display a progress counter. File lock-extension operation is marked uninterruptible as we have a limited time in which to do it, and the release op is marked uninterruptible also as if we fail to unlock a file, we'll have to wait 20 mins before anyone can lock it again. The store operation logs a warning if it gets interruption, e.g.: kAFS: Unexpected error from FS.StoreData -4 because it's run from the background - but it can also be run from fdatasync()-type things. However, store options aren't marked interruptible at the moment. Fix this in the following ways: (1) Mark store operations as uninterruptible. It might make sense to relax this for certain situations, but I'm not sure how to make sure that background store ops aren't affected by signals to foreground processes that happen to trigger them. (2) In afs_get_io_locks(), where we're getting the serialisation lock for talking to the fileserver, return ERESTARTSYS rather than EINTR because a lot of the operations (e.g. mkdir) are restartable if we haven't yet started sending the op to the server. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-07-08 16:27:07 +08:00
op->error = -ERESTARTSYS;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_STOP;
mutex_unlock(&vnode->io_lock);
op->flags &= ~AFS_OPERATION_LOCK_0;
_leave(" = f [I 1]");
return false;
}
op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_LOCK_1;
}
_leave(" = t [2]");
return true;
}
static void afs_drop_io_locks(struct afs_operation *op)
{
struct afs_vnode *vnode = op->file[0].vnode;
struct afs_vnode *vnode2 = op->file[1].vnode;
_enter("");
if (op->flags & AFS_OPERATION_LOCK_1)
mutex_unlock(&vnode2->io_lock);
if (op->flags & AFS_OPERATION_LOCK_0)
mutex_unlock(&vnode->io_lock);
}
static void afs_prepare_vnode(struct afs_operation *op, struct afs_vnode_param *vp,
unsigned int index)
{
struct afs_vnode *vnode = vp->vnode;
if (vnode) {
vp->fid = vnode->fid;
vp->dv_before = vnode->status.data_version;
vp->cb_break_before = afs_calc_vnode_cb_break(vnode);
if (vnode->lock_state != AFS_VNODE_LOCK_NONE)
op->flags |= AFS_OPERATION_CUR_ONLY;
}
if (vp->fid.vnode)
_debug("PREP[%u] {%llx:%llu.%u}",
index, vp->fid.vid, vp->fid.vnode, vp->fid.unique);
}
/*
* Begin an operation on the fileserver.
*
* Fileserver operations are serialised on the server by vnode, so we serialise
* them here also using the io_lock.
*/
bool afs_begin_vnode_operation(struct afs_operation *op)
{
struct afs_vnode *vnode = op->file[0].vnode;
ASSERT(vnode);
_enter("");
if (op->file[0].need_io_lock)
if (!afs_get_io_locks(op))
return false;
afs_prepare_vnode(op, &op->file[0], 0);
afs_prepare_vnode(op, &op->file[1], 1);
op->cb_v_break = op->volume->cb_v_break;
_leave(" = true");
return true;
}
/*
* Tidy up a filesystem cursor and unlock the vnode.
*/
static void afs_end_vnode_operation(struct afs_operation *op)
{
_enter("");
if (op->error == -EDESTADDRREQ ||
op->error == -EADDRNOTAVAIL ||
op->error == -ENETUNREACH ||
op->error == -EHOSTUNREACH)
afs_dump_edestaddrreq(op);
afs_drop_io_locks(op);
if (op->error == -ECONNABORTED)
op->error = afs_abort_to_error(op->ac.abort_code);
}
/*
* Wait for an in-progress operation to complete.
*/
void afs_wait_for_operation(struct afs_operation *op)
{
_enter("");
while (afs_select_fileserver(op)) {
op->cb_s_break = op->server->cb_s_break;
if (test_bit(AFS_SERVER_FL_IS_YFS, &op->server->flags) &&
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->ops->issue_yfs_rpc)
op->ops->issue_yfs_rpc(op);
afs: Fix accessing YFS xattrs on a non-YFS server If someone attempts to access YFS-related xattrs (e.g. afs.yfs.acl) on a file on a non-YFS AFS server (such as OpenAFS), then the kernel will jump to a NULL function pointer because the afs_fetch_acl_operation descriptor doesn't point to a function for issuing an operation on a non-YFS server[1]. Fix this by making afs_wait_for_operation() check that the issue_afs_rpc method is set before jumping to it and setting -ENOTSUPP if not. This fix also covers other potential operations that also only exist on YFS servers. afs_xattr_get/set_yfs() then need to translate -ENOTSUPP to -ENODATA as the former error is internal to the kernel. The bug shows up as an oops like the following: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [...] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. [...] Call Trace: afs_wait_for_operation+0x83/0x1b0 [kafs] afs_xattr_get_yfs+0xe6/0x270 [kafs] __vfs_getxattr+0x59/0x80 vfs_getxattr+0x11c/0x140 getxattr+0x181/0x250 ? __check_object_size+0x13f/0x150 ? __fput+0x16d/0x250 __x64_sys_fgetxattr+0x64/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x49/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fb120a9defe This was triggered with "cp -a" which attempts to copy xattrs, including afs ones, but is easier to reproduce with getfattr, e.g.: getfattr -d -m ".*" /afs/openafs.org/ Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003498.html [1] Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003566.html # v1 Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003572.html # v2
2021-03-02 18:26:45 +08:00
else if (op->ops->issue_afs_rpc)
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
op->ops->issue_afs_rpc(op);
afs: Fix accessing YFS xattrs on a non-YFS server If someone attempts to access YFS-related xattrs (e.g. afs.yfs.acl) on a file on a non-YFS AFS server (such as OpenAFS), then the kernel will jump to a NULL function pointer because the afs_fetch_acl_operation descriptor doesn't point to a function for issuing an operation on a non-YFS server[1]. Fix this by making afs_wait_for_operation() check that the issue_afs_rpc method is set before jumping to it and setting -ENOTSUPP if not. This fix also covers other potential operations that also only exist on YFS servers. afs_xattr_get/set_yfs() then need to translate -ENOTSUPP to -ENODATA as the former error is internal to the kernel. The bug shows up as an oops like the following: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [...] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. [...] Call Trace: afs_wait_for_operation+0x83/0x1b0 [kafs] afs_xattr_get_yfs+0xe6/0x270 [kafs] __vfs_getxattr+0x59/0x80 vfs_getxattr+0x11c/0x140 getxattr+0x181/0x250 ? __check_object_size+0x13f/0x150 ? __fput+0x16d/0x250 __x64_sys_fgetxattr+0x64/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x49/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fb120a9defe This was triggered with "cp -a" which attempts to copy xattrs, including afs ones, but is easier to reproduce with getfattr, e.g.: getfattr -d -m ".*" /afs/openafs.org/ Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003498.html [1] Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003566.html # v1 Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003572.html # v2
2021-03-02 18:26:45 +08:00
else
op->ac.error = -ENOTSUPP;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
afs: Fix accessing YFS xattrs on a non-YFS server If someone attempts to access YFS-related xattrs (e.g. afs.yfs.acl) on a file on a non-YFS AFS server (such as OpenAFS), then the kernel will jump to a NULL function pointer because the afs_fetch_acl_operation descriptor doesn't point to a function for issuing an operation on a non-YFS server[1]. Fix this by making afs_wait_for_operation() check that the issue_afs_rpc method is set before jumping to it and setting -ENOTSUPP if not. This fix also covers other potential operations that also only exist on YFS servers. afs_xattr_get/set_yfs() then need to translate -ENOTSUPP to -ENODATA as the former error is internal to the kernel. The bug shows up as an oops like the following: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [...] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. [...] Call Trace: afs_wait_for_operation+0x83/0x1b0 [kafs] afs_xattr_get_yfs+0xe6/0x270 [kafs] __vfs_getxattr+0x59/0x80 vfs_getxattr+0x11c/0x140 getxattr+0x181/0x250 ? __check_object_size+0x13f/0x150 ? __fput+0x16d/0x250 __x64_sys_fgetxattr+0x64/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x49/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7fb120a9defe This was triggered with "cp -a" which attempts to copy xattrs, including afs ones, but is easier to reproduce with getfattr, e.g.: getfattr -d -m ".*" /afs/openafs.org/ Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Reported-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Gaja Sophie Peters <gaja.peters@math.uni-hamburg.de> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003498.html [1] Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003566.html # v1 Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-March/003572.html # v2
2021-03-02 18:26:45 +08:00
if (op->call)
op->error = afs_wait_for_call_to_complete(op->call, &op->ac);
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
}
switch (op->error) {
case 0:
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
_debug("success");
op->ops->success(op);
break;
case -ECONNABORTED:
if (op->ops->aborted)
op->ops->aborted(op);
afs: Use the fs operation ops to handle FetchData completion Use the 'success' and 'aborted' afs_operations_ops methods and add a 'failed' method to handle the completion of an AFS.FetchData, AFS.FetchData64 or YFS.FetchData64 RPC operation rather than directly calling the done func pointed to by the afs_read struct from the call delivery handler. This means the done function will be called back on error also, not just on successful completion. This allows motion towards asynchronous data reception on data fetch calls and allows any error to be handed off to the fscache read helper in the same place as a successful completion. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-By: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160588541471.3465195.8807019223378490810.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161118157260.1232039.6549085372718234792.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161161052647.2537118.12922380836599003659.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161340417106.1303470.3502017303898569631.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v3 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161539560673.286939.391310781674212229.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v4 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161653816367.2770958.5856904574822446404.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v5 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161789099994.6155.473719823490561190.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v6
2020-09-18 16:11:15 +08:00
fallthrough;
default:
afs: Use the fs operation ops to handle FetchData completion Use the 'success' and 'aborted' afs_operations_ops methods and add a 'failed' method to handle the completion of an AFS.FetchData, AFS.FetchData64 or YFS.FetchData64 RPC operation rather than directly calling the done func pointed to by the afs_read struct from the call delivery handler. This means the done function will be called back on error also, not just on successful completion. This allows motion towards asynchronous data reception on data fetch calls and allows any error to be handed off to the fscache read helper in the same place as a successful completion. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-By: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160588541471.3465195.8807019223378490810.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161118157260.1232039.6549085372718234792.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # rfc Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161161052647.2537118.12922380836599003659.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161340417106.1303470.3502017303898569631.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v3 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161539560673.286939.391310781674212229.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v4 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161653816367.2770958.5856904574822446404.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v5 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161789099994.6155.473719823490561190.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v6
2020-09-18 16:11:15 +08:00
if (op->ops->failed)
op->ops->failed(op);
break;
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
}
afs_end_vnode_operation(op);
if (op->error == 0 && op->ops->edit_dir) {
_debug("edit_dir");
op->ops->edit_dir(op);
}
_leave("");
}
/*
* Dispose of an operation.
*/
int afs_put_operation(struct afs_operation *op)
{
int i, ret = op->error;
_enter("op=%08x,%d", op->debug_id, ret);
if (op->ops && op->ops->put)
op->ops->put(op);
if (op->file[0].put_vnode)
iput(&op->file[0].vnode->vfs_inode);
if (op->file[1].put_vnode)
iput(&op->file[1].vnode->vfs_inode);
if (op->more_files) {
for (i = 0; i < op->nr_files - 2; i++)
if (op->more_files[i].put_vnode)
iput(&op->more_files[i].vnode->vfs_inode);
kfree(op->more_files);
}
afs_end_cursor(&op->ac);
afs_put_serverlist(op->net, op->server_list);
afs_put_volume(op->net, op->volume, afs_volume_trace_put_put_op);
key_put(op->key);
afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept Turn the afs_operation struct into the main way that most fileserver operations are managed. Various things are added to the struct, including the following: (1) All the parameters and results of the relevant operations are moved into it, removing corresponding fields from the afs_call struct. afs_call gets a pointer to the op. (2) The target volume is made the main focus of the operation, rather than the target vnode(s), and a bunch of op->vnode->volume are made op->volume instead. (3) Two vnode records are defined (op->file[]) for the vnode(s) involved in most operations. The vnode record (struct afs_vnode_param) contains: - The vnode pointer. - The fid of the vnode to be included in the parameters or that was returned in the reply (eg. FS.MakeDir). - The status and callback information that may be returned in the reply about the vnode. - Callback break and data version tracking for detecting simultaneous third-parth changes. (4) Pointers to dentries to be updated with new inodes. (5) An operations table pointer. The table includes pointers to functions for issuing AFS and YFS-variant RPCs, handling the success and abort of an operation and handling post-I/O-lock local editing of a directory. To make this work, the following function restructuring is made: (A) The rotation loop that issues calls to fileservers that can be found in each function that wants to issue an RPC (such as afs_mkdir()) is extracted out into common code, in a new file called fs_operation.c. (B) The rotation loops, such as the one in afs_mkdir(), are replaced with a much smaller piece of code that allocates an operation, sets the parameters and then calls out to the common code to do the actual work. (C) The code for handling the success and failure of an operation are moved into operation functions (as (5) above) and these are called from the core code at appropriate times. (D) The pseudo inode getting stuff used by the dynamic root code is moved over into dynroot.c. (E) struct afs_iget_data is absorbed into the operation struct and afs_iget() expects to be given an op pointer and a vnode record. (F) Point (E) doesn't work for the root dir of a volume, but we know the FID in advance (it's always vnode 1, unique 1), so a separate inode getter, afs_root_iget(), is provided to special-case that. (G) The inode status init/update functions now also take an op and a vnode record. (H) The RPC marshalling functions now, for the most part, just take an afs_operation struct as their only argument. All the data they need is held there. The result delivery functions write their answers there as well. (I) The call is attached to the operation and then the operation core does the waiting. And then the new operation code is, for the moment, made to just initialise the operation, get the appropriate vnode I/O locks and do the same rotation loop as before. This lays the foundation for the following changes in the future: (*) Overhauling the rotation (again). (*) Support for asynchronous I/O, where the fileserver rotation must be done asynchronously also. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-04-11 03:51:51 +08:00
kfree(op);
return ret;
}
int afs_do_sync_operation(struct afs_operation *op)
{
afs_begin_vnode_operation(op);
afs_wait_for_operation(op);
return afs_put_operation(op);
}