x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-01-31 09:51:44 +08:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2011-2013 Eric Dumazet (eric.dumazet@gmail.com)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* Internal BPF Copyright (c) 2011-2014 PLUMgrid, http://plumgrid.com
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
|
|
|
|
* of the License.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/filter.h>
|
2012-10-27 10:26:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
|
2018-02-27 05:13:52 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/bpf.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-09 06:58:11 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/set_memory.h>
|
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call
Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts
the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into
another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution,
we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well
when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop.
The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]).
JIT dump after patch:
# bpftool p d x i 1
0: (18) r2 = map[id:1]
2: (b7) r3 = 0
3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
4: (b7) r0 = 2
5: (95) exit
With CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000072 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000072 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+
66: pause |
68: lfence |
6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 |
6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) |
71: retq |
72: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
+ retpoline for indirect jump
Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000063 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000063 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: jmpq *%rax |-
63: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
- plain indirect jump as before
[0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static u8 *emit_code(u8 *ptr, u32 bytes, unsigned int len)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (len == 1)
|
|
|
|
*ptr = bytes;
|
|
|
|
else if (len == 2)
|
|
|
|
*(u16 *)ptr = bytes;
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
*(u32 *)ptr = bytes;
|
|
|
|
barrier();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return ptr + len;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#define EMIT(bytes, len) \
|
|
|
|
do { prog = emit_code(prog, bytes, len); cnt += len; } while (0)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define EMIT1(b1) EMIT(b1, 1)
|
|
|
|
#define EMIT2(b1, b2) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8), 2)
|
|
|
|
#define EMIT3(b1, b2, b3) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8) + ((b3) << 16), 3)
|
|
|
|
#define EMIT4(b1, b2, b3, b4) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8) + ((b3) << 16) + ((b4) << 24), 4)
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#define EMIT1_off32(b1, off) \
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
do { EMIT1(b1); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#define EMIT2_off32(b1, b2, off) \
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
do { EMIT2(b1, b2); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#define EMIT3_off32(b1, b2, b3, off) \
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
do { EMIT3(b1, b2, b3); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#define EMIT4_off32(b1, b2, b3, b4, off) \
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
do { EMIT4(b1, b2, b3, b4); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool is_imm8(int value)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return value <= 127 && value >= -128;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool is_simm32(s64 value)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
return value == (s64)(s32)value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool is_uimm32(u64 value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return value == (u64)(u32)value;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov dst, src */
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#define EMIT_mov(DST, SRC) \
|
|
|
|
do { \
|
|
|
|
if (DST != SRC) \
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, DST, SRC), 0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, DST, SRC)); \
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int bpf_size_to_x86_bytes(int bpf_size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (bpf_size == BPF_W)
|
|
|
|
return 4;
|
|
|
|
else if (bpf_size == BPF_H)
|
|
|
|
return 2;
|
|
|
|
else if (bpf_size == BPF_B)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
else if (bpf_size == BPF_DW)
|
|
|
|
return 4; /* imm32 */
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* List of x86 cond jumps opcodes (. + s8)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
* Add 0x10 (and an extra 0x0f) to generate far jumps (. + s32)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define X86_JB 0x72
|
|
|
|
#define X86_JAE 0x73
|
|
|
|
#define X86_JE 0x74
|
|
|
|
#define X86_JNE 0x75
|
|
|
|
#define X86_JBE 0x76
|
|
|
|
#define X86_JA 0x77
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#define X86_JL 0x7C
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#define X86_JGE 0x7D
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#define X86_JLE 0x7E
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
#define X86_JG 0x7F
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Pick a register outside of BPF range for JIT internal work */
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
#define AUX_REG (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The following table maps BPF registers to x86-64 registers.
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* x86-64 register R12 is unused, since if used as base address
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* register in load/store instructions, it always needs an
|
|
|
|
* extra byte of encoding and is callee saved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2018-05-04 07:08:16 +08:00
|
|
|
* Also x86-64 register R9 is unused. x86-64 register R10 is
|
|
|
|
* used for blinding (if enabled).
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static const int reg2hex[] = {
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_0] = 0, /* RAX */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_1] = 7, /* RDI */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_2] = 6, /* RSI */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_3] = 2, /* RDX */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_4] = 1, /* RCX */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_5] = 0, /* R8 */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_6] = 3, /* RBX callee saved */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_7] = 5, /* R13 callee saved */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_8] = 6, /* R14 callee saved */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_9] = 7, /* R15 callee saved */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_FP] = 5, /* RBP readonly */
|
|
|
|
[BPF_REG_AX] = 2, /* R10 temp register */
|
|
|
|
[AUX_REG] = 3, /* R11 temp register */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* is_ereg() == true if BPF register 'reg' maps to x86-64 r8..r15
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* which need extra byte of encoding.
|
|
|
|
* rax,rcx,...,rbp have simpler encoding
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool is_ereg(u32 reg)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-12-05 07:00:48 +08:00
|
|
|
return (1 << reg) & (BIT(BPF_REG_5) |
|
|
|
|
BIT(AUX_REG) |
|
|
|
|
BIT(BPF_REG_7) |
|
|
|
|
BIT(BPF_REG_8) |
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
BIT(BPF_REG_9) |
|
|
|
|
BIT(BPF_REG_AX));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-20 08:24:35 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool is_axreg(u32 reg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return reg == BPF_REG_0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Add modifiers if 'reg' maps to x86-64 registers R8..R15 */
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static u8 add_1mod(u8 byte, u32 reg)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(reg))
|
|
|
|
byte |= 1;
|
|
|
|
return byte;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static u8 add_2mod(u8 byte, u32 r1, u32 r2)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(r1))
|
|
|
|
byte |= 1;
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(r2))
|
|
|
|
byte |= 4;
|
|
|
|
return byte;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Encode 'dst_reg' register into x86-64 opcode 'byte' */
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static u8 add_1reg(u8 byte, u32 dst_reg)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
return byte + reg2hex[dst_reg];
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Encode 'dst_reg' and 'src_reg' registers into x86-64 opcode 'byte' */
|
2014-12-05 09:01:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static u8 add_2reg(u8 byte, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
return byte + reg2hex[dst_reg] + (reg2hex[src_reg] << 3);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-08 14:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
static void jit_fill_hole(void *area, unsigned int size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Fill whole space with INT3 instructions */
|
2014-09-08 14:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
memset(area, 0xcc, size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
struct jit_context {
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
int cleanup_addr; /* Epilogue code offset */
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Maximum number of bytes emitted while JITing one eBPF insn */
|
2014-10-11 11:30:23 +08:00
|
|
|
#define BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE 128
|
|
|
|
#define BPF_INSN_SAFETY 64
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-04 07:08:16 +08:00
|
|
|
#define AUX_STACK_SPACE 40 /* Space for RBX, R13, R14, R15, tailcnt */
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-05-04 07:08:16 +08:00
|
|
|
#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 37
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Emit x86-64 prologue code for BPF program and check its size.
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
* bpf_tail_call helper will skip it while jumping into another program
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-02-24 08:08:02 +08:00
|
|
|
static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 *prog = *pprog;
|
|
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* push rbp */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x55);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* mov rbp,rsp */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5);
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-31 04:31:35 +08:00
|
|
|
/* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth + AUX_STACK_SPACE */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC,
|
|
|
|
round_up(stack_depth, 8) + AUX_STACK_SPACE);
|
2017-05-31 04:31:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* sub rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xED, AUX_STACK_SPACE);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-31 04:31:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+0],rbx */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x5D, 0);
|
|
|
|
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+8],r13 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x6D, 8);
|
|
|
|
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+16],r14 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x75, 16);
|
|
|
|
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+24],r15 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x7D, 24);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Clear the tail call counter (tail_call_cnt): for eBPF tail
|
2018-02-24 08:08:02 +08:00
|
|
|
* calls we need to reset the counter to 0. It's done in two
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* instructions, resetting RAX register to 0, and moving it
|
2018-02-24 08:08:02 +08:00
|
|
|
* to the counter location.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:02 +08:00
|
|
|
/* xor eax, eax */
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x31, 0xc0);
|
|
|
|
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+32], rax */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x45, 32);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt != PROLOGUE_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*pprog = prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Generate the following code:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
* ... bpf_tail_call(void *ctx, struct bpf_array *array, u64 index) ...
|
|
|
|
* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
|
|
|
|
* goto out;
|
|
|
|
* if (++tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
|
|
|
|
* goto out;
|
2015-08-06 15:02:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* prog = array->ptrs[index];
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
* if (prog == NULL)
|
|
|
|
* goto out;
|
|
|
|
* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size);
|
|
|
|
* out:
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 *prog = *pprog;
|
|
|
|
int label1, label2, label3;
|
|
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* rdi - pointer to ctx
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
* rsi - pointer to bpf_array
|
|
|
|
* rdx - index in bpf_array
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
|
|
|
|
* goto out;
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-10-04 06:37:20 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x89, 0xD2); /* mov edx, edx */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x39, 0x56, /* cmp dword ptr [rsi + 16], edx */
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries));
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#define OFFSET1 (41 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE) /* Number of bytes to jump */
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(X86_JBE, OFFSET1); /* jbe out */
|
|
|
|
label1 = cnt;
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
|
|
|
|
* goto out;
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-05-31 04:31:34 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, 36); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp + 36] */
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
|
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call
Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts
the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into
another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution,
we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well
when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop.
The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]).
JIT dump after patch:
# bpftool p d x i 1
0: (18) r2 = map[id:1]
2: (b7) r3 = 0
3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
4: (b7) r0 = 2
5: (95) exit
With CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000072 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000072 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+
66: pause |
68: lfence |
6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 |
6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) |
71: retq |
72: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
+ retpoline for indirect jump
Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000063 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000063 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: jmpq *%rax |-
63: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
- plain indirect jump as before
[0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#define OFFSET2 (30 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE)
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(X86_JA, OFFSET2); /* ja out */
|
|
|
|
label2 = cnt;
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */
|
2017-05-31 04:31:34 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, 36); /* mov dword ptr [rbp + 36], eax */
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-08-06 15:02:33 +08:00
|
|
|
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */
|
2017-08-31 19:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT4_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x84, 0xD6, /* mov rax, [rsi + rdx * 8 + offsetof(...)] */
|
2015-08-06 15:02:33 +08:00
|
|
|
offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs));
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* if (prog == NULL)
|
|
|
|
* goto out;
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-08-31 19:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x48, 0x85, 0xC0); /* test rax,rax */
|
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call
Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts
the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into
another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution,
we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well
when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop.
The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]).
JIT dump after patch:
# bpftool p d x i 1
0: (18) r2 = map[id:1]
2: (b7) r3 = 0
3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
4: (b7) r0 = 2
5: (95) exit
With CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000072 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000072 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+
66: pause |
68: lfence |
6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 |
6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) |
71: retq |
72: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
+ retpoline for indirect jump
Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000063 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000063 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: jmpq *%rax |-
63: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
- plain indirect jump as before
[0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#define OFFSET3 (8 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE)
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(X86_JE, OFFSET3); /* je out */
|
|
|
|
label3 = cnt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x40, /* mov rax, qword ptr [rax + 32] */
|
|
|
|
offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func));
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC0, PROLOGUE_SIZE); /* add rax, prologue_size */
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Wow we're ready to jump into next BPF program
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
* rdi == ctx (1st arg)
|
|
|
|
* rax == prog->bpf_func + prologue_size
|
|
|
|
*/
|
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call
Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts
the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into
another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution,
we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well
when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop.
The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]).
JIT dump after patch:
# bpftool p d x i 1
0: (18) r2 = map[id:1]
2: (b7) r3 = 0
3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
4: (b7) r0 = 2
5: (95) exit
With CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000072 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000072 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+
66: pause |
68: lfence |
6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 |
6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) |
71: retq |
72: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
+ retpoline for indirect jump
Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000063 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000063 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: jmpq *%rax |-
63: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
- plain indirect jump as before
[0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
|
|
|
RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT();
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* out: */
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label1 != OFFSET1);
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label2 != OFFSET2);
|
|
|
|
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label3 != OFFSET3);
|
|
|
|
*pprog = prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
static void emit_mov_imm32(u8 **pprog, bool sign_propagate,
|
|
|
|
u32 dst_reg, const u32 imm32)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 *prog = *pprog;
|
|
|
|
u8 b1, b2, b3;
|
|
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Optimization: if imm32 is positive, use 'mov %eax, imm32'
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* (which zero-extends imm32) to save 2 bytes.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (sign_propagate && (s32)imm32 < 0) {
|
|
|
|
/* 'mov %rax, imm32' sign extends imm32 */
|
|
|
|
b1 = add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg);
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0xC7;
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xC0;
|
|
|
|
EMIT3_off32(b1, b2, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
|
|
|
|
goto done;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Optimization: if imm32 is zero, use 'xor %eax, %eax'
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* to save 3 bytes.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (imm32 == 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0x31; /* xor */
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xC0;
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(b2, add_2reg(b3, dst_reg, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
goto done;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* mov %eax, imm32 */
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(add_1reg(0xB8, dst_reg), imm32);
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
|
|
*pprog = prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void emit_mov_imm64(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg,
|
|
|
|
const u32 imm32_hi, const u32 imm32_lo)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 *prog = *pprog;
|
|
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is_uimm32(((u64)imm32_hi << 32) | (u32)imm32_lo)) {
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* For emitting plain u32, where sign bit must not be
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
* propagated LLVM tends to load imm64 over mov32
|
|
|
|
* directly, so save couple of bytes by just doing
|
|
|
|
* 'mov %eax, imm32' instead.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
emit_mov_imm32(&prog, false, dst_reg, imm32_lo);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* movabsq %rax, imm64 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), add_1reg(0xB8, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
EMIT(imm32_lo, 4);
|
|
|
|
EMIT(imm32_hi, 4);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*pprog = prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
static void emit_mov_reg(u8 **pprog, bool is64, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 *prog = *pprog;
|
|
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is64) {
|
|
|
|
/* mov dst, src */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, src_reg);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* mov32 dst, src */
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*pprog = prog;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
|
|
|
|
int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct bpf_insn *insn = bpf_prog->insnsi;
|
|
|
|
int insn_cnt = bpf_prog->len;
|
|
|
|
bool seen_exit = false;
|
|
|
|
u8 temp[BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE + BPF_INSN_SAFETY];
|
|
|
|
int i, cnt = 0;
|
|
|
|
int proglen = 0;
|
|
|
|
u8 *prog = temp;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:02 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_prologue(&prog, bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
|
|
|
|
bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog));
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
const s32 imm32 = insn->imm;
|
|
|
|
u32 dst_reg = insn->dst_reg;
|
|
|
|
u32 src_reg = insn->src_reg;
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 b2 = 0, b3 = 0;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
s64 jmp_offset;
|
|
|
|
u8 jmp_cond;
|
|
|
|
int ilen;
|
|
|
|
u8 *func;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (insn->code) {
|
|
|
|
/* ALU */
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ADD: b2 = 0x01; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_SUB: b2 = 0x29; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_AND: b2 = 0x21; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_OR: b2 = 0x09; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_XOR: b2 = 0x31; break;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
|
|
|
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(b2, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_mov_reg(&prog,
|
|
|
|
BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64,
|
|
|
|
dst_reg, src_reg);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* neg dst */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_NEG:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG:
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, dst_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* b3 holds 'normal' opcode, b2 short form only valid
|
2018-01-20 08:24:35 +08:00
|
|
|
* in case dst is eax/rax.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
|
2018-01-20 08:24:35 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ADD:
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xC0;
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0x05;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_SUB:
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xE8;
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0x2D;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_AND:
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xE0;
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0x25;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_OR:
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xC8;
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0x0D;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_XOR:
|
|
|
|
b3 = 0xF0;
|
|
|
|
b2 = 0x35;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_imm8(imm32))
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
|
2018-01-20 08:24:35 +08:00
|
|
|
else if (is_axreg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(b2, imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2_off32(0x81, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_mov_imm32(&prog, BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64,
|
|
|
|
dst_reg, imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction
add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register.
All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction.
Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction:
insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM
insn[0].dst_reg = destination register
insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit
insn[1].code = 0
insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit
All unused fields must be zero.
Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM
which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register.
x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64'
arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn
Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter.
It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one
instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions:
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32)
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2)
User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only.
To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of
this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding
to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide.
For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose.
src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and
load in-kernel map pointer.
src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer
src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data
All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer
as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel
to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then
will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside
the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never
see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that
loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct
pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other
instructions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-05 13:17:17 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW:
|
2018-02-24 08:07:59 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_mov_imm64(&prog, dst_reg, insn[1].imm, insn[0].imm);
|
net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction
add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register.
All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction.
Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction:
insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM
insn[0].dst_reg = destination register
insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit
insn[1].code = 0
insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit
All unused fields must be zero.
Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM
which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register.
x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64'
arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn
Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter.
It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one
instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions:
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32)
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2)
User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only.
To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of
this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding
to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide.
For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose.
src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and
load in-kernel map pointer.
src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer
src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data
All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer
as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel
to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then
will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside
the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never
see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that
loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct
pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other
instructions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-05 13:17:17 +08:00
|
|
|
insn++;
|
|
|
|
i++;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* dst %= src, dst /= src, dst %= imm32, dst /= imm32 */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x52); /* push rdx */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov r11, src_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, src_reg);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov r11, imm32 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3_off32(0x49, 0xC7, 0xC3, imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov rax, dst_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(BPF_REG_0, dst_reg);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* xor edx, edx
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* equivalent to 'xor rdx, rdx', but one byte less
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
|
|
|
|
/* div r11 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x49, 0xF7, 0xF3);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
/* div r11d */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x41, 0xF7, 0xF3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_MOD)
|
|
|
|
/* mov r11, rdx */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x49, 0x89, 0xD3);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
/* mov r11, rax */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x49, 0x89, 0xC3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x5A); /* pop rdx */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x58); /* pop rax */
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov dst_reg, r11 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, AUX_REG);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
bool is64 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_0)
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
|
|
|
|
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_3)
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x52); /* push rdx */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov r11, dst_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, dst_reg);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_mov_reg(&prog, is64, BPF_REG_0, src_reg);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_mov_imm32(&prog, is64, BPF_REG_0, imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is64)
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, AUX_REG));
|
|
|
|
else if (is_ereg(AUX_REG))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, AUX_REG));
|
|
|
|
/* mul(q) r11 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xE0, AUX_REG));
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-24 08:08:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_3)
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x5A); /* pop rdx */
|
|
|
|
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_0) {
|
|
|
|
/* mov dst_reg, rax */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, BPF_REG_0);
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x58); /* pop rax */
|
|
|
|
}
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2018-02-24 08:08:01 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Shifts */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
|
|
|
|
case BPF_LSH: b3 = 0xE0; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_RSH: b3 = 0xE8; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ARSH: b3 = 0xF8; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-02-24 08:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (imm32 == 1)
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0xD1, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-26 03:27:02 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Check for bad case when dst_reg == rcx */
|
2014-08-26 03:27:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_4) {
|
|
|
|
/* mov r11, dst_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, dst_reg);
|
|
|
|
dst_reg = AUX_REG;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (src_reg != BPF_REG_4) { /* common case */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x51); /* push rcx */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* mov rcx, src_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(BPF_REG_4, src_reg);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* shl %rax, %cl | shr %rax, %cl | sar %rax, %cl */
|
|
|
|
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
|
|
|
|
case BPF_LSH: b3 = 0xE0; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_RSH: b3 = 0xE8; break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ARSH: b3 = 0xF8; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (src_reg != BPF_REG_4)
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x59); /* pop rcx */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_4)
|
|
|
|
/* mov dst_reg, r11 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT_mov(insn->dst_reg, AUX_REG);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_BE:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (imm32) {
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case 16:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'ror %ax, 8' to swap lower 2 bytes */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x66);
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x41);
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xC8, dst_reg), 8);
|
2015-05-12 14:25:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'movzwl eax, ax' */
|
2015-05-12 14:25:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x45, 0x0F, 0xB7);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x0F, 0xB7);
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, dst_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 32:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'bswap eax' to swap lower 4 bytes */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x41, 0x0F);
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x0F);
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1reg(0xC8, dst_reg));
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case 64:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'bswap rax' to swap 8 bytes */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0x0F,
|
|
|
|
add_1reg(0xC8, dst_reg));
|
2013-01-31 09:51:44 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:
|
2015-05-12 14:25:16 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (imm32) {
|
|
|
|
case 16:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Emit 'movzwl eax, ax' to zero extend 16-bit
|
2015-05-12 14:25:16 +08:00
|
|
|
* into 64 bit
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x45, 0x0F, 0xB7);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x0F, 0xB7);
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 32:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'mov eax, eax' to clear upper 32-bits */
|
2015-05-12 14:25:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x45);
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 64:
|
|
|
|
/* nop */
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x41, 0xC6);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0xC6);
|
|
|
|
goto st;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x66, 0x41, 0xC7);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x66, 0xC7);
|
|
|
|
goto st;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x41, 0xC7);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0xC7);
|
|
|
|
goto st;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0xC7);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_1reg(0x40, dst_reg), insn->off);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(add_1reg(0x80, dst_reg), insn->off);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT(imm32, bpf_size_to_x86_bytes(BPF_SIZE(insn->code)));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* STX: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = src_reg */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'mov byte ptr [rax + off], al' */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg) ||
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* We have to add extra byte for x86 SIL, DIL regs */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
src_reg == BPF_REG_1 || src_reg == BPF_REG_2)
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x88);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x88);
|
|
|
|
goto stx;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x66, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0x66, 0x89);
|
|
|
|
goto stx;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x89);
|
|
|
|
goto stx;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
stx: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), insn->off);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, dst_reg, src_reg),
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
insn->off);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* LDX: dst_reg = *(u8*)(src_reg + off) */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'movzx rax, byte ptr [rax + off]' */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB6);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
goto ldx;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'movzx rax, word ptr [rax + off]' */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB7);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
goto ldx;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'mov eax, dword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0x8B);
|
|
|
|
goto ldx;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'mov rax, qword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
ldx: /*
|
|
|
|
* If insn->off == 0 we can save one extra byte, but
|
|
|
|
* special case of x86 R13 which always needs an offset
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* is not worth the hassle
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (is_imm8(insn->off))
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), insn->off);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, src_reg, dst_reg),
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
insn->off);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* STX XADD: lock *(u32*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Emit 'lock add dword ptr [rax + off], eax' */
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0xF0, 0x01);
|
|
|
|
goto xadd;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
xadd: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), insn->off);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, dst_reg, src_reg),
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
insn->off);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* call */
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp_offset = func - (image + addrs[i]);
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!imm32 || !is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_err("unsupported BPF func %d addr %p image %p\n",
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
imm32, func, image);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(0xE8, jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-31 04:31:27 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL:
|
2015-05-20 07:59:04 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_bpf_tail_call(&prog);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
/* cond jump */
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_X:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_X:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_X:
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_X:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_X:
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X:
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* cmp dst_reg, src_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x39,
|
|
|
|
add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
goto emit_cond_jmp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* test dst_reg, src_reg */
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x85,
|
|
|
|
add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
goto emit_cond_jmp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* test dst_reg, imm32 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
|
|
|
|
EMIT2_off32(0xF7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_reg), imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
goto emit_cond_jmp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_K:
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_K:
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
/* cmp dst_reg, imm8/32 */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_imm8(imm32))
|
|
|
|
EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, dst_reg), imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
else
|
2014-06-07 05:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT2_off32(0x81, add_1reg(0xF8, dst_reg), imm32);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
emit_cond_jmp: /* Convert BPF opcode to x86 */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JEQ:
|
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JSET:
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JNE:
|
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JNE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JGT:
|
|
|
|
/* GT is unsigned '>', JA in x86 */
|
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JA;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JLT:
|
|
|
|
/* LT is unsigned '<', JB in x86 */
|
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JB;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JGE:
|
|
|
|
/* GE is unsigned '>=', JAE in x86 */
|
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JAE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JLE:
|
|
|
|
/* LE is unsigned '<=', JBE in x86 */
|
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JBE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JSGT:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Signed '>', GT in x86 */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JG;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JSLT:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Signed '<', LT in x86 */
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JL;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JSGE:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Signed '>=', GE in x86 */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JGE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JSLE:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Signed '<=', LE in x86 */
|
2017-08-10 07:39:56 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp_cond = X86_JLE;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
default: /* to silence GCC warning */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
jmp_offset = addrs[i + insn->off] - addrs[i];
|
|
|
|
if (is_imm8(jmp_offset)) {
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(jmp_cond, jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
|
|
|
|
EMIT2_off32(0x0F, jmp_cond + 0x10, jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("cond_jmp gen bug %llx\n", jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JA:
|
bpf, x64: fix JIT emission for dead code
Commit 2a5418a13fcf ("bpf: improve dead code sanitizing") replaced dead
code with a series of ja-1 instructions, for safety. That made JIT
compilation much more complex for some BPF programs. One instance of such
programs is, for example:
bool flag = false
...
/* A bunch of other code */
...
if (flag)
do_something()
In some cases llvm is not able to remove at compile time the code for
do_something(), so the generated BPF program ends up with a large amount
of dead instructions. In one specific real life example, there are two
series of ~500 and ~1000 dead instructions in the program. When the
verifier replaces them with a series of ja-1 instructions, it causes an
interesting behavior at JIT time.
During the first pass, since all the instructions are estimated at 64
bytes, the ja-1 instructions end up being translated as 5 bytes JMP
instructions (0xE9), since the jump offsets become increasingly large (>
127) as each instruction gets discovered to be 5 bytes instead of the
estimated 64.
Starting from the second pass, the first N instructions of the ja-1
sequence get translated into 2 bytes JMPs (0xEB) because the jump offsets
become <= 127 this time. In particular, N is defined as roughly 127 / (5
- 2) ~= 42. So, each further pass will make the subsequent N JMP
instructions shrink from 5 to 2 bytes, making the image shrink every time.
This means that in order to have the entire program converge, there need
to be, in the real example above, at least ~1000 / 42 ~= 24 passes just
for translating the dead code. If we add this number to the passes needed
to translate the other non dead code, it brings such program to 40+
passes, and JIT doesn't complete. Ultimately the userspace loader fails
because such BPF program was supposed to be part of a prog array owner
being JITed.
While it is certainly possible to try to refactor such programs to help
the compiler remove dead code, the behavior is not really intuitive and it
puts further burden on the BPF developer who is not expecting such
behavior. To make things worse, such programs are working just fine in all
the kernel releases prior to the ja-1 fix.
A possible approach to mitigate this behavior consists into noticing that
for ja-1 instructions we don't really need to rely on the estimated size
of the previous and current instructions, we know that a -1 BPF jump
offset can be safely translated into a 0xEB instruction with a jump offset
of -2.
Such fix brings the BPF program in the previous example to complete again
in ~9 passes.
Fixes: 2a5418a13fcf ("bpf: improve dead code sanitizing")
Signed-off-by: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-25 13:42:16 +08:00
|
|
|
if (insn->off == -1)
|
|
|
|
/* -1 jmp instructions will always jump
|
|
|
|
* backwards two bytes. Explicitly handling
|
|
|
|
* this case avoids wasting too many passes
|
|
|
|
* when there are long sequences of replaced
|
|
|
|
* dead code.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
jmp_offset = -2;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
jmp_offset = addrs[i + insn->off] - addrs[i];
|
|
|
|
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!jmp_offset)
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Optimize out nop jumps */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
emit_jmp:
|
|
|
|
if (is_imm8(jmp_offset)) {
|
|
|
|
EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
|
|
|
|
EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("jmp gen bug %llx\n", jmp_offset);
|
|
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT:
|
2014-11-30 06:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
if (seen_exit) {
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
jmp_offset = ctx->cleanup_addr - addrs[i];
|
|
|
|
goto emit_jmp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-30 06:46:13 +08:00
|
|
|
seen_exit = true;
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Update cleanup_addr */
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
ctx->cleanup_addr = proglen;
|
2017-05-31 04:31:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/* mov rbx, qword ptr [rbp+0] */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x5D, 0);
|
|
|
|
/* mov r13, qword ptr [rbp+8] */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x6D, 8);
|
|
|
|
/* mov r14, qword ptr [rbp+16] */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x75, 16);
|
|
|
|
/* mov r15, qword ptr [rbp+24] */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x7D, 24);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* add rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */
|
|
|
|
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC5, AUX_STACK_SPACE);
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */
|
|
|
|
EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
default:
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* By design x86-64 JIT should support all BPF instructions.
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
* This error will be seen if new instruction was added
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* to the interpreter, but not to the JIT, or if there is
|
|
|
|
* junk in bpf_prog.
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->code);
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT
Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.
Performance:
1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before
Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"
original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp
1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp
4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp
8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A
c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X
e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d
12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10
3b: mov %rdi,%rbx
1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi
22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax
2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a
2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi
33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax
3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074
3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax
42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074
44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax
47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117
49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi
4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax
56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110
58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi
5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax
65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110
67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117
69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax
6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117
70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi
75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91
7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax
7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2
81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax
84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2
86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax
89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117
8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi
90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75
95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax
99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117
d5: mov %rax,%r14
9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi
a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
e2: and $0xf,%eax
e5: shl $0x2,%eax
e8: mov %rax,%r13
eb: mov %r14,%rax
ee: mov %r13,%rsi
a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi
a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax
b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110
ff: mov %r13,%rsi
b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi
b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d
ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax
bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117
bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax
c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c
c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax
c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13
cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14
131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15
138: leaveq
139: retq
On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.
The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:
Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.
New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.
Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.
2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT
Notes:
. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
and can be used to see generated assembler
. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF
seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
ilen = prog - temp;
|
2014-10-11 11:30:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ilen > BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE) {
|
2017-02-17 05:24:49 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_err("bpf_jit: fatal insn size error\n");
|
2014-10-11 11:30:23 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (image) {
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(proglen + ilen > oldproglen)) {
|
2017-02-17 05:24:49 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_err("bpf_jit: fatal error\n");
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
memcpy(image + proglen, temp, ilen);
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
proglen += ilen;
|
|
|
|
addrs[i] = proglen;
|
|
|
|
prog = temp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return proglen;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
struct x64_jit_data {
|
|
|
|
struct bpf_binary_header *header;
|
|
|
|
int *addrs;
|
|
|
|
u8 *image;
|
|
|
|
int proglen;
|
|
|
|
struct jit_context ctx;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-14 01:08:31 +08:00
|
|
|
struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct bpf_binary_header *header = NULL;
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
struct x64_jit_data *jit_data;
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
int proglen, oldproglen = 0;
|
|
|
|
struct jit_context ctx = {};
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
bool tmp_blinded = false;
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
bool extra_pass = false;
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
u8 *image = NULL;
|
|
|
|
int *addrs;
|
|
|
|
int pass;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 09:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!prog->jit_requested)
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return orig_prog;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tmp = bpf_jit_blind_constants(prog);
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If blinding was requested and we failed during blinding,
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
* we must fall back to the interpreter.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(tmp))
|
|
|
|
return orig_prog;
|
|
|
|
if (tmp != prog) {
|
|
|
|
tmp_blinded = true;
|
|
|
|
prog = tmp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
jit_data = prog->aux->jit_data;
|
|
|
|
if (!jit_data) {
|
|
|
|
jit_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*jit_data), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!jit_data) {
|
|
|
|
prog = orig_prog;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
prog->aux->jit_data = jit_data;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
addrs = jit_data->addrs;
|
|
|
|
if (addrs) {
|
|
|
|
ctx = jit_data->ctx;
|
|
|
|
oldproglen = jit_data->proglen;
|
|
|
|
image = jit_data->image;
|
|
|
|
header = jit_data->header;
|
|
|
|
extra_pass = true;
|
|
|
|
goto skip_init_addrs;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
addrs = kmalloc(prog->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!addrs) {
|
|
|
|
prog = orig_prog;
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out_addrs;
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Before first pass, make a rough estimation of addrs[]
|
|
|
|
* each BPF instruction is translated to less than 64 bytes
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
for (proglen = 0, i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
|
|
|
|
proglen += 64;
|
|
|
|
addrs[i] = proglen;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ctx.cleanup_addr = proglen;
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
skip_init_addrs:
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* JITed image shrinks with every pass and the loop iterates
|
|
|
|
* until the image stops shrinking. Very large BPF programs
|
2015-05-23 06:42:55 +08:00
|
|
|
* may converge on the last pass. In such case do one more
|
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable
So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and
noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from
the networking code:
/* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle
and used in arch/x86/ as well:
/*
* Multi-line comment ...
* ... looks like this.
*/
Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066
> But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats.
> Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed
> shit-for-brains:
>
> (no)
> /* This is disgusting drug-induced
> * crap, and should die
> */
>
> (no-no-no)
> /* This is also very nasty
> * and visually unbalanced */
>
> Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment
> style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just
> really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar
> (d) in pretty much every way.
Also improve the comments and some other details while at it:
- Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise
identical code patterns within the same function,
- capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently,
- capitalize sentences consistently,
- instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term,
- use more consistent punctuation,
- use standard coding style in macros as well,
- fix typos and a few other minor details.
Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/.
No change in functionality.
( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code
I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! )
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
|
|
|
* pass to emit the final image.
|
2015-05-23 06:42:55 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2018-03-08 05:10:01 +08:00
|
|
|
for (pass = 0; pass < 20 || image; pass++) {
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
proglen = do_jit(prog, addrs, image, oldproglen, &ctx);
|
|
|
|
if (proglen <= 0) {
|
2018-05-03 02:12:22 +08:00
|
|
|
out_image:
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
image = NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (header)
|
2014-09-08 14:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
prog = orig_prog;
|
|
|
|
goto out_addrs;
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
if (image) {
|
2014-10-11 11:30:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (proglen != oldproglen) {
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
pr_err("bpf_jit: proglen=%d != oldproglen=%d\n",
|
|
|
|
proglen, oldproglen);
|
2018-05-03 02:12:22 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out_image;
|
2014-10-11 11:30:23 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (proglen == oldproglen) {
|
2014-09-08 14:04:47 +08:00
|
|
|
header = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(proglen, &image,
|
|
|
|
1, jit_fill_hole);
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!header) {
|
|
|
|
prog = orig_prog;
|
|
|
|
goto out_addrs;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
oldproglen = proglen;
|
2018-03-08 05:10:01 +08:00
|
|
|
cond_resched();
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-22 05:22:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
|
2015-07-30 18:42:48 +08:00
|
|
|
bpf_jit_dump(prog->len, proglen, pass + 1, image);
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (image) {
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
|
|
|
|
bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(header);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
jit_data->addrs = addrs;
|
|
|
|
jit_data->ctx = ctx;
|
|
|
|
jit_data->proglen = proglen;
|
|
|
|
jit_data->image = image;
|
|
|
|
jit_data->header = header;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-05-14 10:50:45 +08:00
|
|
|
prog->bpf_func = (void *)image;
|
2015-09-30 07:41:50 +08:00
|
|
|
prog->jited = 1;
|
2017-06-06 03:15:51 +08:00
|
|
|
prog->jited_len = proglen;
|
2017-01-07 07:26:33 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
prog = orig_prog;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
|
bpf, x64: fix memleak when not converging on calls
The JIT logic in jit_subprogs() is as follows: for all subprogs we
allocate a bpf_prog_alloc(), populate it (prog->is_func = 1 here),
and pass it to bpf_int_jit_compile(). If a failure occurred during
JIT and prog->jited is not set, then we bail out from attempting to
JIT the whole program, and punt to the interpreter instead. In case
JITing went successful, we fixup BPF call offsets and do another
pass to bpf_int_jit_compile() (extra_pass is true at that point) to
complete JITing calls. Given that requires to pass JIT context around
addrs and jit_data from x86 JIT are freed in the extra_pass in
bpf_int_jit_compile() when calls are involved (if not, they can
be freed immediately). However, if in the original pass, the JIT
image didn't converge then we leak addrs and jit_data since image
itself is NULL, the prog->is_func is set and extra_pass is false
in that case, meaning both will become unreachable and are never
cleaned up, therefore we need to free as well on !image. Only x64
JIT is affected.
Fixes: 1c2a088a6626 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-05-03 02:12:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!image || !prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
out_addrs:
|
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(addrs);
|
|
|
|
kfree(jit_data);
|
|
|
|
prog->aux->jit_data = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-05-14 01:08:33 +08:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
if (tmp_blinded)
|
|
|
|
bpf_jit_prog_release_other(prog, prog == orig_prog ?
|
|
|
|
tmp : orig_prog);
|
2016-05-14 01:08:31 +08:00
|
|
|
return prog;
|
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|