linux/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

1195 lines
29 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* bpf_jit_comp.c: BPF JIT compiler
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
*
* Copyright (C) 2011-2013 Eric Dumazet (eric.dumazet@gmail.com)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
* Internal BPF Copyright (c) 2011-2014 PLUMgrid, http://plumgrid.com
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
* of the License.
*/
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <asm/set_memory.h>
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution, we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop. The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]). JIT dump after patch: # bpftool p d x i 1 0: (18) r2 = map[id:1] 2: (b7) r3 = 0 3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 4: (b7) r0 = 2 5: (95) exit With CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000072 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000072 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+ 66: pause | 68: lfence | 6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 | 6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) | 71: retq | 72: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case + retpoline for indirect jump Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000063 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000063 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: jmpq *%rax |- 63: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case - plain indirect jump as before [0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 [1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
static u8 *emit_code(u8 *ptr, u32 bytes, unsigned int len)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
{
if (len == 1)
*ptr = bytes;
else if (len == 2)
*(u16 *)ptr = bytes;
else {
*(u32 *)ptr = bytes;
barrier();
}
return ptr + len;
}
#define EMIT(bytes, len) \
do { prog = emit_code(prog, bytes, len); cnt += len; } while (0)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
#define EMIT1(b1) EMIT(b1, 1)
#define EMIT2(b1, b2) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8), 2)
#define EMIT3(b1, b2, b3) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8) + ((b3) << 16), 3)
#define EMIT4(b1, b2, b3, b4) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8) + ((b3) << 16) + ((b4) << 24), 4)
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
#define EMIT1_off32(b1, off) \
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
do { EMIT1(b1); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
#define EMIT2_off32(b1, b2, off) \
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
do { EMIT2(b1, b2); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
#define EMIT3_off32(b1, b2, b3, off) \
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
do { EMIT3(b1, b2, b3); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
#define EMIT4_off32(b1, b2, b3, b4, off) \
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
do { EMIT4(b1, b2, b3, b4); EMIT(off, 4); } while (0)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
static bool is_imm8(int value)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
{
return value <= 127 && value >= -128;
}
static bool is_simm32(s64 value)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
{
return value == (s64)(s32)value;
}
static bool is_uimm32(u64 value)
{
return value == (u64)(u32)value;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
/* mov dst, src */
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
#define EMIT_mov(DST, SRC) \
do { \
if (DST != SRC) \
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, DST, SRC), 0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, DST, SRC)); \
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
} while (0)
static int bpf_size_to_x86_bytes(int bpf_size)
{
if (bpf_size == BPF_W)
return 4;
else if (bpf_size == BPF_H)
return 2;
else if (bpf_size == BPF_B)
return 1;
else if (bpf_size == BPF_DW)
return 4; /* imm32 */
else
return 0;
}
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* List of x86 cond jumps opcodes (. + s8)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
* Add 0x10 (and an extra 0x0f) to generate far jumps (. + s32)
*/
#define X86_JB 0x72
#define X86_JAE 0x73
#define X86_JE 0x74
#define X86_JNE 0x75
#define X86_JBE 0x76
#define X86_JA 0x77
#define X86_JL 0x7C
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
#define X86_JGE 0x7D
#define X86_JLE 0x7E
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
#define X86_JG 0x7F
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Pick a register outside of BPF range for JIT internal work */
#define AUX_REG (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* The following table maps BPF registers to x86-64 registers.
*
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
* x86-64 register R12 is unused, since if used as base address
* register in load/store instructions, it always needs an
* extra byte of encoding and is callee saved.
*
* Also x86-64 register R9 is unused. x86-64 register R10 is
* used for blinding (if enabled).
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
*/
static const int reg2hex[] = {
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
[BPF_REG_0] = 0, /* RAX */
[BPF_REG_1] = 7, /* RDI */
[BPF_REG_2] = 6, /* RSI */
[BPF_REG_3] = 2, /* RDX */
[BPF_REG_4] = 1, /* RCX */
[BPF_REG_5] = 0, /* R8 */
[BPF_REG_6] = 3, /* RBX callee saved */
[BPF_REG_7] = 5, /* R13 callee saved */
[BPF_REG_8] = 6, /* R14 callee saved */
[BPF_REG_9] = 7, /* R15 callee saved */
[BPF_REG_FP] = 5, /* RBP readonly */
[BPF_REG_AX] = 2, /* R10 temp register */
[AUX_REG] = 3, /* R11 temp register */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
};
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* is_ereg() == true if BPF register 'reg' maps to x86-64 r8..r15
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
* which need extra byte of encoding.
* rax,rcx,...,rbp have simpler encoding
*/
static bool is_ereg(u32 reg)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
{
return (1 << reg) & (BIT(BPF_REG_5) |
BIT(AUX_REG) |
BIT(BPF_REG_7) |
BIT(BPF_REG_8) |
BIT(BPF_REG_9) |
BIT(BPF_REG_AX));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
}
static bool is_axreg(u32 reg)
{
return reg == BPF_REG_0;
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Add modifiers if 'reg' maps to x86-64 registers R8..R15 */
static u8 add_1mod(u8 byte, u32 reg)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
{
if (is_ereg(reg))
byte |= 1;
return byte;
}
static u8 add_2mod(u8 byte, u32 r1, u32 r2)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
{
if (is_ereg(r1))
byte |= 1;
if (is_ereg(r2))
byte |= 4;
return byte;
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Encode 'dst_reg' register into x86-64 opcode 'byte' */
static u8 add_1reg(u8 byte, u32 dst_reg)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
{
return byte + reg2hex[dst_reg];
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Encode 'dst_reg' and 'src_reg' registers into x86-64 opcode 'byte' */
static u8 add_2reg(u8 byte, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
{
return byte + reg2hex[dst_reg] + (reg2hex[src_reg] << 3);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
}
static void jit_fill_hole(void *area, unsigned int size)
{
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Fill whole space with INT3 instructions */
memset(area, 0xcc, size);
}
struct jit_context {
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
int cleanup_addr; /* Epilogue code offset */
};
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Maximum number of bytes emitted while JITing one eBPF insn */
#define BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE 128
#define BPF_INSN_SAFETY 64
#define AUX_STACK_SPACE 40 /* Space for RBX, R13, R14, R15, tailcnt */
#define PROLOGUE_SIZE 37
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Emit x86-64 prologue code for BPF program and check its size.
* bpf_tail_call helper will skip it while jumping into another program
*/
static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf)
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
int cnt = 0;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* push rbp */
EMIT1(0x55);
/* mov rbp,rsp */
EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5);
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
/* sub rsp, rounded_stack_depth + AUX_STACK_SPACE */
EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC,
round_up(stack_depth, 8) + AUX_STACK_SPACE);
/* sub rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xED, AUX_STACK_SPACE);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+0],rbx */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x5D, 0);
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+8],r13 */
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x6D, 8);
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+16],r14 */
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x75, 16);
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+24],r15 */
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x89, 0x7D, 24);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Clear the tail call counter (tail_call_cnt): for eBPF tail
* calls we need to reset the counter to 0. It's done in two
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
* instructions, resetting RAX register to 0, and moving it
* to the counter location.
*/
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
/* xor eax, eax */
EMIT2(0x31, 0xc0);
/* mov qword ptr [rbp+32], rax */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x45, 32);
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt != PROLOGUE_SIZE);
}
*pprog = prog;
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Generate the following code:
*
* ... bpf_tail_call(void *ctx, struct bpf_array *array, u64 index) ...
* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
* goto out;
* if (++tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
* prog = array->ptrs[index];
* if (prog == NULL)
* goto out;
* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size);
* out:
*/
static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
int label1, label2, label3;
int cnt = 0;
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* rdi - pointer to ctx
* rsi - pointer to bpf_array
* rdx - index in bpf_array
*/
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
* goto out;
*/
EMIT2(0x89, 0xD2); /* mov edx, edx */
EMIT3(0x39, 0x56, /* cmp dword ptr [rsi + 16], edx */
offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries));
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
#define OFFSET1 (41 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE) /* Number of bytes to jump */
EMIT2(X86_JBE, OFFSET1); /* jbe out */
label1 = cnt;
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
* goto out;
*/
EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, 36); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp + 36] */
EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution, we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop. The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]). JIT dump after patch: # bpftool p d x i 1 0: (18) r2 = map[id:1] 2: (b7) r3 = 0 3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 4: (b7) r0 = 2 5: (95) exit With CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000072 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000072 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+ 66: pause | 68: lfence | 6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 | 6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) | 71: retq | 72: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case + retpoline for indirect jump Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000063 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000063 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: jmpq *%rax |- 63: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case - plain indirect jump as before [0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 [1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
#define OFFSET2 (30 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE)
EMIT2(X86_JA, OFFSET2); /* ja out */
label2 = cnt;
EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */
EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, 36); /* mov dword ptr [rbp + 36], eax */
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */
EMIT4_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x84, 0xD6, /* mov rax, [rsi + rdx * 8 + offsetof(...)] */
offsetof(struct bpf_array, ptrs));
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* if (prog == NULL)
* goto out;
*/
EMIT3(0x48, 0x85, 0xC0); /* test rax,rax */
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution, we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop. The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]). JIT dump after patch: # bpftool p d x i 1 0: (18) r2 = map[id:1] 2: (b7) r3 = 0 3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 4: (b7) r0 = 2 5: (95) exit With CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000072 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000072 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+ 66: pause | 68: lfence | 6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 | 6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) | 71: retq | 72: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case + retpoline for indirect jump Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000063 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000063 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: jmpq *%rax |- 63: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case - plain indirect jump as before [0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 [1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
#define OFFSET3 (8 + RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT_SIZE)
EMIT2(X86_JE, OFFSET3); /* je out */
label3 = cnt;
/* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size); */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x40, /* mov rax, qword ptr [rax + 32] */
offsetof(struct bpf_prog, bpf_func));
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC0, PROLOGUE_SIZE); /* add rax, prologue_size */
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Wow we're ready to jump into next BPF program
* rdi == ctx (1st arg)
* rax == prog->bpf_func + prologue_size
*/
bpf, x64: implement retpoline for tail call Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution, we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop. The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]). JIT dump after patch: # bpftool p d x i 1 0: (18) r2 = map[id:1] 2: (b7) r3 = 0 3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 4: (b7) r0 = 2 5: (95) exit With CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000072 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000072 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+ 66: pause | 68: lfence | 6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 | 6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) | 71: retq | 72: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case + retpoline for indirect jump Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE: # bpftool p d j i 1 [...] 33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi) 36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |* 38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax 3e: cmp $0x20,%eax 41: ja 0x0000000000000063 | 43: add $0x1,%eax 46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp) 4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax 54: test %rax,%rax 57: je 0x0000000000000063 | 59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax 5d: add $0x25,%rax 61: jmpq *%rax |- 63: mov $0x2,%eax [...] * relative fall-through jumps in error case - plain indirect jump as before [0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886 [1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-02-22 22:12:53 +08:00
RETPOLINE_RAX_BPF_JIT();
/* out: */
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label1 != OFFSET1);
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label2 != OFFSET2);
BUILD_BUG_ON(cnt - label3 != OFFSET3);
*pprog = prog;
}
static void emit_mov_imm32(u8 **pprog, bool sign_propagate,
u32 dst_reg, const u32 imm32)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
u8 b1, b2, b3;
int cnt = 0;
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Optimization: if imm32 is positive, use 'mov %eax, imm32'
* (which zero-extends imm32) to save 2 bytes.
*/
if (sign_propagate && (s32)imm32 < 0) {
/* 'mov %rax, imm32' sign extends imm32 */
b1 = add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg);
b2 = 0xC7;
b3 = 0xC0;
EMIT3_off32(b1, b2, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
goto done;
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Optimization: if imm32 is zero, use 'xor %eax, %eax'
* to save 3 bytes.
*/
if (imm32 == 0) {
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, dst_reg));
b2 = 0x31; /* xor */
b3 = 0xC0;
EMIT2(b2, add_2reg(b3, dst_reg, dst_reg));
goto done;
}
/* mov %eax, imm32 */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
EMIT1_off32(add_1reg(0xB8, dst_reg), imm32);
done:
*pprog = prog;
}
static void emit_mov_imm64(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg,
const u32 imm32_hi, const u32 imm32_lo)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
int cnt = 0;
if (is_uimm32(((u64)imm32_hi << 32) | (u32)imm32_lo)) {
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* For emitting plain u32, where sign bit must not be
* propagated LLVM tends to load imm64 over mov32
* directly, so save couple of bytes by just doing
* 'mov %eax, imm32' instead.
*/
emit_mov_imm32(&prog, false, dst_reg, imm32_lo);
} else {
/* movabsq %rax, imm64 */
EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), add_1reg(0xB8, dst_reg));
EMIT(imm32_lo, 4);
EMIT(imm32_hi, 4);
}
*pprog = prog;
}
static void emit_mov_reg(u8 **pprog, bool is64, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
int cnt = 0;
if (is64) {
/* mov dst, src */
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, src_reg);
} else {
/* mov32 dst, src */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg));
EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
}
*pprog = prog;
}
static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx)
{
struct bpf_insn *insn = bpf_prog->insnsi;
int insn_cnt = bpf_prog->len;
bool seen_exit = false;
u8 temp[BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE + BPF_INSN_SAFETY];
int i, cnt = 0;
int proglen = 0;
u8 *prog = temp;
emit_prologue(&prog, bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
const s32 imm32 = insn->imm;
u32 dst_reg = insn->dst_reg;
u32 src_reg = insn->src_reg;
u8 b2 = 0, b3 = 0;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
s64 jmp_offset;
u8 jmp_cond;
int ilen;
u8 *func;
switch (insn->code) {
/* ALU */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X:
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
case BPF_ADD: b2 = 0x01; break;
case BPF_SUB: b2 = 0x29; break;
case BPF_AND: b2 = 0x21; break;
case BPF_OR: b2 = 0x09; break;
case BPF_XOR: b2 = 0x31; break;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg));
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg));
EMIT2(b2, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X:
emit_mov_reg(&prog,
BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64,
dst_reg, src_reg);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
/* neg dst */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_ALU | BPF_NEG:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG:
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, dst_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_AND | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_K:
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* b3 holds 'normal' opcode, b2 short form only valid
* in case dst is eax/rax.
*/
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
case BPF_ADD:
b3 = 0xC0;
b2 = 0x05;
break;
case BPF_SUB:
b3 = 0xE8;
b2 = 0x2D;
break;
case BPF_AND:
b3 = 0xE0;
b2 = 0x25;
break;
case BPF_OR:
b3 = 0xC8;
b2 = 0x0D;
break;
case BPF_XOR:
b3 = 0xF0;
b2 = 0x35;
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
}
if (is_imm8(imm32))
EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
else if (is_axreg(dst_reg))
EMIT1_off32(b2, imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT2_off32(0x81, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
emit_mov_imm32(&prog, BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64,
dst_reg, imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register. All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction. Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction: insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM insn[0].dst_reg = destination register insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit insn[1].code = 0 insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit All unused fields must be zero. Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register. x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64' arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter. It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions: BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32) BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32) BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32) BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2) User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only. To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide. For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose. src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and load in-kernel map pointer. src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other instructions. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-05 13:17:17 +08:00
case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW:
emit_mov_imm64(&prog, dst_reg, insn[1].imm, insn[0].imm);
net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register. All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction. Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction: insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM insn[0].dst_reg = destination register insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit insn[1].code = 0 insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit All unused fields must be zero. Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register. x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64' arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter. It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions: BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32) BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32) BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32) BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2) User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only. To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide. For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose. src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and load in-kernel map pointer. src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other instructions. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-09-05 13:17:17 +08:00
insn++;
i++;
break;
/* dst %= src, dst /= src, dst %= imm32, dst /= imm32 */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
EMIT1(0x52); /* push rdx */
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
/* mov r11, src_reg */
EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, src_reg);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
/* mov r11, imm32 */
EMIT3_off32(0x49, 0xC7, 0xC3, imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
/* mov rax, dst_reg */
EMIT_mov(BPF_REG_0, dst_reg);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* xor edx, edx
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
* equivalent to 'xor rdx, rdx', but one byte less
*/
EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2);
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
/* div r11 */
EMIT3(0x49, 0xF7, 0xF3);
else
/* div r11d */
EMIT3(0x41, 0xF7, 0xF3);
if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_MOD)
/* mov r11, rdx */
EMIT3(0x49, 0x89, 0xD3);
else
/* mov r11, rax */
EMIT3(0x49, 0x89, 0xC3);
EMIT1(0x5A); /* pop rdx */
EMIT1(0x58); /* pop rax */
/* mov dst_reg, r11 */
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, AUX_REG);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
{
bool is64 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64;
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_0)
EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_3)
EMIT1(0x52); /* push rdx */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
/* mov r11, dst_reg */
EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, dst_reg);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
emit_mov_reg(&prog, is64, BPF_REG_0, src_reg);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
emit_mov_imm32(&prog, is64, BPF_REG_0, imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
if (is64)
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, AUX_REG));
else if (is_ereg(AUX_REG))
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, AUX_REG));
/* mul(q) r11 */
EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xE0, AUX_REG));
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_3)
EMIT1(0x5A); /* pop rdx */
if (dst_reg != BPF_REG_0) {
/* mov dst_reg, rax */
EMIT_mov(dst_reg, BPF_REG_0);
EMIT1(0x58); /* pop rax */
}
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Shifts */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K:
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
case BPF_LSH: b3 = 0xE0; break;
case BPF_RSH: b3 = 0xE8; break;
case BPF_ARSH: b3 = 0xF8; break;
}
if (imm32 == 1)
EMIT2(0xD1, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg));
else
EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg), imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Check for bad case when dst_reg == rcx */
if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_4) {
/* mov r11, dst_reg */
EMIT_mov(AUX_REG, dst_reg);
dst_reg = AUX_REG;
}
if (src_reg != BPF_REG_4) { /* common case */
EMIT1(0x51); /* push rcx */
/* mov rcx, src_reg */
EMIT_mov(BPF_REG_4, src_reg);
}
/* shl %rax, %cl | shr %rax, %cl | sar %rax, %cl */
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
else if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x40, dst_reg));
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
case BPF_LSH: b3 = 0xE0; break;
case BPF_RSH: b3 = 0xE8; break;
case BPF_ARSH: b3 = 0xF8; break;
}
EMIT2(0xD3, add_1reg(b3, dst_reg));
if (src_reg != BPF_REG_4)
EMIT1(0x59); /* pop rcx */
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_4)
/* mov dst_reg, r11 */
EMIT_mov(insn->dst_reg, AUX_REG);
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_BE:
switch (imm32) {
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case 16:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'ror %ax, 8' to swap lower 2 bytes */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT1(0x66);
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT1(0x41);
EMIT3(0xC1, add_1reg(0xC8, dst_reg), 8);
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'movzwl eax, ax' */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT3(0x45, 0x0F, 0xB7);
else
EMIT2(0x0F, 0xB7);
EMIT1(add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, dst_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
case 32:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'bswap eax' to swap lower 4 bytes */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT2(0x41, 0x0F);
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
else
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT1(0x0F);
EMIT1(add_1reg(0xC8, dst_reg));
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case 64:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'bswap rax' to swap 8 bytes */
EMIT3(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0x0F,
add_1reg(0xC8, dst_reg));
break;
}
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
case BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_FROM_LE:
switch (imm32) {
case 16:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Emit 'movzwl eax, ax' to zero extend 16-bit
* into 64 bit
*/
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT3(0x45, 0x0F, 0xB7);
else
EMIT2(0x0F, 0xB7);
EMIT1(add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, dst_reg));
break;
case 32:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'mov eax, eax' to clear upper 32-bits */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
EMIT1(0x45);
EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, dst_reg));
break;
case 64:
/* nop */
break;
}
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT2(0x41, 0xC6);
else
EMIT1(0xC6);
goto st;
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT3(0x66, 0x41, 0xC7);
else
EMIT2(0x66, 0xC7);
goto st;
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT2(0x41, 0xC7);
else
EMIT1(0xC7);
goto st;
case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0xC7);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
EMIT2(add_1reg(0x40, dst_reg), insn->off);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1_off32(add_1reg(0x80, dst_reg), insn->off);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT(imm32, bpf_size_to_x86_bytes(BPF_SIZE(insn->code)));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
/* STX: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = src_reg */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'mov byte ptr [rax + off], al' */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg) ||
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* We have to add extra byte for x86 SIL, DIL regs */
src_reg == BPF_REG_1 || src_reg == BPF_REG_2)
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x88);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1(0x88);
goto stx;
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
EMIT3(0x66, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT2(0x66, 0x89);
goto stx;
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1(0x89);
goto stx;
case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
stx: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), insn->off);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, dst_reg, src_reg),
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
insn->off);
break;
/* LDX: dst_reg = *(u8*)(src_reg + off) */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'movzx rax, byte ptr [rax + off]' */
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB6);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
goto ldx;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'movzx rax, word ptr [rax + off]' */
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB7);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
goto ldx;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'mov eax, dword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1(0x8B);
goto ldx;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'mov rax, qword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
ldx: /*
* If insn->off == 0 we can save one extra byte, but
* special case of x86 R13 which always needs an offset
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
* is not worth the hassle
*/
if (is_imm8(insn->off))
EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), insn->off);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, src_reg, dst_reg),
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
insn->off);
break;
/* STX XADD: lock *(u32*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Emit 'lock add dword ptr [rax + off], eax' */
if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT2(0xF0, 0x01);
goto xadd;
case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW:
EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
xadd: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), insn->off);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, dst_reg, src_reg),
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
insn->off);
break;
/* call */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
jmp_offset = func - (image + addrs[i]);
if (!imm32 || !is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
pr_err("unsupported BPF func %d addr %p image %p\n",
imm32, func, image);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
return -EINVAL;
}
EMIT1_off32(0xE8, jmp_offset);
break;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL:
emit_bpf_tail_call(&prog);
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
/* cond jump */
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_X:
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_X:
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_X:
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_X:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_X:
/* cmp dst_reg, src_reg */
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x39,
add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
goto emit_cond_jmp;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_X:
/* test dst_reg, src_reg */
EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x85,
add_2reg(0xC0, dst_reg, src_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
goto emit_cond_jmp;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K:
/* test dst_reg, imm32 */
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
EMIT2_off32(0xF7, add_1reg(0xC0, dst_reg), imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
goto emit_cond_jmp;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JEQ | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JNE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLT | BPF_K:
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JGE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JLE | BPF_K:
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGT | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLT | BPF_K:
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K:
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K:
/* cmp dst_reg, imm8/32 */
EMIT1(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg));
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
if (is_imm8(imm32))
EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, dst_reg), imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
else
EMIT2_off32(0x81, add_1reg(0xF8, dst_reg), imm32);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
emit_cond_jmp: /* Convert BPF opcode to x86 */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
switch (BPF_OP(insn->code)) {
case BPF_JEQ:
jmp_cond = X86_JE;
break;
case BPF_JSET:
case BPF_JNE:
jmp_cond = X86_JNE;
break;
case BPF_JGT:
/* GT is unsigned '>', JA in x86 */
jmp_cond = X86_JA;
break;
case BPF_JLT:
/* LT is unsigned '<', JB in x86 */
jmp_cond = X86_JB;
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JGE:
/* GE is unsigned '>=', JAE in x86 */
jmp_cond = X86_JAE;
break;
case BPF_JLE:
/* LE is unsigned '<=', JBE in x86 */
jmp_cond = X86_JBE;
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JSGT:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Signed '>', GT in x86 */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
jmp_cond = X86_JG;
break;
case BPF_JSLT:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Signed '<', LT in x86 */
jmp_cond = X86_JL;
break;
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JSGE:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Signed '>=', GE in x86 */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
jmp_cond = X86_JGE;
break;
case BPF_JSLE:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Signed '<=', LE in x86 */
jmp_cond = X86_JLE;
break;
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
default: /* to silence GCC warning */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
return -EFAULT;
}
jmp_offset = addrs[i + insn->off] - addrs[i];
if (is_imm8(jmp_offset)) {
EMIT2(jmp_cond, jmp_offset);
} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
EMIT2_off32(0x0F, jmp_cond + 0x10, jmp_offset);
} else {
pr_err("cond_jmp gen bug %llx\n", jmp_offset);
return -EFAULT;
}
break;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
case BPF_JMP | BPF_JA:
bpf, x64: fix JIT emission for dead code Commit 2a5418a13fcf ("bpf: improve dead code sanitizing") replaced dead code with a series of ja-1 instructions, for safety. That made JIT compilation much more complex for some BPF programs. One instance of such programs is, for example: bool flag = false ... /* A bunch of other code */ ... if (flag) do_something() In some cases llvm is not able to remove at compile time the code for do_something(), so the generated BPF program ends up with a large amount of dead instructions. In one specific real life example, there are two series of ~500 and ~1000 dead instructions in the program. When the verifier replaces them with a series of ja-1 instructions, it causes an interesting behavior at JIT time. During the first pass, since all the instructions are estimated at 64 bytes, the ja-1 instructions end up being translated as 5 bytes JMP instructions (0xE9), since the jump offsets become increasingly large (> 127) as each instruction gets discovered to be 5 bytes instead of the estimated 64. Starting from the second pass, the first N instructions of the ja-1 sequence get translated into 2 bytes JMPs (0xEB) because the jump offsets become <= 127 this time. In particular, N is defined as roughly 127 / (5 - 2) ~= 42. So, each further pass will make the subsequent N JMP instructions shrink from 5 to 2 bytes, making the image shrink every time. This means that in order to have the entire program converge, there need to be, in the real example above, at least ~1000 / 42 ~= 24 passes just for translating the dead code. If we add this number to the passes needed to translate the other non dead code, it brings such program to 40+ passes, and JIT doesn't complete. Ultimately the userspace loader fails because such BPF program was supposed to be part of a prog array owner being JITed. While it is certainly possible to try to refactor such programs to help the compiler remove dead code, the behavior is not really intuitive and it puts further burden on the BPF developer who is not expecting such behavior. To make things worse, such programs are working just fine in all the kernel releases prior to the ja-1 fix. A possible approach to mitigate this behavior consists into noticing that for ja-1 instructions we don't really need to rely on the estimated size of the previous and current instructions, we know that a -1 BPF jump offset can be safely translated into a 0xEB instruction with a jump offset of -2. Such fix brings the BPF program in the previous example to complete again in ~9 passes. Fixes: 2a5418a13fcf ("bpf: improve dead code sanitizing") Signed-off-by: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-25 13:42:16 +08:00
if (insn->off == -1)
/* -1 jmp instructions will always jump
* backwards two bytes. Explicitly handling
* this case avoids wasting too many passes
* when there are long sequences of replaced
* dead code.
*/
jmp_offset = -2;
else
jmp_offset = addrs[i + insn->off] - addrs[i];
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
if (!jmp_offset)
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Optimize out nop jumps */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
break;
emit_jmp:
if (is_imm8(jmp_offset)) {
EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_offset);
} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_offset);
} else {
pr_err("jmp gen bug %llx\n", jmp_offset);
return -EFAULT;
}
break;
case BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT:
if (seen_exit) {
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
jmp_offset = ctx->cleanup_addr - addrs[i];
goto emit_jmp;
}
seen_exit = true;
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/* Update cleanup_addr */
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
ctx->cleanup_addr = proglen;
/* mov rbx, qword ptr [rbp+0] */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x5D, 0);
/* mov r13, qword ptr [rbp+8] */
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x6D, 8);
/* mov r14, qword ptr [rbp+16] */
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x75, 16);
/* mov r15, qword ptr [rbp+24] */
EMIT4(0x4C, 0x8B, 0x7D, 24);
/* add rbp, AUX_STACK_SPACE */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xC5, AUX_STACK_SPACE);
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */
EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */
break;
default:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* By design x86-64 JIT should support all BPF instructions.
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
* This error will be seen if new instruction was added
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
* to the interpreter, but not to the JIT, or if there is
* junk in bpf_prog.
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
*/
pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->code);
return -EINVAL;
}
net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions. This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT. sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch. Performance: 1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code. No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22" original BPF -> old JIT: original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT: 0: push %rbp 0: push %rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 1: mov %rsp,%rbp 4: sub $0x60,%rsp 4: sub $0x228,%rsp 8: mov %rbx,-0x8(%rbp) b: mov %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue 12: mov %r13,-0x220(%rbp) 19: mov %r14,-0x218(%rbp) 20: mov %r15,-0x210(%rbp) 27: xor %eax,%eax // clear A c: xor %ebx,%ebx 29: xor %r13,%r13 // clear X e: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 2c: mov 0x68(%rdi),%r9d 12: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 30: sub 0x6c(%rdi),%r9d 16: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r8 34: mov 0xd8(%rdi),%r10 3b: mov %rdi,%rbx 1d: mov $0xc,%esi 3e: mov $0xc,%esi 22: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 43: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 27: cmp $0x86dd,%eax 48: cmp $0x86dd,%rax 2c: jne 0x0000000000000069 4f: jne 0x000000000000009a 2e: mov $0x14,%esi 51: mov $0x14,%esi 33: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 56: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 38: cmp $0x84,%eax 5b: cmp $0x84,%rax 3d: je 0x0000000000000049 62: je 0x0000000000000074 3f: cmp $0x6,%eax 64: cmp $0x6,%rax 42: je 0x0000000000000049 68: je 0x0000000000000074 44: cmp $0x11,%eax 6a: cmp $0x11,%rax 47: jne 0x00000000000000c6 6e: jne 0x0000000000000117 49: mov $0x36,%esi 74: mov $0x36,%esi 4e: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 79: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 53: cmp $0x16,%eax 7e: cmp $0x16,%rax 56: je 0x00000000000000bf 82: je 0x0000000000000110 58: mov $0x38,%esi 88: mov $0x38,%esi 5d: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 8d: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 62: cmp $0x16,%eax 92: cmp $0x16,%rax 65: je 0x00000000000000bf 96: je 0x0000000000000110 67: jmp 0x00000000000000c6 98: jmp 0x0000000000000117 69: cmp $0x800,%eax 9a: cmp $0x800,%rax 6e: jne 0x00000000000000c6 a1: jne 0x0000000000000117 70: mov $0x17,%esi a3: mov $0x17,%esi 75: callq 0xffffffffe1021e31 a8: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 7a: cmp $0x84,%eax ad: cmp $0x84,%rax 7f: je 0x000000000000008b b4: je 0x00000000000000c2 81: cmp $0x6,%eax b6: cmp $0x6,%rax 84: je 0x000000000000008b ba: je 0x00000000000000c2 86: cmp $0x11,%eax bc: cmp $0x11,%rax 89: jne 0x00000000000000c6 c0: jne 0x0000000000000117 8b: mov $0x14,%esi c2: mov $0x14,%esi 90: callq 0xffffffffe1021e15 c7: callq 0xffffffffe102bd75 95: test $0x1fff,%ax cc: test $0x1fff,%rax 99: jne 0x00000000000000c6 d3: jne 0x0000000000000117 d5: mov %rax,%r14 9b: mov $0xe,%esi d8: mov $0xe,%esi a0: callq 0xffffffffe1021e44 dd: callq 0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH e2: and $0xf,%eax e5: shl $0x2,%eax e8: mov %rax,%r13 eb: mov %r14,%rax ee: mov %r13,%rsi a5: lea 0xe(%rbx),%esi f1: add $0xe,%esi a8: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d f4: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ad: cmp $0x16,%eax f9: cmp $0x16,%rax b0: je 0x00000000000000bf fd: je 0x0000000000000110 ff: mov %r13,%rsi b2: lea 0x10(%rbx),%esi 102: add $0x10,%esi b5: callq 0xffffffffe1021e0d 105: callq 0xffffffffe102bd6d ba: cmp $0x16,%eax 10a: cmp $0x16,%rax bd: jne 0x00000000000000c6 10e: jne 0x0000000000000117 bf: mov $0xffff,%eax 110: mov $0xffff,%eax c4: jmp 0x00000000000000c8 115: jmp 0x000000000000011c c6: xor %eax,%eax 117: mov $0x0,%eax c8: mov -0x8(%rbp),%rbx 11c: mov -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue cc: leaveq 123: mov -0x220(%rbp),%r13 cd: retq 12a: mov -0x218(%rbp),%r14 131: mov -0x210(%rbp),%r15 138: leaveq 139: retq On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute. BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec. The difference in generated assembler is due to the following: Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function inside bpf_jit.S. New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer. New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger, but the cost is within noise on x64. Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'. New JIT clears %rax unconditionally. 2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions. Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter. The longer the filter the higher performance gain. Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT Notes: . net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional and can be used to see generated assembler . there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is: sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile() Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14 10:50:46 +08:00
ilen = prog - temp;
if (ilen > BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE) {
pr_err("bpf_jit: fatal insn size error\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
if (image) {
if (unlikely(proglen + ilen > oldproglen)) {
pr_err("bpf_jit: fatal error\n");
return -EFAULT;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
memcpy(image + proglen, temp, ilen);
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
proglen += ilen;
addrs[i] = proglen;
prog = temp;
}
return proglen;
}
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
struct x64_jit_data {
struct bpf_binary_header *header;
int *addrs;
u8 *image;
int proglen;
struct jit_context ctx;
};
struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct bpf_binary_header *header = NULL;
struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
struct x64_jit_data *jit_data;
int proglen, oldproglen = 0;
struct jit_context ctx = {};
bool tmp_blinded = false;
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
bool extra_pass = false;
u8 *image = NULL;
int *addrs;
int pass;
int i;
if (!prog->jit_requested)
return orig_prog;
tmp = bpf_jit_blind_constants(prog);
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* If blinding was requested and we failed during blinding,
* we must fall back to the interpreter.
*/
if (IS_ERR(tmp))
return orig_prog;
if (tmp != prog) {
tmp_blinded = true;
prog = tmp;
}
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
jit_data = prog->aux->jit_data;
if (!jit_data) {
jit_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*jit_data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!jit_data) {
prog = orig_prog;
goto out;
}
prog->aux->jit_data = jit_data;
}
addrs = jit_data->addrs;
if (addrs) {
ctx = jit_data->ctx;
oldproglen = jit_data->proglen;
image = jit_data->image;
header = jit_data->header;
extra_pass = true;
goto skip_init_addrs;
}
addrs = kmalloc(prog->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!addrs) {
prog = orig_prog;
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
goto out_addrs;
}
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* Before first pass, make a rough estimation of addrs[]
* each BPF instruction is translated to less than 64 bytes
*/
for (proglen = 0, i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
proglen += 64;
addrs[i] = proglen;
}
ctx.cleanup_addr = proglen;
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
skip_init_addrs:
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
/*
* JITed image shrinks with every pass and the loop iterates
* until the image stops shrinking. Very large BPF programs
* may converge on the last pass. In such case do one more
x86/bpf: Clean up non-standard comments, to make the code more readable So by chance I looked into x86 assembly in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c and noticed the weird and inconsistent comment style it mistakenly learned from the networking code: /* Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Fix this to use the standard comment style specified in Documentation/CodingStyle and used in arch/x86/ as well: /* * Multi-line comment ... * ... looks like this. */ Also, to quote Linus's ... more explicit views about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/21066 > But no, the networking code picked *none* of the above sane formats. > Instead, it picked these two models that are just half-arsed > shit-for-brains: > > (no) > /* This is disgusting drug-induced > * crap, and should die > */ > > (no-no-no) > /* This is also very nasty > * and visually unbalanced */ > > Please. The networking code actually has the *worst* possible comment > style. You can literally find that (no-no-no) style, which is just > really horribly disgusting and worse than the otherwise fairly similar > (d) in pretty much every way. Also improve the comments and some other details while at it: - Don't mix same-line and previous-line comment style on otherwise identical code patterns within the same function, - capitalize 'BPF' and x86 register names consistently, - capitalize sentences consistently, - instead of 'x64' use 'x86-64': x64 is a Microsoft specific term, - use more consistent punctuation, - use standard coding style in macros as well, - fix typos and a few other minor details. Consistent coding style is not optional, at least in arch/x86/. No change in functionality. ( In case this commit causes conflicts with pending development code I'll be glad to help resolve any conflicts! ) Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-04-27 17:54:40 +08:00
* pass to emit the final image.
*/
for (pass = 0; pass < 20 || image; pass++) {
proglen = do_jit(prog, addrs, image, oldproglen, &ctx);
if (proglen <= 0) {
out_image:
image = NULL;
if (header)
bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
prog = orig_prog;
goto out_addrs;
}
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
if (image) {
if (proglen != oldproglen) {
pr_err("bpf_jit: proglen=%d != oldproglen=%d\n",
proglen, oldproglen);
goto out_image;
}
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
break;
}
if (proglen == oldproglen) {
header = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(proglen, &image,
1, jit_fill_hole);
if (!header) {
prog = orig_prog;
goto out_addrs;
}
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
oldproglen = proglen;
cond_resched();
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
bpf_jit_dump(prog->len, proglen, pass + 1, image);
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
if (image) {
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
if (!prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(header);
} else {
jit_data->addrs = addrs;
jit_data->ctx = ctx;
jit_data->proglen = proglen;
jit_data->image = image;
jit_data->header = header;
}
prog->bpf_func = (void *)image;
prog->jited = 1;
prog->jited_len = proglen;
} else {
prog = orig_prog;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}
if (!image || !prog->is_func || extra_pass) {
out_addrs:
bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls. With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets. For example in case of three bpf functions: main: call foo call bpf_map_lookup exit foo: call bar exit bar: exit We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar() x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge. After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions will be good except call targets, since start addresses of foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main() (note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly during initial passes). Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass. Additional safety checks are done to make sure this last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller than previous pass. When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last pass can change size of the JITed code. Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off. x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter. All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from JITs point of view. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2017-12-15 09:55:15 +08:00
kfree(addrs);
kfree(jit_data);
prog->aux->jit_data = NULL;
}
out:
if (tmp_blinded)
bpf_jit_prog_release_other(prog, prog == orig_prog ?
tmp : orig_prog);
return prog;
net: filter: Just In Time compiler for x86-64 In order to speedup packet filtering, here is an implementation of a JIT compiler for x86_64 It is disabled by default, and must be enabled by the admin. echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable It uses module_alloc() and module_free() to get memory in the 2GB text kernel range since we call helpers functions from the generated code. EAX : BPF A accumulator EBX : BPF X accumulator RDI : pointer to skb (first argument given to JIT function) RBP : frame pointer (even if CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n) r9d : skb->len - skb->data_len (headlen) r8 : skb->data To get a trace of generated code, use : echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable Example of generated code : # tcpdump -p -n -s 0 -i eth1 host 192.168.20.0/24 flen=18 proglen=147 pass=3 image=ffffffffa00b5000 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5000: 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 60 48 89 5d f8 44 8b 4f 60 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5010: 44 2b 4f 64 4c 8b 87 b8 00 00 00 be 0c 00 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5020: e8 24 7b f7 e0 3d 00 08 00 00 75 28 be 1a 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5030: 00 e8 fe 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 74 49 be JIT code: ffffffffa00b5040: 1e 00 00 00 e8 eb 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5050: 74 36 eb 3b 3d 06 08 00 00 74 07 3d 35 80 00 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5060: 75 2d be 1c 00 00 00 e8 c8 7a f7 e0 24 00 3d 00 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5070: 14 a8 c0 74 13 be 26 00 00 00 e8 b5 7a f7 e0 24 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5080: 00 3d 00 14 a8 c0 75 07 b8 ff ff 00 00 eb 02 31 JIT code: ffffffffa00b5090: c0 c9 c3 BPF program is 144 bytes long, so native program is almost same size ;) (000) ldh [12] (001) jeq #0x800 jt 2 jf 8 (002) ld [26] (003) and #0xffffff00 (004) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 5 (005) ld [30] (006) and #0xffffff00 (007) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (008) jeq #0x806 jt 10 jf 9 (009) jeq #0x8035 jt 10 jf 17 (010) ld [28] (011) and #0xffffff00 (012) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 13 (013) ld [38] (014) and #0xffffff00 (015) jeq #0xc0a81400 jt 16 jf 17 (016) ret #65535 (017) ret #0 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-04-20 17:27:32 +08:00
}