2019-05-27 14:55:01 +08:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Freescale FlexTimer Module (FTM) PWM Driver
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2012-2013 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/clk.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/err.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/io.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/mutex.h>
|
2023-07-15 01:48:50 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/of.h>
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/pm.h>
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/pwm.h>
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/regmap.h>
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
2019-04-02 14:30:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/fsl/ftm.h>
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-19 12:38:01 +08:00
|
|
|
#define FTM_SC_CLK(c) (((c) + 1) << FTM_SC_CLK_MASK_SHIFT)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enum fsl_pwm_clk {
|
|
|
|
FSL_PWM_CLK_SYS,
|
|
|
|
FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX,
|
|
|
|
FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT,
|
|
|
|
FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN,
|
|
|
|
FSL_PWM_CLK_MAX
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_ftm_soc {
|
|
|
|
bool has_enable_bits;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg {
|
|
|
|
enum fsl_pwm_clk clk_select;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int clk_ps;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int mod_period;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip {
|
|
|
|
struct mutex lock;
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
struct regmap *regmap;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
/* This value is valid iff a pwm is running */
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg period;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
struct clk *ipg_clk;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
struct clk *clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_MAX];
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const struct fsl_ftm_soc *soc;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline struct fsl_pwm_chip *to_fsl_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-14 17:31:27 +08:00
|
|
|
return pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-12 22:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
static void ftm_clear_write_protection(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
regmap_read(fpc->regmap, FTM_FMS, &val);
|
|
|
|
if (val & FTM_FMS_WPEN)
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Use regmap_clear_bits and regmap_set_bits where applicable
Found using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, bits)
+ regmap_set_bits(map, reg, bits)
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, 0)
+ regmap_clear_bits(map, reg, bits)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115111347.3705732-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-12-03 02:35:14 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_set_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_MODE, FTM_MODE_WPDIS);
|
2019-06-12 22:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ftm_set_write_protection(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Use regmap_clear_bits and regmap_set_bits where applicable
Found using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, bits)
+ regmap_set_bits(map, reg, bits)
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, 0)
+ regmap_clear_bits(map, reg, bits)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115111347.3705732-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-12-03 02:35:14 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_set_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_FMS, FTM_FMS_WPEN);
|
2019-06-12 22:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fsl_pwm_periodcfg_are_equal(const struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg *a,
|
|
|
|
const struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg *b)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (a->clk_select != b->clk_select)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (a->clk_ps != b->clk_ps)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (a->mod_period != b->mod_period)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = clk_prepare_enable(fpc->ipg_clk);
|
|
|
|
if (!ret && fpc->soc->has_enable_bits) {
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&fpc->lock);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Use regmap_clear_bits and regmap_set_bits where applicable
Found using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, bits)
+ regmap_set_bits(map, reg, bits)
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, 0)
+ regmap_clear_bits(map, reg, bits)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115111347.3705732-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-12-03 02:35:14 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_set_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_SC, BIT(pwm->hwpwm + 16));
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&fpc->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fpc->soc->has_enable_bits) {
|
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&fpc->lock);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Use regmap_clear_bits and regmap_set_bits where applicable
Found using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, bits)
+ regmap_set_bits(map, reg, bits)
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, 0)
+ regmap_clear_bits(map, reg, bits)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115111347.3705732-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-12-03 02:35:14 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_clear_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_SC, BIT(pwm->hwpwm + 16));
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&fpc->lock);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->ipg_clk);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned int fsl_pwm_ticks_to_ns(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int ticks)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long rate;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long long exval;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rate = clk_get_rate(fpc->clk[fpc->period.clk_select]);
|
|
|
|
exval = ticks;
|
|
|
|
exval *= 1000000000UL;
|
|
|
|
do_div(exval, rate >> fpc->period.clk_ps);
|
|
|
|
return exval;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fsl_pwm_calculate_period_clk(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int period_ns,
|
|
|
|
enum fsl_pwm_clk index,
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg *periodcfg
|
|
|
|
)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long long c;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int ps;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
c = clk_get_rate(fpc->clk[index]);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
c = c * period_ns;
|
|
|
|
do_div(c, 1000000000UL);
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (c == 0)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
for (ps = 0; ps < 8 ; ++ps, c >>= 1) {
|
|
|
|
if (c <= 0x10000) {
|
|
|
|
periodcfg->clk_select = index;
|
|
|
|
periodcfg->clk_ps = ps;
|
|
|
|
periodcfg->mod_period = c - 1;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fsl_pwm_calculate_period(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int period_ns,
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg *periodcfg)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
enum fsl_pwm_clk m0, m1;
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long fix_rate, ext_rate;
|
|
|
|
bool ret;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = fsl_pwm_calculate_period_clk(fpc, period_ns, FSL_PWM_CLK_SYS,
|
|
|
|
periodcfg);
|
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix_rate = clk_get_rate(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX]);
|
|
|
|
ext_rate = clk_get_rate(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (fix_rate > ext_rate) {
|
|
|
|
m0 = FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX;
|
|
|
|
m1 = FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
m0 = FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT;
|
|
|
|
m1 = FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = fsl_pwm_calculate_period_clk(fpc, period_ns, m0, periodcfg);
|
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return fsl_pwm_calculate_period_clk(fpc, period_ns, m1, periodcfg);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned int fsl_pwm_calculate_duty(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int duty_ns)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long long duty;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int period = fpc->period.mod_period + 1;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int period_ns = fsl_pwm_ticks_to_ns(fpc, period);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
duty = (unsigned long long)duty_ns * period;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
do_div(duty, period_ns);
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return (unsigned int)duty;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fsl_pwm_is_any_pwm_enabled(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
|
|
|
|
struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 val;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_read(fpc->regmap, FTM_OUTMASK, &val);
|
|
|
|
if (~val & 0xFF)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool fsl_pwm_is_other_pwm_enabled(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
|
|
|
|
struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 val;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_read(fpc->regmap, FTM_OUTMASK, &val);
|
|
|
|
if (~(val | BIT(pwm->hwpwm)) & 0xFF)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:24 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_apply_config(struct pwm_chip *chip,
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
2019-08-24 23:37:07 +08:00
|
|
|
const struct pwm_state *newstate)
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-14 17:31:24 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int duty;
|
|
|
|
u32 reg_polarity;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_periodcfg periodcfg;
|
|
|
|
bool do_write_period = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!fsl_pwm_calculate_period(fpc, newstate->period, &periodcfg)) {
|
2024-02-14 17:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "failed to calculate new period\n");
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!fsl_pwm_is_any_pwm_enabled(fpc, pwm))
|
|
|
|
do_write_period = true;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The Freescale FTM controller supports only a single period for
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
* all PWM channels, therefore verify if the newly computed period
|
|
|
|
* is different than the current period being used. In such case
|
|
|
|
* we allow to change the period only if no other pwm is running.
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
else if (!fsl_pwm_periodcfg_are_equal(&fpc->period, &periodcfg)) {
|
|
|
|
if (fsl_pwm_is_other_pwm_enabled(fpc, pwm)) {
|
2024-02-14 17:31:25 +08:00
|
|
|
dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip),
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
"Cannot change period for PWM %u, disable other PWMs first\n",
|
|
|
|
pwm->hwpwm);
|
|
|
|
return -EBUSY;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (fpc->period.clk_select != periodcfg.clk_select) {
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
enum fsl_pwm_clk oldclk = fpc->period.clk_select;
|
|
|
|
enum fsl_pwm_clk newclk = periodcfg.clk_select;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = clk_prepare_enable(fpc->clk[newclk]);
|
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->clk[oldclk]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
do_write_period = true;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-12 22:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
ftm_clear_write_protection(fpc);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (do_write_period) {
|
|
|
|
regmap_update_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_SC, FTM_SC_CLK_MASK,
|
|
|
|
FTM_SC_CLK(periodcfg.clk_select));
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_update_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_SC, FTM_SC_PS_MASK,
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
periodcfg.clk_ps);
|
|
|
|
regmap_write(fpc->regmap, FTM_MOD, periodcfg.mod_period);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
fpc->period = periodcfg;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
duty = fsl_pwm_calculate_duty(fpc, newstate->duty_cycle);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_write(fpc->regmap, FTM_CSC(pwm->hwpwm),
|
|
|
|
FTM_CSC_MSB | FTM_CSC_ELSB);
|
|
|
|
regmap_write(fpc->regmap, FTM_CV(pwm->hwpwm), duty);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
reg_polarity = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (newstate->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
|
|
|
|
reg_polarity = BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_update_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_POL, BIT(pwm->hwpwm), reg_polarity);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-12 22:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
ftm_set_write_protection(fpc);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
2019-08-24 23:37:07 +08:00
|
|
|
const struct pwm_state *newstate)
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pwm_state *oldstate = &pwm->state;
|
|
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* oldstate to newstate : action
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* disabled to disabled : ignore
|
|
|
|
* enabled to disabled : disable
|
|
|
|
* enabled to enabled : update settings
|
|
|
|
* disabled to enabled : update settings + enable
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&fpc->lock);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!newstate->enabled) {
|
|
|
|
if (oldstate->enabled) {
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Use regmap_clear_bits and regmap_set_bits where applicable
Found using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, bits)
+ regmap_set_bits(map, reg, bits)
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, 0)
+ regmap_clear_bits(map, reg, bits)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115111347.3705732-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-12-03 02:35:14 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_set_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_OUTMASK,
|
|
|
|
BIT(pwm->hwpwm));
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN]);
|
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->clk[fpc->period.clk_select]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
goto end_mutex;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:24 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = fsl_pwm_apply_config(chip, pwm, newstate);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
goto end_mutex;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* check if need to enable */
|
|
|
|
if (!oldstate->enabled) {
|
|
|
|
ret = clk_prepare_enable(fpc->clk[fpc->period.clk_select]);
|
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
2019-06-26 17:36:40 +08:00
|
|
|
goto end_mutex;
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = clk_prepare_enable(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN]);
|
|
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->clk[fpc->period.clk_select]);
|
2019-06-26 17:36:40 +08:00
|
|
|
goto end_mutex;
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Use regmap_clear_bits and regmap_set_bits where applicable
Found using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, bits)
+ regmap_set_bits(map, reg, bits)
@@
expression map, reg, bits;
@@
- regmap_update_bits(map, reg, bits, 0)
+ regmap_clear_bits(map, reg, bits)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115111347.3705732-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2022-12-03 02:35:14 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_clear_bits(fpc->regmap, FTM_OUTMASK, BIT(pwm->hwpwm));
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
end_mutex:
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&fpc->lock);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct pwm_ops fsl_pwm_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.request = fsl_pwm_request,
|
|
|
|
.free = fsl_pwm_free,
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
.apply = fsl_pwm_apply,
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_init(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = clk_prepare_enable(fpc->ipg_clk);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
regmap_write(fpc->regmap, FTM_CNTIN, 0x00);
|
|
|
|
regmap_write(fpc->regmap, FTM_OUTINIT, 0x00);
|
|
|
|
regmap_write(fpc->regmap, FTM_OUTMASK, 0xFF);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->ipg_clk);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-15 13:21:34 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool fsl_pwm_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (reg) {
|
2019-06-12 22:12:46 +08:00
|
|
|
case FTM_FMS:
|
|
|
|
case FTM_MODE:
|
2014-10-15 13:21:34 +08:00
|
|
|
case FTM_CNT:
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct regmap_config fsl_pwm_regmap_config = {
|
|
|
|
.reg_bits = 32,
|
|
|
|
.reg_stride = 4,
|
|
|
|
.val_bits = 32,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.max_register = FTM_PWMLOAD,
|
2014-10-15 13:21:34 +08:00
|
|
|
.volatile_reg = fsl_pwm_volatile_reg,
|
2016-01-21 10:56:22 +08:00
|
|
|
.cache_type = REGCACHE_FLAT,
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pwm_chip *chip;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
void __iomem *base;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:27 +08:00
|
|
|
chip = devm_pwmchip_alloc(&pdev->dev, 8, sizeof(*fpc));
|
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(chip))
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(chip);
|
|
|
|
fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mutex_init(&fpc->lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
fpc->soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-12-29 16:05:40 +08:00
|
|
|
base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(base))
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(base);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
fpc->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk(&pdev->dev, "ftm_sys", base,
|
2014-08-19 12:38:02 +08:00
|
|
|
&fsl_pwm_regmap_config);
|
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(fpc->regmap)) {
|
|
|
|
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "regmap init failed\n");
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(fpc->regmap);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_SYS] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ftm_sys");
|
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_SYS])) {
|
|
|
|
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get \"ftm_sys\" clock\n");
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_SYS]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ftm_fix");
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX]))
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_FIX]);
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ftm_ext");
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT]))
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_EXT]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN] =
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ftm_cnt_clk_en");
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN]))
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN]);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* ipg_clk is the interface clock for the IP. If not provided, use the
|
|
|
|
* ftm_sys clock as the default.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
fpc->ipg_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ipg");
|
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(fpc->ipg_clk))
|
|
|
|
fpc->ipg_clk = fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_SYS];
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
chip->ops = &fsl_pwm_ops;
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, chip);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (ret < 0) {
|
|
|
|
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add PWM chip: %d\n", ret);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return fsl_pwm_init(fpc);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
|
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Fix clock enable/disable when using PM
A FTM PWM instance enables/disables three clocks: The bus clock, the
counter clock and the PWM clock. The bus clock gets enabled on
pwm_request, whereas the counter and PWM clocks will be enabled upon
pwm_enable.
The driver has three closesly related issues when enabling/disabling
clocks during suspend/resume:
- The three clocks are not treated differently in regards to the
individual PWM state enabled/requested. This can lead to clocks
getting disabled which have not been enabled in the first place
(a PWM channel which only has been requested going through
suspend/resume).
- When entering suspend, the current behavior relies on the
FTM_OUTMASK register: If a PWM output is unmasked, the driver
assumes the clocks are enabled. However, some PWM instances
have only 2 channels connected (e.g. Vybrid's FTM1). In that case,
the FTM_OUTMASK reads 0x3 if all channels are disabled, even if
the code wrote 0xff to it before. For those PWM instances, the
current approach to detect enabled PWM signals does not work.
- A third issue applies to the bus clock only, which can get enabled
multiple times (once for each PWM channel of a PWM chip). This is
fine, however when entering suspend mode, the clock only gets
disabled once.
This change introduces a different approach by relying on the enable
and prepared counters of the clock framework and using the frameworks
PWM signal states to address all three issues.
Clocks get disabled during suspend and back enabled on resume
regarding to the PWM channels individual state (requested/enabled).
Since we do not count the clock enables in the driver, this change no
longer clears the Status and Control registers Clock Source Selection
(FTM_SC[CLKS]). However, since we disable the selected clock anyway,
and we explicitly select the clock source on reenabling a PWM channel
this approach should not make a difference in practice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-24 06:45:07 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
regcache_cache_only(fpc->regmap, true);
|
|
|
|
regcache_mark_dirty(fpc->regmap);
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Fix clock enable/disable when using PM
A FTM PWM instance enables/disables three clocks: The bus clock, the
counter clock and the PWM clock. The bus clock gets enabled on
pwm_request, whereas the counter and PWM clocks will be enabled upon
pwm_enable.
The driver has three closesly related issues when enabling/disabling
clocks during suspend/resume:
- The three clocks are not treated differently in regards to the
individual PWM state enabled/requested. This can lead to clocks
getting disabled which have not been enabled in the first place
(a PWM channel which only has been requested going through
suspend/resume).
- When entering suspend, the current behavior relies on the
FTM_OUTMASK register: If a PWM output is unmasked, the driver
assumes the clocks are enabled. However, some PWM instances
have only 2 channels connected (e.g. Vybrid's FTM1). In that case,
the FTM_OUTMASK reads 0x3 if all channels are disabled, even if
the code wrote 0xff to it before. For those PWM instances, the
current approach to detect enabled PWM signals does not work.
- A third issue applies to the bus clock only, which can get enabled
multiple times (once for each PWM channel of a PWM chip). This is
fine, however when entering suspend mode, the clock only gets
disabled once.
This change introduces a different approach by relying on the enable
and prepared counters of the clock framework and using the frameworks
PWM signal states to address all three issues.
Clocks get disabled during suspend and back enabled on resume
regarding to the PWM channels individual state (requested/enabled).
Since we do not count the clock enables in the driver, this change no
longer clears the Status and Control registers Clock Source Selection
(FTM_SC[CLKS]). However, since we disable the selected clock anyway,
and we explicitly select the clock source on reenabling a PWM channel
this approach should not make a difference in practice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-24 06:45:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!test_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->ipg_clk);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Fix clock enable/disable when using PM
A FTM PWM instance enables/disables three clocks: The bus clock, the
counter clock and the PWM clock. The bus clock gets enabled on
pwm_request, whereas the counter and PWM clocks will be enabled upon
pwm_enable.
The driver has three closesly related issues when enabling/disabling
clocks during suspend/resume:
- The three clocks are not treated differently in regards to the
individual PWM state enabled/requested. This can lead to clocks
getting disabled which have not been enabled in the first place
(a PWM channel which only has been requested going through
suspend/resume).
- When entering suspend, the current behavior relies on the
FTM_OUTMASK register: If a PWM output is unmasked, the driver
assumes the clocks are enabled. However, some PWM instances
have only 2 channels connected (e.g. Vybrid's FTM1). In that case,
the FTM_OUTMASK reads 0x3 if all channels are disabled, even if
the code wrote 0xff to it before. For those PWM instances, the
current approach to detect enabled PWM signals does not work.
- A third issue applies to the bus clock only, which can get enabled
multiple times (once for each PWM channel of a PWM chip). This is
fine, however when entering suspend mode, the clock only gets
disabled once.
This change introduces a different approach by relying on the enable
and prepared counters of the clock framework and using the frameworks
PWM signal states to address all three issues.
Clocks get disabled during suspend and back enabled on resume
regarding to the PWM channels individual state (requested/enabled).
Since we do not count the clock enables in the driver, this change no
longer clears the Status and Control registers Clock Source Selection
(FTM_SC[CLKS]). However, since we disable the selected clock anyway,
and we explicitly select the clock source on reenabling a PWM channel
this approach should not make a difference in practice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-24 06:45:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN]);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_disable_unprepare(fpc->clk[fpc->period.clk_select]);
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int fsl_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
|
|
|
|
struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Fix clock enable/disable when using PM
A FTM PWM instance enables/disables three clocks: The bus clock, the
counter clock and the PWM clock. The bus clock gets enabled on
pwm_request, whereas the counter and PWM clocks will be enabled upon
pwm_enable.
The driver has three closesly related issues when enabling/disabling
clocks during suspend/resume:
- The three clocks are not treated differently in regards to the
individual PWM state enabled/requested. This can lead to clocks
getting disabled which have not been enabled in the first place
(a PWM channel which only has been requested going through
suspend/resume).
- When entering suspend, the current behavior relies on the
FTM_OUTMASK register: If a PWM output is unmasked, the driver
assumes the clocks are enabled. However, some PWM instances
have only 2 channels connected (e.g. Vybrid's FTM1). In that case,
the FTM_OUTMASK reads 0x3 if all channels are disabled, even if
the code wrote 0xff to it before. For those PWM instances, the
current approach to detect enabled PWM signals does not work.
- A third issue applies to the bus clock only, which can get enabled
multiple times (once for each PWM channel of a PWM chip). This is
fine, however when entering suspend mode, the clock only gets
disabled once.
This change introduces a different approach by relying on the enable
and prepared counters of the clock framework and using the frameworks
PWM signal states to address all three issues.
Clocks get disabled during suspend and back enabled on resume
regarding to the PWM channels individual state (requested/enabled).
Since we do not count the clock enables in the driver, this change no
longer clears the Status and Control registers Clock Source Selection
(FTM_SC[CLKS]). However, since we disable the selected clock anyway,
and we explicitly select the clock source on reenabling a PWM channel
this approach should not make a difference in practice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-24 06:45:07 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-02-14 17:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
|
|
|
|
struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Fix clock enable/disable when using PM
A FTM PWM instance enables/disables three clocks: The bus clock, the
counter clock and the PWM clock. The bus clock gets enabled on
pwm_request, whereas the counter and PWM clocks will be enabled upon
pwm_enable.
The driver has three closesly related issues when enabling/disabling
clocks during suspend/resume:
- The three clocks are not treated differently in regards to the
individual PWM state enabled/requested. This can lead to clocks
getting disabled which have not been enabled in the first place
(a PWM channel which only has been requested going through
suspend/resume).
- When entering suspend, the current behavior relies on the
FTM_OUTMASK register: If a PWM output is unmasked, the driver
assumes the clocks are enabled. However, some PWM instances
have only 2 channels connected (e.g. Vybrid's FTM1). In that case,
the FTM_OUTMASK reads 0x3 if all channels are disabled, even if
the code wrote 0xff to it before. For those PWM instances, the
current approach to detect enabled PWM signals does not work.
- A third issue applies to the bus clock only, which can get enabled
multiple times (once for each PWM channel of a PWM chip). This is
fine, however when entering suspend mode, the clock only gets
disabled once.
This change introduces a different approach by relying on the enable
and prepared counters of the clock framework and using the frameworks
PWM signal states to address all three issues.
Clocks get disabled during suspend and back enabled on resume
regarding to the PWM channels individual state (requested/enabled).
Since we do not count the clock enables in the driver, this change no
longer clears the Status and Control registers Clock Source Selection
(FTM_SC[CLKS]). However, since we disable the selected clock anyway,
and we explicitly select the clock source on reenabling a PWM channel
this approach should not make a difference in practice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-24 06:45:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!test_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:34 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_prepare_enable(fpc->ipg_clk);
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: Fix clock enable/disable when using PM
A FTM PWM instance enables/disables three clocks: The bus clock, the
counter clock and the PWM clock. The bus clock gets enabled on
pwm_request, whereas the counter and PWM clocks will be enabled upon
pwm_enable.
The driver has three closesly related issues when enabling/disabling
clocks during suspend/resume:
- The three clocks are not treated differently in regards to the
individual PWM state enabled/requested. This can lead to clocks
getting disabled which have not been enabled in the first place
(a PWM channel which only has been requested going through
suspend/resume).
- When entering suspend, the current behavior relies on the
FTM_OUTMASK register: If a PWM output is unmasked, the driver
assumes the clocks are enabled. However, some PWM instances
have only 2 channels connected (e.g. Vybrid's FTM1). In that case,
the FTM_OUTMASK reads 0x3 if all channels are disabled, even if
the code wrote 0xff to it before. For those PWM instances, the
current approach to detect enabled PWM signals does not work.
- A third issue applies to the bus clock only, which can get enabled
multiple times (once for each PWM channel of a PWM chip). This is
fine, however when entering suspend mode, the clock only gets
disabled once.
This change introduces a different approach by relying on the enable
and prepared counters of the clock framework and using the frameworks
PWM signal states to address all three issues.
Clocks get disabled during suspend and back enabled on resume
regarding to the PWM channels individual state (requested/enabled).
Since we do not count the clock enables in the driver, this change no
longer clears the Status and Control registers Clock Source Selection
(FTM_SC[CLKS]). However, since we disable the selected clock anyway,
and we explicitly select the clock source on reenabling a PWM channel
this approach should not make a difference in practice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2015-11-24 06:45:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
pwm: fsl-ftm: More relaxed permissions for updating period
The Flextimer has only one period for several channels. The PWM
subsystem doesn't allow to model something like that. The current
implementation simply disallows changing the period once it has
been set, having as a side effect that you need to enable and
disable the PWM if you want to change the period.
The driver should allow as much freedom as possible for configuring
the period and duty cycle. Therefore, this patch reworks the code
to allow the following:
- period and duty_cycle can be set at will when the PWM is disabled;
- when enabling a PWM, verify that the period is either not set yet,
or the same as the other already enabled PWM(s), and fail if not;
- allow to change the period on the fly when the PWM is the only one
enabled.
It also allows to have different periods configured for different PWMs.
Only one period can be used at a time, thus the first PWM to be enabled
will set that period, only other PWMs with that same period can be
enabled at the same time. To use another PWM with another period, the
enabled PWMs must be disabled first.
Example scenario :
echo 5000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/period #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm1/duty_cycle #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 1 > pwm1/enable #OK
echo 1000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 2000000 > pwm0/period #OK
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #FAIL (pwm0/period != pwm1/period)
echo 2000000 > pwm1/period #OK (pwm1 still running, changed on the fly)
echo 1 > pwm0/enable #OK (now pwm0/period == pwm1/period)
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #FAIL (other PWMs running)
echo 0 > pwm0/enable #OK
echo 3000000 > pwm1/period #OK (only this PWM running)
Adapting the code to satisfy these constraints turned up a number of
additional issues with the current implementation:
- the prescaler value 0 was not used (when it could have been);
- when setting the period was not possible, the internal state was
inconsistent;
- the maximal value for configuring the period was never used;
Since all of these interact with each other, rather than trying to fix
each individual issue, this patch reworks how the period and duty cycle
are set entirely, with the following additional improvements:
- implement the new apply() method instead of the individual methods;
- return the exact used period/duty_cycle values;
- more coherent argument types for period, duty_cycle;
Signed-off-by: Patrick Havelange <patrick.havelange@essensium.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2019-06-12 22:12:45 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_prepare_enable(fpc->clk[fpc->period.clk_select]);
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
clk_prepare_enable(fpc->clk[FSL_PWM_CLK_CNTEN]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* restore all registers from cache */
|
|
|
|
regcache_cache_only(fpc->regmap, false);
|
|
|
|
regcache_sync(fpc->regmap);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct dev_pm_ops fsl_pwm_pm_ops = {
|
|
|
|
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(fsl_pwm_suspend, fsl_pwm_resume)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct fsl_ftm_soc vf610_ftm_pwm = {
|
|
|
|
.has_enable_bits = false,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-09 03:22:36 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct fsl_ftm_soc imx8qm_ftm_pwm = {
|
|
|
|
.has_enable_bits = true,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
static const struct of_device_id fsl_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
|
2018-06-09 03:22:35 +08:00
|
|
|
{ .compatible = "fsl,vf610-ftm-pwm", .data = &vf610_ftm_pwm },
|
2018-06-09 03:22:36 +08:00
|
|
|
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-ftm-pwm", .data = &imx8qm_ftm_pwm },
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
{ /* sentinel */ }
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_pwm_dt_ids);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct platform_driver fsl_pwm_driver = {
|
|
|
|
.driver = {
|
|
|
|
.name = "fsl-ftm-pwm",
|
|
|
|
.of_match_table = fsl_pwm_dt_ids,
|
2014-10-15 13:21:35 +08:00
|
|
|
.pm = &fsl_pwm_pm_ops,
|
2014-02-27 17:39:49 +08:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
.probe = fsl_pwm_probe,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
module_platform_driver(fsl_pwm_driver);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Freescale FlexTimer Module PWM Driver");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_AUTHOR("Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@freescale.com>");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_ALIAS("platform:fsl-ftm-pwm");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|